Ending the War; Council on Foreign Relations, PC Roberts, and Deranged US Politicians
Usenet Supreme Loser ChuckWorth
Spin...@yahoogroups.com, coh...@washpost.com, jdr...@nejm.org,
let...@courant.com, Jgerb...@cdc.gov, len...@courant.com,
motomani...@yahoo.com, con...@po.state.ct.us, executive-
edi...@nytimes.com, managin...@nytimes.com, news-
ti...@nytimes.com, the-...@nytimes.com, biz...@nytimes.com,
for...@nytimes.com, me...@nytimes.com, nati...@nytimes.com,
spo...@nytimes.com, dv...@cdc.gov, brigidc...@optonline.net,
tr...@hotmail.com, ubi...@courant.com, spin...@yahoogroups.com,
ma...@concentric.net, camp...@courant.com, jhorn...@fff.org,
thomas...@usdoj.gov, edi...@commondreams.org, kur...@washpost.com,
georg...@washpost.com, hor...@courant.com,
commissi...@po.state.ct.us, cohen...@aol.com,
leonar...@po.state.ct.us, FalN...@aol.com,
brans...@comcast.net, vts...@comcast.net, mcne...@aol.com,
o...@po.state.ct.us, da...@davila-dilzer.com,
scott....@po.state.ct.us, attorney...@po.state.ct.us,
randall...@usdoj.gov,patrick....@jud.state.ct.us
CC:
fra...@ucia.gov,dr-ahma...@president.ir,
eugener...@washpost.com, dh...@courant.com, hor...@courant.com,
bmi...@newstimes.com, eliot....@oag.state.ny.us,
tr...@hotmail.com, rast...@aol.com, billc...@gmail.com,
thomas...@usdoj.gov, amcg...@rms-law.com, rjmu...@aol.com,
paulcrai...@yahoo.com, sidney_b...@yahoo.com,
criminal...@usdoj.gov, karla.d...@usdoj.gov,
christophe...@usdoj.gov, fra...@ucia.gov,
govern...@po.state.ct.us, fit...@gmail.com,
patrick.f...@usdoj.gov, model...@sbcglobal.net
Subject:
Ending the War; Council on Foreign Relations and PC Roberts
Date:
Saturday, February 10, 2007 3:30:51 AM
(TWO ARTICLES HERE)
Paul-
BushCo is a missile with no landing gear.
Elected representatives, I don't know if you have ever seen them
in action, but they do indeed have some kind of mental disorder
where they can't state a fact or be clear in their statements.
Whereas the Republicans move like pack animals, like velociraptors,
Democrats don't even have the capacity, as a group, to assess threats,
and put them all on the table in a legitimate war room. The Democrats
haven't pinpointed all the rogue operatives and their individual
agendas,
they don't see the overall Republican agenda, they can't capture
what's
wrong with innovation in corporate America, they're not watching the
highest level corporations or the military or the intelligence
community,
and the direction these latter 3 groups all heading... They, the
Democrats,
in a word, can't wrap their brains around the Republican Party in
order to
capture them and tie them down.
The Democrats are blind. They don't see the dangers. They don't know
where
to look. They don't know HOW to look. The Dems can't capture intent
or capture
all the variables. There truly is something wrong with their brains,
but this
is a lesser
mental disorder than the majority of the Republicans have. If only
13% of
Republicans believe [CORRECTION] global warming is taking place, that
gives you a clear assessment
of the heirarchy in the Republican Party. There are a few Republican
leaders,
and the rest are the battering rams. Almost literally.
This is not to say the majority or even a fraction of Americans know
what
the hell is going on, either. Maybe 1%, and among those in the 1%,
99%
of them are silent (cowards).
So, BushCo is a missile with no landing gear and we're taking that
ride into destruction with him.
The Council on Foreign Relations, members of which filled the empty
head of Bush in the first place, are *now* saying, "Okay, Actually
this is
GAME OVER in Iraq," (article below yours), which, to a Bush Watcher,
spells even more trouble, because Bush is so insane, this CFR
recommendation will make Bush reallu go off the deep end. I think
the
CFR knows this, but don't want to go down in history (what there will
be
of it), as having not tried to stop this maniac.
Russia has stated clearly, and I put the links to those statements as
links
in the top right navigation bar of my website:
http://en.rian.ru/russia/20070209/60480804.html
"We are being told that the system will be installed in the Czech
Republic and
Poland to prevent missile launches by North Korea or Iran. ***
Everyone knows
that it is easier to intercept any missile at the boost phase.*** The
question
is, why should our American partners not deploy these systems
elsewhere - for
example, in Turkey or Afghanistan or Iraq," he said.
Russia has stated clearly that they know what the game plan
is, and they know they have been clearly identified by Gates as
member 4 of 5 in the new 5 point Bush Axis of Evil (China is 5).
So, not to be a party pooper (no pun intended), but the probability
that the Democrats will suddenly transform themselves (the Dems
are also loaded with traitors like Hillary Clinton), into a force is
very,
very low number. Politicians seem to be, like, a subspecies.
They're
in the group with lawyers and psychiatrists. Their brains are wired
for deception. A brain so pre-occupied with bullshit - when bullshit
is the driver - can't capture or even consider deploying a framework
to develop strategies to contain this beast, BushCo/AIPAC. AND,
there's no time.
What remains then, are the asymmetric options of Russia, China
and their allies. Russia is key. Russia has the intelligence.
(The
Chinese tend to be more like Republicans- they do whatever they
can get away with and are less morally bound.) The asymmetric
options Russia sees are not the same kind of asymmetric options
Rummy saw, because Rummy is a psychopath. Psychopaths
are not intellectuals.
And lastly, it is true that as far as globalization, Corporate America
lost because they have no intelligence, either. They have no ideas.
They didn't even know they should have been assessing their lack
of ideas. Automobiles collapsed (Ford made shitty cars for decades),
BigPharma took their eye off the ball and went for vaccines and
multiple
copies of old drugs, rather than assess emerging health threats.
Vaccines
can't capture all the new diseases and you can't hypervaccinate people
or
their immune systems become wrecked, which is not to mention,
BigPharma
has far from perfected carriers- most of them are toxic (squalene,
OspA-like
adjuvants, mercury, etc). People like Henry Kissinger, who is not a
scientist,
were making all the decisions for Anglo-AmerIsrael and the CFR, which,
again,
politicians and philosophers are not scientists or analytical
thinkers.
They're bullshit experts.
You can't run a country on bullshit. As you said before, this is a
failed state
end of discussion:
http://vdare.com/roberts/070204_israel.htm
Bullshit was the poison that killed America. We have no options.
We're flying
and there is no landing gear.
KMDickson
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----
http://vdare.com/roberts/070209_brzezinski.htm
Paul Craig Roberts Archive
Paul Craig Robert's appeal on behalf of VDARE.COM
Email a Friend...
Printer Friendly Version...
February 09, 2007
Brzezinski: "Time For The Congress To Assert Itself" Against Bush
Bullying
By Paul Craig Roberts
Gentle reader, you are probably unaware of former National Security
Adviser
Zbigniew Brzezinski?s damning indictment of the Bush Regime in his
testimony
before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee on February 1, 2007, as
the United
States no longer has a media--only a government propaganda ministry.
Brzezinski damned the Bush Regime?s war in Iraq as "a historic,
strategic, and
moral calamity." Brzezinski damned the war as "driven by Manichean
impulses and
imperial hubris." He damned the war for "intensifying regional
instability" and for "undermining America?s global
legitimacy."[Testimony--PDF]
Finally, a voice with weight speaks. Brzezinski is a real intellect, a
real
expert, unlike the political hacks who have followed him in the
office.
Brzezinski told the Senate Foreign Relations Committee that "the
final
destination on this downhill track is likely to be a head-on conflict
with Iran
and with much of the world of Islam." Brzezinski predicts "some
provocation in
Iraq or a terrorist act in the U.S. blamed on Iran; culminating in a
?defensive?
U.S. military action against Iran that plunges a lonely America into a
spreading
and deepening quagmire eventually ranging across Iraq, Iran,
Afghanistan, and
Pakistan."
There is something deadly wrong with a society and a political system
that
permits a Regime capable of such insane and criminal "leadership" to
remain in
power. By the time Hitler launched World War II, the German Reichstag
had no
power to prevent him. But we have not yet reached that point in the
United States.
Brzezinski concludes his testimony with the statement that it is "time
for the
Congress to assert itself."
The reasons for impeaching Bush and Cheney exceed by many multiples
all the
reasons for impeaching every president combined in US history. The
reasons have
been enumerated many times and do not need repeating. If members of
Congress
were faithful to their oaths of office to uphold the Constitution,
Bush and
Cheney would already have been impeached and convicted.
The very least Congress can do at this very late stage is to make it
perfectly
clear in no uncertain terms that any attack on Iran under any pretext
without
the authorization of Congress after a careful examination of the
pretext will
lead to the immediate removal of Bush and Cheney from power, as will
any
escalation of the war in Iraq without explicit authorization by
Congress.
Having delivered this ultimatum, Congress must immediately begin
investigations
of the Bush Regime?s attack on civil liberties and the separation of
powers, on the Bush Regime?s use of lies and deception to lead America
into a
war with Iraq, on the Bush Regime?s violation of the Geneva
Conventions, and on
the Bush Regime?s plans to attack Iran.
The American people and their representatives in Congress must face
the fact
that criminal and dictatorial persons control executive power in the
United
States and immediately rectify this highly dangerous situation.
COPYRIGHT CREATORS SYNDICATE, INC.
Paul Craig Roberts [email him] was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury
in the
Reagan Administration. He is the author of Supply-Side Revolution : An
Insider's
Account of Policymaking in Washington; Alienation and the Soviet
Economy and
Meltdown: Inside the Soviet Economy, and is the co-author with
Lawrence M.
Stratton of The Tyranny of Good Intentions : How Prosecutors and
Bureaucrats Are
Trampling the Constitution in the Name of Justice. Click here for
Peter
Brimelow?s Forbes Magazine interview with Roberts about the recent
epidemic of
prosecutorial misconduct.
================
http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20070209/pl_afp/iraqstrategyus_070209140225
Yahoo! News
US think tank urges retreat from Iraq
by Dave ClarkFri Feb 9, 9:02 AM ET
An independent think tank warned that the situation in Iraq was beyond
repair
and urged that US forces should be pulled out whatever the result of
the current
"surge" of troops into Baghdad.
A report from Washington's Council on Foreign Relations concluded that
a US
military victory was impossible in Iraq, where "amateurish" post-
invasion rule
by American officials had seen Iraq collapse into civil war.
The respected institute's stark assessment comes at a time of
collapsing public
support for the war in the United States and mounting opposition to
President
George W. Bush's strategy within Congress.
"The United States has already achieved all that it is likely to
achieve in
Iraq... Staying in Iraq can only drive up the price of those gains in
blood,
treasure and strategic position," wrote Steven Simon, author of the
report.
"The time has come to acknowledge that the United States must
fundamentally
recast its commitment to Iraq. It must do so without any illusions
that there
are unexplored or magic fixes, whether diplomatic or military," he
warned.
"Some disasters are irretrievable," he continued, calling for troops
to be
pulled out by the end of 2008.
Simon, in a paper entitled "After the Surge: The Case for US Military
Disengagement from Iraq," said troop levels are still too low to quell
the
fighting but more reinforcements would make little difference in any
case.
The US invasion "plunged the country into a civil war that brought
about the
deaths of tens of thousands of Iraqi civilians, wrecked the country's
already
debilitated infrastructure, and spurred violent sectarian rivalries."
"The crisis has now moved beyond the capacity of Washington to control
on its
own... The United States lacks the military resources and the domestic
and
international political support to master the situation," Simon
warned.
Bush and his commanders have pinned the success of his Iraq strategy
on sending
21,500 additional US troops to secure Baghdad and allow the embattled
Iraqi
government and US reconstruction teams to rebuild the country.
But Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki's so-called unity government is
wracked by
sectarian rivalry and much of the country is prey to illegal Shiite
militias and
roving bands of Sunni anti-US insurgents.
In addition, Simon warns, Washington has been unable to contribute
enough
personnel for a sustained counterinsurgency and nation building
effort.
He notes that the US civilian agencies have been only able to find 116
staff to
fill a planned 167 positions on "provincial reconstruction teams,"
compared to
the 1,700 who were thrown into a similar failed effort in Vietnam.
And even accounting for the extra troops in the ongoing "surge," the
new US
commander in Iraq, Lieutenant General David Petraeus, has only half
the number
of soldiers he would need to follow his own counterinsurgency
doctrine.
In addition to destroying the Iraqi state and plunging the country
into crisis,
the US invasion has strengthened the hand of Washington's enemies in
Iran and
tied down troops that could be more usefully used elsewhere.
"By siphoning resources and political attention away from Afghanistan,
a
continuing military commitment to Iraq may lead to US losses in
southwest Asia,"
Simon warned starkly of NATO's ongoing operation against the Taliban.
American failures since the March 2003 invasion had cost Bush public
support at
home, making military disengagement inevitable, the report warns.
"It is now just a matter of time," Simon wrote. "Better to withdraw as
a
coherent and somewhat volitional act than withdraw later in hectic
response to
public opposition to the war in the United States."
Copyright ? 2007 Agence France Presse. All rights reserved. The
information
contained in the AFP News report may not be published, broadcast,
rewritten or
redistributed without the prior written authority of Agence France
Presse.
Copyright ? 2007 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Questions or Comments
Privacy Policy -Terms of Service - Copyright/IP Policy - Ad Feedback
--
http://www.actionlyme.org
