Preparing the Criminal Indictment against Yale and the ALDF.com
Mort Zuckerman
kshe...@calea.org, fit...@gmail.com, patrick.f...@usdoj.gov,
model...@sbcglobal.net, jdr...@nejm.org, let...@courant.com,
Jgerb...@cdc.gov, len...@courant.com, michae...@po.state.ct.us,
con...@po.state.ct.us, executiv...@nytimes.com, managing-
edi...@nytimes.com, news...@nytimes.com, the-...@nytimes.com,
biz...@nytimes.com, for...@nytimes.com, me...@nytimes.com,
nati...@nytimes.com, dv...@cdc.gov, brigidc...@optonline.net,
tr...@hotmail.com, ubi...@courant.com, ma...@concentric.net,
camp...@courant.com, jhorn...@fff.org, thomas...@usdoj.gov,
thoma...@po.state.ct.us, kur...@washpost.com,
georg...@washpost.com, hor...@courant.com,
commissi...@po.state.ct.us, cohen...@aol.com,
FalN...@aol.com, brans...@comcast.net, vts...@comcast.net,
o...@po.state.ct.us, da...@davila-dilzer.com,
scott....@po.state.ct.us, govern...@po.state.ct.us,
attorney...@po.state.ct.us, randall...@usdoj.gov
Cc: fra...@ucia.gov, dr-ahma...@president.ir,
eugener...@washpost.com, hor...@courant.com,
bmi...@newstimes.com, tr...@hotmail.com, rast...@aol.com,
billc...@gmail.com, thomas...@usdoj.gov, amcg...@rms-law.com,
rjmu...@aol.com, paulcrai...@yahoo.com,
sidney_b...@yahoo.com, criminal...@usdoj.gov,
karla.d...@usdoj.gov, christophe...@usdoj.gov
Subject: Preparing the Criminal Indictment against Yale and the
ALDF.com
Date: Jun 29, 2008 10:28 AM
http://www.actionlyme.org/index.htm
(Go to the homepage to use the active links and acquire all these
reports for yourselves)
In the future, find this data at:
http://www.actionlyme.org/080629.htm
--------------------------------------
What is meant by "scientifically valid"
FDA's Rules on the VALIDATION of an Analytical Method
Specificity (only detects one thing)
Accuracy (data from known concentrations is all over the place,
but never should
detect "none" as is the case with Lyme Western Blotting and the Lyme
ELISA,
especially)
Limit of Detection (the opposite of Steere's "receiver operating
characteristic"
below)
Precision (system has integrity in performance)
Ruggedness (anyone can run the test with their own equipment and
get the same
results)
Linearity (concentration range of analyte for which the test is
valid) in and
out of matrix
As far as we can tell, there are plenty of personal spirochetes for
whom humans
are allowed to be hosts, as long as we don’t call any of them “Lyme
Disease,” since
that’s trade marked concept, is meant to be associated LYMErix®
(Dearborn =
RICO), and is the imaginary autoimmune arthritis in a knee invented by
CDC officer
Allen Steere while he was in Europe in the early 1990s. We will get
to a more specific
description of what exactly “Lyme Disease” is in later chapters, but
first one must
acquire scientific-validity-speak.
In this book we will freely make up new words. We’re talking
“medicine,” here,
and as most people know, new diseases are being invented all the time,
with the
same frequency as BigPharma and psychiatry expand products and
associated diseases,
while BigInsurance attempts to narrow the definitions of those
diseases. For example,
Pfizer invented “erectile dysfunction,” while BigInsurance invented
that the “antiphospholipid
syndrome” should replace “Lupus,” raising the bar on how many
antibodies one may
have in order to have an “illness.” BigInsurance and BigPharma
together invent
vector-borne diseases, since Kaiser-Permanente and SmithKline
established the “American
Lyme Disease Foundation” or the ALDF.com at New York Medical College
in New York
in association with, primarily, Yale. ... See the rest of the
Chapter 1 explainer
on how science is actually done HERE.
The above is the very essential graphic for interpreting Steere's
Elephant Diagnostics
Rule (from Chp 3). He tried to assert that the higher the antibody
concentration,
the more "valid" the test, falsely claiming that by "narrowing the
number of persons who will test positive," that makes his test more
SPECIFIC,
and claimed that "the higher the concentration of antibodies in the
blood makes
the test more SENSITIVE," when as we know, SENSITIVITY is a function
of LIMIT
of DETECTION or the ability of the test to detect very low
concentrations of analyte.
The new Steere fantasy term "receiver operating characteristic" is not
a criterion for the validation of an analytical method. It means the
opposite of
sensitivity or the goal of detecting increasingly lower quantities of
the specific
analyte in question with reliability.
What this scientific nonsense by Steere means is that we can
throw out all
data generated by the Steere/Dearborn method, including the Klempner
report. If
the Klempner report is thrown out, IDSA has no basis for their
"guidelines"
other than their own former handiwork [Chapters 1 (crooks know how to
validate methods
of detection), 3 (no one agreed with Steere at Dearborn, but this 'two-
tiered'
testing schema was approved anyway by the interest-conflicted
parties), 5 (crooks
are playing a shell game with the RNA and DNA primers), 8 (the 1989
IDSA Reviews
tells an opposing story from today's), 9 (Biomarkers and ALS and MS-
like outcomes
discovered by the crooks, who then deployed scientifically bogus
psychiatry), 10
(Mark Klempner's obvious crime), 11 (crooks all reported persistence
past treatment),
14 (crooks are aware of the viability of the cyst form and that they
should be using
a rodent-spinal fluid infectivity test to assess antibiotic
efficacies), 17 (crooks'
own data on Congenital Lyme), and probably over the 4 reports by the
crooks that
show they could not actual read their Western Blots in LYMErix-
vaccinated people
but did not report this to the FDA] - the very data they refused to
turn over to
CT Attorney Richard Blumenthal for nearly 2 years after his subpoena.
The above is, in fact, the outline of the indictment for
murder. MURDER
and not manslaughter or negligence because of the deliberate
derogatory libel, slander,
and false statements made about us in the press and in conferences.
The harassment,
the false criminal charges, the perjury, the anonymous internet
harassment (a federal
crime), the stalking, the Munchausen's accusations, the wiretapping,
the deployment
of the moron child protective services, the false criminal charges,
false reports
to the medical boards, and the deployment of the IRS, show "intent to
cause
harm."
Or, the www.ALDF.com, now having taken over www.IDSociety.org
- since
all the MDs associated with IDSA now happen to have been exposed to
the whole world
as morons to not have read their own previous reports - is a
"racketeering-
influenced and corrupt organization."
As Yale's Durland Fish admits, his gang "...tried to shut
him
down."
Durland Fish- Hilarious Courant Interview
"I need more than rumors to attack!!" surely as regards
the
wiretapping later performed by Edward McSweegan which he later said
under oath at
the depositions, was information to libel the Lyme.org, obtained via
"clairvoyance"
or "wishful thinking." (You can read more about their criminal
antics,
HERE, on the Chapter 2, McSweegan and Barry Goldwater page)
IDSA finally caved to Blumenthal after everyone interested
witnessed Yale's
Eugene Shapiro lie his face off in the new movie, UNDER OUR SKIN about
congenital
Lyme.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sxWgS0XLVqw
Yale and Allen Steere are the authors of several reports on
congenital Lyme,
including Yale's famous congenital Lyme autopsy where they reported
that the
cause of the infant's death was the congenital Lyme brain damage. The
mother
and baby were "seronegative," treated for Lyme, and they mentioned the
"remarkable lack of inflammation" in the autopsy.
Hence, a person can have a disease, the disease could cause
damage, and
the damage could be caused by mechanisms other than inflammation.
In the agreement with Richard Blumenthal, you can see that
IDSA very strongly
wants to avoid criminal charges.
The diagnostic standard for "Lyme disease" is bogus science
and
was meant to screen out all the neurologic cases of Lyme disease in
the first step,
the ELISA (only detects late Lyme arthritis), since those are the
patients who need
the expensive, relapsing, intravenous ceftriaxone.
Looking further into who is involved in the deliberate
maltreatment of "Lyme
Disease" victims:
the 3rd Man
> The above is, in fact, the outline of the indictment for
> murder. MURDER
> and not manslaughter or negligence because of the deliberate
> derogatory libel, slander,
> and false statements made about us in the press and in conferences.
> The harassment,
> the false criminal charges, the perjury, the anonymous internet
> harassment (a federal
> crime), the stalking, the Munchausen's accusations, the wiretapping,
> the deployment
> of the moron child protective services, the false criminal charges,
> false reports
> to the medical boards, and the deployment of the IRS, show "intent to
> cause
> harm."
No.
While the technical stautory definition of "murder" may vary somewhat
from jursidiction to jurisdiction...what they have in common is the
specific INTENT to unlawfully take the life of another.
The "mental element" of the crime is NOT to "do harm" as you so
ignorantly put it, but to KILL.
This is what some jusrisdictions call "malice aforethought"...and is
distinguished from other crimes involving homicide, such as
manslaughter or involuntary manslaughter or negligent homicide...where
there is a lesser requirement of the premeditation of the mental
element.
LOL...so what you have to prove to make your "murder' charges
stick...is that the changing of the serologic standards was an attempt
to knowingly and intentionally KILL people...despite the fact that
those standards weren't supposed to be used to diagnose people
exclusively.
Good luck with that.
Don't you have ANYTHING else to do?
What I find sort of bizarre about stuff like the above...is that you
don't even make the slightest attempt to even research any of this.
There are some prison inmates, for instance, that do fairly credible
jobs as jailhouse lawyers, I guess.
You are just not even close...and you shouldn't be trying to mislead
people like this.
You are just making yourself look utterly foolish...and very, very
disturbed.
Mort Zuckerman
There is nothing you can do about it, buck.
Everyone GETS IT now and GUESS WHO will
be identified as THE whistleblower?
the 3rd Man
>
> There is nothing you can do about it, buck.
> Everyone GETS IT now and GUESS WHO will
> be identified as THE whistleblower?
No.
You need to find something else to do.
The Staute of Limitations ran on all your other mindless
accusations...and there's no way in hell that anyone committed
"murder" under any possible interpretation of any scenario, here.
Sorry, "crimebuster"...time to turn in your tin whistle and secret
decoder ring.