The State Department is Flippin Out Over the 911-Murdoch Gang's Antics
Mort Zuckerman
scientifi...@ostp.gov, pkru...@princeton.edu,
Stanle...@fiu.edu, emcsw...@niaid.nih.gov, afa...@niaid.nih.gov,
Spin...@yahoogroups.com, kshe...@calea.org, fit...@gmail.com,
patrick.f...@usdoj.gov, model...@sbcglobal.net,
jdr...@nejm.org, let...@courant.com, Jgerb...@cdc.gov,
michae...@po.state.ct.us, con...@po.state.ct.us, executive-
edi...@nytimes.com, managin...@nytimes.com, news-
ti...@nytimes.com, biz...@nytimes.com, for...@nytimes.com,
nati...@nytimes.com, dv...@cdc.gov, brigidc...@optonline.net,
tr...@hotmail.com, illino...@aol.com, jle...@courant.com,
tinaj...@yahoo.com, jhorn...@fff.org, thomas...@usdoj.gov,
thoma...@po.state.ct.us, kur...@washpost.com,
georg...@washpost.com, p...@allegorypress.com,
commissi...@po.state.ct.us, brans...@comcast.net,
vts...@comcast.net, o...@po.state.ct.us, freet...@charter.net,
scott....@po.state.ct.us, govern...@po.state.ct.us,
attorney...@po.state.ct.us, randall...@usdoj.gov,
Robert....@yale.edu, edi...@greenwich-post.com,
harol...@yale.edu, sedm...@nswbc.org, rrmcg...@aol.com,
fr...@nytimes.com, dpr...@stmartin.edu
Cc: fra...@ucia.gov, dr-ahma...@president.ir,
eugener...@washpost.com, afa...@niaid.nih.gov,
bmi...@newstimes.com, tr...@hotmail.com, rast...@aol.com,
billc...@gmail.com, amcg...@rms-law.com, rjmu...@aol.com,
paulcrai...@yahoo.com, sidney_b...@yahoo.com,
criminal...@usdoj.gov, karla.d...@usdoj.gov,
christophe...@usdoj.gov, richar...@yale.edu,
harol...@yale.edu, james.p...@yale.edu, inq...@aldf.com,
ly...@idsociety.org, meganm...@theatlantic.com
Subject: The State Department is Flippin Out Over the 911-Murdoch
Gang's Antics
Date: Nov 23, 2009 9:53 AM
ARTICLE BELOW ABOUT HOW FURIOUS
911 MURDOCH IS ABOUT 911 EXPOSURE
==========================
Murdoch admitted to trying to spin the
Iraq war, because he is a part of that
Israeli 911 gang:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.diseases.lyme/browse_thread/thread/100739ea14a1c428?hl=en#
Murdoch and the Israeli 911 gang:
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_911_107.htm
How do I know that the State Department
is flipping over the fact that the
Israelis participated in the 911
event to Secure Their Realm?
Well, it's just insider stuff.
People from every country in the world and
every major university here in the USA and
Europe (and South America) come to my website.
AND, 70% of the Literate Earth know
what 911 was. *AND* Kroll Associates is
a member of the ALDF.com Lyme gang.
AND Mitre.org is part of the Israeli
Weapons' Theft Group...
"For Sale; The West's Deadliest Nuclear
Secrets"
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/middle_east/article3137695.ece
"Drug Money Out, 'Terrorists' In"
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.diseases.lyme/browse_thread/thread/f292d4237fe811ba?hl=en#
Same ^^^ group, same network of spies,
same goal of US Information Theft to
benefit Israel.
Murdoch belongs to it. The Banksters
belong to it. Zuckerman belongs to it.
The ALDF.com/Durland Eye-ball-In-The-
Sky belongs to it:
http://www.actionlyme.org/TICK_BITE_CONSPIRACY.htm
"I need more than rumors to attack."
Get it?
How are they going to get more than
rumors to attack?
How are they going to prevent others
from either exposing or being enticed
to play the same game?
Who even started the game?
The Jesuits:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adam_Weishaupt
Kathleen M. Dickson
http://www.actionlyme.org
===============================
http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/technology/2009/11/microsoft_and_murdoch_teaming.html
Microsoft and Murdoch: Teaming up to bash Google?
Rory Cellan-Jones | 11:24 UK time, Monday, 23 November 2009
There's a fascinating story in this morning's edition of the Financial
Times, which could signal a big shift in the balance of power between
parts of the web and other parts of the media. The piece says that
Microsoft has been in talks with the media giant News Corporation over
a plan which could see the firm behind papers from the Wall Street
Journal to the Sun being paid to stop Google searching its news
websites.
Rupert MurdochThe implication is that Microsoft's search engine Bing
would be the place to go for news - and that Google would have to
start paying if it wanted to retain that kind of content.
The FT's story comes a week or so after the Techcrunch UK blog
reported that Microsoft had held talks with European publishers about
what sounds like a similar plan to get them onside as part of a battle
to make Bing a more attractive and lucrative place than Google for
their content.
So is there any truth in either report? Well, a couple of days after
the Techcrunch post, I was due to interview a senior executive from
Bing, and Microsoft called to ask whether I would be asking about that
story. When I said yes I would, they said he could not talk about it -
and we therefore pulled out of the interview. Make of that what you
will.
All of this comes against the background of Rupert Murdoch's campaign
to start getting people to pay for the online content of his
newspapers, a move fleshed out last week in a speech by the editor of
the Times, James Harding.
But Mr Murdoch has also made it clear that Google - and indeed the BBC
- are two major obstacles to this campaign, because they are both
major ways to get free news. Meanwhile, Microsoft is anxious to do two
things - to give Bing a big push, and to get in on Google's profit
margins.
So it's understandable that News Corp and Microsoft might want to
unite against the idea that news content on the internet should be
free. But there are also plenty of reasons why Microsoft in particular
would want to keep these negotiations as quiet as possible.
After all, if internet users get it into their heads that Bing's
results are not as unbiased as Google's appear to be, because of an
alliance with news providers, then they may well be less keen to
switch to Microsoft's search engine.
Ah, but what if Bing were the only place to get quality news because
such content had been shut out of Google? Well, that would be an
interesting test of just how important news is to the mass of internet
users. For we professional journalists, that could be a worrying
moment - one where we find out the true market value of our content.
* Bookmark with:
* del.icio.us |
* Digg |
* Newsvine |
* NowPublic |
* Reddit
* - What's
"[Real] scientists are *fiercely* independent. That's the good
news."-- NIH's Top Fool, Anthony Fauci