Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

The 1/2 diet will work

2 views
Skip to first unread message

tr...@mychoice.com

unread,
Apr 16, 2007, 5:49:29 PM4/16/07
to
All this two pound diet weighing stuff is for the birds. Here is a
method that always works to lose weight, no million dollar prizes
required thank you and no scales to lug around, it uses the measures you
already use at meal time which are familiar and easy to use.. With two
pounds you are taking a chance that you will lose or gain weight because
it is not tied to your calories needs forheight and activity level.

Whatevr you now consume now in calories to maintain your current weight
status is too much if you are overweight as it is medically defined.

Start simply eating 1/2 of everything you do now. Instead of two eggs
for breakfast have one. Instead of two sandwiches for lunch have one.
Instead of two servings at dinner have one. You will in time lose
weight.

If you should reach a point where no additional weight is lost for a
reasonable time but your goal is not met, half food intake again. By
the time you do gain the weight of your goal you will have enough
experience with food amounts to know exactly how much to consume to
maintain it.

Exercise aids in the loss as it consumes calories and changes tissue
cells in a way that results in continued weight loss even after you have
stopped exercising for the day. It makes loss biologically more
effective in several ways.


Seek information to know what foods will give you the most nutritional
bang for those reduced amounts you consume.

johnniemccoy@

unread,
Apr 16, 2007, 9:27:04 PM4/16/07
to

<tr...@mychoice.com> wrote in message
news:4623ef69$0$5015$1c46...@selenium.club.cc.cmu.edu...
>
> .......simply eating 1/2 of everything you do now...... You will in time
> lose
> weight.
>
Why didn't I think of that!

John
(just kidding)


Mu

unread,
Apr 17, 2007, 4:19:00 AM4/17/07
to

Because it may not be true? Half of 9,000 true calories when you expend
only 2,000 = weight gain but don't tell the Original Poster Doofus.

Elocutus

unread,
Apr 17, 2007, 5:36:38 AM4/17/07
to
Mu <nocowi...@gmail.com> popped their head through the hatch and
pleaded:

Even if it weighs less than 2lbs?

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,
Apr 17, 2007, 6:14:02 AM4/17/07
to
convicted neighbor David Silverman (Elocutus) wrote:
> brother Mu wrote:
> > johnniemccoy wrote:

> >> satan via a sockpuppet (demon) wrote:
> >>>
> >>> .......simply eating 1/2 of everything you do now...... You will in time
> >>> lose
> >>> weight.
> >>>
> >> Why didn't I think of that!
> >>
> >> John
> >> (just kidding)
> >
> > Because it may not be true? Half of 9,000 true calories when you expend
> > only 2,000 = weight gain
>
> Even if it weighs less than 2lbs?

Over time 4500 calories will average out to be 4500 calories.

The amount of calories in 2 lbs will over time average out to be
exactly the amount of calories that was needed.

This will be by GOD and not by chance because there is no such thing
as chance (Proverbs 16:33).

Truth is simple.

Behold in wonder and amazement:

http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit/overweight.asp

There is even a million dollar guarantee:

http://TruthRUS.org/Guarantee

May GOD bless you in HIS mighty way.

Prayerfully in Jesus' awesome love,

Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
http://HeartMDPhD.com/Love/TheTruth

Mu

unread,
Apr 17, 2007, 9:33:50 AM4/17/07
to

It who?

tr...@mychoice.com

unread,
Apr 17, 2007, 9:54:24 AM4/17/07
to
"Because it may not be true? Half of 9,000 true calories when you expend
only 2,000 = weight gain but don't tell the Original Poster Doofus."

My 8th grade science tells me that current weight is maintained by about
10 calories intake per pound per day. So to get that about 900 pound
weight down to 450, one would half calorie intake to achieve that new
lower weight status. Once reached, one can half again etc. until one
achieves the weight level desired, by which time one will know by hands
on experience what amounts of food will maintain the new weight status.

No weighing food, no million dollar prizes no trash science, just 8th
grade arithmetic and science, and using the already familiar measures of
food one uses each day at each meal, and just half them..

Mu

unread,
Apr 17, 2007, 10:36:25 AM4/17/07
to
On 17 Apr 2007 13:54:24 GMT, tr...@mychoice.com wrote:

> "Because it may not be true? Half of 9,000 true calories when you expend
> only 2,000 = weight gain but don't tell the Original Poster Doofus."
>
> My 8th grade science tells me that current weight is maintained by about
> 10 calories intake per pound per day. So to get that about 900 pound
> weight down to 450, one would half calorie intake to achieve that new
> lower weight status. Once reached, one can half again etc. until one
> achieves the weight level desired, by which time one will know by hands
> on experience what amounts of food will maintain the new weight status.

Anyone follow this drivel?

> No weighing food, no million dollar prizes no trash science, just 8th
> grade arithmetic and science, and using the already familiar measures of
> food one uses each day at each meal, and just half them..

Did you bring your bomb calorimeter with you?

tr...@mechoice.com

unread,
Apr 17, 2007, 10:42:03 AM4/17/07
to
"Over time 4500 calories will average out to be 4500 calories.

The amount of calories in 2 lbs will over time average out to be
exactly the amount of calories that was needed."

Correct, the two pound diet is trash science, thank you for restating
one reason why.

Truth is simple.

God bless.

tr...@mychoice.com

unread,
Apr 17, 2007, 10:57:57 AM4/17/07
to
> My 8th grade science tells me that current weight is maintained by
about
> 10 calories intake per pound per day. So to get that about 900 pound
> weight down to 450, one would half calorie intake to achieve that new
> lower weight status. Once reached, one can half again etc. until one
> achieves the weight level desired, by which time one will know by
hands
> on experience what amounts of food will maintain the new weight
status.

"Anyone follow this drivel?"

Only those with at least an 8th grade grasp of science, please don't
request any lower grade level explanation.

> No weighing food, no million dollar prizes no trash science, just 8th
> grade arithmetic and science, and using the already familiar measures
of
> food one uses each day at each meal, and just half them..

"Did you bring your bomb calorimeter with you?"

No need, the 1/2 diet says just half ones usual daily portions for each
meal. Instead of two eggs have one, instead of two sandwiches have one
and instead of two servings of meat and potatoes have one. With two
fingers and a 1st grade level grasp of number theor and set theory one
can do it.

Cubit

unread,
Apr 17, 2007, 12:29:45 PM4/17/07
to
Every diet has failed to capture acceptance as the one true correct diet.
In this context, the insane 2 pound diet may not be as bad as it looks.

The body has its own regulatory system for calories and diet. I think what
we can learn from the 2 pound diet is that even if you do everything wrong,
some people will still maintain normal weight and health.


"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <lov...@thetruth.com> wrote in message
news:1176804842.6...@p77g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...

tr...@squad.com

unread,
Apr 17, 2007, 2:25:27 PM4/17/07
to
"Every diet has failed to capture acceptance as the one true correct
diet.
In this context, the insane 2 pound diet may not be as bad as it looks.

The body has its own regulatory system for calories and diet. I think
what
we can learn from the 2 pound diet is that even if you do everything
wrong,
some people will still maintain normal weight and health."

Correct within limits, and it can by accident be done at 1.5 and 3
pounds of food intake also. If the pounds chosen also happens to match
the foods chosen and both match height and activity level needs then it
will work to maintain weight status. For some fraction of the
population the 2 pounds and foods chosen will happen to match the energy
and activity needs of those in that fraction.

Epinephrine

unread,
Apr 17, 2007, 9:32:25 PM4/17/07
to

<tr...@mychoice.com> wrote in message
news:4624e075$0$5014$1c46...@selenium.club.cc.cmu.edu...

>> My 8th grade science tells me that current weight is maintained by
> about
>> 10 calories intake per pound per day. So to get that about 900 pound
>> weight down to 450, one would half calorie intake to achieve that new
>> lower weight status. Once reached, one can half again etc. until one
>> achieves the weight level desired, by which time one will know by
> hands
>> on experience what amounts of food will maintain the new weight
> status.
>
> "Anyone follow this drivel?"

Talking to yourself, again?

> Only those with at least an 8th grade grasp of science, please don't
> request any lower grade level explanation.
>
>> No weighing food, no million dollar prizes no trash science, just 8th
>> grade arithmetic and science, and using the already familiar measures
> of
>> food one uses each day at each meal, and just half them..
>
> "Did you bring your bomb calorimeter with you?"

Only common sense. Did you bring your scales?

> No need, the 1/2 diet says just half ones usual daily portions for each
> meal. Instead of two eggs have one, instead of two sandwiches have one
> and instead of two servings of meat and potatoes have one. With two
> fingers and a 1st grade level grasp of number theor and set theory one
> can do it.

This makes sense, has a scientific basis, and practical to follow. More
importantly, no scales - and no looking like a 'Mu'ppet.


Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,
Apr 17, 2007, 10:52:00 PM4/17/07
to
Cubit wrote:
> Every diet has failed to capture acceptance as the one true correct diet.

The 2PD-OMER Approach is not a diet.

If it were, combining it with a regular diet would not be possible.

Truth is simple.

May GOD bless you.

MaryL

unread,
Apr 18, 2007, 1:00:23 AM4/18/07
to

<tr...@mychoice.com> wrote in message
news:4623ef69$0$5015$1c46...@selenium.club.cc.cmu.edu...

It really depends on *what* you eat as well as *how much* you consume.
Porton control was never a problem for me -- I never did eat overly large
portions. However, I ate *all the wrong foods* prior to diagnosis. I lost
a lot of weight once I changed the type of foods I eat, and I actually eat
larger portions (emphasis on foods such as fresh fruit and veggies now
contrasted with lots of "sweets" previously).

MaryL


Mu

unread,
Apr 18, 2007, 3:30:03 AM4/18/07
to
On Tue, 17 Apr 2007 16:29:45 GMT, Cubit wrote:

> Every diet has failed to capture acceptance as the one true correct diet.
> In this context, the insane 2 pound diet may not be as bad as it looks.
>
> The body has its own regulatory system for calories and diet. I think what
> we can learn from the 2 pound diet is that even if you do everything wrong,
> some people will still maintain normal weight and health.

It's not about regulation as much imo as if the body magically somehow
compensates (two lbs of chocolate today, two pounds of water tomorrow =
no weight gain), it's about reduced consumption over a realistic period
of time.

One of the ingrained misconceptions that comes from nearly every diet
that has been commercailly sold is this mentality that the sum of the
parts do not equal the Ho', er, whole (Imus, to the back of the room!).
So we see the criticisms of the 2PD-AOOCS lasering in on daily intakes.

Well, truthfully Cubit, this is mainly from moronic Chung obssessors on
eternal spring break.

The 2PD-AOOCS is sosimple nd true and, remember, it is typically invoked
by obese people who are eating well over tha mark and, like Mu, didn't
even realize it.


Mu

unread,
Apr 18, 2007, 3:41:10 AM4/18/07
to
On Tue, 17 Apr 2007 16:29:45 GMT, Cubit wrote:

> Every diet has failed to capture acceptance as the one true correct diet.

Yes, Chung and I disagree on the term "diet" but the disagreement is
semantical, he's a stickler for terminolgy, I'm more colloquial. And
much cuter, waaay cuter lol

The 2PD-AOOCS works and it works nearly universally, there is absolutely
no doubt about it (unless there is a fine minority of diseased,
physically stunted or retarded, etc where physiological parameters
change) and I have no expertise to discuss those individuals.

Mu

unread,
Apr 18, 2007, 3:47:45 AM4/18/07
to
On Tue, 17 Apr 2007 16:29:45 GMT, Cubit wrote:

> Every diet has failed to capture acceptance as the one true correct diet.

What I find fascinating, and it is the secondary reason I return from
time to Mu-time, is the resistance to such a basic concept.

I have often thought about the times Chung and I have discussed this,
well why not the 1PD or .5PD? Surely this will show 100% weight loss
results!!

Seriously, that 2 number (averaged) in pounds of consumption, it appears
to be useable by most everyone.

flyingrat

unread,
Apr 18, 2007, 5:33:36 AM4/18/07
to
In article <1176864720.7...@n76g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>,
lov...@thetruth.com says...
> Truth is simple.
>
indeed it is. here is some.

Andrew Chung:

Is a frequent and proven liar (evidence archived forever on Google)

Has lost numerous NNTP accounts with supernews and others, has had many
Google accounts nuked, and his vanity domain heartmdphd.com is now
banned from setting up accounts. He is instead using multiple Google
sock accounts and email addresses in the format love#@thetruth.com (#
being a number)

Is unemployed after being sacked with cause from his one and only job
after just over 80 days

Fled the state of Florida, and now claims to practice in Georgia despite
having no admission priveliges in the State's hospitals

Runs a phony foundation with a total declared income of circa $200, the
ownership and contact details of which are obfuscated on its website

Makes failed prophecies concerning earthquakes with areas and dates,
which don't happen (remember the bible quotes about false prophets)

Performed a public attempt at 'exorcising' a Malaysian sock on usenet,
then denied doing it. He has recently reversed position again and admits
to practicing exorcism by usenet, proving himself a liar in the process.

Promotes a dangerous diet, with a million dollar guarantee that he
demands thirty dollars to access details of. This despite being
unemployed. His soliciting and spamming for donations looks to be
similar to the Nigerian Advance Fee Fraud, where victims pay money
upfront in the hope of coming into riches but find they have merely
bought into a lie. Part of his advice is to pour nail polish remover
onto food.

Declares he has a cardiology practice despite posting night and day from
the same IP address (his home presumably) or a coffee shop internet cafe

Makes further false prophecies that we should now be all dying in a bird
flu pandemic. When these fail to happen, he does them all over again and
changes the dates. Nuclear war is another Chung spciality, which
naturally doesn't happen when he says it is going to.

Worships evil hatemonger Fred Phelps and will not denounce the acts of
Westboro's congregation. He even accuses someone with the name Phelps of
being Fred's son and refuses to accept he is completely wrong.

Uses the same patter as Pat Robertson, indicating his religious activity
is confined to watching cable TV. No evidence Chung has ever attended a
church.

Has a tendency to cyberstalk, particularly women. His wife fled some
time ago to another state, an act which Chung tries to pass off as
"being
on vacation".

Frequently passes himself off as being qualified in areas such as
endocrinology, despite making incredibly fundamental blunders in his
'advice'. It is no wonder the Florida heart facility terminated him, and
has publicly denounced his version of events. Again archived on Google.

Don't forget the fake fast, where he didn't lose any weight, as well as
the infamous 666 stamping fiasco. His latest vile trick is spamming the
blogs of dying cancer patients and then crowing triumphantly when they
pass away.

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,
Apr 18, 2007, 7:11:40 AM4/18/07
to
convicted neighbor FR wrote:
> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>
> > Truth is simple.
>
> indeed it is. here is some.
>
> Andrew Chung:

http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts/FR

Indeed.

Laus Deo ! ! !

Many thanks, much praise, and all the glory to GOD for HIS compelling
you to unwittingly provide this opportunity for the light of the
truth, Who is LORD Jesus Christ, to shine even more brightly.

May GOD bless you in HIS mighty way making you hungrier than you have
ever been in your life.

Prayerfully in Jesus' awesome love,

Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
http://HeartMDPhD.com/Love/TheTruth

> Is a frequent and proven liar (evidence archived forever on Google)

tr...@squad.com

unread,
Apr 18, 2007, 10:25:31 AM4/18/07
to
What I find fascinating, and it is the secondary reason I return from
time to Mu-time, is the resistance to such a basic concept.

"I have often thought about the times Chung and I have discussed this,
well why not the 1PD or .5PD? Surely this will show 100% weight loss
results!!

Seriously, that 2 number (averaged) in pounds of consumption, it appears
to be useable by most everyone."

The resistance occurs because the two pound diet is trash science.

Please provide the core scientific principles on which its truth claims
are made.

Then provide the confirmation in research of the truth claims as would
be found in a scientific journal.

Picking any reasonable weight of foods by accident will for some narrow
segment of the total population cause either weight loss or gain or
current weight maintenance.

It is all a function of how tall one is and how physicall active one is.

I mention the above basic truth claims as examples of what is required
of the two pound diet supporters. Given the extraordinary claims made
of the two pound diet research confirmation is required, unlike the
above basic items which are extraordinarly documented in research.

tr...@squad.com

unread,
Apr 18, 2007, 10:28:20 AM4/18/07
to
"The 2PD-AOOCS works and it works nearly universally, there is
absolutely no doubt about it (unless there is a fine minority of
diseased, physically stunted or retarded, etc where physiological
parameters change) and I have no expertise to discuss those
individuals."

If you please, such extraordinary claims requires equally extraordinary
confirmation in research. Would you please provide?

God bless.

Cubit

unread,
Apr 18, 2007, 11:38:42 AM4/18/07
to
Wow, Flying Rat. If even part of what you allege is true, this MD is a
serious dangerous nutcase. I had assumed he was a harmless nutcase.

I deleted your comments from my reply, because the potential for false
accusations seemed very high. This is, after all, USENET.

You make him sound like someone showing some of the danger signs that Korean
student made.


<Flying Rat>; "board-certified Earthquack trainer" <m...@privacy.net> wrote in
message news:MPG.208ff64b3...@news.readfreenews.net...

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,
Apr 18, 2007, 12:17:41 PM4/18/07
to
Cubit wrote:
> Wow, Flying Rat. If even part of what you allege is true, this MD is a
> serious dangerous nutcase.

Thankfully, none of it is true:

http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts/FR

Truth is simple.

May GOD bless you in HIS mighty way.

Prayerfully in Jesus' awesome love,

Cary Kittrell

unread,
Apr 18, 2007, 12:42:26 PM4/18/07
to
In article <1176913061.5...@b58g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <ach...@emorycardiology.com> writes:
> Cubit wrote:

> > Wow, Flying Rat. If even part of what you allege is true, this MD is a
> > serious dangerous nutcase.

>
> Thankfully, none of it is true:
>
> http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts/FR

Yeah, now THERE's a display which should convince
him you're not a "nutcase".


-- cary

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,
Apr 18, 2007, 1:47:00 PM4/18/07
to
convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote:
> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> > Cubit wrote:
>
> > > Wow, Flying Rat. If even part of what you allege is true, this MD is a
> > > serious dangerous nutcase.
> >
> > Thankfully, none of it is true:
> >
> > http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts/FR
>
> Yeah, now THERE's a display which should convince
> him you're not a "nutcase".

That should be obvious to the most casual observer.

Truth is simple.

The same can not be written about the obsessive-compulsive behavior of
dear neighbor FR:

http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit/Diabetes

flyingrat

unread,
Apr 18, 2007, 2:09:38 PM4/18/07
to
In article <1176918420.8...@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>,
ach...@emorycardiology.com says...
> Truth is simple.
>

--

flyingrat

unread,
Apr 18, 2007, 2:14:53 PM4/18/07
to
In article <6YqVh.4529$2v1...@newssvr14.news.prodigy.net>, n...@not.not
says...

> Wow, Flying Rat. If even part of what you allege is true, this MD is a
> serious dangerous nutcase. I had assumed he was a harmless nutcase.
>
> I deleted your comments from my reply, because the potential for false
> accusations seemed very high. This is, after all, USENET.
>
> You make him sound like someone showing some of the danger signs that Korean
> student made.
>
every word of it is verifiable, as well as the address of his
"practice" showing up as a derelict lot on Google earth.

Chung's lies and evasions are many, all archived on Google. He will not
answer the question about his hospital priveliges, because he CAN'T.
Proof of him lying about it was posted the other day.

Chung is a florid paranoid schizophrenc, with Aspergers Syndrome thrown
in (his inability to do teamwork and considering himself to be
superior), which got him sacked from the Ocala facility after 88 days.
You can easily 'discern' the changes in his personality from his posts
at different times of the day.

Avoid him and anything he says. He is completely obsessional and is now
stalking me and Cary plus others for showing him up as being a total
phony and fake Christian.

FR
--
Earthquack reminds me of a drowning man, alone at sea. Clutching at
pieces of driftwood and declaring that they are "Proof of Boat"

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,
Apr 18, 2007, 2:22:18 PM4/18/07
to
convicted neighbor FR wrote:
> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>
> > Truth is simple.
>
> Andrew Chung:

http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts/FR

Suggested reading:

http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit/Diabetes

May GOD bless you in HIS mighty way making you hungrier than you have


ever been in your life.

Prayerfully in Jesus' awesome love,

Daedalus

unread,
Apr 18, 2007, 2:43:38 PM4/18/07
to
On 18 Apr 2007 10:47:00 -0700, "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"
<ach...@emorycardiology.com> wrote:

I cooked Jesus in a madeira wine reduction and ate him with a
vegetable medley.

slspslspsspslspsospslsp!!!!

Jade

>Andrew <><

Cary Kittrell

unread,
Apr 18, 2007, 2:30:32 PM4/18/07
to

Andrew is stalking me? Well, that WOULD explain the odd
rustling in the cholla.

But no, actually I don't think he is.


-- cary

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,
Apr 18, 2007, 3:51:55 PM4/18/07
to
satan via a sockpuppet (demon) wrote:
> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> >convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote:
> >> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> >> > Cubit wrote:
> >>
> >> > > Wow, Flying Rat. If even part of what you allege is true, this MD is a
> >> > > serious dangerous nutcase.
> >> >
> >> > Thankfully, none of it is true:
> >> >
> >> > http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts/FR
> >>
> >> Yeah, now THERE's a display which should convince
> >> him you're not a "nutcase".
> >
> >That should be obvious to the most casual observer.
> >
> >Truth is simple.
> >
> >The same can not be written about the obsessive-compulsive behavior of
> >dear neighbor FR:
> >
> >http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit/Diabetes
>
> I cooked Jesus in a madeira wine reduction and ate him with a
> vegetable medley.
>
> slspslspsspslspsospslsp!!!!

For this thread, the flesh you would be eating would be Bob Pastorio's
since he is the one who has recently died.

May GOD annihilate you soon.

Prayerfully in Jesus' awesome name,

Archie Leach

unread,
Apr 18, 2007, 5:22:34 PM4/18/07
to

ALL HALE DADEALUS, FOR SHE HACE BEEN D3M0NIZ3D BY THE
CHUNGINATOR!!!1!!

Phineas T Puddleduck

unread,
Apr 18, 2007, 5:24:47 PM4/18/07
to
In article <gv2d23hinv211pqut...@4ax.com>,
Archie Leach <archie@s.s> wrote:

ALL HALE DADEALUS, FOR SHE HACE BEEN DOUBLEE D3M0NIZ3D BY THE
CHUNGINATOR!!!2!!

--
Sacred keeper of the Hollow Sphere, and the space within. Coffee boy to the
rich and famous. Proud owner of the Mop Jockey.

COOSN-174-07-82116: alt.astronomy's favourite poster (from a survey taken
of the saucerhead high command).

Art Deco

unread,
Apr 18, 2007, 5:43:18 PM4/18/07
to
False prophet Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD <lov...@thetruth.com> with yet
another email address spewed:

Another fine example of Andy Chung's "christian" witness.

--
Supreme Leader of the Brainwashed Followers of Art Deco

"Still suffering from reading comprehension problems, Deco?
The section is clearly attributed to Art Deco, not to you, Deco."
-- Dr. David Tholen

"Who is "David Tholen", Daedalus? Still suffering from
attribution problems?"
-- Dr. David Tholen

Mu

unread,
Apr 19, 2007, 2:45:31 AM4/19/07
to
On Wed, 18 Apr 2007 15:38:42 GMT, Cubit wrote:

> Wow, Flying Rat. If even part of what you allege is true, this MD is a
> serious dangerous nutcase. I had assumed he was a harmless nutcase.

This is a hard one for you, Cubit. Who do we believe? The morphing, God
Knows Who, 100 posts per day Chung Obsessed Troll, or a known,
identifiable, call-him-on-the-phone cardiologist.

Nmmm, think that through and get back to Mu.

Mu

unread,
Apr 19, 2007, 2:47:26 AM4/19/07
to

Sure

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,
Apr 19, 2007, 9:17:25 AM4/19/07
to
Paul L wrote:
>
> What possible constructive purpose is served by you
> crossposting these unrelated and unwanted personal
> battles on the diabetic support newsgroup ?
>
> Serious question.

May the following help you understand the reason:

http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit/Diabetes

tr...@squad.com

unread,
Apr 19, 2007, 11:17:26 AM4/19/07
to
> "The 2PD-AOOCS works and it works nearly universally, there is
> absolutely no doubt about it (unless there is a fine minority of
> diseased, physically stunted or retarded, etc where physiological
> parameters change) and I have no expertise to discuss those
> individuals."
>
> If you please, such extraordinary claims requires equally
extraordinary
> confirmation in research. Would you please provide?
>
> God bless.

"Sure"

Happy to recieve same.

God bless.

Mu

unread,
Apr 19, 2007, 1:37:18 PM4/19/07
to

"Sure"

Happy to recieve same.

God bless.
--
After four months and being an American in Taipei I never want to hear
“Oh your koala very cute” ever again. If there is an off chance that if
I do encounter a koala, I may have to punch it in the face as a result.
Even a pretty koala looks ugly with a broken nose.

tr...@squad.com

unread,
Apr 19, 2007, 1:59:30 PM4/19/07
to

I accept your concession to the truth by the non-response, the two pound
diet is trash science and does not cure diabetes. With no research by
which to support extraordinary claims one must in the end produce
extraordinary irrelevant responses as a best effort. Or many choose
instead to attack the messenger, who was it who said that "personal
attack is the last refuge of the scoundrel"?

God bless.

Mu

unread,
Apr 19, 2007, 2:22:52 PM4/19/07
to
On 19 Apr 2007 17:59:30 GMT, tr...@squad.com wrote:

>>>> "The 2PD-AOOCS works and it works nearly universally, there is
>>>> absolutely no doubt about it (unless there is a fine minority of
>>>> diseased, physically stunted or retarded, etc where physiological
>>>> parameters change) and I have no expertise to discuss those
>>>> individuals."
>>>>
>>>> If you please, such extraordinary claims requires equally
>>> extraordinary
>>>> confirmation in research. Would you please provide?
>>>>
>>>> God bless.
>>>
>>> "Sure"
>>>
>>> Happy to recieve same.
>>>
>>> God bless.
>>
>>"Sure"
>>
>>Happy to recieve same.
>>
>>God bless.
>>--
>>After four months and being an American in Taipei I never want to hear
>>´Oh your koala very cute¡ ever again. If there is an off chance that if
>>I do encounter a koala, I may have to punch it in the face as a result.
>>Even a pretty koala looks ugly with a broken nose.
>
> I accept your concession to the truth by the non-response,

lol

I accept your inability to post like an adult as fact that you like to
eat cheese under your bed when it rains.

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,
Apr 19, 2007, 4:14:23 PM4/19/07
to
neighbor Paul L wrote:
> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> > neighbor Paul L wrote:
> >
> > > What possible constructive purpose is served by you
> > > crossposting these unrelated and unwanted personal
> > > battles on the diabetic support newsgroup ?
> >
> > > Serious question.
> >
> > May the following help you understand the reason:
> >
> > http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit/Diabetes
>
> That link doesn't explain why you spread your
> personal flamewar into the diabetic newsgroup.

The link does inform you about a few things that are relevant to ASD:

(1) Diabetes is from LORD Almighty GOD.

(2) There are those among you who know this and are angry at GOD and
HIS brethren for their affliction.

(3) Dear diabetic neighbor FR is a particularly outspoken example of
(2).

(4) Until a diabetic repents and seeks GOD's forgiveness, s/he will
not be healed of his/her diabetes:

http://www.interviewwithgod.com/forgiven/

May you wisely choose to be forgiven by GOD simply by publicly
declaring with your mouth that "Jesus is LORD:"

http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit/TheWay

truth@squad..com

unread,
Apr 19, 2007, 4:35:59 PM4/19/07
to

Phineas T Puddleduck

unread,
Apr 19, 2007, 5:01:16 PM4/19/07
to
In article <1177013662.9...@p77g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>,

"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <lo...@thetruth.com> wrote:

> (4) Until a diabetic repents and seeks GOD's forgiveness, s/he will
> not be healed of his/her diabetes:
>
> http://www.interviewwithgod.com/forgiven/


So how do you explain that there are non-christians in hospitals who recover
from illnesses, idiot?

Mu

unread,
Apr 19, 2007, 7:45:00 PM4/19/07
to

Sure.

tr...@squad.com

unread,
Apr 19, 2007, 8:50:07 PM4/19/07
to

Ni hao ma?

Ah, smile, not only is there a failure to be able to respond for lack of
such requested support; there is an obvious failure of imagination as
well. These two pounds of contrition will serve nonetheless.

I accept your consession to be unable to respond, unless in Taipei such
8th grade doggerel is somehow a preload, a lull of silence before a real
response, we shall see.

At present the state of the art knowledge finds the two pound diet trash
science, as before, and it does not cure diabetes, as always.

God bless.

Tzi chin.

Mu

unread,
Apr 20, 2007, 1:45:10 AM4/20/07
to

flyingrat

unread,
Apr 20, 2007, 5:38:32 AM4/20/07
to
In article <f05o48$j89$1...@onion.ccit.arizona.edu>,
ca...@afone.as.arizona.edu says...
depends on how you define it, cyberstalking is probably better.

Shit lists, death wishes, websites devoted to our grisly deaths. The
whole nine yards. It is how Chunk behaves when he's cornered and
wriggling, just like a terrified rat in front of a couple of pursuing
cats.

He's got some fresh graves to dance on as well, should keep him occupied
if he can panhandle the bus fare to join Fred Phelps at the funeral
desecrations

FR

Daedalus

unread,
Apr 20, 2007, 8:45:36 AM4/20/07
to
On 18 Apr 2007 12:51:55 -0700, "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"
<lov...@thetruth.com> wrote:

I'm still here, false Christian fraud.

Your God is powerless to strike me down. Every day I live proves it as
such.

Jade - I ate your Jesus. He was delicious!

Daedalus

unread,
Apr 20, 2007, 8:46:30 AM4/20/07
to

BWAHAHAHAHA!!!!!! VROOOOOOOOOOOOOOOM!!!!!!

Jade

Archie Leach

unread,
Apr 20, 2007, 9:15:09 AM4/20/07
to
Daedalus <ja...@netk0o0oks.org> wrote:

"You are now officially posessed by the Demon who posessed Cho
Seung-Hui."--you know who (er ist ein Doppeldoktor!)


keys...@mark.com

unread,
Apr 20, 2007, 11:29:42 AM4/20/07
to

>>>>>>>> "The 2PD-AOOCS works and it works nearly universally, there is
>>>>>>>> absolutely no doubt about it (unless there is a fine minority of
>>>>>>>> diseased, physically stunted or retarded, etc where physiological
>>>>>>>> parameters change) and I have no expertise to discuss those
>>>>>>>> individuals."
>>>>
>>>> If you please, such extraordinary claims requires equally extraordinary
>>>> confirmation in research. Would you please provide?
>>>>
>>>> God bless.
>>>
>>>Sure.
>>>--
>>>After four months and being an American in Taipei I never want to hear
>>>“Oh your koala very cute” ever again. If there is an off chance that if

>>>I do encounter a koala, I may have to punch it in the face as a result.
>>>Even a pretty koala looks ugly with a broken nose.
>>
>> Ni hao ma?
>>
>> Ah, smile, not only is there a failure to be able to respond for lack of
>> such requested support; there is an obvious failure of imagination as
>> well. These two pounds of contrition will serve nonetheless.
>>
>> I accept your consession to be unable to respond, unless in Taipei such
>> 8th grade doggerel is somehow a preload, a lull of silence before a real
>> response, we shall see.
>>
>> At present the state of the art knowledge finds the two pound diet trash
>> science, as before, and it does not cure diabetes, as always.
>>
>> God bless.
>>
>> Tzi chin.
>
>If you please, such extraordinary claims requires equally extraordinary
>confirmation in research. Would you please provide?
>
>God bless.
>--
>After four months and being an American in Taipei I never want to hear
>āOh your koala very cuteā ever again. If there is an off chance that if

>I do encounter a koala, I may have to punch it in the face as a result.
>Even a pretty koala looks ugly with a broken nose.

well. These two, now three, pounds of contrition will serve
nonetheless.

God bless.

Art Deco

unread,
Apr 20, 2007, 11:50:06 AM4/20/07
to
Daedalus <ja...@netk0o0oks.org> wrote:

I find it very difficult to believe, even after seeing it in B&W, but
Andy Chung the fake christian just keeps getting slimier and slimier.

Daedalus

unread,
Apr 20, 2007, 12:09:38 PM4/20/07
to
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 09:50:06 -0600, Art Deco <er...@caballista.org>
wrote:

He'll find it more and more difficult to deny how wrong he is about
everything. He'll continue to betray himself in order to deny it.

The final fraudulent meltdown has begun. Soon he'll be another Ray
Kazoo farting out angry screeds about how he's a Christ and everyone
else is Satan.

Jade

Art Deco

unread,
Apr 20, 2007, 12:22:38 PM4/20/07
to
Mu <nocowi...@gmail.com> wrote:

Wrong. They are your (and fraud Andy's) claims, it is therefore up to
you to show the efficacy and illness cures of the 2-lb fraud diet.
>
>God bless.

Yeah right, just like Chung "blesses" people with his death wishes and
hate.

Art Deco

unread,
Apr 20, 2007, 12:36:15 PM4/20/07
to
Daedalus <ja...@netk0o0oks.org> wrote:

As the demons close in from all sides, there brave Andy will be
hammering away on his keyboard.

Cary Kittrell

unread,
Apr 20, 2007, 12:53:47 PM4/20/07
to
Daedalus <ja...@netk0o0oks.org>

Um, Daedalus? Maybe you should be nice to Andrew: if Andy's right
about his GOD, then maybe he can arrange to have your poor dead Ike
brought back to you.


Hey, it's worth a try.


-- cary

Daedalus

unread,
Apr 20, 2007, 1:13:01 PM4/20/07
to

You think the incident with the wings was an accident?

*evil laughter*

Jade

Cary Kittrell

unread,
Apr 20, 2007, 1:25:39 PM4/20/07
to
In article <h3th23l74ukhjb0d2...@4ax.com> Daedalus <ja...@netk0o0oks.org> writes:
> com> <2kpc235kmnbp3snpj...@4ax.com> <1176925915.1...@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com> <dbdh23lf3sdcvgned...@4ax.com> <f0ar6r$932$1...@onion.ccit.arizona.edu>
> X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 3.3/32.846
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Lines: 61
> Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 13:13:01 -0400
> NNTP-Posting-Host: 69.115.163.209
> X-Complaints-To: ab...@cv.net
> X-Trace: newsfe12.lga 1177089163 69.115.163.209 (Fri, 20 Apr 2007 10:12:43 MST)
> NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 10:12:43 MST
> Organization: Optimum Online
> Xref: news.arizona.edu alt.atheism:1373142 sci.med.cardiology:84175 rec.food.cooking:373177 alt.usenet.kooks:633064


Whoa! ......geez, that's cold....


Kid took the chariot without asking you one time too many, or what?


-- cary

flyingrat

unread,
Apr 19, 2007, 4:48:44 PM4/19/07
to
In article <1177013662.9...@p77g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>,
lo...@thetruth.com says...

> (1) Diabetes is from LORD Almighty GOD.
>
> (2) There are those among you who know this and are angry at GOD and
> HIS brethren for their affliction.
>
> (3) Dear diabetic neighbor FR is a particularly outspoken example of
> (2).
>
> (4) Until a diabetic repents and seeks GOD's forgiveness, s/he will
> not be healed of his/her diabetes:
>
I'm so glad that you confirm just how much contempt you hold diabetics
in. Every post you hiss and spit out about me and others who won't bow
down and kiss your bony ass confirms this.

However...I thought you said that your Two Pound Diet and losing
visceral adipose tissue "cures" diabetes? It's all archived on Google...

Or were you just lying again?

Keep hissing and spitting Chung. You dig the hole ever deeper. I'm
afraid that your little tirades aren't going to get you any patients in
the diabetes groups, you'll just have to stay on welfare and keep
cashing the checks

FR

Barry

unread,
Apr 26, 2007, 7:32:13 AM4/26/07
to
You're so wrong Andrew.

It's the goodness of God that draws men to him, not hurt and pain etc.

What a destructive message you have there boy.

--

You don't have to answer this Andrew, and.. correct me if I'm wrong,
but you sit and dote about homosexual sex acts.

You don't have to raise your hand, we already know this to be a truth.

I know this to be true because of Romans CHAPTER 1:24

You're probably going to land in prison due to your faulty medical
advices.


Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,
Apr 26, 2007, 12:27:23 PM4/26/07
to
convicted neighbor Barry wrote:
>
> You're so wrong Andrew.

Correct.

The brethren of LORD Jesus Christ are neither perfect nor more
right...

... we are simply forgiven:

http://www.interviewwithgod.com/forgiven/

May GOD bless you.

Prayerfully in Jesus' awesome love,

Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

http://EmoryCardiology.com

"Unlike the 2PD-OMER Approach, weight loss diets can't be combined
with well-balanced diets."
http://HeartMDPhD.com/Love/TheTruth

Art Deco

unread,
Apr 26, 2007, 12:52:24 PM4/26/07
to
False prophet Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD <lov...@thetruth.com> with yet
another email address spewed with his usual hate:

>convicted neighbor Barry wrote:
>>
>> You're so wrong Andrew.
>
>Correct.
>
>The brethren of LORD Jesus Christ are neither perfect nor more
>right...
>
>... we are simply forgiven:

Yet you also claim that you don't sin, ever. Which is it, fraud?

[chung spew targets flushed]

Cary Kittrell

unread,
Apr 26, 2007, 1:08:50 PM4/26/07
to
In article <1177604843....@c18g2000prb.googlegroups.com> "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <lov...@thetruth.com> writes:
> convicted neighbor Barry wrote:
> >
> > You're so wrong Andrew.
>
> Correct.
>
> The brethren of LORD Jesus Christ are neither perfect nor more
> right...

And therefore no more worthy of being listened to.


-- cary

John "C"

unread,
Apr 26, 2007, 8:25:05 PM4/26/07
to

"Art Deco" <er...@caballista.org> wrote in message
news:260420071052248450%er...@caballista.org...

> False prophet Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD <lov...@thetruth.com> with yet
> another email address spewed with his usual hate:
>
> >convicted neighbor Barry wrote:
> >>
> >> You're so wrong Andrew.
> >
> >Correct.
> >
> >The brethren of LORD Jesus Christ are neither perfect nor more
> >right...
> >
> >... we are simply forgiven:
>
> Yet you also claim that you don't sin, ever.

Dr. Chung,

Please overlook my stepson Art, he's full of the devil as I ever saw anyone.
Pray for Art to overcome this demon inside him so he won't burn in hell for
eternity.

I pray for your ministry,
John C.


Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,
Apr 26, 2007, 9:50:48 PM4/26/07
to
convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote:
> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> > convicted neighbor Barry wrote:
> > >
> > > You're so wrong Andrew.
> >
> > Correct.
> >
> > The brethren of LORD Jesus Christ are neither perfect nor more
> > right...
>
> > ... we are simply forgiven:
> >
> > http://www.interviewwithgod.com/forgiven/
>
> And therefore no more worthy of being listened to.

Correct. Only HE is perfect:

"I am the way, the truth, and the life..." -- LORD Jesus Christ.

Amen.

Marana tha

Art Deco

unread,
Apr 26, 2007, 11:24:35 PM4/26/07
to
False prophet Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD <lo...@thetruth.com> with yet
another email address spewed his usual hate:

>Correct. Only HE is perfect:

Which is a blatant contradiction to your claim that you never sin, ever.

[chung spew targets snecked]

Michael Gray

unread,
Apr 27, 2007, 7:14:28 AM4/27/07
to
On 26 Apr 2007 04:32:13 -0700, Barry <brry...@yahoo.com> wrote:
- Refer: <1177587133....@t38g2000prd.googlegroups.com>

>You're so wrong Andrew.
>
>It's the goodness of God that draws men to him, not hurt and pain etc.

Which "god"?
Minerva?
Thor?
Qetzlcoatl?

They are ALL imaginary, you know.

>What a destructive message you have there boy.

As do you, with your infantile fantasy world.

--

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,
Apr 28, 2007, 9:26:59 AM4/28/07
to
brother John C wrote:

> satam via a sockpuppet (demon) wrote:
> > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> > >convicted neighbor Barry wrote:
> > >>
> > >> You're so wrong Andrew.
> > >
> > >Correct.
> > >
> > >The brethren of LORD Jesus Christ are neither perfect nor more
> > >right...
> > >
> > >... we are simply forgiven:
> >
> > Yet you also claim that you don't sin, ever.

It remains my choice to continue to refrain from sinning since my LORD
has made me able to do so.

> Dr. Chung,
>
> Please overlook my stepson Art, he's full of the devil as I ever saw anyone.
> Pray for Art to overcome this demon inside him so he won't burn in hell for
> eternity.
>
> I pray for your ministry,
> John C.

The prayers are working because GOD is blessing me more.

How do I know?

Feeling hungrier than ever :-)

May GOD bless you similarly in HIS mighty way making you hungrier than
you have ever been in your life.

Art Deco

unread,
Apr 28, 2007, 11:36:31 AM4/28/07
to
False prophet Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD <lov...@thetruth.com> with yet
another email address spew his usual hate:

>brother John C wrote:
>> satam via a sockpuppet (demon) wrote:

You're a coward, Chung, and a hypocrite.

"Name calling simply means you remain..." -- Andy Chung the hypocrite.

>> > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>> > >convicted neighbor Barry wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >> You're so wrong Andrew.
>> > >
>> > >Correct.
>> > >
>> > >The brethren of LORD Jesus Christ are neither perfect nor more
>> > >right...
>> > >
>> > >... we are simply forgiven:
>> >
>> > Yet you also claim that you don't sin, ever.
>
>It remains my choice to continue to refrain from sinning since my LORD
>has made me able to do so.

You lie.


>
>> Dr. Chung,
>>
>> Please overlook my stepson Art, he's full of the devil as I ever saw anyone.
>> Pray for Art to overcome this demon inside him so he won't burn in hell for
>> eternity.
>>
>> I pray for your ministry,
>> John C.
>
>The prayers are working because GOD is blessing me more.
>
>How do I know?
>
>Feeling hungrier than ever :-)

Keep slurping Outhouse John, Andy, he can teach you the joys of
pedophilia laming.

[chung spew targets snecked]

--
Supreme Leader of the Brainwashed Followers of Art Deco

"Causation of gravity is missing frame field always attempting
renormalization back to base memory of equalized uniform momentum."
-- nightbat the saucerhead-in-chief

0 new messages