Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Daily Spirit-guided thought for 04/11/08.

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,
Apr 11, 2008, 4:13:22 AM4/11/08
to
http://ABChung.LiveJournal.com/111316.html

May dear neighbors, friends, and brethren have a blessedly wonderful
2008th year since the birth of our LORD Jesus Christ as the Son of
Man ...

... by being hungrier:

http://TruthRUS.org/KnowingGOD

Hunger is wonderful:

http://HeartMDPhD.com/Hunger

It's how we know what GOD wants, which is what is good.

Yes, hunger is our knowledge of good versus evil that Adam and Eve
paid for with their and our immortal lives.

Those who suffer from the powerful delusion predicted by the prophecy
of 2 Thessalonians 2:9-11 would deny this and perish ( gone !!! )
forever ...

http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts/CrazyOne

http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts/CrazyTwo

http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts/CrazyThree

http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts/CrazyFour

http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts/Bob

... gone:

http://YouTube.com/watch?v=Qb6d_z5C35E

Such will be the demise of all those who refuse to know **and** love
the truth, Who is LORD Jesus Christ:

http://HeartMDPhD.com/Love/TheTruth

Be hungry... be healthy... be hungrier... be blessed:

http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit/BeBlessed

"Blessed are you who hunger NOW...

... for you will be satisfied." -- LORD Jesus Christ (Luke 6:21)

Amen.

http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit/Luke6_21

A simple parable for the wise and discerning:

http://HeartMDPhD.com/Parable

Be hungry... be healthy... be hungrier... be healthier:

http://TheWellnessFoundation.com/BeHealthier

Marana tha

Prayerfully in the infinite power and might of the Holy Spirit,

Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Lawful steward of http://EmoryCardiology.com
A latter-day disciple of the KING of kings and LORD of lords.
http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit/DiscipleNow

Paul Hands

unread,
Apr 11, 2008, 1:05:27 PM4/11/08
to
Fuckwit.

monkfish

unread,
Apr 11, 2008, 1:38:23 PM4/11/08
to
On Fri, 11 Apr 2008 10:05:27 -0700, Paul Hands wrote:

> Fuckwit.

Is that you?

--
monkfish

J A

unread,
Apr 11, 2008, 11:00:55 AM4/11/08
to

"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <heart...@emorycardiology.com> wrote in message
news:0062e9c4-4cdf-45a1...@a22g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
> http://ABChung.LiveJournal.com/111316.html

Yahweh setting out the rules for Jews owning slaves:
Leviticus 25:44-46 "Both thy bondmen, and thy bondmaids, which thou shalt
have, shall be of the heathen that are round about you; of them shall ye buy
bondmen and bondmaids. Moreover of the children of the strangers that do
sojourn among you, of them shall ye buy, and of their families that are with
you, which they begat in your land: and they shall be your possession. And
ye shall take them as an inheritance for your children after you, to inherit
them for a possession; they shall be your bondmen for ever: but over your
brethren the children of Israel, ye shall not rule one over another with
rigour."

Albert Einstein quote:

" it was, of course, a lie what you read about my religious convictions, a
lie which has been systematically repeated. I do not believe in a personal
God and I have never denied this but have expressed it clearly. If something
is in me which can be called religious then it is the unbounded admiration
for the structure of the world so far as our science can reveal it."

Albert Einstein: "the idea of a personal God is quite alien to me and seems
even naïve."


monkfish

unread,
Apr 11, 2008, 6:22:57 PM4/11/08
to
On Fri, 11 Apr 2008 08:00:55 -0700, J A wrote:

>
> Albert Einstein: "the idea of a personal God is quite alien to me and
> seems even naïve."

That's how it's supposed to be
before you get to know God.

--
monkfish

J A

unread,
Apr 11, 2008, 8:31:38 PM4/11/08
to

"monkfish" <monk...@nowhere.org> wrote in message
news:7K6dnR722ctceWLa...@ptd.net...

> On Fri, 11 Apr 2008 08:00:55 -0700, J A wrote:
>
>>
>> Albert Einstein: "the idea of a personal God is quite alien to me and
>> seems even naīve."

>
> That's how it's supposed to be
> before you get to know God.

If you know him so well, have him show himself and prove his powers.

Let's see if you can do that.

And quit screwing witht he newsgroup address line, you little turd fish.


monkfish

unread,
Apr 11, 2008, 7:46:25 PM4/11/08
to
On Fri, 11 Apr 2008 17:31:38 -0700, J A wrote:

> "monkfish" <monk...@nowhere.org> wrote in message
> news:7K6dnR722ctceWLa...@ptd.net...
>> On Fri, 11 Apr 2008 08:00:55 -0700, J A wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Albert Einstein: "the idea of a personal God is quite alien to me and

>>> seems even naïve."


>>
>> That's how it's supposed to be
>> before you get to know God.
>
> If you know him so well, have him show himself and prove his powers.
>
> Let's see if you can do that.
>
> And quit screwing witht he newsgroup address line, you little turd fish.

You seem to be clueless about the Usenet as well.
Stop crossposting so much, dear.

BTW you are getting my replies
purely by the love and compassion of God.

--
monkfish

J666

unread,
Apr 11, 2008, 8:19:44 PM4/11/08
to
On Fri, 11 Apr 2008 19:31:38 -0500, J A wrote
(in message <45adneAvQpVsaWLa...@earthlink.com>):

> And quit screwing witht he newsgroup address line, you little turd fish.

That seems to be what he wants to do - he feels by trying to restrict the
responses, he will be left with the last word.

All Whyfish has to do is stop posting on SNC and all the other groups he
objects to and stick with alt.christnet.theology where there is little
posting that is not crossposted from somewhere else and filter out those with
crossposting or just delete unread and he will solve his problem - BUT that
is either not what he wants and is lying or is too stupid to realize
something so simple.

So regards Whyfish, stupid/lying is as stupid/lying does.

He does not seem to like being ignored and trivialized and readily responds
when someone comments - but like Chung, do not expect anything different so
respond to him to have fun at his expense - like Chung, laugh at him, not
with him.

Will be interesting if he continues to posting here and not trying to take
the first step by only responding to the one group he wants - but, no doubt
his motto is to do as he says, not as he does.

monkfish

unread,
Apr 11, 2008, 9:40:10 PM4/11/08
to

Excuses, excuses.
Just stop crossposting, dear.

--
monkfish

J666

unread,
Apr 11, 2008, 10:12:17 PM4/11/08
to
On Fri, 11 Apr 2008 19:31:38 -0500, J A wrote
(in message <45adneAvQpVsaWLa...@earthlink.com>):

> And quit screwing witht he newsgroup address line, you little turd fish.

It is interesting how those who complain about croosposting feel they, and
they alone, should have the right to decide who sees future responses.

Now maybe those who believe in an all-protect father figure, do not want to
have think and decide what everyone should read or not, but that should not
be the case for others.

Do you think they are smart enough to realize they alone do not know what is
best or do they really think their crap does not smell.

Whyfish seems to have his/her/its own 2CENTS Belief Approach as to what and
where others should read.

Chung better show up soon or he will be passe on SMC

monkfish

unread,
Apr 11, 2008, 10:20:11 PM4/11/08
to

Excuses, excuses.

--
monkfish

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,
Apr 11, 2008, 10:27:58 PM4/11/08
to

J A

unread,
Apr 12, 2008, 10:36:15 AM4/12/08
to

"monkfish" <monk...@nowhere.org> wrote in message
news:9tidnStBic3MZWLa...@ptd.net...

> On Fri, 11 Apr 2008 17:31:38 -0700, J A wrote:
>
>> "monkfish" <monk...@nowhere.org> wrote in message
>> news:7K6dnR722ctceWLa...@ptd.net...
>>> On Fri, 11 Apr 2008 08:00:55 -0700, J A wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Albert Einstein: "the idea of a personal God is quite alien to me and
>>>> seems even naīve."

>>>
>>> That's how it's supposed to be
>>> before you get to know God.
>>
>> If you know him so well, have him show himself and prove his powers.
>>
>> Let's see if you can do that.
>>
>> And quit screwing witht he newsgroup address line, you little turd fish.


> You seem to be clueless about the Usenet as well.
> Stop crossposting so much, dear.

Dear? In addition to all your other problems, are you a queer?

I notice you're too gutless to answer my challenge: If you know [god] so

well, have him show himself and prove his powers.

> BTW you are getting my replies


> purely by the love and compassion of God.

Bullshit - I'm getting your dissolute pseudo replies via the internet.

Morons like who ascribe things to the "love and compassion of God" should
get it into your pinheads that means he's also responsible for disease,
wars, plagues, birth defects etc.

The more you post, the stupider you look.


Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,
Apr 12, 2008, 9:48:33 AM4/12/08
to

J A

unread,
Apr 12, 2008, 12:08:06 PM4/12/08
to

"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <heart...@emorycardiology.com> wrote in message
news:01ff6cba-4f56-45f4...@2g2000hsn.googlegroups.com...

You have to conjure up "demons" and "satans", and then pretend they're fools
and you've defeated them...


J666

unread,
Apr 12, 2008, 11:21:31 AM4/12/08
to
On Sat, 12 Apr 2008 11:08:06 -0500, J A wrote
(in message <c7idnXEl7dbATZ3V...@earthlink.com>):

Because in dealing in the real world with real people, Chung has been a
complete and total failure - family, friends and profession.

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,
Apr 12, 2008, 12:29:38 PM4/12/08
to

J A

unread,
Apr 12, 2008, 2:09:35 PM4/12/08
to

monkfish

unread,
Apr 12, 2008, 1:14:42 PM4/12/08
to
On Sat, 12 Apr 2008 07:36:15 -0700, J A wrote:
>
> I notice you're too gutless to answer my challenge: If you know [god]
> so well, have him show himself and prove his powers.
>

You are still clueless about what God is.
God is invisible, dear.

Is money visible to you?

--
monkfish

monkfish

unread,
Apr 12, 2008, 1:42:57 PM4/12/08
to
On Sat, 12 Apr 2008 10:21:31 -0500, J666 wrote:
>>
> Because in dealing in the real world with real people, Chung has been a
> complete and total failure - family, friends and profession.

What a strange thing to say.
How about you?

--
monkfish

J A

unread,
Apr 12, 2008, 2:56:29 PM4/12/08
to

"monkfish" <monk...@nowhere.org> wrote in message
news:hLGdna1lh-efc53V...@ptd.net...

Do you ever say anything meaningful?

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,
Apr 12, 2008, 2:02:53 PM4/12/08
to

J666

unread,
Apr 12, 2008, 2:32:27 PM4/12/08
to
On Sat, 12 Apr 2008 13:56:29 -0500, J A wrote

>
> Do you ever say anything meaningful?

Nothing meaningful if referring to intelligent discourse by Whyfish, but yes
to meaningful if referring to mean and nasty.

monkfish

unread,
Apr 12, 2008, 2:34:33 PM4/12/08
to

Do you even know what meaningfulness is?
Does it even exist?
How do you prove that meaningfulness exists?

Clueless?

--
monkfish

monkfish

unread,
Apr 12, 2008, 2:37:22 PM4/12/08
to

You don't evn know what meaningfulness means, do you?
What does it mean for sentences to be meaningful?

--
monkfish

J A

unread,
Apr 12, 2008, 3:47:02 PM4/12/08
to

"monkfish" <monk...@nowhere.org> wrote in message
news:Qo-dnfrNROEknZzV...@ptd.net...

What is the meaning of the fearfulness that causes you to alter the
newsgroup addresses?


J666

unread,
Apr 12, 2008, 3:02:42 PM4/12/08
to
On Sat, 12 Apr 2008 14:47:02 -0500, J A wrote
(in message <PICdnRPRkZsunpzV...@earthlink.com>):

> What is the meaning of the fearfulness that causes you to alter the
> newsgroup addresses?
>
>

It seems Chung only gives us statements about meanings and whyfish only gives
us questions about meaning - I am a little surprised that whyfish knows so
little and always has to ask questions. Of course it takes very little
thinking to respond to a statement with a question.

Statement (S) The sky blue
Question (S) Do you understand the sky? What is the meaning of blue?

S - I like bananas
Q - Do you have any clue about what are bananas? Does like exist?

S - Whyfish asks inane repetitive questions.
Q - Why are you so cruel? Do you know what questions are.

monkfish

unread,
Apr 12, 2008, 3:12:32 PM4/12/08
to

God is the ultimate point of reference.
Or God is the ground of all being.

Which one do you like better?

--
monkfish

monkfish

unread,
Apr 12, 2008, 3:14:59 PM4/12/08
to
On Sat, 12 Apr 2008 12:47:02 -0700, J A wrote:

> "monkfish" <monk...@nowhere.org> wrote in message
> news:Qo-dnfrNROEknZzV...@ptd.net...
>> On Sat, 12 Apr 2008 11:56:29 -0700, J A wrote:
>>
>>> "monkfish" <monk...@nowhere.org> wrote in message
>>> news:hLGdna1lh-efc53V...@ptd.net...
>>>> On Sat, 12 Apr 2008 07:36:15 -0700, J A wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I notice you're too gutless to answer my challenge: If you know
>>>>> [god] so well, have him show himself and prove his powers.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> You are still clueless about what God is. God is invisible, dear.
>>>>
>>>> Is money visible to you?
>>>
>>> Do you ever say anything meaningful?
>>
>> Do you even know what meaningfulness is? Does it even exist?
>> How do you prove that meaningfulness exists?
>
> What is the meaning of the fearfulness that causes you to alter the
> newsgroup addresses?

I don't like crossposting.
You are supposed to set the followup-to header
as much as possible;
unless of course you are trolling.

Did we humans create language?

--
monkfish

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,
Apr 12, 2008, 3:44:15 PM4/12/08
to
friend monkfish wrote:
> satan via a sockpuppet (corporeal demon) hissed:

>
> > What is the meaning of the fearfulness that causes you to alter the
> > newsgroup addresses?
>
> I don't like crossposting.

What you should be doing is what HE desires even if you do not like
it.

You remind me of Jonah who did not like delivering GOD's message to
Nineveh.

In the Holy Spirit, there is no fear.

"You are the light of the world. A city on a hill cannot be hidden.
Neither do people light a lamp and put it under a bowl. Instead they
put it on its stand, and it gives light to everyone in the house. In
the same way, let your light shine before men, that they may see your
good deeds and praise your Father in heaven." -- LORD Jesus Christ
(Matthew 5:14-16)

Amen.

Laus Deo ! ! !

http://HeartMDPhD.com/LausDeo

May you and other dear neighbors, friends, and brethren have a
blessedly wonderful 2008th year since the birth of our LORD Jesus
Christ as the Son of Man ...

... by being hungrier:

http://TruthRUS.org/KnowingGOD

Hunger is wonderful:

http://HeartMDPhD.com/Hunger

It's how we know what GOD wants, which is what is good.

Yes, hunger is our knowledge of good versus evil that Adam and Eve
paid for with their and our immortal lives.

Those who suffer from the powerful delusion predicted by the prophecy
of 2 Thessalonians 2:9-11 would deny this and perish ( gone !!! )
forever ...

http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts/CrazyOne

http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts/CrazyTwo

http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts/CrazyThree

http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts/CrazyFour

http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts/Bob

... gone:

http://YouTube.com/watch?v=Qb6d_z5C35E

Such will be the demise of all those who refuse to know **and** love
the truth, Who is LORD Jesus Christ:

http://HeartMDPhD.com/Love/TheTruth

Be hungry... be healthy... be hungrier... be blessed:

http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit/BeBlessed

"Blessed are you who hunger NOW...

... for you will be satisfied." -- LORD Jesus Christ (Luke 6:21)

Amen.

http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit/Luke6_21

A simple parable for the wise and discerning:

http://HeartMDPhD.com/Parable

Be hungry... be healthy... be hungrier... be healthier:

http://TheWellnessFoundation.com/BeHealthier

Marana tha

Prayerfully in the infinite power and might of the Holy Spirit,

Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Lawful steward of http://EmoryCardiology.com
A latter-day disciple of the KING of kings and LORD of lords.
http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit/DiscipleNow

monkfish

unread,
Apr 12, 2008, 3:55:28 PM4/12/08
to
On Sat, 12 Apr 2008 12:44:15 -0700, Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:

> friend monkfish wrote:
>>
>> I don't like crossposting.
>
> What you should be doing is what HE desires even if you do not like it.
>
> You remind me of Jonah who did not like delivering GOD's message to
> Nineveh.
>

I'm kind of surprised to see that
people are still replying to you.
Even I don't read much of your posts.

--
monkfish

Phobos

unread,
Apr 12, 2008, 4:16:16 PM4/12/08
to
On Sat, 12 Apr 2008 14:55:28 -0500, monkfish wrote
(in message <_YCdndUp6OItjpzV...@ptd.net>):

You are jealous - far more respond to Chung than you - you need new material
if you want to be in prime time.

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,
Apr 12, 2008, 4:20:09 PM4/12/08
to
friend monkfish wrote:

> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> > friend monkfish wrote:
> >>
> >> I don't like crossposting.
> >
> > What you should be doing is what HE desires even if you do not like it.
> >
> > You remind me of Jonah who did not like delivering GOD's message to
> > Nineveh.
> >
>
> I'm kind of surprised to see that
> people are still replying to you.

That would be to GOD's glory and not mine.

> Even I don't read much of your posts.

That would also be to GOD's glory...

... and definitely not yours.

J A

unread,
Apr 12, 2008, 5:26:53 PM4/12/08
to

"monkfish" <monk...@nowhere.org> wrote in message
news:K7ydnfVGMqaul5zV...@ptd.net...

> On Sat, 12 Apr 2008 12:47:02 -0700, J A wrote:
>
>> "monkfish" <monk...@nowhere.org> wrote in message
>> news:Qo-dnfrNROEknZzV...@ptd.net...
>>> On Sat, 12 Apr 2008 11:56:29 -0700, J A wrote:
>>>
>>>> "monkfish" <monk...@nowhere.org> wrote in message
>>>> news:hLGdna1lh-efc53V...@ptd.net...
>>>>> On Sat, 12 Apr 2008 07:36:15 -0700, J A wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I notice you're too gutless to answer my challenge: If you know
>>>>>> [god] so well, have him show himself and prove his powers.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> You are still clueless about what God is. God is invisible, dear.
>>>>>
>>>>> Is money visible to you?
>>>>
>>>> Do you ever say anything meaningful?
>>>
>>> Do you even know what meaningfulness is? Does it even exist?
>>> How do you prove that meaningfulness exists?
>>
>> What is the meaning of the fearfulness that causes you to alter the
>> newsgroup addresses?
>
> I don't like crossposting.

If that were true, then why do you read them?

> You are supposed to set the followup-to header
> as much as possible;

Why do you lie so much and so poorly?


> unless of course you are trolling.

Why are you so fearful that you keep messing with the followups?


J A

unread,
Apr 12, 2008, 5:38:01 PM4/12/08
to

"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <heart...@emorycardiology.com> wrote in message
news:2af3f536-35f9-43a0...@c65g2000hsa.googlegroups.com...

> friend monkfish wrote:
>> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>> > friend monkfish wrote:
>> >>
>> >> I don't like crossposting.
>> >
>> > What you should be doing is what HE desires even if you do not like it.
>> >
>> > You remind me of Jonah who did not like delivering GOD's message to
>> > Nineveh.
>> >
>>
>> I'm kind of surprised to see that
>> people are still replying to you.
>

> That would be to GOD's glory and not mine.

LOL.

Two nuts vying for status in their groveling to nonexistent supernatural
beings....

There was a scientific test conducted to see if prayer could help people
recovering from heart surgery. The results were reported in the American
heart Journal, April 2006. There was no difference between those patients
who were prayed for and those who were not. There was a difference between
those who knew they had been prayed for and those who did not. Those who
knew they had been prayed for were worse off by having significantly more
complications than those who did not know that they had been prayed for.

J666

unread,
Apr 12, 2008, 4:48:50 PM4/12/08
to
On Sat, 12 Apr 2008 14:44:15 -0500, Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote
(in message
<72314a65-847f-4192...@x41g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>):

regarding someone babbling "I don't like crossposting."

>
> What you should be doing is what HE desires even if you do not like
> it.


Jesus died on the cross, so that you can crosspost and God will be cross with
you if you do not.

"Thou Shall Crosspost" God

J666

unread,
Apr 12, 2008, 4:54:08 PM4/12/08
to
On Sat, 12 Apr 2008 16:26:53 -0500, J A wrote
(in message <V8udnZ98sfZOgJzV...@earthlink.com>):

> If that were true, then why do you read them?
>
>> You are supposed to set the followup-to header
>> as much as possible;
>
> Why do you lie so much and so poorly?
>
>
>> unless of course you are trolling.
>
> Why are you so fearful that you keep messing with the followups?
>

It is whyfish's nature. When you get that feeling you know you have to have
a bowel movement, same with him except it comes out of his mother

Lets see what some possible responses may be.

How do you know that shit exists? Suggested answer: Because you exist

What is the meaning of that feeling Suggested answer: Because you are full
of it and your head would burst if you kept it in.

monkfish

unread,
Apr 12, 2008, 4:54:44 PM4/12/08
to

That's the way the sincere people use the Usenet.
I'm only subscribed to ACT.
If you are not interested in theology,
just stop replying to me
and stop crossposting to ACT, please.

--
monkfish

J666

unread,
Apr 12, 2008, 4:54:56 PM4/12/08
to
On Sat, 12 Apr 2008 16:38:01 -0500, J A wrote
(in message <V8udnZ58sfZLgJzV...@earthlink.com>):

> LOL.
>
> Two nuts vying for status in their groveling to nonexistent supernatural
> beings....

A lover's spat. Should make for an interesting trip for Chung if whyfish
goes along as ballast or to be used for trolling for sharks

monkfish

unread,
Apr 12, 2008, 5:00:11 PM4/12/08
to

Were they trying to order God around?
Incredible people.
Probably because they were clueless about what God is.

monkfish

unread,
Apr 12, 2008, 5:01:59 PM4/12/08
to

God still loves you.

--
monkfish

monkfish

unread,
Apr 12, 2008, 5:03:35 PM4/12/08
to

God still loves you.

--
monkfish

monkfish

unread,
Apr 12, 2008, 5:05:04 PM4/12/08
to

Be grateful for everything.

--
monkfish

J666

unread,
Apr 12, 2008, 5:12:31 PM4/12/08
to
> It is whyfish's nature. When you get that feeling you know you have to have
> a bowel movement, same with him except it comes out of his mother

Most people are born vaginally or by C-section, but then some seem to be the
result of their mother's bowel movement.

Obvioulsy, the three who make up the Holey Assinity are most likely that way.

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,
Apr 12, 2008, 5:16:35 PM4/12/08
to
friend monkfish wrote:
> satan via a sockpuppet (corproreal demon) hissed:

> > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> >
> >> What you should be doing is what HE desires even if you do not like it.
> >
> > Jesus died on the cross, so that you can crosspost and God will be cross
> > with you if you do not.
> >
> > "Thou Shall Crosspost" God
>
> God still loves you.

Incorrect.

http://HeartMDPhD.com/GODhatessatan

monkfish

unread,
Apr 12, 2008, 5:21:52 PM4/12/08
to

God still loves you.

--
monkfish

J A

unread,
Apr 12, 2008, 6:24:17 PM4/12/08
to

"monkfish" <monk...@nowhere.org> wrote in message
news:PfGdnSOZcbYJvJzV...@ptd.net...

Why do you fear crossposting?

Why did you respond to this thread, since you knew it had been crossposted
by the crazed cardio chinaman?

What makes you think you can judge people who crosspost, when Horus II said
"judge not, lest ye be judged"?

Did some god create you as a bad joke?

>
> --
> monkfish


J A

unread,
Apr 12, 2008, 6:18:30 PM4/12/08
to

"monkfish" <monk...@nowhere.org> wrote in message
news:PfGdnSKZcbZGv5zV...@ptd.net...

Which god(s)?

There are thousands of gods that have been worshipped by homo sapiens
in the past and present.
Start here: <http://www.lowchensaustralia.com/names/gods.htm>
Can you tell me which ones you believe in and which you don't, and
show the EVIDENCE for the existence of the ones you believe in?

Or, if you're stupid enough to think all god claims need to be
disproved by non-believers instead of PROVED by the believer - then
also give evidence for the non-existence of all the gods you don't
believe in.

And hurry it up MonkeyCarp, we're all on pins and needles waiting for more
of your hackneyed insights.

monkfish

unread,
Apr 12, 2008, 5:29:25 PM4/12/08
to

People are not Satan.

--
monkfish

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,
Apr 12, 2008, 5:35:11 PM4/12/08
to
friend monkfish wrote:
> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> > friend monkfish wrote:
> >> satan via a sockpuppet (corproreal demon) hissed:
> >> > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> What you should be doing is what HE desires even if you do not like
> >> >> it.
> >> >
> >> > Jesus died on the cross, so that you can crosspost and God will be
> >> > cross with you if you do not.
> >> >
> >> > "Thou Shall Crosspost" God
> >>
> >> God still loves you.
> >
> > Incorrect.
> >
> > http://HeartMDPhD.com/GODhatessatan
>
> People are not Satan.

Did not write that people were.

Bottom line:

You are untruthful.

This simply shows that you are among the lost:

http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit/TheLost

The brethren of LORD Jesus Christ are neither perfect nor more
special...

... we are simply forgiven by GOD:

http://www.interviewwithgod.com/forgiven/

May you wisely choose to be forgiven too by publicly declaring with
your mouth that "Jesus is LORD:"

http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit/TheWay

monkfish

unread,
Apr 12, 2008, 5:38:17 PM4/12/08
to

Without Love, all is lost.

Are you talking to people or to Satan?

--
monkfish

monkfish

unread,
Apr 12, 2008, 5:43:25 PM4/12/08
to

So, they didn't even know
which god they were praying to?
No wonder they failed.

Why don't you ask those learned doctors
what god were they praying to?
Did they even believe in the god
they were praying to?
Probably they were praying to an idol.
Definitely not to God.

You just don't order God around.

--
monkfish

monkfish

unread,
Apr 12, 2008, 5:46:05 PM4/12/08
to

Is this the best you can do
to do theology?

If you wanna know what God is,
first you need to realize that
you don't know what God is.

--
monkfish

J666

unread,
Apr 12, 2008, 5:54:57 PM4/12/08
to
On Sat, 12 Apr 2008 16:16:35 -0500, Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote

> friend monkfish wrote:

>>
>> God still loves you.
>
> Incorrect.
>
> http://HeartMDPhD.com/GODhatessatan

OK you two love birds.

One says Satan is dead and the other that Satan is alive.

One says God loves me, the other that God does not love me.

So we have you two of faith saying different things so one of you has to b e
WRONG.

So why don't you two meet for a nice candlelight dinner of less than two
pounds and Chung always has a scale, and decide and get back to me

J666

unread,
Apr 12, 2008, 6:05:35 PM4/12/08
to
On Sat, 12 Apr 2008 16:35:11 -0500, Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote


> friend monkfish wrote:

>>
>> People are not Satan.
>
> Did not write that people were.
>
> Bottom line:
>
> You are untruthful.

Oh no - this relationship looks like it is headed it irreconcilable
differences. If there is a divorce, who will be their lawyers since all
lawyers are in Hell with Satan (whether Satan is alive or dead).

Looks like Chung is stepping in to hold his turf - now monkfish is a
untruthful, then a liar, then will be conviceted and then a sockpuppet of a
living or dead Satan. Monkfish better get out while the getting out is good
- oops, mean is wonderful - good is out and wonderful is in - or submit to
the will and wisdom of Chung, who is a Disciple of etc and to whom the Holy
Spirit talks - you are outclassed.

J666

unread,
Apr 12, 2008, 6:10:05 PM4/12/08
to
On Sat, 12 Apr 2008 17:18:30 -0500, J A wrote
(in message <SbWdnWI274EctZzV...@earthlink.com>):

> And hurry it up MonkeyCarp, we're all on pins and needles waiting for more
> of your hackneyed insights.

Yes we are and also enjoy the skirmish between two of the Holey Assinity,
Chung and Whyfish.

I'll put my money (if it exists) on Chung rather than on the pipsqueak
whyfish

J666

unread,
Apr 12, 2008, 6:11:10 PM4/12/08
to
On Sat, 12 Apr 2008 17:24:17 -0500, J A wrote
(in message <SbWdnZ0x74EYtZzV...@earthlink.com>):

> Did some god create you as a bad joke?

No, his mother had a large constipated bowel movement and there was whyfish.

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,
Apr 12, 2008, 6:15:16 PM4/12/08
to
convicted friend monkfish wrote:
> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> > convicted friend monkfish wrote:
> >> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> >> > convicted friend monkfish wrote:
> >> >> satan via a sockpuppet (corproreal demon) hissed:
> >> >> > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> What you should be doing is what HE desires even if you do not
> >> >> >> like it.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Jesus died on the cross, so that you can crosspost and God will be
> >> >> > cross with you if you do not.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > "Thou Shall Crosspost" God
> >> >>
> >> >> God still loves you.
> >> >
> >> > Incorrect.
> >> >
> >> > http://HeartMDPhD.com/GODhatessatan
> >>
> >> People are not Satan.
> >
> > Did not write that people were.
> >
> > Bottom line:
> >
> > You are untruthful.
> >
> > This simply shows that you are among the lost:
> >
> > http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit/TheLost
> >
> > The brethren of LORD Jesus Christ are neither perfect nor more
> > special...
> >
> > ... we are simply forgiven by GOD:
> >
> > http://www.interviewwithgod.com/forgiven/
> >
> > May you wisely choose to be forgiven too by publicly declaring with your
> > mouth that "Jesus is LORD:"
> >
> > http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit/TheWay
>
> Without Love, all is lost.

Without faith in LORD Jesus Christ, you will remain lost.

> Are you talking to people or to Satan?

Neither.

Am posting typed messages on usenet and not talking.

Bottom line:

You remain untruthful.

This simply shows that the Holy Spirit is absolutely right to convict
you:

http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts

You do not have much longer, dear friend monkfish:

http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit/Prophecy

May you wisely choose to repent soon by publicly declaring with your


mouth that "Jesus is LORD:"

http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit/TheWay

Prayerfully in the infinite power and might of the Holy Spirit,

Andrew <><

J666

unread,
Apr 12, 2008, 6:30:23 PM4/12/08
to
On Sat, 12 Apr 2008 17:15:16 -0500, Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote


>
> convicted friend monkfish wrote:

>>
>> Without Love, all is lost.
>
> Without faith in LORD Jesus Christ, you will remain lost.
>
>> Are you talking to people or to Satan?
>
> Neither.
>
> Am posting typed messages on usenet and not talking.
>
> Bottom line:
>
> You remain untruthful.

Watch for Chung calling the pipsqueak a liar, and then we know it has gone
beyond the lover's spat.

Looks like Chung is out to net himself a monkfish.

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,
Apr 12, 2008, 6:33:18 PM4/12/08
to

monkfish

unread,
Apr 12, 2008, 6:36:01 PM4/12/08
to

Be grateful for everything.

--
monkfish

monkfish

unread,
Apr 12, 2008, 6:37:43 PM4/12/08
to

Still clueless about God's love?

--
monkfish

monkfish

unread,
Apr 12, 2008, 6:39:16 PM4/12/08
to

God is love.
Love conquers everything.

--
monkfish

monkfish

unread,
Apr 12, 2008, 6:40:28 PM4/12/08
to

How do you prove that love even exists?

--
monkfish

monkfish

unread,
Apr 12, 2008, 6:44:40 PM4/12/08
to
On Sat, 12 Apr 2008 15:18:30 -0700, J A wrote:

Are you admitting that


they didn't even know which god
they were praying to?

To be scientific they should have
picked only those who know what God is.
Too dumb to do that?

Anyone here who knows what God is?

--
monkfish

monkfish

unread,
Apr 12, 2008, 6:47:30 PM4/12/08
to

God is forgiving.

--
monkfish

J666

unread,
Apr 12, 2008, 6:47:38 PM4/12/08
to

J A

unread,
Apr 12, 2008, 7:51:22 PM4/12/08
to

"monkfish" <monk...@nowhere.org> wrote in message
news:iPCdnSBp5ORgsZzV...@ptd.net...

Why didn't you answer the question, instead of dodging it?

Why do you send your replies to all the followup groups, but then reset the
followup to only one group - a dishonest and chickenshit thing to do?

Again, MonkeyCarp:

Which god(s)?

There are thousands of gods that have been worshipped by homo sapiens
in the past and present.
Start here: <http://www.lowchensaustralia.com/names/gods.htm>
Can you tell me which ones you believe in and which you don't, and
show the EVIDENCE for the existence of the ones you believe in?

Or, if you're stupid enough to think all god claims need to be
disproved by non-believers instead of PROVED by the believer - then
also give evidence for the non-existence of all the gods you don't
believe in.

And hurry it up MonkeyCarp, we're all on pins and needles waiting for more
of your hackneyed insights.

> Why don't you ask those learned doctors


> what god were they praying to?
> Did they even believe in the god
> they were praying to?

You stupid ass.

The doctors weren't praying, they had devoted christians praying, it's a
famous study and this is the first you've heard of it?

You're a dumbass, with no character, who weasels around with phony
questions, and trying to rig the followup groups posted to.

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,
Apr 12, 2008, 6:57:32 PM4/12/08
to
convicted friend monkfish wrote:
> satan via a sockpuppet (corporeal demon) hissed:
> > convicted friend monkfish wrote:
> >> satan via a sockpuppet (corporeal demon) hissed:

> >>> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> >>>> convicted friend monkfish wrote:
> >>>>> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:

We, who are Jesus' disciples, know GOD and love Him with all our
hearts, souls, minds, and strengths:

http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit/Dare2Share

"My LORD and my GOD!" -- a disciple of LORD Jesus Christ upon
beholding His resurrected form (John 20:28).

May we, who are Jesus' disciple, continue to pray for your perishing
soul:

http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts/PrayForMonkfish

monkfish

unread,
Apr 12, 2008, 7:04:27 PM4/12/08
to
On Sat, 12 Apr 2008 15:57:32 -0700, Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:

> monkfish wrote:
>>
>> Anyone here who knows what God is?
>
> We, who are Jesus' disciples, know GOD and love Him with all our hearts,
> souls, minds, and strengths:
>

That's nice.
Are we supposed to call people names?

--
monkfish

J666

unread,
Apr 12, 2008, 7:10:40 PM4/12/08
to
On Sat, 12 Apr 2008 17:57:32 -0500, Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote


> convicted friend monkfish wrote:

>>
>> Anyone here who knows what God is?
>
> We, who are Jesus' disciples, know GOD and love Him with all our
> hearts, souls, minds, and strengths:

Wow - whyfish must be on "cloud 9" Someone asnswered his questions. Well it
was Chung, so even though some may say it is still not better than no one, it
is at least a response.

BUT - whyfish is now convicted. At least before whyfish was convictede,
being in the group of convicted and sockpuppets was an exclusive group of
intelligent people.

Well, with whyfish now in our group, there goes the neighborhood.

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,
Apr 12, 2008, 7:10:47 PM4/12/08
to
convicted friend monkfish wrote:
> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> > convicted friend monkfish wrote:
> >>
> >> Anyone here who knows what God is?
> >
> > We, who are Jesus' disciples, know GOD and love Him with all our hearts,
> > souls, minds, and strengths:
> >
> > http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit/Dare2Share
>
> That's nice.

It is wonderful.

> Are we supposed to call people names?

We are supposed to do what GOD desires of us.

To do otherwise is to sin:

http://TruthRUS.org/KnowingGOD

May we, who are Christians, continue to pray for your perishing soul,
dear friend monkfish, as GOD desires:

monkfish

unread,
Apr 12, 2008, 7:11:41 PM4/12/08
to

What makes you think
those devoted Christian knew
what they were doing?
Those clueless doctors set them up.

You just don't order God around.

You should be grateful for what you got;
no matter what.

Of course, you can pray.
But you are better off
praying for your own acceptance
of God's will.
And beg a little, if you must.

--
monkfish

J666

unread,
Apr 12, 2008, 7:12:42 PM4/12/08
to
On Sat, 12 Apr 2008 18:51:22 -0500, J A wrote
(in message <6-6dnWlN4bdyoZzV...@earthlink.com>):

> Why didn't you answer the question, instead of dodging it?

Whyfish has just been called a convicted neighbor - perhaps time, out of
pity, to give him a little slack ........... OK, that enough time for slack.

monkfish

unread,
Apr 12, 2008, 7:15:02 PM4/12/08
to

Does health even exist?
How do we prove that health exists?

--
monkfish

monkfish

unread,
Apr 12, 2008, 7:17:58 PM4/12/08
to
On Sat, 12 Apr 2008 16:10:47 -0700, Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:

> convicted friend monkfish wrote:
>> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>> > convicted friend monkfish wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Anyone here who knows what God is?
>> >
>> > We, who are Jesus' disciples, know GOD and love Him with all our
>> > hearts, souls, minds, and strengths:
>> >
>> > http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit/Dare2Share
>>
>> That's nice.
>
> It is wonderful.
>
>> Are we supposed to call people names?
>
> We are supposed to do what GOD desires of us.
>
> To do otherwise is to sin:
>

How do you figure out what God wants?

--
monkfish

J666

unread,
Apr 12, 2008, 7:18:36 PM4/12/08
to
On Sat, 12 Apr 2008 18:04:27 -0500, monkfish wrote
(in message <cqSdnYnncupmopzV...@ptd.net>):

The rift spreads - soon going to make the parting of the Red Sea child's
play.

Seems to be a little crossposting here

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,
Apr 12, 2008, 7:22:15 PM4/12/08
to
convicted friend monkfish wrote:

> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldy wrote:
> > convicted friend monkfish wrote:
> >> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> >> > convicted friend monkfish wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> Anyone here who knows what God is?
> >> >
> >> > We, who are Jesus' disciples, know GOD and love Him with all our
> >> > hearts, souls, minds, and strengths:
> >> >
> >> > http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit/Dare2Share
> >>
> >> That's nice.
> >
> > It is wonderful.
> >
> >> Are we supposed to call people names?
> >
> > We are supposed to do what GOD desires of us.
> >
> > To do otherwise is to sin:
> >
> > http://TruthRUS.org/KnowingGOD

>
> How do you figure out what God wants?

"With man this is impossible, but with GOD all things are possible."
-- LORD Jesus Christ (Matthew 19:26)

Amen.

May we, who are Christians, continue to pray for your perishing soul,

dear friend monkfish:

monkfish

unread,
Apr 12, 2008, 7:22:22 PM4/12/08
to

You are becoming obsolete.

--
monkfish

monkfish

unread,
Apr 12, 2008, 7:24:59 PM4/12/08
to

God is love.
You are still loved by God.

--
monkfish

J666

unread,
Apr 12, 2008, 7:29:33 PM4/12/08
to
On Sat, 12 Apr 2008 18:51:22 -0500, J A wrote
(in message <6-6dnWlN4bdyoZzV...@earthlink.com>):

> Why didn't you answer the question, instead of dodging it?

Like Chung, whyfish has no intention of answering, but just posting
questions. Most likely just a troll.

J666

unread,
Apr 12, 2008, 7:35:18 PM4/12/08
to
ONE GOD Approach is the One Way to go for God and life.

Juan Gawd
Disciple-in-Chief of all the Disciples of the KING of Kings and the LORD of
Lords

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,
Apr 12, 2008, 8:19:42 PM4/12/08
to

J666

unread,
Apr 12, 2008, 8:32:32 PM4/12/08
to
http://God.org/OneGod/Approach

One God. One Way.

monkfish

unread,
Apr 12, 2008, 8:34:28 PM4/12/08
to

Do you believe in health?
Does health even exist?

--
monkfish

J666

unread,
Apr 12, 2008, 8:34:39 PM4/12/08
to
ONE GOD Approach One Way

"I am the ONE and the only ONE." God

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,
Apr 12, 2008, 8:35:35 PM4/12/08
to

monkfish

unread,
Apr 12, 2008, 8:36:10 PM4/12/08
to

You are even clueless about health.
How do you prove that health even exists?

--
monkfish

marika

unread,
Apr 12, 2008, 8:39:22 PM4/12/08
to
On Apr 12, 7:10 pm, J666 <j...@jmail.com> wrote:
\>

> Wow - whyfish must be on "cloud 9"  Someone asnswered his questions.  

I will only add to say that we were aware of this way back when and
made note of this likely confusion when the idea was first dreamt of.

>Well it
> was Chung, so even though some may say it is still not better than no one, it
> is at least a response.


people won't use the features anyway because of
disclosure issues. And we are still waiting for someone to even clear
the
use of this


mk5000

"You're liable to get burned girl
Now, now, now,
We were stretched out on the floor, baby,
it's all elastic"--confidence man, jeff healey

J A

unread,
Apr 12, 2008, 9:43:59 PM4/12/08
to

"monkfish" <monk...@nowhere.org> wrote in message
news:cqSdnYjncuow3JzV...@ptd.net...

More lying and evading.

Again. I'll show you for the lying weasel you are.

NY Times By BENEDICT CAREY Published: March 31, 2006

Long-Awaited Medical Study Questions the Power of Prayer

Prayers offered by strangers had no effect on the recovery of people who
were undergoing heart surgery, a large and long-awaited study has found.

And patients who knew they were being prayed for had a higher rate of
post-operative complications like abnormal heart rhythms, perhaps because of
the expectations the prayers created, the researchers suggested.

Because it is the most scientifically rigorous investigation of whether
prayer can heal illness, the study, begun almost a decade ago and involving
more than 1,800 patients, has for years been the subject of speculation.

The question has been a contentious one among researchers. Proponents have
argued that prayer is perhaps the most deeply human response to disease, and
that it may relieve suffering by some mechanism that is not yet understood.
Skeptics have contended that studying prayer is a waste of money and that it
presupposes supernatural intervention, putting it by definition beyond the
reach of science.

At least 10 studies of the effects of prayer have been carried out in the
last six years, with mixed results. The new study was intended to overcome
flaws in the earlier investigations. The report was scheduled to appear in
The American Heart Journal next week, but the journal's publisher released
it online yesterday.

In a hurriedly convened news conference, the study's authors, led by Dr.
Herbert Benson, a cardiologist and director of the Mind/Body Medical
Institute near Boston, said that the findings were not the last word on the
effects of so-called intercessory prayer. But the results, they said, raised
questions about how and whether patients should be told that prayers were
being offered for them.

"One conclusion from this is that the role of awareness of prayer should be
studied further," said Dr. Charles Bethea, a cardiologist at Integris
Baptist Medical Center in Oklahoma City and a co-author of the study.

Other experts said the study underscored the question of whether prayer was
an appropriate subject for scientific study.

"The problem with studying religion scientifically is that you do violence
to the phenomenon by reducing it to basic elements that can be quantified,
and that makes for bad science and bad religion," said Dr. Richard Sloan, a
professor of behavioral medicine at Columbia and author of a forthcoming
book, "Blind Faith: The Unholy Alliance of Religion and Medicine."

The study cost $2.4 million, and most of the money came from the John
Templeton Foundation, which supports research into spirituality. The
government has spent more than $2.3 million on prayer research since 2000.

Dean Marek, a chaplain at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minn., and a
co-author of the report, said the study said nothing about the power of
personal prayer or about prayers for family members and friends.

Working in a large medical center like Mayo, Mr. Marek said, "You hear tons
of stories about the power of prayer, and I don't doubt them."

In the study, the researchers monitored 1,802 patients at six hospitals who
received coronary bypass surgery, in which doctors reroute circulation
around a clogged vein or artery.

The patients were broken into three groups. Two were prayed for; the third
was not. Half the patients who received the prayers were told that they were
being prayed for; half were told that they might or might not receive
prayers.

The researchers asked the members of three congregations - St. Paul's
Monastery in St. Paul; the Community of Teresian Carmelites in Worcester,
Mass.; and Silent Unity, a Missouri prayer ministry near Kansas City - to
deliver the prayers, using the patients' first names and the first initials
of their last names.

The congregations were told that they could pray in their own ways, but they
were instructed to include the phrase, "for a successful surgery with a
quick, healthy recovery and no complications."

Analyzing complications in the 30 days after the operations, the researchers
found no differences between those patients who were prayed for and those
who were not.

In another of the study's findings, a significantly higher number of the
patients who knew that they were being prayed for - 59 percent - suffered
complications, compared with 51 percent of those who were uncertain. The
authors left open the possibility that this was a chance finding. But they
said that being aware of the strangers' prayers also may have caused some of
the patients a kind of performance anxiety.

J A

unread,
Apr 12, 2008, 9:48:55 PM4/12/08
to

"monkfish" <monk...@nowhere.org> wrote in message
news:cqSdnZLncurFppzV...@ptd.net...
> Are you admitting that

> they didn't even know which god
> they were praying to?

[You continue to alter the follow ups- consistent with your lack of
character.]


They were praying to your god(s), who failed.

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,
Apr 12, 2008, 8:55:33 PM4/12/08
to

J A

unread,
Apr 12, 2008, 10:07:03 PM4/12/08
to

"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <heartdoc16@ <snip > ;-)

J666

unread,
Apr 12, 2008, 9:14:31 PM4/12/08
to
On Sat, 12 Apr 2008 21:07:03 -0500, J A wrote
(in message <1O2dnb4EdZl0wZzV...@earthlink.com>):

> Prayers offered by strangers had no effect on the recovery of people who
> were undergoing heart surgery, a large and long-awaited study has found.

Sounds like patients who do not have a prayer do better.

Remember - the philosphy of believers in prayer:

If it works, it is the work of God and if it does not work, then it was the
will of God.

Heads God wins, tails the patient loses. Wonder if God gambles in Las Vegas.

monkfish

unread,
Apr 12, 2008, 9:31:31 PM4/12/08
to

Did your mother love you unconditionally?

--
monkfish

Father Haskell

unread,
Apr 12, 2008, 9:44:45 PM4/12/08
to
On Apr 12, 5:21 pm, monkfish <monkf...@nowhere.org> wrote:
> On Sat, 12 Apr 2008 16:12:31 -0500, J666 wrote:
> >> It is whyfish's nature. When you get that feeling you know you have to
> >> have a bowel movement, same with him except it comes out of his mother
>
> > Most people are born vaginally or by C-section, but then some seem to be
> > the result of their mother's bowel movement.
>
> > Obvioulsy, the three who make up the Holey Assinity are most likely that
> > way.
>
> God still loves you.

I understand saying things like that was Gacy's idea of
foreplay.

Father Haskell

unread,
Apr 12, 2008, 9:46:17 PM4/12/08
to
On Apr 12, 6:40 pm, monkfish <monkf...@nowhere.org> wrote:
> On Sat, 12 Apr 2008 17:11:10 -0500, J666 wrote:
> > On Sat, 12 Apr 2008 17:24:17 -0500, J A wrote (in message
> > <SbWdnZ0x74EYtZzVnZ2dnUVZ_u7in...@earthlink.com>):
>
> >> Did some god create you as a bad joke?
>
> > No, his mother had a large constipated bowel movement and there was
> > whyfish.
>
> How do you prove that love even exists?

Isn't Star Trek on right now?

monkfish

unread,
Apr 12, 2008, 9:49:00 PM4/12/08
to

They are like a fool
who is trying to catch a cloud
with a net.
Do you really think
you can take picture of a spirit?

Why don't you grab hold of your self
and shake it until it makes a sound?

--
monkfish

monkfish

unread,
Apr 12, 2008, 9:53:36 PM4/12/08
to

What are they saying about God?
Do they say they know what God is?
What does it mean to pray to something
you don't even know what it is?

Just tell me what the learned doctors said about God.
Did they say they believe in God?
If not, what on earth were they doing
trying to pray to something that does not even exist?

No wonder they got nothing.
They were praying to nothing!

--
monkfish

J666

unread,
Apr 12, 2008, 9:55:21 PM4/12/08
to
On Sat, 12 Apr 2008 20:46:17 -0500, Father Haskell wrote
(in message
<d1859e4a-68fb-4314...@a23g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>):

> Isn't Star Trek on right now?

Isn't the God character called Spook who does battle with Spock and a spick
on a speck of a planet called Spuck ruled by SpacK

It is loading more messages.
0 new messages