Sweeg, Anthrax, the NYTimes, Yale, UConn and duh DCF Sluts and Morons Brigade- Self-Ass-Biting at its Finest
Peenies, Peenies, Peenies, My Name is Chuck and I love McSweenies'
From:
kmdi...@comcast.net
[Add to Address Book]
To:
Spin...@yahoogroups.com, coh...@washpost.com, jdr...@nejm.org,
let...@courant.com, Jgerb...@cdc.gov, len...@courant.com,
motomani...@yahoo.com, con...@po.state.ct.us,
executiv...@nytimes.com, managin...@nytimes.com,
news...@nytimes.com, the-...@nytimes.com, biz...@nytimes.com,
for...@nytimes.com, me...@nytimes.com, nati...@nytimes.com,
spo...@nytimes.com, dv...@cdc.gov, brigidc...@optonline.net,
tr...@hotmail.com, ubi...@courant.com, spin...@yahoogroups.com,
ma...@concentric.net, camp...@courant.com, jhorn...@fff.org,
thomas...@usdoj.gov, edi...@commondreams.org, kur...@washpost.com,
georg...@washpost.com, hor...@courant.com,
commissi...@po.state.ct.us, cohen...@aol.com,
leonar...@po.state.ct.us, FalN...@aol.com,
brans...@comcast.net, vts...@comcast.net, mcne...@aol.com,
o...@po.state.ct.us, da...@davila-dilzer.com,
scott....@po.state.ct.us, attorney...@po.state.ct.us,
randall...@usdoj.gov,patrick....@jud.state.ct.us
CC:
fra...@ucia.gov,dr-ahma...@president.ir,
eugener...@washpost.com, dh...@courant.com, hor...@courant.com,
bmi...@newstimes.com, eliot....@oag.state.ny.us, tr...@hotmail.com,
rast...@aol.com, bill...@comcast.net, thomas...@usdoj.gov,
amcg...@rms-law.com, rjmu...@aol.com, paulcrai...@yahoo.com,
sidney_b...@yahoo.com, criminal...@usdoj.gov,
karla.d...@usdoj.gov, christophe...@usdoj.gov,
fra...@ucia.gov, govern...@po.state.ct.us, fit...@gmail.com,
patrick.f...@usdoj.gov, model...@sbcglobal.net
Subject:
Steven Hatfill (Suing the NYTimes)- Germ Warfare Scientist and
Borrelia (Lyme) Expert - Ain't no Coincidence
Date:
Saturday, January 06, 2007 2:15:14 PM
New York Times Story Below.....
Steve Hatfill worked with NIH and National Cancer Institute's
Paul Duray (who also is a US Military Staff Member), and is *THE*
WORLD's expert pathologist on Lyme.
That is, Duray's done a lot of autopsies and has been sent
a lot of diseased tissue from Lyme victims.
The two of them found that Borrelia grew exponentially in brain tissue
in a NASA biorotating culture (antigravity culture - this is for use in
outer space, so they spin it to use centrifugal force to replicate
gravity).
Duray found that Borreliosis results in Lymphoma and lymphocyte
deformities that can be mistaken for blood cancer (You see, it
is the opposite of what we are told: LYME IS A CAUSE OF ALL THESE
MUTATIONS, rather than it being true that "Lyme is MISDDIAGNOSED
as...."):
http://www.actionlyme.org/1992_DURAY_LYMPHOCYTES.jpg
(click to enlarge again).
http://www.actionlyme.org/Duray.htm
So, the issue is, Hafill and Duray work in the bioweapons program
directly or indirectly and they all know Lyme is a brain disease and
causes blood cancer, but the UCONN staff perjured themselves
and also violated HIPPA laws at Blumenthal's Second Lyme
Disease Conference (Jan 2004), AND~~ more important still,
Yale's Eugene Shapiro perjured himself at the Ray Jones hearing
recently as regards Congenital Lyme, since Yale Pathology Department
was a participant in the autopsy of a congenitally infected newborn
who, they reported, died of the Lyme brain damage:
http://www.actionlyme.org/HOW_RICO_WILL_BE_CHARGED.htm
You can see those congenital Lyme dead-baby reports on that
RICO page, click to enlarge the reports, and verify independently.
THE LATEST TWIST in the Yale Lyme FRAUD story, is that the
Yale and Medical Board, in their perjury and harassment campaign
of all victims of Lyme, have moved the Jones Hearing (next Jan 18,
2006) to the CT Department of Health Office, presumably to narrow
the audience who will hear Larry Zemel at UCONN or Henry Feder,
again perjure themselves.
Maybe they'll go with the lymphoma baloney story again- the same
one they FRAUDULENTLY keep recycling. Lyme is a cause of
Lymphoma- Go to MedLine and see for yourselves.
I thought this Hatfill-NY Times story was amusing for yet another
reason.
Since Israel probably did 9/11 they probably also did the Anthrax
Mailings,
and we believe McSweegan *knows* who did the Anthrax Mailings because
why else would he tell people not to worry if they get an envelope
with powder in it?
http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_edward_m_061209_hoaxes_2c_statistics_a.htm
Clearly the INSANO DCF did not get the "Sweeg-Knows Who Did
the Anthrax" message,
http://www.actionlyme.org/McSweegan.htm
but then duh DCF are always looking for an excuse to throw people in
jail
since they're too retarded to actually do any "work," and the State
gets
all sorts of money from the federal government for each kid they
kidnap...
This excessive kidnapping racket also guarantees that these lying sluts
and morons only have to "work" for 20 years before they get a nice
State
retirement and benefits packages.
DFC also parties and screws with the cops, so they're *all* into
the "Bodies for Money Scam." but not a single brain cell or testicle
among them all to be shared. They're all psychopaths like Edward
McSweegan, Jessica Gauvin, and Kristine Party and Screw Ragaglia.
Hatfill SHOULD sue these bastards. And the Times should
investigate McSweegan, ... unless they too know who did the
Anthrax Mailings, or, they know about Lyme and McSweegan and
refuse to publish the truth about Lyme.
Cowardly, spineless, dickless you know whats- we hope they
all *get* Lyme. For the first 8 years, they won't know what hit
them....
They'll be in a state of shock.
KMDickson
"USA"
====================
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/06/us/06hatfill.html?partner=MYWAY&pagewanted=print
The New York Times
Printer Friendly Format Sponsored By
January 6, 2007
Editor's E-Mail May Be Used in Suit Against The Times
By NEIL A. LEWIS
ALEXANDRIA, Va., Jan. 5 - A lawyer for a former government scientist
who is
suing The New York Times for defamation over a series of columns about
the
deadly anthrax mailings of 2001 said Friday in court that he was
prepared to
introduce an internal e-mail message from a senior Times editor that
raised
questions about one of the columns.
The lawyer, Mark A. Grannis, said the columns written by Nicholas D.
Kristof
about the federal investigation of the mailings unfairly damaged the
reputation
of his client, Dr. Stephen A. Hatfill, a former germ warfare scientist.
Dr. Hatfill's lawyers have said the columns wrongfully suggested that
he was
responsible for the attacks.
Mr. Grannis told Judge Claude M. Hilton of Federal District Court here
that if
the trial proceeded he would introduce evidence including a May 23,
2002,
message from Philip Taubman, then deputy editor of the editorial page,
raising
questions about a draft of a column by Mr. Kristof.
Beginning that spring, Mr. Kristof wrote a series of columns about a
government scientist
whom he initially referred to as Mr. Z., saying the scientist had
become the
overwhelming focus of the investigation. That August, Mr. Kristof wrote
that Dr.
Hatfill had acknowledged that he was Mr. Z. at a news conference in
which he
said the news media had mistreated him.
Mr. Grannis said he would introduce evidence of questions about the
column posed
by Mr. Taubman and others. The evidence from Mr. Taubman, the lawyer
said, was a
message saying the as-yet-unpublished column "pointed pretty much at
the
guy" and encouraging Mr. Kristof to take out some of the material
that did
that.
Mr. Grannis made his disclosure of the information that he has obtained
in the
discovery phase of the suit in a hearing on a Times motion to seek
dismissal of
the complaint.
The trial is scheduled to start Jan. 29. Judge Hilton did not say when
he would
rule.
The Times has argued that the columns were aimed at prodding the
Federal
Bureau of Investigation to pursue the anthrax case more vigorously and
did not accuse
Dr. Hatfill of being the person responsible for the mailings.
In writing about the investigation, Mr. Kristof's ire was directed
against
federal officials for not moving swiftly to decide whether the
scientist was
guilty or innocent, the paper's lawyers have said.
"His intent was to focus on the F.B.I.," a lawyer for The Times,
Lee Levine,
told Judge Hilton.
Mr. Levine, of Levine Sullivan Koch & Schulz, told Judge Hilton that
Mr. Hatfill
was a public figure, or as someone recognized in libel and defamation
law as a
limited-purpose public figure, because of his involvement in the public
debate
about preparedness for a bioterrorist attack.
Mr. Levine said Dr. Hatfill had "voluntarily thrust himself into the
vortex of
that controversy" through his writings and speeches, confirmed by Dr.
Hatfill's complaints that he was easily identified as Mr. Z by many
people in
the field.
As a public figure Dr. Hatfill would have a far greater burden in his
effort to win a
defamation suit. To
prevail, a public figure has to prove that the material was published
with "
actual malice," that is with the knowledge that the statements were
false or
with reckless disregard as to whether they were false.
Lawyers for The Times also argued that neither Mr. Taubman's message
nor any
other evidence put forward by Mr. Hatfill's lawyers was proof that
Mr. Kristof
had acted with reckless disregard for the truth, the standard that Mr.
Hatfill
must meet if he is found to be a public figure.
The Times said that even if all of Mr. Hatfill's assertions were
true, he
would not prevail and that therefore the judge should dismiss the case
before
trial. The message from Mr. Taubman, now Washington bureau chief for
The Times,
was released Friday afternoon by the lawyers for The Times. It read:
"Nick,
you're still pointing pretty much at the guy. I think you need to
lose the
material I've marked in boldface."
Mr. Taubman had marked two paragraphs referring to a middle-age
American scientist with
experience in producing bioweapons. The column, which appeared May 24,
included
the first of those two paragraphs but dropped the second, the messages
showed.
Although the essence of that message was pretty much as Mr. Grannis
represented
it in court, two other e-mail messages he cited were more ambiguous.
He said messages from Nicholas Wade, a former science editor at the
paper and
then a special projects writer, and Gail Collins, the editorial page
editor,
were critical of a column prepared for publication in July. Those
messages, as
disclosed by lawyers for The Times, raised more generalized
suggestions.
Mr. Grannis said Mr. Wade's message had said the column made it
plausible to a
reader that Mr. Kristof was pointing at Mr. Z as the culprit. But the
message
said it was plausible that Dr. Hatfill might have been involved in an
earlier
anthrax scare that was a hoax.
In her message, Ms. Collins said the column "looked fine to me" and
asked how
an anthrax mailing to The National Enquirer in Florida
fit in.
Five people died in the attacks. Although federal authorities
identified Dr.
Hatfill as a "person of interest" in the case, he was not charged
with any
crimes. No one has been charged in the attacks.
Home
The Frayed Ends of Sanity
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
Ordinary
Peenies, Peenies, Peenies, My Name is Chuck and I love McSweenies'
wrote:
The Frayed Ends of Sanity
Ordinary ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
Usenet Supreme Loser ChuckWorth
Peenies, Peenies, Peenies, My Name is Chuck and I love McSweenies'
wrote:
The Frayed Ends of Sanity
Usenet ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ