JAMA: "We're kicking the CDC's butt"
Mort Zuckerman
lPick...@cdc.gov, Durlan...@yale.edu, Aa...@columbia.edu,
gary_w...@nymc.edu, scientifi...@ostp.gov,
pkru...@princeton.edu, Stanle...@fiu.edu,
emcsw...@niaid.nih.gov, afa...@niaid.nih.gov,
Spin...@yahoogroups.com, kshe...@calea.org, fit...@gmail.com,
patrick.f...@usdoj.gov, model...@sbcglobal.net,
jdr...@nejm.org, let...@courant.com, Jgerb...@cdc.gov,
michae...@po.state.ct.us, con...@po.state.ct.us, executive-
edi...@nytimes.com, managin...@nytimes.com, news-
ti...@nytimes.com, biz...@nytimes.com, for...@nytimes.com,
nati...@nytimes.com, dv...@cdc.gov, brigidc...@optonline.net,
tr...@hotmail.com, illino...@aol.com, jle...@courant.com,
tinaj...@yahoo.com, jhorn...@fff.org, thomas...@usdoj.gov,
thoma...@po.state.ct.us, kur...@washpost.com,
georg...@washpost.com, p...@allegorypress.com,
commissi...@po.state.ct.us, brans...@comcast.net,
vts...@comcast.net, o...@po.state.ct.us, freet...@charter.net,
scott....@po.state.ct.us, govern...@po.state.ct.us,
attorney...@po.state.ct.us, randall...@usdoj.gov,
Robert....@yale.edu, edi...@greenwich-post.com,
harol...@yale.edu, sedm...@nswbc.org, rrmcg...@aol.com,
fr...@nytimes.com, dpr...@stmartin.edu, saint....@sbcglobal.net
Cc: fra...@ucia.gov, dr-ahma...@president.ir,
eugener...@washpost.com, afa...@niaid.nih.gov,
bmi...@newstimes.com, tr...@hotmail.com, rast...@aol.com,
billc...@gmail.com, amcg...@rms-law.com, rjmu...@aol.com,
paulcrai...@yahoo.com, criminal...@usdoj.gov,
karla.d...@usdoj.gov, christophe...@usdoj.gov,
richar...@yale.edu, harol...@yale.edu, james.p...@yale.edu,
inq...@aldf.com, ly...@idsociety.org, meganm...@theatlantic.com
Subject: JAMA: "We're kicking the CDC's butt"
Date: May 26, 2010 8:11 AM
Hmm. I guess the AMA's had enough
of being taken for fools:
http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/extract/303/20/2080
Retooling the Uniformed US Public Health Service for the 21st Century
Donald A. Donahue Jr, DHEd, MBA; Richard H. Carmona, MD, MPH
JAMA. 2010;303(20):2080-2081.
Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the
first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.
The history of public health in the United States is marked by great
advances interspersed with periods of benign neglect—eras of
maintaining the status quo ended by a significant epidemiological
event. Cholera, tuberculosis, plague, polio, and malaria have
catalyzed significant advances in public health. These problems are
now largely banished from the US landscape, but not from the global
perspective. In developing countries, millions of individuals die
annually from largely preventable or treatable diseases. Some of these
diseases could be transported to developed countries in a new form.
New diseases are emerging at an unprecedented rate, prompting the
World Health Organization to identify this issue as a global threat.1
Even as medicine continues to find effective treatments for specific
diseases, nature continues to adapt and cause illness with Legionnaire
disease, Lyme disease, AIDS, Hantavirus, severe acute respiratory
syndrome . . . [Full Text of this Article]
Author Affiliations: Center for Health Policy and Preparedness,
Potomac Institute for Policy Studies, Arlington, Virginia (Dr
Donahue); University of Pittsburgh Center for National Preparedness,
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (Dr Donahue); 17th Surgeon General of the
United States, 2002-2006 (Dr Carmona); and Mel and Enid Zuckerman
College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson (Dr Carmona).
"[Real] scientists are *fiercely* independent. That's the good
news."-- NIH's Top Fool, Anthony Fauci
Greegor
indicate that somebody is kicking the CDC's butt?
I didn't see that, at least not in the shortened version.
Mort Zuckerman
They reference the statements of the WHIO
and the EU on IDSA's chronic ridiculous
position on "vaccines" over treatments.
The failed Tb, HIV, and LYMErix vaccines
were all the same and they all failed for
the same LYMErix immunosuppression
reasons.
I have been posting about it.
You can also read about it on
IDSA's website, or you could go
to mine and see more of the links
from the WHO and the EU.
http://www.actionlyme,org/index.htm
Kathleen
Greegor
> On May 26, 11:34 am, Greegor <greego...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Kathleen, How does the articly you linked to
> > indicate that somebody is kicking the CDC's butt?
>
> > I didn't see that, at least not in the shortened version.
>
> They reference the statements of the WHIO
> and the EU on IDSA's chronic ridiculous
> position on "vaccines" over treatments.
So now the various ""authorities"" are
arguing with each other instead of
covering up for each other?
> The failed Tb, HIV, and LYMErix vaccines
> were all the same and they all failed for
> the same LYMErix immunosuppression
> reasons.
Turning off someone's immune system permanently?
That's a doozy of a side effect.
After LymeRIX shuts off a person's immune
system can it recover at all?
> I have been posting about it.
> You can also read about it on
> IDSA's website, or you could go
> to mine and see more of the links
> from the WHO and the EU.
> http://www.actionlyme,org/index.htm
> Kathleen
It's too specialized for me.
Thanks for the help though.
Mort Zuckerman
With new B cells, perhaps.
After getting rid of all the fungal
and other infections:
See:
http://www.actionlyme.org/PAM3CYS_APPLICATIONS.htm