Stalker IP locates to Yale-Haven.
BoratQueerTwins
patrick.f...@usdoj.gov, model...@sbcglobal.net,
jdr...@nejm.org, let...@courant.com, Jgerb...@cdc.gov,
len...@courant.com, michae...@po.state.ct.us,
con...@po.state.ct.us, executiv...@nytimes.com, managing-
edi...@nytimes.com, news...@nytimes.com, the-...@nytimes.com,
biz...@nytimes.com, for...@nytimes.com, me...@nytimes.com,
nati...@nytimes.com, dv...@cdc.gov, brigidc...@optonline.net,
tr...@hotmail.com, ubi...@courant.com, ma...@concentric.net,
camp...@courant.com, jhorn...@fff.org, thomas...@usdoj.gov,
thoma...@po.state.ct.us, kur...@washpost.com,
georg...@washpost.com, hor...@courant.com,
commissi...@po.state.ct.us, cohen...@aol.com,
FalN...@aol.com, brans...@comcast.net, vts...@comcast.net,
o...@po.state.ct.us, da...@davila-dilzer.com,
scott....@po.state.ct.us, govern...@po.state.ct.us,
attorney...@po.state.ct.us, randall...@usdoj.gov
Cc: fra...@ucia.gov, dr-ahma...@president.ir,
eugener...@washpost.com, hor...@courant.com,
bmi...@newstimes.com, tr...@hotmail.com, rast...@aol.com,
billc...@gmail.com, thomas...@usdoj.gov, amcg...@rms-law.com,
rjmu...@aol.com, paulcrai...@yahoo.com,
sidney_b...@yahoo.com, criminal...@usdoj.gov,
karla.d...@usdoj.gov, christophe...@usdoj.gov
Subject: Stalker IP locates to Yale-Haven.
Date: Feb 22, 2008 10:31 AM
I'll just report this and then repost and link to my website so that
the whole
world can see that the USDOJ does not protect us against criminals and
that this
specific crime of wiretapping, stalking and harassing Lyme victims has
been going
on for over 10 years.
Note the date on these emails between Yale's Durland Fish and NIH's
Edward
McSweegan:
http://www.actionlyme.org/TICK_BITE_CONSPIRACY.htm
*** 1995 ***
These exhibits were given to Richard Blumenthal at his 1999 Lyme
Hearing, by the
Forschners, speaking to Blumenthal's incompetence:
http://www.ct.gov/AG/cwp/view.asp?A=1774&Q=282848
http://www.actionlyme.org/index.htm
http://www.actionlyme.org/DURLAND_FISH_AKA_CHUCK_P_ADAMS.htm
(IP map = exactly at Yale)
Karen Forschner of the Lyme Disease Foundation witnesses the stalking,
harassment
and perjury against myself:
http://www.actionlyme.org/KFORSCHNER_ON_FDA_EXHIBIT_A.htm
Karen Forschner is a victim of the same stalking and harassment and
wiretapping:
http://www.actionlyme.org/TICK_BITE_CONSPIRACY.htm
McSweegan at the depositions (lawsuits between the criminal McSweegan
and the Forschners
over this stalking and slander)
http://www.actionlyme.org/McSweegan_Relentless.htm
saying he got his dirt on the Forschners due to "clairvoyance" (next
link).
Karen posted this in response to McSweegan trashing me over my FDA
presentation
(since McSweegan was at the FDA meeting since he has no work to do at
the NIH)
FDA MEETING:
http://www.fda.gov/OHRMS/DOCKETS/ac/01/slides/3680s2.htm
MCSWEEGAN TELLING ME MY PRESENTATION WAS LOUSY BECAUSE IT WAS RIGHT-ON
AND *IS*
THE QUI TAM CASE:
http://www.actionlyme.org/McSweegan_Stalking_Feb_2001_38a561b9b28962b5.htm
Since I am an analytical chemist and am familiar with the rules of
FDA's method
validations, since this is what I did for a living at Pfizer:
http://www.fda.gov/cder/guidance/4252fnl.htm
Karen answer's McSweegan's trash-o-gram of my exposure of their
scientific
crimes to the FDA vaccine committee on Jan 31, 2001:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.diseases.lyme/msg/c5e50e5b067b2565?dmode=source
That presentation:
http://www.actionlyme.org/DICKSON_FDA_SUBMISSION_FULL.htm
Only part of this datapackage was scanned into the FDA's website. The
FDA left
out the actual DATA to support my claims, speaking to what LOW-LIVES
the FDA staff
are:
http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/ac/01/slides/3680s2_11.pdf
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.diseases.lyme/msg/c5e50e5b067b2565?dmode=source
Subject: Re: na...@cotse.com (ONE OF MCSWEEGAN'S PAID REMAILERS TO
HIDE IS ADDRESS
IS NA...@COTSE.COM)
archive: Re: "Submitted to FDA with supporting" (ORIGINALLY POSTED BY
ME IN FEB 2001)
Message-ID: <20010208125831...@ng-md1.aol.com>
THIS IS KAREN WRITING TO MCSWEEGAN:
"Anon:
Sorry you have so much confused and incorrect. Why would you keep
attributing
statements to me, that you know I did not say? You need to be
accurate.
"My concern is that you are fixated on me, and that fixation is
increasing.
Including increasing over the internet.
"Ed did say "Buzz-off Karen." Not very mature. And, I did not go
up to him. I
noticed him after I was talking with Phil Baker. And, he was there
with Phil.
"I wonder how his lawsuit against NIH is going. Is he claiming
conspiracy again?
"And, the document was missing when it was FOI'd. Ed even sent an
email
to the
reporter, asking why she was interested in the document(s). But, I
guess you
know this.
"You state "I heard both conversations went badly." What do you think
you
"heard"? Now, be careful, because you need to cite first hand
information,
not
gossip. Who told you the information, Phil or Ed?
"Lastly, I admit that I did cry during the deposition. Yup. It was
during a
reading of material Ed admitted writing, that mocked our dead son and
pets.
And, a number of such writings were done WHILE he was a public
official
working at NIH as LD Project Officer.
"I was also surprised that Ed, (while a Public Official and LD Program
Officer)
was tracking my parents address and phone numbers; my home address and
phone
numbers; my travel agent's information; employee names, home
addresses, home
phone numbers; my movements while working for the LDF; and had been at
the
LDF's office.
"He even had tracked down and talked with a person working with Dr.
Joe
Burrascano. Keeping their informtion in his files. I was also
surprised to see
his point system, giving himself a score when he was able to harm/
interfere
with an LDF/Karen initiative. This was happening while he was the LD
project
officer.
"When was he working? And, who else did he track that he wasn't
caught
tracking?
"Anon, if you plan to cite depositions I suggest this format.
"These are regarding various charges Ed made about the LDF. Ed's
deposition.
Q's
are by lawyers to Ed. A's are Eds answers.
p229 lines 11-13.
"Q. But you have no factual basis to rely on?
A. Not at the moment."
p 288 lines 1-8
"Q. And what was your basis for saying this may invite investigation
and
prosecution?
(ed -accusing the LDF of a wide range of things while NIH LD Program
Office)
A. Clairvoyance.
Q. Anything else?
A. Wishful thinking. I don't know.
Q. Clairvoyance and wishful thinking, okay. Anything else's?
A. No, I didn't have any knowledge of anything related to
investigations at
the
time."
p 147 lines 15-22 p 148 lines 1-6
"Q. Are the things you've said about them, the Forschners or the
Foundation,
that you believe to be true but that you didn't necessarily follow up
on and
check yourself before you made those statements?
A. For example?
Q Anything
A. I don't think so.
Q In other words, if you made a statement about the Forschners or the
Lyme
Disease Foundation that you didn't have personal knowledge about, did
you make
an inquiry about it before you would make that statement in writing or
orally
to make sure it was accurate?
A. Yes, but, in fact, I have no personal knowledge of anything."
"The LDF (www.lyme.org) received a lot of material from Ed during the
time
he was suing the
LDF. Much of this crossed lines from NIH to CDC and to the FDA. Ed
appeared
to be very concerned with the activities of various people and we were
not the
only ones to receive threats, retaliation, or reporting to federal
authorities.
His own colleagues and a grantee was included as targets to be turned
in to
federal, state, and local officials accused of serious wrongdoing.
"It wasn't just the LDF. "--- By Karen Forschner of the Lyme Disease
Foundation.
----------------------------
So I will repost this, and hopefully some "terrorists" will kidnap and
render these Yale Inc Lyme criminals to Saudi Arabia or Iran or
somewhere like that
where they can be tortured and mutilated, since apparently those are
America's
Rules. American Justice is meant to protect such criminals as these
and the corporations
they whore for.
It's clearly a free-for-all, no matter what the topic, eh?
There are no rules any more, no matter what the issue.
Kathleen M. Dickson
cowabu...@yahoo.com
SCROLL ON BY
BoratQueerTwins
> To: SpinL...@yahoogroups.com, kshep...@calea.org, fitz...@gmail.com,
> patrick.fitzger...@usdoj.gov, modelt1...@sbcglobal.net,
> jdra...@nejm.org, lett...@courant.com, Jgerberd...@cdc.gov,
> len...@courant.com, michael.c...@po.state.ct.us,
> conn...@po.state.ct.us, executive-edi...@nytimes.com, managing-
> edi...@nytimes.com, news-t...@nytimes.com, the-a...@nytimes.com,
> biz...@nytimes.com, fore...@nytimes.com, me...@nytimes.com,
> natio...@nytimes.com, dv...@cdc.gov, brigidcalla...@optonline.net,
> t...@hotmail.com, ubi...@courant.com, m...@concentric.net,
> campb...@courant.com, jhornber...@fff.org, thomas.car...@usdoj.gov,
> thomas.r...@po.state.ct.us, kur...@washpost.com,
> georgew...@washpost.com, hor...@courant.com,
> commissioner....@po.state.ct.us, cohencol...@aol.com,
> FalNie...@aol.com, bransfi...@comcast.net, vtsh...@comcast.net,
> o...@po.state.ct.us, d...@davila-dilzer.com,
> scott.mur...@po.state.ct.us, governor.r...@po.state.ct.us,
> attorney.gene...@po.state.ct.us, randall.samb...@usdoj.gov
> Cc: fran...@ucia.gov, dr-ahmadine...@president.ir,
> eugenerobin...@washpost.com, hor...@courant.com,
> bmil...@newstimes.com, t...@hotmail.com, rastr...@aol.com,
> billcurr...@gmail.com, thomas.car...@usdoj.gov, amcgui...@rms-law.com,
> rjmur...@aol.com, paulcraigrobe...@yahoo.com,
> sidney_blument...@yahoo.com, criminal.divis...@usdoj.gov,
> karla.dobin...@usdoj.gov, christopher.chris...@usdoj.gov
>
> saying he got his dirt on the Forschners due to "clairvoyance" (next
> link).
> Karen posted this in response to McSweegan trashing me over my FDA
> presentation
> (since McSweegan was at the FDA meeting since he has no work to do at
> the NIH)
> FDA MEETING:http://www.fda.gov/OHRMS/DOCKETS/ac/01/slides/3680s2.htm
> MCSWEEGAN TELLING ME MY PRESENTATION WAS LOUSY BECAUSE IT WAS RIGHT-ON
> AND *IS*
> Since I am an analytical chemist and am familiar with the rules of
> FDA's method
> validations, since this is what I did for a living at Pfizer:http://www.fda.gov/cder/guidance/4252fnl.htm
>
> Karen answer's McSweegan's trash-o-gram of my exposure of their
> scientific
>
> That presentation:http://www.actionlyme.org/DICKSON_FDA_SUBMISSION_FULL.htm
> Only part of this datapackage was scanned into the FDA's website. The
> FDA left
> out the actual DATA to support my claims, speaking to what LOW-LIVES
> the FDA staff
> are:http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/ac/01/slides/3680s2_11.pdf
>
>
> Subject: Re: na...@cotse.com (ONE OF MCSWEEGAN'S PAID REMAILERS TO
> HIDE IS ADDRESS
> IS NA...@COTSE.COM)
>
> archive: Re: "Submitted to FDA with supporting" (ORIGINALLY POSTED BY
> ME IN FEB 2001)
cowabu...@yahoo.com
ime...@yahoo.com
>
> saying he got his dirt on the Forschners due to "clairvoyance" (next
> link).
> Karen posted this in response to McSweegan trashing me over my FDA
> presentation
> (since McSweegan was at the FDA meeting since he has no work to do at
> the NIH)
> FDA MEETING:http://www.fda.gov/OHRMS/DOCKETS/ac/01/slides/3680s2.htm
> MCSWEEGAN TELLING ME MY PRESENTATION WAS LOUSY BECAUSE IT WAS RIGHT-ON
> AND *IS*
> Since I am an analytical chemist and am familiar with the rules of
> FDA's method
> validations, since this is what I did for a living at Pfizer:http://www.fda.gov/cder/guidance/4252fnl.htm
>
> Karen answer's McSweegan's trash-o-gram of my exposure of their
> scientific
>
> That presentation:http://www.actionlyme.org/DICKSON_FDA_SUBMISSION_FULL.htm
> Only part of this datapackage was scanned into the FDA's website. The
> FDA left
> out the actual DATA to support my claims, speaking to what LOW-LIVES
> the FDA staff
> are:http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/ac/01/slides/3680s2_11.pdf
>
>
> Subject: Re: na...@cotse.com (ONE OF MCSWEEGAN'S PAID REMAILERS TO
> HIDE IS ADDRESS
> IS NA...@COTSE.COM)
>
> archive: Re: "Submitted to FDA with supporting" (ORIGINALLY POSTED BY
> ME IN FEB 2001)
cowabu...@yahoo.com
ime...@yahoo.com
>
> saying he got his dirt on the Forschners due to "clairvoyance" (next
> link).
> Karen posted this in response to McSweegan trashing me over my FDA
> presentation
> (since McSweegan was at the FDA meeting since he has no work to do at
> the NIH)
> FDA MEETING:http://www.fda.gov/OHRMS/DOCKETS/ac/01/slides/3680s2.htm
> MCSWEEGAN TELLING ME MY PRESENTATION WAS LOUSY BECAUSE IT WAS RIGHT-ON
> AND *IS*
> Since I am an analytical chemist and am familiar with the rules of
> FDA's method
> validations, since this is what I did for a living at Pfizer:http://www.fda.gov/cder/guidance/4252fnl.htm
>
> Karen answer's McSweegan's trash-o-gram of my exposure of their
> scientific
>
> That presentation:http://www.actionlyme.org/DICKSON_FDA_SUBMISSION_FULL.htm
> Only part of this datapackage was scanned into the FDA's website. The
> FDA left
> out the actual DATA to support my claims, speaking to what LOW-LIVES
> the FDA staff
> are:http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/ac/01/slides/3680s2_11.pdf
>
>
> Subject: Re: na...@cotse.com (ONE OF MCSWEEGAN'S PAID REMAILERS TO
> HIDE IS ADDRESS
> IS NA...@COTSE.COM)
>
> archive: Re: "Submitted to FDA with supporting" (ORIGINALLY POSTED BY
> ME IN FEB 2001)
cowabun...@yahoo.com
BoratQueerTwinsDurl&Sweeg
>
> saying he got his dirt on the Forschners due to "clairvoyance" (next
> link).
> Karen posted this in response to McSweegan trashing me over my FDA
> presentation
> (since McSweegan was at the FDA meeting since he has no work to do at
> the NIH)
> FDA MEETING:http://www.fda.gov/OHRMS/DOCKETS/ac/01/slides/3680s2.htm
> MCSWEEGAN TELLING ME MY PRESENTATION WAS LOUSY BECAUSE IT WAS RIGHT-ON
> AND *IS*
> Since I am an analytical chemist and am familiar with the rules of
> FDA's method
> validations, since this is what I did for a living at Pfizer:http://www.fda.gov/cder/guidance/4252fnl.htm
>
> Karen answer's McSweegan's trash-o-gram of my exposure of their
> scientific
>
> That presentation:http://www.actionlyme.org/DICKSON_FDA_SUBMISSION_FULL.htm
> Only part of this datapackage was scanned into the FDA's website. The
> FDA left
> out the actual DATA to support my claims, speaking to what LOW-LIVES
> the FDA staff
> are:http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/ac/01/slides/3680s2_11.pdf
>
>
> Subject: Re: na...@cotse.com (ONE OF MCSWEEGAN'S PAID REMAILERS TO
> HIDE IS ADDRESS
> IS NA...@COTSE.COM)
>
> archive: Re: "Submitted to FDA with supporting" (ORIGINALLY POSTED BY
> ME IN FEB 2001)
cowabungabartn...@yahoo.com
Foley Hearts Chuck
>
> saying he got his dirt on the Forschners due to "clairvoyance" (next
> link).
> Karen posted this in response to McSweegan trashing me over my FDA
> presentation
> (since McSweegan was at the FDA meeting since he has no work to do at
> the NIH)
> FDA MEETING:http://www.fda.gov/OHRMS/DOCKETS/ac/01/slides/3680s2.htm
> MCSWEEGAN TELLING ME MY PRESENTATION WAS LOUSY BECAUSE IT WAS RIGHT-ON
> AND *IS*
> Since I am an analytical chemist and am familiar with the rules of
> FDA's method
> validations, since this is what I did for a living at Pfizer:http://www.fda.gov/cder/guidance/4252fnl.htm
>
> Karen answer's McSweegan's trash-o-gram of my exposure of their
> scientific
>
> That presentation:http://www.actionlyme.org/DICKSON_FDA_SUBMISSION_FULL.htm
> Only part of this datapackage was scanned into the FDA's website. The
> FDA left
> out the actual DATA to support my claims, speaking to what LOW-LIVES
> the FDA staff
> are:http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/ac/01/slides/3680s2_11.pdf
>
>
> Subject: Re: na...@cotse.com (ONE OF MCSWEEGAN'S PAID REMAILERS TO
> HIDE IS ADDRESS
> IS NA...@COTSE.COM)
>
> archive: Re: "Submitted to FDA with supporting" (ORIGINALLY POSTED BY
> ME IN FEB 2001)
cowabungabartn...@yahoo.com
>
> - Show quoted text -