Hornberger on the Ends and the Means... And Coptards
Mort Zuckerman
pkru...@princeton.edu, Stanle...@fiu.edu,
emcsw...@niaid.nih.gov, afa...@niaid.nih.gov,
Spin...@yahoogroups.com, kshe...@calea.org, fit...@gmail.com,
patrick.f...@usdoj.gov, model...@sbcglobal.net,
jdr...@nejm.org, let...@courant.com, Jgerb...@cdc.gov,
michae...@po.state.ct.us, con...@po.state.ct.us, executive-
edi...@nytimes.com, managin...@nytimes.com, news-
ti...@nytimes.com, biz...@nytimes.com, for...@nytimes.com,
nati...@nytimes.com, dv...@cdc.gov, brigidc...@optonline.net,
tr...@hotmail.com, illino...@aol.com, jle...@courant.com,
tinaj...@yahoo.com, jhorn...@fff.org, thomas...@usdoj.gov,
thoma...@po.state.ct.us, kur...@washpost.com,
georg...@washpost.com, p...@allegorypress.com,
commissi...@po.state.ct.us, brans...@comcast.net,
vts...@comcast.net, o...@po.state.ct.us, freet...@charter.net,
scott....@po.state.ct.us, govern...@po.state.ct.us,
attorney...@po.state.ct.us, randall...@usdoj.gov,
Robert....@yale.edu, edi...@greenwich-post.com,
harol...@yale.edu, sedm...@nswbc.org, rrmcg...@aol.com
Cc: fra...@ucia.gov, dr-ahma...@president.ir,
eugener...@washpost.com, afa...@niaid.nih.gov,
bmi...@newstimes.com, tr...@hotmail.com, rast...@aol.com,
billc...@gmail.com, amcg...@rms-law.com, rjmu...@aol.com,
paulcrai...@yahoo.com, sidney_b...@yahoo.com,
criminal...@usdoj.gov, karla.d...@usdoj.gov,
christophe...@usdoj.gov, richar...@yale.edu,
harol...@yale.edu, james.p...@yale.edu, inq...@aldf.com,
ly...@idsociety.org, meganm...@theatlantic.com,
bob.d...@latimes.com
Subject: Hornberger on the Ends and the Means... And Coptards
Date: Jun 3, 2009 12:02 PM
ARTICLE BELOW
==============================
The End was the Dictatorship; The Means was the
911 stunt (a CIA-Mossad Operation). Russia and
many other countries are absolutely convinced the
911 stunt was a stunt.
So, the Council on Foreign Trilateral Bilderbergs
lost the Middle East, and they lost South America,
so now they will focus on NAU (North American Union).
Europe? Eh, Rockefeller really doesn't care what
happens to Europe.
Canada is key. That's why we're not hearing much
about Canada. Our intentions towards Canada and
how the Canadians feel about it is kept out of the
MSM.
The point is that the stupid authoritarian
cops and their Repugnicant Hypocrite bosses
don't *think* about what the outcome will be
of going along with the 911 WarCrimes and
the Assault on the Constitution and Bill
of Rights.
If they allow the dictatorship, it will be a
dictatorship.
Do cops have any idea what a dictatorship means?
No.
That's why they're cops. Bad tempers, arrogance,
hostility, hatred, blaming the victim,... are part
of their physiological make-up. It's like a drug.
The hatred causes a physiological change in their
brains.
This acquired brain damage also occurs in the genuine
fairies, like lawyers and psychiatrists, who are
all LEFT BRAIN thinkers. (Try explaining science
to a lawyer. You get a WILD defense reaction; they
attack anything but the actual science under
discussion, just like a girl; just like a teenage
girl who's trying to be A *Cool* Girl.)
So these two types of epidemics of mental
illness are the problem. If the cops and
the authoritarians, and the true fairies of
the Repugs and the lawyers refuse mental
health treatment then there will be chaos.
And you can't explain it to these TARDS that
there will be no OUTCOME - no country left - if
they go along with these PATRIOT Act abuses
and torture insanities because that's the
thing about their mental illness:
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1004090,00.html
"Personality disorders, by contrast, are marbleized through the entire
temperament. Narcissists may be self-absorbed, but they believe they
jolly well have a right to be..."
http://www.minddisorders.com/Del-Fi/Denial.html
"Certain personality disorders tend to be characterized by denial more
than others. For example, those with narcissistic personality disorder
deny information that suggests they are not perfect. Antisocial
behavior is characterized by denial of the harm done to others (such
as with sexual offenders or substance abusers)."
You can't fix em. They're the same as all
the other brain damaged drug addicts and
drunks. It's kinda the same brain damage:
"IT'S ALL ABOUT MEEEeee!!"
Logic doesn't work. Going after typical coptard
cowardliness doesn't work. They can't be embarrassed out
of the behavior (because being embarrassed would mean
they care about social pressures). If you expose them, they
just get madder, not that that stops me because this
is a contest of wills and cowards are not going to
win in the end. (That's a guarantee.) You can't scare
em into thinking about how they're selling out their
own children. They clearly don't care about their own
children or they would cease and desist their occupations
and take up the protest banners and signs and be marching
on Washington…
But you can’t train coptards and make em understand
they’re selling their posterity out to future abuses by
the Bigs, and lawyers are too cowardly to actually do
anything. Lawyers just babble on and try to impress you
with their knowledge of cases that they had nothing to
do with and reveal that they have no innate creative ability.
They just repeat cases. They don’t talk about how easy
it is to prove FRAUD because logic is not in their brains.
You have to see it as a real genuine mental or learning
disability like Asperger’s. The RIGHT SIDE of their brains
are missing.
Ya might be able to PTSD-em or electroshock lawyers
and coptards but that will happen anyway in the end, with
the civil disorder – civil war – and the chaos that is
totally inevitable without their cooperation with us’n lowly
scientists and rights activists
It can’t be done. Ferget tryin.
What I do is expose the crime for the benefit of other
nations. They have to be told to throw out all of
CDC’s “science” since 1990 and start over. Most particularly
they need to know the Pam3Cys reasons the HIV and
Tuberculosis vaccines failed. They were derivatives
of Yale's LYMErix non-vaccine.
It works pretty well. Last month (May), I had ~500
visitors from China.
Kathleen M. Dickson
http://www.actionlyme.org
=============================================
http://www.fff.org/blog/jghblog2009-06-01.asp
Hornberger’s Blog
Monday, June 1, 2009
Hornberger’s Blog Index
RSS Feed
Information about RSS
Loving Freedom While Destroying It
by Jacob G. Hornberger
A few days after 9/11, a friend of mine at the conservative Heritage
Foundation proudly exclaimed to me that Heritage had immediately
jumped out in favor of the Bush administration’s war on terrorism,
with positions papers and articles. At the same time, Heritage
continued to carry the same mission statement on its website: “to
formulate public policies based on the principles of free enterprise,
limited government, individual freedom, traditional values, and a
strong national defense.”
What my friend failed to recognize is that by jumping out in favor of
the war on terrorism, the Heritage Foundation was, at the same time,
supporting a policy that permanently precluded the achievement of
“free enterprise, limited government, individual freedom, and
traditional values.”
Look at what the war on terrorism has brought our nation:
1. The attack, invasion, and occupations of Iraq and Afghanistan,
which are still taking place some 8 years later, along with the deaths
and maiming of hundreds of thousands of people, the exile of millions
of people, and the destruction of both countries. Such actions have
ensured the perpetual threat of terrorist retaliation, which means the
war on terrorism has become a permanent feature of American life. We
should also bear in mind that neither attack was done with the
constitutionally required congressional declaration of war, thereby
further denigrating the very document that conservatives purport to
hold dear.
2. Federal spending continues to soar out of control, not just to fund
ever-growing welfare-state needs at home but also because of the ever-
growing expenses associated with the occupations of Iraq and
Afghanistan. That can only mean ever-growing taxes, borrowing, and
inflation.
Yet, while conservative scholars, including those at Heritage, seem to
understand the economic dangers posed by out-of-control federal
spending, taxation, government debt, and inflation, what’s fascinating
is that they don’t see that it’s the very policies they support that
destroy sound money.
3. One of the aspects of the war on terrorism that has most fascinated
me is how conservatives have either supported or pooh-poohed the
torture and sex abuse that has taken place at the hands of the U.S.
military and the CIA. Before 9/11, never in my wildest dreams did I
ever think conservatives, who generally pride themselves on their
religious values, would ever endorse or downplay the torture and sex
abuse of other people. I would have thought that they would be so
shocked and appalled by it all that they would be demanding
investigations to determine whether such acts were not just the
product of some dysfunctional CIA agents and U.S. soldiers, but
instead part of a well-organized governmental policy to discourage
resistance to U.S. power. Alas, not so. Conservatives continue to
oppose any investigation into the matter, whether through criminal
prosecution or by truth commission.
4. The war on terrorism has vested the U.S. government with the power
to seize Americans as “enemy combatants” and to deny them trial by
jury and due process of law, powers that that cannot possibly be
reconciled with the principles of a free society. Since the war on
terrorism is permanent, so are the powers that are integral to waging
it.
5. Americans are also now subject to the constant threat of random
searches of their email and wiretapping of their telephone calls. Even
if it’s done illegally, everyone knows that no federal official who
does it is ever going to be punished for doing so. How can living in a
society under the constant threat of being spied upon and monitored be
consistent with freedom? Yet, that’s an integral part of the war on
terrorism.
As part of its mission statement, Heritage also calls for a “strong
national defense.” But deep down, conservatives have to realize that
such a position is disingenuous. In actuality, conservatives support a
federal military and military-industrial complex that has nothing to
do with defending the United States, especially given that no nation
on earth has the military capability of attacking, invading, and
occupying the United States.
When the conservatives say they support a “strong national defense,”
what they really mean is an enormous military with the capability of
establishing and maintaining bases in countries all over the world and
imposing its will universally through foreign aid, assassinations,
invasions, coups, sanctions, embargoes, and the like.
The perversity of that pro-empire, pro-intervention foreign policy is
that it produces the very conditions for terrorist blowback, which is
precisely what happened with 9/11, which is then used as the excuse to
continue indefinitely the policies that destroy freedom here at home,
including foreign invasions, occupations, out-of-control federal
spending, kidnapping, torture and sex abuse, rendition, and suspension
of civil liberties.
Libertarians, like conservatives, favor “free enterprise, limited
government, individual freedom, and traditional values.” What
distinguishes us from conservatives, however, is that we will don’t
endorse governmental policies that destroy what we support. That’s
why, unlike conservatives, we oppose a foreign policy of empire and
intervention and favor the restoration of a constitutional republic to
our land.
Hornberger’s Blog Archives
Jacob Hornberger is founder and president of The Future of Freedom
Foundation, publisher of Your Money or Your Life: Why We Must Abolish
the Income Tax by Sheldon Richman. Send him email
"[Real] scientists are *fiercely* independent. That's the good
news."-- NIH's Top Fool, Anthony Fauci