Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Kaiser and Yale- Central Players in the Lyme FRAUD and how to beat them

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Kathleen

unread,
Feb 25, 2006, 7:56:19 AM2/25/06
to
From: kmdi...@comcast.net
[Add to Address Book]
To:
Spin...@yahoogroups.com,thomas...@usdoj.gov,vts...@comcast.net,brans...@comcast.net,ltsh...@aol.com
Cc:
pj...@netscape.com,ige...@igenex.com,in...@massmed.org,texasl...@gmail.com,jgerb...@cdc.gov,pba...@niaid.nih.gov,karen.vanderh...@quinnipiac.edu,dolm...@upi.com,l...@cnn.com,let...@globe.com,ctl...@yahoogroups.com,klem...@bu.edu,texa...@gmail.com,criminal...@usdoj.gov,patrick.f...@usdoj.gov,thomas...@usdoj.gov,spin...@yahoogroups.com,jhorn...@fff.org,
edi...@commondreams.org, kur...@washpost.com, georg...@washpost.com,
hor...@courant.com, commissi...@po.state.ct.us,
cohen...@aol.com, let...@courant.com, leonar...@po.state.ct.us,
o...@po.state.ct.us, attorney...@po.state.ct.us,
thoma...@po.state.ct.us, fr...@courant.com, cpoi...@courant.com,
will...@senatedems.ct.gov, l...@lewrockwell.com,
kenneth...@po.state.ct.us, inst...@thenation.com,
Elizabet...@Verizon.net, Loftu...@cs.com,
sidney_b...@yahoo.com, han...@senatedems.ct.gov,
ltgoverno...@po.state.ct.us, ubi...@courant.com,
fra...@ucia.gov, govern...@po.state.

Subject: Re: [SpinLyme] Kaiser trivializes Lyme, discourages diagnosis
and
treatment....again
Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2006 10:33:47 +0000

I will tell you how this is winnable and very simply, no matter how
much money
any of these crooks have.

There is an utter absolutism in science and a term that all real
scientists
understand, not just the FDA, and not just BigPharma. That term is a
"scientific validation." The validation of a scientific analytical
method
has the same requirements regardless of the analytical system:
Specificity,
Accuracy, Precision, Linearity (range), Limit of Detection or
Quantitation.

Specificity means the test does not detect something else incidentally
or
accidentally.
Accuracy means how many known-to-be-positives-ahead-of-time, will test
positive.

This is a validation:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=1894359&query_hl=1&itool=pubmed_docsum
Print out the full text. It is available free.
Yale patented this method in the US and were assigned patent no
5,618,533.

The principle is the same for this flagellin test no matter what kind
of
borrelia we are talking about, and all known borrelia have had their
flagellin
DNA sequenced. That means borrelia-specific flagellar fragments from
all known
borrelia can be placed in the same mix or separate ones.

Yale says this test is 94.4% accurate for Lyme borreliosis (Lyme
borreliosis
only represents 3 of hundreds of borrelioses).


No other test even comes close, no matter what CDC says. There is
nothing to
argue. *Everyone* agrees 41 kD (flagellin), is the first and the
longest-
apprearing antibody. 41 only occurs naturally in humans 1.5% of the
time.

Read what Steere says here:
http://www.pubmedcentral.gov/pagerender.fcgi?artid=423723&pageindex=5
(Top right paragraph.)


Therefore, no matter what money Kaiser throws into protecting their
illegal
behavior, they can't win. They can only win as long as the average MD
does not
understand the simple concept of SCIENTIFIC METHOD VALIDITY.

And it *is* very simple, if you give it some thought. What we have now
for a
Lyme test (CDC's bogus version) is like using a helium detector to
detect radon
in your home:
Lyme arthritis (Steere's imaginary IgG disease) is obviously not the
same
species as the Brookhaven "Stealth Infection:"
http://actionlyme.org/JohnDunn_Brookhaven.htm

Look at the difference in the blots between Steere's "disease" and the
rest of
us:
http://actionlyme.org/USDOJ_COMPLAINT_RICO.htm


What BigInsurance tries to do in Lyme, which they know is a brain
disease, is
have you diagnosed as crazy, because they all only pay for 2 years for
a long
term disability claim, if the diagnosis is "crazy."

That's why all Lyme patients should refuse any psych evals. THIS is
the reason
they insist you have one, in order to approve your (dis)continued
disability
payments.

Psychiatrists are not medical doctors. Their specialty is their own
imagination. You know as well as I do, that penises and sexual
gratification
have ZERO to do with your Lyme encephalitis. No amount of sexual
experimentation is going to make that brain fog go away. The next day
you are
still going to wake up with a Lyme hangover.

Psychiatrists are, by their own definition, CRAZY, since they make it
all up,
and in addition, they are clueless about medicine. What psychiatrists
know
about medicine, BigPharma tells them. The drug reps tell them. They
admit they
have learned all they know from the drug reps.

Additionally, and probably most dangerous, is that they can give you
any drug
they want, and retrodiagnose the damage they have caused and the
malpractice, as
another one of your "mental illnesses."

Kaiser knows these things. If they are going to be paying the biggest
bucks for
law firms, you can be sure they also have people who understand these
bogus
medicine matters.


The way to defeat these crimes is for everyone to undertake upon
themselves an
understanding of what is a VALID ANALYTICAL METHOD. Then it is GAME
OVER for
Kaiser, Yale, and the ALDF. The bad guys rely on the fact that people
will not
put the effort into this discovery.

So far they have gotten away with their crimes because the average MD
is pretty
clueless and because patients are willing to try bogus therapies to
effect
recovery, rather than the logical approach. The logical approach, is
to say, "I
*KNOW* I am sick, dammit, so how can I prove it?"
http://actionlyme.org/BIOMARKERS.doc (Look for what else they
know.)


They all (both good MDs and bad MDs) act like these scientific matters
are too
sophisticated for the average- and even the above average- person.
They aren't.
This science is common sense and you will believe me when you put the
time into
it.

And then, you will be very PISSED that you've been hoodwinked and
treated like
an imbecile, by imbecile MDs, and especially, by people like Anthony
Fauci and
Julie Gerberding- the head of the CDC.

You will guess they placed Gerberding at the head of the CDC because
she is
another HeckuvaJob Brownie.

There is NOTHING Kaiser's lawyers can say against these scientific
absolutisms.

Yale has had the best and most accurate test for Lyme since 1991. They
didn't
use it to see if LYMErix prevented Lyme because they knew it didn't.
It is not
in use now because no one wants Lyme diagnosed, especially Kaiser and
even more
especially, Yale, because people will say to Yale, "Well, why didn't
you *use*
this test to qualify LYMErix if you had it all along?"


and then all hell will break loose, because Yale's Lyme scam seriously
negatively affected people on at least three continents: Eurasia,
North
America, and Australia.


Kathleen
--
If stuff is true, ya gotta say it.
http://actionlyme.org

-------------- Original message ----------------------
From:
> Kathleen,
>
> Kaiser is well set up for lawsuits. I was told they have the highest budget
> for legal matters of any HMO.
>
> We have tried to bring a class action or group action against Kaiser for
> Lyme disease. Kaiser has many large law firms tied up on retainer so they
> can't be hired by parties wanting to sue Kaiser. Some of the others have
> commented, after seeing documentation, that the case is worthy but it would
> involve the committment of financial resources beyond what would be prudent
> for firms of their size. Kaiser's financial clout is used to intimidate
> their members as well as law firms. Bringing a case to arbitration and
> judged by a Kaiser arbitrator can cost a Kaiser member $500,000. Kaiser's
> member base is primarily low and middle income. Members are not aware of the
> costs of arbitration and are led to believe it is a cost-efficient way to
> settle disputes. Kaiser's financial clout is also used to intimidate doctors
> who diagnose Lyme disease in Kaiser market areas.
>
> Kaiser probably owns the medical board in Oregon and probably has at least
> a major influence on the California board. They might also have a major
> influence with the insurance commissioners in both states. And most
> certainly their influence, especially regarding Lyme disease, extends to the
> health departments of both states. One example is the Sonoma County
> Department of Health web page in California. The health department has
> allowed Kaiser and the for-profit Permanente Medical Groups, exclusive
> employer of Kaiser doctors, to put their biased, misleading and incorrect
> information on their Lyme web page. It is the only non-government source
> listed. Despite complaints by Lyme advocates, Sonoma County has not taken
> down the Kaiser information. I have complained to California legislators but
> since I am not a resident, my complaints are likely ignored.
>
> Recently, Sonoma County, who does tests for babesia, expanded their
> diagnostic parameters so that few, if any, cases of babesia will be
> detected. Looks like Kaiser also doesn't like this disease diagnosed.
> Kaiser's involvement in this is a speculation on my part but not improbable.
>
> Kaiser's influence extends to Washington State through their affiliate,
> Group Health of Puget Sound.
>
> Kaiser is a major problem. They do not want Lyme disease diagnosed in their
> backyard. This is a systemic problem at Kaiser. One employee told me that
> because appropriate treatment for Lyme disease can be more expensive than
> that of an AIDS patient, Kaiser's solution is not to diagnose. A report was
> requested by and provided to a Congressional investigative committee
> regarding the manipulation of medical testing by Kaiser. Lyme disease was
> addressed in this report. It has been two years and nothing has been heard
> from this powerful committee.
>
>
>
> X
>
>
> Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 3:08 PM
> Subject: Re: [SpinLyme] Kaiser trivializes Lyme, discourages diagnosis and
> treatment....again
>
>
> >
> > You're simply going to have to bring a lawsuit against Kaiser and the CDC,
> and possibly the New York Department of Health.
> >
> > The CDC's Lyme test is no more than 25% accurate by Gary Wormser's own
> investigations re early Lyme, and 4% accurate by Klempner's investigations
> in late Lyme.
> >
> > CDC cannot claim their test is "accurate" or "valid" if it misses 75% or
> more of the cases, and we are talking about borreliosis, not just Lyme.
> Borreliosis is anything that doesn't have OspA, basically, so it is an
> imaginary entity- to go along with the imaginary knee disease, invented by
> Allen Steere.

0 new messages