The End is upon us
Father Haskell
Cary Kittrell
> In twenty minutes. Quick, Dr. Chung, grab a pot and a spoon.
>
It's snappier without that first "a".
-- cary
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
>
> It's snappier without that first "a".
Indeed:
Cary ==> Cry
Clearly you remain convicted by the Holy Spirit:
http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts
Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
http://EmoryCardiology.com
Stephen Knight
<lo...@thetruth.com> wrote:
>convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote:
>>
>> It's snappier without that first "a".
>
>Indeed:
>
>Cary ==> Cry
>
>Clearly you remain convicted by the Holy Spirit:
>
>http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts
>
>Andrew <><
Cary.... Don't get me wrong here, but Dung clearly seems to have a
'Boner' for you.
I'm the Warlord and I'm can't use words like 'Icky!' or
'Eeeeuuu!!!!', but you sure seem to have a bona fide Internet Whackjob
as a stalker.
Warlord Steve
BAAWA
I KILLED YOUR GOD---IT WAS FUN!
raven1
<lo...@thetruth.com> wrote:
>convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote:
>>
>> It's snappier without that first "a".
>
>Indeed:
>
>Cary ==> Cry
>
>Clearly you remain convicted by the Holy Spirit:
Clearly you are a false prophet, and thus a servant of Satan.
--
"O Sybilli, si ergo
Fortibus es in ero
O Nobili! Themis trux
Sivat sinem? Causen Dux"
Parsifal
So, how was your lunar eclipse, Mr. pro-death penalty pseudo christian?
Pastor Kutchie, ordained atheist minister
wrote:
> convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote:
>
>
>
> > It's snappier without that first "a".
>
> Indeed:
>
> Cary ==> Cry
>
> Clearly you remain convicted by the Holy Spirit:
>
Chunky just doesn't get all sorts of things about being human, so he
probably doesn't understand just how desperate he looks!
> http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts
Earthquack's list of perceived persecutors grows ever longer.
>
> Andrew <><
> --
Written fish is silent flatulence.
Pastor Kutchie, ordained atheist minister
Since when have devout Christians ever been opposed to killing people?
Machete
"Father Haskell" <father...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1172956335....@30g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
> In twenty minutes. Quick, Dr. Chung, grab a pot and a spoon.
>
As I said, the density of Chung's head is unmatched, impenetrable.
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
Michael Gray
minister" <use...@heathens.org.uk> wrote:
- Refer: <1173084269.6...@s48g2000cws.googlegroups.com>
Aspergers it ain't.
He is a classic dangerous raving psychopath, and some.
--
Cary Kittrell
> On 4 Mar 2007 19:21:27 -0800, "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"
> <lo...@thetruth.com> wrote:
>
> >convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote:
> >>
> >> It's snappier without that first "a".
> >
> >Indeed:
> >
> >Cary ==> Cry
> >
> >Clearly you remain convicted by the Holy Spirit:
> >
> >http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts
> >
> >Andrew <><
>
> Cary.... Don't get me wrong here, but Dung clearly seems to have a
> 'Boner' for you.
I do appear to make him nuts lately, don't I. Nutser.
>
> I'm the Warlord and I'm can't use words like 'Icky!' or
> 'Eeeeuuu!!!!', but you sure seem to have a bona fide Internet Whackjob
> as a stalker.
>
> Warlord Steve
> BAAWA
-- cary
Kumar
> In article <c66nu29mlfukv5i2966ri8iqh8ba6c0...@4ax.com> Stephen Knight <wool...@comcast.net> writes:
> > On 4 Mar 2007 19:21:27 -0800, "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"
>
> > >convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote:
>
> > >> It's snappier without that first "a".
>
> > >Indeed:
>
> > >Cary ==> Cry
>
> > >Clearly you remain convicted by the Holy Spirit:
>
> > >http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts
>
> > >Andrew <><
>
> > Â Â Cary.... Don't get me wrong here, but Dung clearly seems to have a
> > 'Boner' for you.
>
> I do appear to make him nuts lately, don't I. Â Nutser.
>
>
>
> > Â Â I'm the Warlord and I'm can't use words like 'Icky!' or
> > 'Eeeeuuu!!!!', but you sure seem to have a bona fide Internet Whackjob
> > as a stalker.
>
> > Warlord Steve
> > BAAWA
>
>
> - Show quoted text -
"In physical cosmology, dark energy is a hypothetical form of energy
that permeates all of space and has strong negative pressure.[1]
According to the Theory of Relativity, the effect of such a negative
pressure is qualitatively similar to a force acting in opposition to
gravity at large scales. Invoking such an effect is currently the most
popular method for explaining recent observations that the universe
appears to be expanding at an accelerating rate, as well as accounting
for a significant portion of the missing mass in the universe.
Two proposed forms for dark energy are the cosmological constant, a
constant energy density filling space homogeneously,[2] and
quintessence, a dynamic field whose energy density can vary in time
and space.
Nature of dark energy
As this NASA chart indicates, roughly 70 percent or more of the
universe consists of dark energy, about which we know next to
nothing.The exact nature of this dark energy is a matter of
speculation. It is known to be very homogeneous, not very dense and is
not known to interact through any of the fundamental forces other than
gravity. Since it is not very dense—roughly 10−29 grams per cubic
centimeter—it is hard to imagine experiments to detect it in the
laboratory (but see the references for a claimed detection). Dark
energy can only have such a profound impact on the universe, making up
70% of all energy, because it uniformly fills otherwise empty space.
The two leading models are quintessence and the cosmological constant.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_energy "
Can you evaluate, how it can be relevant to your new topic subject?
Cary Kittrell
> On Mar 5, 11:52=C2=A0pm, c...@afone.as.arizona.edu (Cary Kittrell) wrote:
> > In article <c66nu29mlfukv5i2966ri8iqh8ba6c0...@4ax.com> Stephen Knight <w=
> ool...@comcast.net> writes:
> > > On 4 Mar 2007 19:21:27 -0800, "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"
> > > <l...@thetruth.com> wrote:
> >
> > > >convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote:
> >
> > > >> It's snappier without that first "a".
> >
> > > >Indeed:
> >
> >
> > > >Clearly you remain convicted by the Holy Spirit:
> >
> > > >http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts
> >
> > > >Andrew <><
> >
> o have a
> > > 'Boner' for you.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > =C2=A0 =C2=A0I'm the Warlord and I'm can't use words like 'Icky!' or
> > > 'Eeeeuuu!!!!', but you sure seem to have a bona fide Internet Whackjob
> > > as a stalker.
> >
> > > Warlord Steve
> > > BAAWA
> >
> > -- cary- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> "In physical cosmology, dark energy is a hypothetical form of energy
> that permeates all of space and has strong negative pressure.[1]
> According to the Theory of Relativity, the effect of such a negative
> pressure is qualitatively similar to a force acting in opposition to
> gravity at large scales. Invoking such an effect is currently the most
> popular method for explaining recent observations that the universe
> appears to be expanding at an accelerating rate, as well as accounting
> for a significant portion of the missing mass in the universe.
>
> Two proposed forms for dark energy are the cosmological constant, a
> constant energy density filling space homogeneously,[2] and
> quintessence, a dynamic field whose energy density can vary in time
> and space.
> Nature of dark energy
>
> As this NASA chart indicates, roughly 70 percent or more of the
> universe consists of dark energy, about which we know next to
> nothing.The exact nature of this dark energy is a matter of
> speculation. It is known to be very homogeneous, not very dense and is
> not known to interact through any of the fundamental forces other than
> cubic
> centimeter=E2=80=94it is hard to imagine experiments to detect it in the
> laboratory (but see the references for a claimed detection). Dark
> energy can only have such a profound impact on the universe, making up
> 70% of all energy, because it uniformly fills otherwise empty space.
> The two leading models are quintessence and the cosmological constant.
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_energy "
>
> Can you evaluate, how it can be relevant to your new topic subject?
>
Ummmm....no. And actually, it's Andrew's old Subject: topic.
Dark energy doesn't have to be homogeneous, by the way. There's
some thought afoot of re-visiting a basic principle of colsmolgy,
that the universe itself is homogeneous at very large scales.
That assumption was necessary to make the equations of general
relativity tractable, but observations increasingly indicate
that it may be a bad assumption. In which case, dark energy
may turn out not to be needed at all to explain cosmic
expansion.
-- cary
Kumar
universe, there should be some balancing mechanism to disturbances/
entropy.
Cary Kittrell
Why? If everything runs down, then everything runs down.
In any event, no one ever said that dark energy would reverse
entropy. Precisely the opposite in fact: an expanding universe
with a fixed energy content represents an increase in entropy.
Furthermore, under some theories of dark energy, the rate of expansion
of space will accelerate until even the atoms are torn apart.
Now THAT's what I call increasing entropy.
-- cary
Kumar
Destruction can be followed by new creation and creation by
destruction via maintaince. What can be the entropy and dark energy
just before big bang at big bang? Will entropy and black energy be
maximum just before big bang and at big bang?
Cary Kittrell
Entrypy would be at a minimum at the Big Bang.
-- cary
Kumar
PLs tell about entropy and black energy just before big bang, at big
bang and decreasing/increasing after big bang till next big bang?
Cary Kittrell
At the Big Bang, the total energy in the universe was concentrated
in a tiny volume. As space expands, that energy disperses; that's
increasing entropy.
As far as conditions before the big bang, as well the question of
whether there will be another...well, here's a quick 500-word essay
that covers both topics:
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
Nobody knows.
-- cary
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
> > convicted neighbor c...@afone.as.arizona.edu (Cary Kittrell) wrote:
> > > convicted neighbor Kumar wrote:
> > > > convicted neighbor c...@afone.as.arizona.edu (Cary Kittrell) wrote:
> > > > > convicted neighbor "Kumar" <lordshiva5...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > convicted neighbor c...@afone.as.arizona.edu (Cary Kittrell) wrote:
> > > > > > > convicted neighbor "Kumar" <lordshiva5...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > convicted neighbor c...@afone.as.arizona.edu (Cary Kittrell) wrote:
> > > > > > > > > convicted neighbor Steve Knight wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote:
> > >
> > > > > > > > > > >> It's snappier without that first "a".
> > >
> > > > > > > > > > >Indeed:
> > >
> > >
> > > > > > > > > > >Clearly you remain convicted by the Holy Spirit:
> > >
> > > > > > > > > > >http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts
> > >
> > > > > > > > > > >Andrew <><
> > >
> > > > > > > > > > =C2=A0 =C2=A0Cary.... Don't get me wrong here, but Dung clearly seems t=
> > > > > > > > o have a
> > > > > > > > > > 'Boner' for you.
> > >
> > > > > > > > > I do appear to make him nuts lately, don't I. =C2=A0Nutser.
> > >
> > > > > > > > > > =C2=A0 =C2=A0I'm the Warlord and I'm can't use words like 'Icky!' or
> > > > > > > > > > 'Eeeeuuu!!!!', but you sure seem to have a bona fide Internet Whackjob
> > > > > > > > > > as a stalker.
> > >
> > > > > > > > > > Warlord Steve
> > > > > > > > > > BAAWA
> > >
> > > > > > > > > -- cary-
> > >
> > > > > > universe, there should be some balancing mechanism to disturbances/
> > > > > > entropy.
> > >
> > > > > Why? If everything runs down, then everything runs down.
> > >
> > > > > In any event, no one ever said that dark energy would reverse
> > > > > entropy. Precisely the opposite in fact: an expanding universe
> > > > > with a fixed energy content represents an increase in entropy.
> > >
> > > > > Furthermore, under some theories of dark energy, the rate of expansion
> > > > > of space will accelerate until even the atoms are torn apart.
> > > > > Now THAT's what I call increasing entropy.
> > >
> > > > > -- cary-
> > >
> > > > destruction via maintaince. What can be the entropy and dark energy
> > > > just before big bang at big bang? Will entropy and black energy be
> > > > maximum just before big bang and at big bang?
> > >
> > > Entrypy would be at a minimum at the Big Bang.
> > >
> > > -- cary-
> >
> > bang and decreasing/increasing after big bang till next big bang?
>
> At the Big Bang, the total energy in the universe was concentrated
> in a tiny volume. As space expands, that energy disperses; that's
> increasing entropy.
>
> As far as conditions before the big bang, as well the question of
> whether there will be another...well, here's a quick 500-word essay
> that covers both topics:
>
>
> Nobody knows.
(...)
> Nobody knows.
Actually, GOD knows. HE is omniscient.
Many thanks, much praise, and all the glory to LORD Almighty GOD for
HIS compelling the man of lawlessness to demonstrate that he does not
know HIM.
Laus Deo ! ! !
Cary Kittrell
Well, that could be quite useful! So why don't you ask HIM, and
report back on HIS answer?
And just so no cynic might accuse you of simply making up "HIS
answer", please ask HIM for a solution to the equations of
General Relativity which does not depend on the simplfying
assumption of large-scale homogeneity? That would provide
not only proof positive, but a possible resolution to
the troubling question of dark energy as well.
-- cary
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Only for those who have eternal life.
> So why don't you ask HIM, and
> report back on HIS answer?
Because it remains my choice to cross bridges as I reach them.
> And just so no cynic might accuse you of simply making up "HIS
> answer", please ask HIM for a solution to the equations of
> General Relativity which does not depend on the simplfying
> assumption of large-scale homogeneity? That would provide
> not only proof positive, but a possible resolution to
> the troubling question of dark energy as well.
Your nasal septum is deviated because of the hook HE has placed
through it:
http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts
May you wisely choose to surrender to HIM by declaring public with
your mouth that "Jesus is LORD:"
http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit/TheWay
Cary Kittrell
Imagine my wonder and astonishment.
>
> > And just so no cynic might accuse you of simply making up "HIS
> > answer", please ask HIM for a solution to the equations of
> > General Relativity which does not depend on the simplfying
> > assumption of large-scale homogeneity? That would provide
> > not only proof positive, but a possible resolution to
> > the troubling question of dark energy as well.
>
> Your nasal septum is deviated because of the hook HE has placed
> through it:
Only if HE did it prenatally.
-- cary
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> > convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote:
> > > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> > > > convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote:
<snip>
> > > > > As far as conditions before the big bang, as well the question of
> > > > > whether there will be another...well, here's a quick 500-word essay
> > > > > that covers both topics:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Nobody knows.
> > > >
> > > > (...)
> > > >
> > > > > Nobody knows.
> > > >
> > > > Actually, GOD knows. HE is omniscient.
> > >
> > > Well, that could be quite useful!
> >
> > Only for those who have eternal life.
> >
> > > So why don't you ask HIM, and
> > > report back on HIS answer?
> >
> > Because it remains my choice to cross bridges as I reach them.
>
> Imagine my wonder and astonishment.
Without the LORD, you are meaningless (Ecclesiastes).
> > > And just so no cynic might accuse you of simply making up "HIS
> > > answer", please ask HIM for a solution to the equations of
> > > General Relativity which does not depend on the simplfying
> > > assumption of large-scale homogeneity? That would provide
> > > not only proof positive, but a possible resolution to
> > > the troubling question of dark energy as well.
> >
> > Your nasal septum is deviated because of the hook HE has placed
> > through it:
http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts
> Only if HE did it prenatally.
In convicting you, HE has altered reality. The past tense here would
not indicate a past time but a past reality.
GOD is the Author of all reality (including the alternate ones).
"With man this is impossible but with GOD all things are possible." --
LORD Jesus Christ (Matthew 19:26)
Amen ! ! ! Laus Deo ! ! ! Marana tha ! ! ! ! ! ! !
Prayerfully in Jesus' amazing love,
Cary Kittrell
Art Deco
>convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote:
>> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>> > convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote:
>> > > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>> > > > convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote:
>
><snip>
>
>> > > > > As far as conditions before the big bang, as well the question of
>> > > > > whether there will be another...well, here's a quick 500-word essay
>> > > > > that covers both topics:
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Nobody knows.
>> > > >
>> > > > (...)
>> > > >
>> > > > > Nobody knows.
>> > > >
>> > > > Actually, GOD knows. HE is omniscient.
>> > >
>> > > Well, that could be quite useful!
>> >
>> > Only for those who have eternal life.
>> >
>> > > So why don't you ask HIM, and
>> > > report back on HIS answer?
>> >
>> > Because it remains my choice to cross bridges as I reach them.
>>
>> Imagine my wonder and astonishment.
>
>Without the LORD, you are meaningless (Ecclesiastes).
What about the meaningless nonsense you spew to usenet, Chung? (Hosea)
>
>> > > And just so no cynic might accuse you of simply making up "HIS
>> > > answer", please ask HIM for a solution to the equations of
>> > > General Relativity which does not depend on the simplfying
>> > > assumption of large-scale homogeneity? That would provide
>> > > not only proof positive, but a possible resolution to
>> > > the troubling question of dark energy as well.
>> >
>> > Your nasal septum is deviated because of the hook HE has placed
>> > through it:
>
>http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts
>
>> Only if HE did it prenatally.
>
>In convicting you, HE has altered reality. The past tense here would
>not indicate a past time but a past reality.
>
>GOD is the Author of all reality (including the alternate ones).
You're demented, Chung.
--
Supreme Leader of the Brainwashed Followers of Art Deco
"To err is human, to cover it up is Weasel" -- Dogbert
Kumar
Whether concentration of energy in tini volume(say in matter) is more
disurbing or its dispersal? Think about atom bomb.
Mark K. Bilbo
So, how's that apocalypse thing working out for you? It was, what, last
week sometime?
--
Mark K. Bilbo a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
------------------------------------------------------------
"The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace
alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing
it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary."
- H. L. Mencken
Kumar
>
> read more »- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
from imperfection) and final on any aspect which is not yet become
absolute, final and know to us.
Though HE is Omni...still indescribable. So I prefer not to enter in
HIS field- express HIM and HIS sayings/work in absolute sense. Current
atmosphere, environment, imalances and age effect can distort and
deviate us. I try to do, follow, indicate and express as per need and
entitlement of time otherwise either probably, HE or nature may take
care accordingly or I may get HIS/Nature's punishments here (may be
reward there). Excess of everything is said to be bad [whether good or
bad]. Best wishes.
Mettas Mother
Atheists do not believe about the existence or non-existence of God. God
knows God exists and therefore God does not need to believe about something
that God knows. So God does not believe in the existence of God. So God is
an Atheist!
"Kumar" <lordsh...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1173602120....@v33g2000cwv.googlegroups.com...
> With so much "Nobody knows", I never consider myself as absolute(free
> from imperfection) and final on any aspect which is not yet become
> absolute, final and know to us.
> Though HE is Omni...still indescribable. So I prefer not to enter in
> HIS field- express HIM and HIS sayings/work in absolute sense. Current
> atmosphere, environment, imalances and age effect can distort and
> deviate us. I try to do, indicate and express as per need and
> entitlement of time otherwise probably HE or nature may take care
> accordinly.
Kumar
> Let's Assume that your GOD exists!
> Atheists do not believe about the existence or non-existence of God. God
> knows God exists and therefore God does not need to believe about something
> that God knows. So God does not believe in the existence of God. So God is
> an Atheist!
GOD as omnipresent, you/all know should know that HE exists.
> "Kumar" <lordshiva5...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:1173602120....@v33g2000cwv.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
> > With so much "Nobody knows", I never consider myself as absolute(free
> > from imperfection) and final on any aspect which is not yet become
> > absolute, final and know to us.
> > Though HE is Omni...still indescribable. So I prefer not to enter in
> > HIS field- express HIM and HIS sayings/work in absolute sense. Current
> > atmosphere, environment, imalances and age effect can distort and
> > deviate us. I try to do, indicate and express as per need and
> > entitlement of time otherwise probably HE or nature may take care
Mettas Mother
"Kumar" <lordsh...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1173678481.7...@c51g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
Kumar
Mettas Mother wrote:
> So god must exist all because you insist so?
couldn't yet recognize HIM as we couldn't yet understood One prime
force of all forces and Mediator to that One Prime Force.
Mettas Mother
"Kumar" <lordsh...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1173699070.7...@n33g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
Kumar
> What's makes you so sure that you are right?
can't be wrong or stupid esp. under current atmosphere.
> "Kumar" <lordshiva5...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:1173699070.7...@n33g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
>
>
> > No, but HE exists. It is another matter or our inability that we
> > couldn't yet recognize HIM as we couldn't yet understood One prime
Mettas Mother
"Kumar" <lordsh...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1173714241.0...@p10g2000cwp.googlegroups.com...
Kumar
> Mass delusion and hallucination is possible!
interests, etc. are also possible till science/understandings/
interpretations become absolute (free from imperfection) and
complete.
> "Kumar" <lordshiva5...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:1173714241.0...@p10g2000cwp.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
> > Nothing can be withiout prime. Most human population feel HIM. All
> > can't be wrong or stupid esp. under current atmosphere.
> > On Mar 12, 5:34 pm, "Mettas Mother" <Mettas_Moth...@yahoo.com> wrote:
Father Haskell
> Mass delusion and hallucination is possible!
What? They're giving away free acid? Where?
Kumar
> Mass delusion and hallucination is possible!
>
>
> news:1173714241.0...@p10g2000cwp.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
> > Nothing can be withiout prime. Most human population feel HIM. All
> > can't be wrong or stupid esp. under current atmosphere.
> > On Mar 12, 5:34 pm, "Mettas Mother" <Mettas_Moth...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> - Show quoted text -
Majority is authority. Unless mass/majority of people agree/accept,
interpretation by few may have no value/vailidity to them.
Mettas Mother
And truth is not substantiated yet, and so your statements
were just claims with no pillars to support them!
"Kumar" <lordsh...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1173758616.4...@p10g2000cwp.googlegroups.com...
Mettas Mother
"Kumar" <lordsh...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1173758939.7...@h3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
Mettas Mother
"Father Haskell" <father...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1173755893.4...@8g2000cwh.googlegroups.com...
Kumar
> Majority may be authority but that does not overrule the truth.
> And truth is not substantiated yet, and so your statements
> were just claims with no pillars to support them!
complete and absolute(free from imperfection). So nothing may be a
truth in science till it become absolute anf final. So understanding
god absolutely is pending in science but "indication; indescribable
may remain inability or capacity of science to understand one mother/
prime of all forces and its mediator. BTW, pls tell me few absolutes
and finals of scientific understandings i.e. truth of science?
> "Kumar" <lordshiva5...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:1173758616.4...@p10g2000cwp.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
>
>
> > Majority is authority. Unless mass/majority of people agree/accept,
Kumar
> The denial of one thing is not proof to evade the denial of another.
> "Kumar" <lordshiva5...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:1173758939.7...@h3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
> > On Mar 12, 9:22 pm, "Mettas Mother" <Mettas_Moth...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > Mass delusion and hallucination is possible!
> > Wrong interpretations, weaknesses, misses, inabilities, vested
> > interests, etc. are also possible till science/understandings/
> > interpretations become absolute (free from imperfection) and
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
> satan via a sockpuppet (demon) wrote:
>
> > The denial of one thing is not proof to evade the denial of another.
>
> Yes but it tell many inabilities ans weaknesses are there/possible.
http://abchung.livejournal.com/986.html?thread=6362#t6362
Father Haskell
>
> "Father Haskell" <fatherhask...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:1173755893.4...@8g2000cwh.googlegroups.com...
>
> > On Mar 12, 12:22 pm, "Mettas Mother" <Mettas_Moth...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > Mass delusion and hallucination is possible!
>
> > What? They're giving away free acid? Where?
>
Not since light pollution has made it damned near impossible to see
anything
dimmer than magnitude 2.5. I'm lucky to make out 30 stars, even in
the winter
sky.
Mettas Mother
Follow the scriptures!
"Father Haskell" <father...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1173893332.6...@b75g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
Mettas Mother
"Kumar" <lordsh...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1173889397.1...@d57g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
Mettas Mother
"Kumar" <lordsh...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1173889316.1...@y66g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
Father Haskell
>
> "Father Haskell" <fatherhask...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:1173893332.6...@b75g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
>
> > On Mar 14, 9:27 am, "Mettas Mother" <Mettas_Moth...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > Just stand under the skies for 1008 hours. You will see 666 stars in the sky!
>
> > Not since light pollution has made it damned near impossible to see
> > anything
> > dimmer than magnitude 2.5. I'm lucky to make out 30 stars, even in
> > the winter
> > sky.
> But have you stood for 1008 hours?
All told, I've looked at the stars for much longer than 1008 hours.
> Follow the scriptures!
I choose to follow star charts.
What three stars make up the winter triangle?
Aldebaran is the alpha star in which constellation?
What is its classification, and what language is it named in?
Father Haskell
Most people believe that toilets flush CCW in the northern hemisphere
due to Earth's unbelievably powerful coriolis effect -- some even
believe
the hair on people's heads north of the equator grows in a CCW
direction
for the same reason. Simple testing proves that neither assumption is
true.
Blind dogmatism is apparently hard coded into the human genome, to
paraphrase Mr. Zappa's famous truism about hydrogen.
Mettas Mother
"Father Haskell" <father...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1173912464.4...@y66g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
Father Haskell
> As yet, many things are yet to be understood as science is not yet
> complete and absolute(free from imperfection).
It's the best we have, and always will be.
Father Haskell
> "Father Haskell" <fatherhask...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:1173912464.4...@y66g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
>
> > On Mar 14, 5:50 pm, "Mettas Mother" <Mettas_Moth...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > "Father Haskell" <fatherhask...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> > >news:1173893332.6...@b75g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
>
> > > > On Mar 14, 9:27 am, "Mettas Mother" <Mettas_Moth...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > > > Just stand under the skies for 1008 hours. You will see 666 stars in the sky!
>
> > > > Not since light pollution has made it damned near impossible to see
> > > > anything
> > > > dimmer than magnitude 2.5. I'm lucky to make out 30 stars, even in
> > > > the winter
> > > > sky.
>
> > > But have you stood for 1008 hours?
>
> > All told, I've looked at the stars for much longer than 1008 hours.
>
> > > Follow the scriptures!
>
> > I choose to follow star charts.
>
> > What three stars make up the winter triangle?
>
> >Aldebaran is the alpha star in which constellation?
>
> > What is its classification, and what language is it named in?
>
> I did not invent them so they are not my fault!
Yet you pretend expertise.
Procyon, Betelgeuse, and Sirius make up the Winter Triangle. A
lovely asterism, a near-perfect equilateral triangle, now high in
the south at about 10:00.
Aldebaran is "the follower," a KIII orange supergiant, 35 solar
diameters,
eye of Taurus the bull. Named "the follower," as it rises -- and
follows -- the
Pleides, the famed Seven (now six) Sisters of ancient times.
Stars generally have Arabic names. I assume by your past posts that
you're islamic? If so, you should have said something when I offered
you the chance.
Kumar
Mettas Mother wrote:
> Are inabilities & weaknesses the answer to discredit anything?
advocators of that's thing's express as truth, abosolute and final,
but actually that is not. Every thing and being made up of any prime
substance need no evidance.
Kumar
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:
> convicted neighbor Kumar wrote:
> > satan via a sockpuppet (demon) wrote:
> >
> > > The denial of one thing is not proof to evade the denial of another.
> >
> > Yes but it tell many inabilities ans weaknesses are there/possible.
>
> http://abchung.livejournal.com/986.html?thread=6362#t6362
Sorry, GOD is the Source of all knowledge but also HE is said to be
omnipresent, so noone should be fool or wrong.
Mettas Mother
Not my fault again!
"Father Haskell" <father...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1173933540....@n76g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
Mettas Mother
"Kumar" <lordsh...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1173945798.0...@y66g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
Father Haskell
>
> "Father Haskell" <fatherhask...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:1173933540....@n76g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
> > Yet you pretend expertise.
>
> > Procyon, Betelgeuse, and Sirius make up the Winter Triangle. A
> > lovely asterism, a near-perfect equilateral triangle, now high in
> > the south at about 10:00.
>
> > Aldebaran is "the follower," a KIII orange supergiant, 35 solar
> > diameters,
> > eye of Taurus the bull. Named "the follower," as it rises -- and
> > follows -- the
> > Pleides, the famed Seven (now six) Sisters of ancient times.
>
> > Stars generally have Arabic names. I assume by your past posts that
> > you're islamic? If so, you should have said something when I offered
> > you the chance.
>
> Not my fault again!
Then you're a muslim. Do you like Cat Stevens?
Kumar
Mettas Mother wrote:
> What is a prime substance?
differently by many names/forms/images....though felt/endorssed by
majority of people and
indicated as "indescribable" by our ancient ancesstors/learned people
but "yet to be known/understood in science(alike many other things).
There has to be one prime/mother-father to all subsequent
generations....forces and its mediators, matters, things and beings.
Btw, what can be thought as "omnipresent" and prime source to all
things and beings?
Mark K. Bilbo
> convicted neighbor Kumar wrote:
>> satan via a sockpuppet (demon) wrote:
>>
>> > The denial of one thing is not proof to evade the denial of another.
>>
>> Yes but it tell many inabilities ans weaknesses are there/possible.
>
> http://abchung.livejournal.com/986.html?thread=6362#t6362
>
> Andrew <><
Where's that apocalypse you promised dammit?
--
Mark K. Bilbo a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
------------------------------------------------------------
"The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace
alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing
it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary."
- H. L. Mencken
Steve O
"Mark K. Bilbo" <gm...@com.mkbilbo> wrote in message
news:pan.2007.03.17...@com.mkbilbo...
> On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 11:19:00 -0700, Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:
>
>> convicted neighbor Kumar wrote:
>>> satan via a sockpuppet (demon) wrote:
>>>
>>> > The denial of one thing is not proof to evade the denial of another.
>>>
>>> Yes but it tell many inabilities ans weaknesses are there/possible.
>>
>> http://abchung.livejournal.com/986.html?thread=6362#t6362
>>
>> Andrew <><
>
> Where's that apocalypse you promised dammit?
Well, Mark - looks like a bit of last minute feverish praying by Chung and
his buddies managed to avert it.
I suppose we should thank him, really.
Hey Chunks, buddy!
Thanks for saving the world (again)
--
Steve O
a.a. #2240 (Apatheist Chapter)
B.A.A.W.A.
"The only problem with Baptists is that they don't hold them underwater long
enough"
Mark K. Bilbo
>
> "Mark K. Bilbo" <gm...@com.mkbilbo> wrote in message
> news:pan.2007.03.17...@com.mkbilbo...
>> On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 11:19:00 -0700, Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:
>>
>>> convicted neighbor Kumar wrote:
>>>> satan via a sockpuppet (demon) wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > The denial of one thing is not proof to evade the denial of another.
>>>>
>>>> Yes but it tell many inabilities ans weaknesses are there/possible.
>>>
>>> http://abchung.livejournal.com/986.html?thread=6362#t6362
>>>
>>> Andrew <><
>>
>> Where's that apocalypse you promised dammit?
>
> Well, Mark - looks like a bit of last minute feverish praying by Chung and
> his buddies managed to avert it.
> I suppose we should thank him, really.
> Hey Chunks, buddy!
> Thanks for saving the world (again)
What? They frustrated the wheel o' god? Well, wasn't that satanic of them...
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
"Re: For those who may have overlooked this: the Holy Spirit back-
edits reality (again)"
> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> > convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote:
> > > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> > > > convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote:
> > > > > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> > > > > > convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote:
> >
> > <snip>
> >
> > > > > > > As far as conditions before the big bang, as well the question of
> > > > > > > whether there will be another...well, here's a quick 500-word essay
> > > > > > > that covers both topics:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Nobody knows.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > (...)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Nobody knows.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Actually, GOD knows. HE is omniscient.
> > > > >
> > > > > Well, that could be quite useful!
> > > >
> > > > Only for those who have eternal life.
> > > >
> > > > > So why don't you ask HIM, and
> > > > > report back on HIS answer?
> > > >
> > > > Because it remains my choice to cross bridges as I reach them.
> > >
> > > Imagine my wonder and astonishment.
> >
> > Without the LORD, you are meaningless (Ecclesiastes).
> >
> > > > > And just so no cynic might accuse you of simply making up "HIS
> > > > > answer", please ask HIM for a solution to the equations of
> > > > > General Relativity which does not depend on the simplfying
> > > > > assumption of large-scale homogeneity? That would provide
> > > > > not only proof positive, but a possible resolution to
> > > > > the troubling question of dark energy as well.
> > > >
> > > > Your nasal septum is deviated because of the hook HE has placed
> > > > through it:
> >
> > http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts
> >
> > > Only if HE did it prenatally.
> >
> > In convicting you, HE has altered reality. The past tense here would
> > not indicate a past time but a past reality.
> >
> > GOD is the Author of all reality (including the alternate ones).
> >
> > "With man this is impossible but with GOD all things are possible." --
> > LORD Jesus Christ (Matthew 19:26)
> >
> > Amen ! ! ! Laus Deo ! ! ! Marana tha ! ! ! ! ! ! !
Many thanks, much praise, and all the glory to GOD for HIS compelling
you to serve unwittingly to illustrate HIS infinite power.
Tragically, dear Bob Pastorio, who remains in my prayers, serves a
timely example of what happens to those who unwisely choose to put off
the Holy Spirit:
http://bobs-amanuensis.livejournal.com/4211.html
May you be wiser than Bob Pastorio by your choice to surrender to HIM
by publicly declaring with your mouth that "Jesus is LORD:"
http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit/TheWay
Prayerfully in Christ's amazing love,
Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung
Cardiologist, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit
As for knowing who are the very elect, these you will know by the
unconditional love they have for everyone including their enemies
(Matthew 5:44-45, 1 Corinthians 13:3, James 2:14-17).
http://HeartMDPhD.com/Love
Kurt Gavin
God-given brains and had honest skepticism based on lack of evidence,
ubiquitous contradictions, and on
the bad acts performed in his name?
Logically, he would seek to punish those
who professed belief in him for selfish reasons of seeking better treatment
in an afterlife and ranting away condemning others -- perhaps he will even
make them the slaves of the more honest and worthy atheist
skeptics.
The Bible is full of various types of tests -- as a ranting Jesus monkey,
the afterlife you can look forward through is probably at the end of a leash
held by an atheist.
Mark K. Bilbo
Hey, Chunk! What happened to that apocalypse you promised us?
Hello? Is this thing on?