CPS Wiretapping & the NYTimes Editorial on Wiretapping (They're Dangerously Stupid)
Mort Zuckerman
pkru...@princeton.edu, Stanle...@fiu.edu,
emcsw...@niaid.nih.gov, afa...@niaid.nih.gov,
Spin...@yahoogroups.com, kshe...@calea.org, fit...@gmail.com,
patrick.f...@usdoj.gov, model...@sbcglobal.net,
jdr...@nejm.org, let...@courant.com, Jgerb...@cdc.gov,
michae...@po.state.ct.us, con...@po.state.ct.us, executive-
edi...@nytimes.com, managin...@nytimes.com, news-
ti...@nytimes.com, biz...@nytimes.com, for...@nytimes.com,
nati...@nytimes.com, dv...@cdc.gov, brigidc...@optonline.net,
tr...@hotmail.com, illino...@aol.com, jle...@courant.com,
tinaj...@yahoo.com, jhorn...@fff.org, thomas...@usdoj.gov,
thoma...@po.state.ct.us, kur...@washpost.com,
georg...@washpost.com, p...@allegorypress.com,
commissi...@po.state.ct.us, brans...@comcast.net,
vts...@comcast.net, o...@po.state.ct.us, freet...@charter.net,
scott....@po.state.ct.us, govern...@po.state.ct.us,
attorney...@po.state.ct.us, randall...@usdoj.gov,
Robert....@yale.edu, edi...@greenwich-post.com,
harol...@yale.edu, sedm...@nswbc.org, rrmcg...@aol.com
Cc: fra...@ucia.gov, dr-ahma...@president.ir,
eugener...@washpost.com, afa...@niaid.nih.gov,
bmi...@newstimes.com, tr...@hotmail.com, rast...@aol.com,
billc...@gmail.com, amcg...@rms-law.com, rjmu...@aol.com,
paulcrai...@yahoo.com, sidney_b...@yahoo.com,
criminal...@usdoj.gov, karla.d...@usdoj.gov,
christophe...@usdoj.gov, richar...@yale.edu,
harol...@yale.edu, james.p...@yale.edu, inq...@aldf.com,
ly...@idsociety.org, meganm...@theatlantic.com,
bob.d...@latimes.com
Subject: [SpinLyme] CPS Wiretapping & the NYTimes Editorial on
Wiretapping
Date: Jun 19, 2009 1:25 AM
NYTIMES EDITORIAL BELOW
======================================
The "Child Protective Services" do this illegal
surveillance routinely, but they *LIE* to the self-alleged
courts about what they find with their illegal wiretapping.
The "judges" know about the hired surveillance (note: these
are usually ex-cops) and assume the DCF is telling
the truth about what the hired private eye finds.
Here is your absolute proof that they lie to the
courts:
http://www.actionlyme.org/ENTRAPMENT_101.htm
And it has never been explained how Jessica Gauvin
stole AG Richard Blumenthal's RICO mail off of his
desk after AAG Tom Ryan et al told me to file this
RICO complaint with the USDOJ:
http://www.actionlyme.org/USDOJ_COMPLAINT_RICO.htm
http://www.actionlyme.org/BLUMENTHALS_MAIL_STOLEN_BY_JESSICA_GAUVIN.htm
Do you really think I am a "Unabomber Chemist" who
threatened to kill Jessica Gauvin?
http://www.actionlyme.org/GAUVIN_DEATH_PENALTY?
Or do you think Yale's James Phillips did not
want to be sued for malpractice?
http://www.actionlyme.org/PENISBITERDOCS.htm
http://www.actionlyme.org/PHILLIPS_JE_PERVERT.htm
I very clearly have Chronic Lyme and my kids
are very clearly CONGENITALLY INFECTED:
http://www.actionlyme.org/Schoen.htm
???
DCF is how to bag a whistleblower or for "political"
(means "before the indictments") purposes. Here is
another example of an Erin Brockowich:
http://www.actionlyme.org/LYNNAE_LAKE_CASE.htm
being tortured by DCF/CPS.
Also, and more importantly, I had proven scientifically
that all psychotropics are brain damaging:
http://www.actionlyme.org/BRAINDAMAGE.htm
The vast majority of children kidnapped by DCF are
drugged and brain-damaged into oblivion and DCF does
not want to be liable, since all DCF is about is DCF
not being liable - thus the secret courts and the
illegal gag orders and the false arrests:
http://www.actionlyme.org/DCF_GRADUATARDS_SPEAK.htm
DCF sleeping off their hangovers (caught by a cop
with a videocamera):
http://www.actionlyme.org/080924.htm
So, everyone needs to know the illegal wiretapping
is about bagging whistleblowers and protecting
the perpetrators. ANY secret, covert program is
subject to such abuses. The NSA dudes were even
spying on their wives and girlfriends. ***If you have
dirt on the Bigs, you better not have had an racy
email exchanges, if ya know what I mean.*** Think
Eliot Spitzer.
I recommend turning the tables on *them,* like studying
up on all the latest physical spyware, in addition to
alerting EVERYONE to DCF's illegal spying. I always
recommend - 100% - leaving the State if DCF comes knocking
on your doors, because, believe me, you never met
more insane and vicious RETARDS in your life and could
never have even imagined such stupid people could ever
have even gotten a driver's license. We've all seen
that part of the reason DCF staff are so stupid is because
most of them are drunks, druggies, and clearly, um,
what's the word... floozies. 'Since all psychotropics
(including alcohol) are brain damaging, and DCF staff
themselves demonstrate it:
http://www.actionlyme.org/RAGAGLIA_GRANDJURY_DETAILS.htm
Social Working College Education educates in becoming
a greedy, selfish whore. I over heard these lectures
myself in college: "*GO* *FOR* *WHATEVER* *YOU* *CAN*
*GET* OUT OF SEX!!!"
I swear to God. I overheard it because the instructor
was literally bellowing this. (Southern CT State U.)
Moral of the Whorey-Glorey Story?
WARN EVERYONE THAT DOT GUV TARDS TEND TO BE TOO
STUPID TO HANDLE THE STOLEN INFORMATION.
Kathleen M. Dickson
http://www.actionlyme.org
=================================
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/18/opinion/18thu1.html?pagewanted=print
The New York Times
June 18, 2009
Editorial
The Eavesdropping Continues
Once again, the country is learning about how the federal government
has been exceeding its legal authority and violating Americans’ most
basic rights in the name of fighting terrorism.
In a disturbing article in The Times on Wednesday, James Risen and
Eric Lichtblau said that Congressional investigations suggest that the
National Security Agency continues to routinely collect Americans’
telephone calls and e-mail messages — perhaps by the millions.
These sweeps seem unconnected to specific terrorism investigations,
and the communications are entirely domestic. The law does not allow
fishing trips through Americans’ communications and only permits the
government to read e-mails or listen to phone calls in which one party
is “reasonably believed” to be outside the United States.
The government offered its usual response: Oops. A spokesman for the
intelligence community said any “overcollection” was inadvertent and
“when such errors are identified,” they are quickly corrected.
That excuse wore thin long ago. We heard it when the F.B.I. was caught
abusing its power to issue “national security letters” to short-
circuit constitutional protections. We heard it in April, when the
Obama administration first acknowledged that the N.S.A. was exceeding
even the expanded authority it was given last year to monitor
international calls and e-mail traffic.
Representative Rush Holt of New Jersey, who leads the House panel that
oversees intelligence agencies’ operations, was right when he said
that “some actions are so flagrant that they can’t be accidental.”
The Times article reported that since 2005, intelligence analysts have
used a database called Pinwale, which systematically archives both
foreign and domestic e-mail messages by the millions — without regard
for whether they are domestic or international or have anything to do
with an actual investigation.
Mr. Holt is doing the right thing by pressing for an inquiry. But
lawmakers should be clear about how this happened: last year, 293
members of the House and 69 senators voted for a dangerous and mostly
unnecessary expansion of the 1978 Foreign Intelligence Surveillance
Act, which protected Americans from unwarranted government spying for
30 years.
President George W. Bush started violating that law shortly after 9/11
when he authorized the N.S.A. to conduct domestic wiretapping without
first getting the required warrant. When that program was exposed by
The Times in late 2004, the Bush team began pressuring Congress to
give retroactive legal cover to the eavesdropping operation and to the
telecommunications companies that participated in it.
That finally happened in the heat of the 2008 campaign. Congress
expanded FISA and gave the companies blanket immunity less than a day
after the bill was introduced. We doubt if many lawmakers read the
legislation. President Obama, who was still a senator at the time,
voted for it, even though he had been passionately denouncing illegal
wiretapping for months.
Many critics of the legislation, including this page, said that the
powers given to the government to eavesdrop were too broad, that the
limits placed on them were too vague and that the remedies for error
or deliberate violations were too weak.
We do not believe that Mr. Obama is deliberately violating Americans’
rights as Mr. Bush did, and it is to his credit that the government
acknowledged part of the problem in April. But this nation’s civil
liberties are not predicated on trusting individuals to wield their
powers honorably. They are founded on laws.
The 2008 expansion of FISA is a deeply flawed law. Congress needs to
repeal it and re-examine, carefully this time, what powers the
government really needs to eavesdrop on Americans and what limits and
safeguards need to be placed on those powers.
Home