Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Chris Hedges and Yale's SusanSlut Block, Beating Naked Women

2 views
Skip to first unread message

Mort Zuckerman

unread,
Oct 26, 2009, 9:36:55 AM10/26/09
to
Durlan...@yale.edu, Aa...@columbia.edu, gary_w...@nymc.edu,
scientifi...@ostp.gov, pkru...@princeton.edu,
Stanle...@fiu.edu, emcsw...@niaid.nih.gov, afa...@niaid.nih.gov,
Spin...@yahoogroups.com, kshe...@calea.org, fit...@gmail.com,
patrick.f...@usdoj.gov, model...@sbcglobal.net,
jdr...@nejm.org, let...@courant.com, Jgerb...@cdc.gov,
michae...@po.state.ct.us, con...@po.state.ct.us, executive-
edi...@nytimes.com, managin...@nytimes.com, news-
ti...@nytimes.com, biz...@nytimes.com, for...@nytimes.com,
nati...@nytimes.com, dv...@cdc.gov, brigidc...@optonline.net,
tr...@hotmail.com, illino...@aol.com, jle...@courant.com,
tinaj...@yahoo.com, jhorn...@fff.org, thomas...@usdoj.gov,
thoma...@po.state.ct.us, kur...@washpost.com,
georg...@washpost.com, p...@allegorypress.com,
commissi...@po.state.ct.us, brans...@comcast.net,
vts...@comcast.net, o...@po.state.ct.us, freet...@charter.net,
scott....@po.state.ct.us, govern...@po.state.ct.us,
attorney...@po.state.ct.us, randall...@usdoj.gov,
Robert....@yale.edu, edi...@greenwich-post.com,
harol...@yale.edu, sedm...@nswbc.org, rrmcg...@aol.com,
fr...@nytimes.com, dpr...@stmartin.edu
Cc: fra...@ucia.gov, dr-ahma...@president.ir,
eugener...@washpost.com, afa...@niaid.nih.gov,
bmi...@newstimes.com, tr...@hotmail.com, rast...@aol.com,
billc...@gmail.com, amcg...@rms-law.com, rjmu...@aol.com,
paulcrai...@yahoo.com, sidney_b...@yahoo.com,
criminal...@usdoj.gov, karla.d...@usdoj.gov,
christophe...@usdoj.gov, richar...@yale.edu,
harol...@yale.edu, james.p...@yale.edu, inq...@aldf.com,
ly...@idsociety.org, meganm...@theatlantic.com,
bob.d...@latimes.com

Subject: Chris Hedges and Yale's SusanSlut Block, Beating Naked Women

Date: Oct 26, 2009 9:35 AM

Yep.

ARTICLE BELOW
========================

Now look at this screwball Yale
graduate:
http://www.drsusanblock.com/

Do I need to comment?

The DCF Whories are told to
"GET ALL YOU CAN OUT OF SEX!!"
in DCF Whore School:
http://www.actionlyme.org/SOCIAL_WORKER_WHORING_STARTS_IN_COLLEGE.htm
I know because I heard the "professors"
yell it, sitting in the next classroom
over at Southern Corrupticut State Whorery.

You can't get a Yalie to scale
up the abuse of women and domestic
violence, though. They're fully
indicktrinated, *every* *last* *one.*

And the female Yale Psychiapervert Med School
students are afraid of speak out about their
sexual harassment by their Yale professors
http://www.actionlyme.org/BUNNEY_YALE_BRAIN_DAMAGE.htm
because of the Retaliation Formulary.

http://www.actionlyme.org/VIKING_INTERVIEWS.htm
Chris Kennedy ^^^became a Freemason,
presumablty so the Corrupticut Freemason
"judge"-perverts would stop torturing him,
BTW.

http://www.actionlyme.org/GAUVIN_DEATH_PENALTY.htm
If you report a mass-murder crime to the
USDOJ you're labeled a terrorist and
mass murderer.

That's what happens if you don't play
along with the DCF-Yalie Whorey Agenda:
http://www.actionlyme.org/AARON_RUSSO.htm


Check her out. This Yalie pervert is
actually beating other naked women:
http://www.drsusanblock.com/

Yale ^^^ approves, obviously, since
they taught her all she knows.


Kathleen M. Dickson
http://www.actionlyme.org

===========================

http://www.commondreams.org/view/2009/10/26-0

Published on Monday, October 26, 2009 by TruthDig.com
War Is a Hate Crime

by Chris Hedges
Violence against lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people is
wrong. So is violence against people in Afghanistan and Iraq. But in
the bizarre culture of identity politics, there are no alliances among
the oppressed. The Matthew Shepard and James Byrd Jr. Hate Crimes
Prevention Act, the first major federal civil rights law protecting
lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people, passed last week, was
attached to a $680-billion measure outlining the Pentagon’s budget,
which includes $130 billion for ongoing military operations in Iraq
and Afghanistan. The Democratic majority in Congress, under the cover
of protecting some innocents, authorized massive acts of violence
against other innocents.

It was a clever piece of marketing. It blunted debate about new
funding for war. And behind the closed doors of the caucus rooms, the
Democratic leadership told Blue Dog Democrats, who are squeamish about
defending gays or lesbians from hate crimes, that they could justify
the vote as support for the war. They told liberal Democrats, who are
squeamish about unlimited funding for war, that they could defend the
vote as a step forward in the battle for civil rights. Gender equality
groups, by selfishly narrowing their concern to themselves,
participated in the dirty game.

“Every thinking person wants to take a stand against hate crimes, but
isn’t war the most offensive of hate crimes?” asked Rep. Dennis
Kucinich, who did not vote for the bill, when I spoke to him by phone.
“To have people have to make a choice, or contemplate the hierarchy of
hate crimes, is cynical. I don’t vote to fund wars. If you are opposed
to war, you don’t vote to authorize or appropriate money. Congress,
historically and constitutionally, has the power to fund or defund a
war. The more Congress participates in authorizing spending for war,
the more likely it is that we will be there for a long, long time.
This reflects an even larger question. All the attention is paid to
what President Obama is going to do right now with respect to Iraq and
Afghanistan. The truth is the Democratic Congress could have ended the
war when it took control just after 2006. We were given control of the
Congress by the American people in November 2006 specifically to end
the war. It did not happen. The funding continues. And while the
attention is on the president, Congress clearly has the authority at
any time to stop the funding. And yet it doesn’t. Worse yet, it finds
other ways to garner votes for bills that authorize funding for war.
The spending juggernaut moves forward, a companion to the inconscient
force of war itself.”

The brutality of Matthew Shepard’s killers, who beat him to death for
being gay, is a product of a culture that glorifies violence and
sadism. It is the product of a militarized culture. We have more
police, prisons, inmates, spies, mercenaries, weapons and troops than
any other nation on Earth. Our military, which swallows half of the
federal budget, is enormously popular—as if it is not part of
government. The military values of hyper-masculinity, blind obedience
and violence are an electric current that run through reality
television and trash-talk programs where contestants endure pain while
they betray and manipulate those around them in a ruthless world of
competition. Friendship and compassion are banished.

This hyper-masculinity is at the core of pornography with its fusion
of violence and eroticism, as well as its physical and emotional
degradation of women. It is an expression of the corporate state where
human beings are reduced to commodities and companies have become
proto-fascist enclaves devoted to maximziing profit. Militarism
crushes the capacity for moral autonomy and difference. It isolates us
from each other. It has its logical fruition in Abu Ghraib, the wars
in Iraq and Afghanistan, along with our lack of compassion for our
homeless, our poor, our mentally ill, our unemployed, our sick, and
yes, our gay, lesbian, transgender and bisexual citizens.

Klaus Theweleit in his two volumes entitled “Male Fantasies,” which
draw on the bitter alienation of demobilized veterans in Germany
following the end of World War I, argues that a militarized culture
attacks all that is culturally defined as the feminine, including
love, gentleness, compassion and acceptance of difference. It sees any
sexual ambiguity as a threat to male “hardness” and the clearly
defined roles required by the militarized state. The continued support
for our permanent war economy, the continued elevation of military
values as the highest good, sustains the perverted ethic, rigid social
roles and emotional numbness that Theweleit explored. It is a moral
cancer that ensures there will be more Matthew Shepards.

Fascism, Theweleit argued, is not so much a form of government or a
particular structuring of the economy or a system, but the creation of
potent slogans and symbols that form a kind of psychic economy which
places sexuality in the service of destruction. The “core of all
fascist propaganda is a battle against everything that constitutes
enjoyment and pleasure,” Theweleit wrote. And our culture, while it
disdains the name of fascism, embraces its dark ethic.

New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman, interviewed in 2003 by
Charlie Rose, spoke in this sexualized language of violence to justify
the war in Iraq, a moment preserved on YouTube (see video below):

“What they needed to see was American boys and girls going house to
house, from Basra to Baghdad, and basically saying, ‘Which part of
this sentence don’t you understand?’ ” Friedman said. “ ‘You don’t
think, you know we care about our open society, you think this bubble
fantasy, we’re just gonna let it grow? Well, suck on this.’ That,
Charlie, is what this war is about. We could have hit Saudi Arabia, it
was part of that bubble. Could have hit Pakistan. We hit Iraq because
we could.”
This is the kind of twisted logic the killers of Matthew Shepard would
understand.

The philosopher Theodor Adorno wrote, in words gay activists should
have heeded, that exclusive preoccupation with personal concerns and
indifference to the suffering of others beyond the self-identified
group made fascism and the Holocaust possible.

“The inability to identify with others was unquestionably the most
important psychological condition for the fact that something like
Auschwitz could have occurred in the midst of more or less civilized
and innocent people,” Adorno wrote. “What is called fellow traveling
was primarily business interest: one pursues one’s own advantage
before all else, and simply not to endanger oneself, does not talk too
much. That is a general law of the status quo. The silence under the
terror was only its consequence. The coldness of the societal monad,
the isolated competitor, was the precondition, as indifference to the
fate of others, for the fact that only very few people reacted. The
torturers know this, and they put it to test ever anew.”
Copyright © 2009 Truthdig, L.L.C.

Chris Hedges writes a regular column for Truthdig.com. Hedges
graduated from Harvard Divinity School and was for nearly two decades
a foreign correspondent for The New York Times. He is the author of
many books, including: War Is A Force That Gives Us Meaning, What
Every Person Should Know About War, and American Fascists: The
Christian Right and the War on America. His most recent book is
Empire of Illusion: The End of Literacy and the Triumph of Spectacle.


"[Real] scientists are *fiercely* independent. That's the good
news."-- NIH's Top Fool, Anthony Fauci

0 new messages