Brooks: "Back off slammin dot guvtard Stupidity"
Mort Zuckerman
scientifi...@ostp.gov, pkru...@princeton.edu,
Stanle...@fiu.edu, emcsw...@niaid.nih.gov, afa...@niaid.nih.gov,
Spin...@yahoogroups.com, kshe...@calea.org, fit...@gmail.com,
patrick.f...@usdoj.gov, model...@sbcglobal.net,
jdr...@nejm.org, let...@courant.com, Jgerb...@cdc.gov,
michae...@po.state.ct.us, con...@po.state.ct.us, executive-
edi...@nytimes.com, managin...@nytimes.com, news-
ti...@nytimes.com, biz...@nytimes.com, for...@nytimes.com,
nati...@nytimes.com, dv...@cdc.gov, brigidc...@optonline.net,
tr...@hotmail.com, illino...@aol.com, jle...@courant.com,
tinaj...@yahoo.com, jhorn...@fff.org, thomas...@usdoj.gov,
thoma...@po.state.ct.us, kur...@washpost.com,
georg...@washpost.com, p...@allegorypress.com,
commissi...@po.state.ct.us, brans...@comcast.net,
vts...@comcast.net, o...@po.state.ct.us, freet...@charter.net,
scott....@po.state.ct.us, govern...@po.state.ct.us,
attorney...@po.state.ct.us, randall...@usdoj.gov,
Robert....@yale.edu, edi...@greenwich-post.com,
harol...@yale.edu, sedm...@nswbc.org, rrmcg...@aol.com,
fr...@nytimes.com, dpr...@stmartin.edu
Cc: fra...@ucia.gov, dr-ahma...@president.ir,
eugener...@washpost.com, afa...@niaid.nih.gov,
bmi...@newstimes.com, tr...@hotmail.com, rast...@aol.com,
billc...@gmail.com, amcg...@rms-law.com, rjmu...@aol.com,
paulcrai...@yahoo.com, sidney_b...@yahoo.com,
criminal...@usdoj.gov, karla.d...@usdoj.gov,
christophe...@usdoj.gov, richar...@yale.edu,
harol...@yale.edu, james.p...@yale.edu, inq...@aldf.com,
ly...@idsociety.org, meganm...@theatlantic.com
Subject: Brooks: "Back off slammin dot guvtard Stupidity"
Date: Jan 1, 2010 5:47 AM
ARTICLE BELOW
===============================
Uuuum, No. Kinda sorta what duh MSM is
pozedta be doin is slammin dot guvtards.
And when you MSM-hoes refused do it, we did.
For going on 11 years straight, as a mattah
fackah. And if you had the balls to take your
thought one thought further, it wasn't anyone's
god-of-technology that failed, it was TRUTH.
Now, on Bush's American Disasters, On Rowland-
Going to Jail for Hanging wid da *Hoes,* ("sluts"
to quote myself) On LYMErix failing because it was
an immune-suppressor, all was callable and I called
em all. Anyone who had been watching these things
and especially those paid to be On Watch, YOU, all,
in fact, were made of the same wimpy-ass Me-Centric/
Penis-Centric lilly-livvered fairy ass clay as the
stupid, chronically failing dot-guvvers.
*Of* *course* we're going to be screaming our
eyeballs out when we know your MSM-and-Dot-Guv
undeserved vanity failed you. Especially since
we haven't seen justice yet:
http://www.actionlyme.org/CRYME_DISEASE.htm
"At the time of this writing (fall, 2007), recent news includes Yale's
Durland Fish's refusal answer to a civil subpoena issued by
Connecticut Attorney General, Richard Blumenthal in the fall of 2006.
In refusing to answer the subpoena as to what data went into the
development of the new and bogus "guidelines" on "Lyme Disease"
produced by the ALDF.com cabal, we quote Durland Fish in the Hartford
Courant newspaper:
"He proceeds down the list, name by name: "Totally bogus." "He killed
one of his patients." "They tried to shut him down." Words like
"crackpot," "wacko," "buffoon" and "fraud" pepper his discourse.
"A little later, he stops to ponder a question.
"I don't know," he says after a moment's thought. "I don't know why
they hate me so much."
- - - - - -
http://www.actionlyme.org/TICK_BITE_CONSPIRACY.htm
Look at the date Durland Fish wrote that ^^^.
"Want to send her a bogus article?"
"I need more than rumors to attack."
"We did lose the railroad case...."
(1995.)
- - - - - - -
Jan 2001, SmithKline called Allen Steere
a lying fool at the FDA LYMErix meeting:
http://www.fda.gov/OHRMS/DOCKETS/ac/01/slides/3680s2_02_lobet.pdf
Kapisch?
The "institutions" didn't "fail." They
*didn't* *care*, when they weren't directly
involved in the crimes.
Instead of bitching at the bitchers, Mr.
Brooks, how about aksin IDSA when they gonna
tell us what "Lyme Disease" is (again)?
1989:
http://www.actionlyme.org/CHP_9_IDSA_REVIEWS.htm
Did the NYTimes carry ^^^ THAT story?
http://www.actionlyme.org/Congenital_Brain_Infection_of_Newborn_Resulting_in_Death.htm
"The death of the newborn was probably due to respiratory failure as a
consequence of perinatal brain damage."-- Yale Department of
Pathology.
http://www.actionlyme.org/080924.htm
Did youz at the Times interview Willy Burgdorfer
and get his "after 30 years we have NOTHING!!"
story?
THIRTY YEARS, and we have nothing.
After it was revealed by Yours Truly what
Pam3Cys is, Fauci said, "We have to rethink
vaccines, altogether."
You're too embarrassed to run the story.
So, instead you say QUIT WHINING, about
30 years worth of the failed DHHS (CDC,
FDA, and NIH).
And 20 million people got unemployment
benefits last year because of Bushie's
predictable and predicted failed oil wars:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.diseases.lyme/browse_thread/thread/6940a8d9e0024621/8591b95e0ece47f7?q=Bush%2FGore+ENERGY+&rnum=1#8591b95e0ece47f7
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.diseases.lyme/browse_frm/thread/e4359868117b8d81/e066f6566802741e?q=lehrer+bush+gore+bombs+bursting+in+air&rnum=1#e066f6566802741e
You're a wuss and every bit the loser
and pussy Dick Cheney is, which is why *YOU*
can't shut up about all your failures.
Kathleen M. Dickson
http://www.actionlyme.org
=======================================
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/01/opinion/01brooks.html?hp
January 1, 2010
Op-Ed Columnist
The God That Fails
By DAVID BROOKS
During the middle third of the 20th century, Americans had impressive
faith in their own institutions. It was not because these institutions
always worked well. The Congress and the Federal Reserve exacerbated
the Great Depression. The military made horrific mistakes during World
War II, which led to American planes bombing American troops and
American torpedoes sinking ships with American prisoners of war.
But there was a realistic sense that human institutions are
necessarily flawed. History is not knowable or controllable. People
should be grateful for whatever assistance that government can provide
and had better do what they can to be responsible for their own fates.
That mature attitude seems to have largely vanished. Now we seem to
expect perfection from government and then throw temper tantrums when
it is not achieved. We seem to be in the position of young adolescents
— who believe mommy and daddy can take care of everything, and then
grow angry and cynical when it becomes clear they can’t.
After Sept. 11, we Americans indulged our faith in the god of
technocracy. We expanded the country’s information-gathering
capacities so that the National Security Agency alone now gathers four
times more data each day than is contained in the Library of Congress.
We set up protocols to convert that information into a form that can
be processed by computers and bureaucracies. We linked agencies and
created new offices. We set up a centralized focal point, the National
Counterterrorism Center.
All this money and technology seems to have reduced the risk of future
attack. But, of course, the system is bound to fail sometimes. Reality
is unpredictable, and no amount of computer technology is going to
change that. Bureaucracies are always blind because they convert the
rich flow of personalities and events into crude notations that can be
filed and collated. Human institutions are always going to miss
crucial clues because the information in the universe is infinite and
events do not conform to algorithmic regularity.
Resilient societies have a level-headed understanding of the risks
inherent in this kind of warfare.
But, of course, this is not how the country has reacted over the past
week. There have been outraged calls for Secretary Janet Napolitano of
the Department of Homeland Security to resign, as if changing the
leader of the bureaucracy would fix the flaws inherent in the
bureaucracy. There have been demands for systemic reform — for more
protocols, more layers and more review systems.
Much of the criticism has been contemptuous and hysterical. Various
experts have gathered bits of Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab’s biography.
Since they can string the facts together to accurately predict the
past, they thunder, the intelligence services should have been able to
connect the dots to predict the future.
Dick Cheney argues that the error was caused by some ideological
choice. Arlen Specter screams for more technology — full-body
examining devices. “We thought that had been remedied,” said Senator
Kit Bond, as if omniscience could be accomplished with legislation.
Many people seem to be in the middle of a religious crisis of faith.
All the gods they believe in — technology, technocracy, centralized
government control — have failed them in this instance.
In a mature nation, President Obama could go on TV and say, “Listen,
we’re doing the best we can, but some terrorists are bound to get
through.” But this is apparently a country that must be spoken to in
childish ways. The original line out of the White House was that the
system worked. Don’t worry, little Johnny.
When that didn’t work the official line went to the other extreme. “I
consider that totally unacceptable,” Obama said. I’m really mad,
Johnny. But don’t worry, I’ll make it all better.
Meanwhile, the Transportation Security Administration has to be seen
doing something, so it added another layer to its stage play,
“Security Theater” — more baggage regulations, more in-flight
restrictions.
At some point, it’s worth pointing out that it wasn’t the centralized
system that stopped terrorism in this instance. As with the shoe
bomber, as with the plane that went down in Shanksville, Pa., it was
decentralized citizen action. The plot was foiled by nonexpert
civilians who had the advantage of the concrete information right in
front of them — and the spirit to take the initiative.
For better or worse, over the past 50 years we have concentrated
authority in centralized agencies and reduced the role of
decentralized citizen action. We’ve done this in many spheres of life.
Maybe that’s wise, maybe it’s not. But we shouldn’t imagine that these
centralized institutions are going to work perfectly or even well most
of the time. It would be nice if we reacted to their inevitable
failures not with rabid denunciation and cynicism, but with a little
resiliency, an awareness that human systems fail and bad things will
happen and we don’t have to lose our heads every time they do.
"[Real] scientists are *fiercely* independent. That's the good
news."-- NIH's Top Fool, Anthony Fauci