Only if the angiogram is done while you are flying.
Considering that we don't even know the results of the angiogram or where
you're flying to, I would suggest asking this to your doctor. He or she
should know your history, results of the test, etc.
Jeff
I have been informed by a work friend that just by having the test
regardless of result, you will not be allowed to fly for 6 months.
Because you will have a healing puncture wound in a major artery
(femoral), it would be wise to refrain for at least 7 days from any
travel such as driving an automobile (ok to be a passenger) or flying
in an aircraft (lifting luggage and pressure changes could be
hazardous) because of associated increased risk for acute arterial
bleeding. Depending on other comorbid factors and how your angiogram
goes, your cardiologist may extend this restriction additional days or
weeks.
In the Holy Spirit,
Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
http://EmoryCardiology.com
That sounds like a question for the cardiologist doing the test.
Do you really want to trust your life to someone you don't even know over
the internet?
Besides, the technology is changing over time. What might have applied two
or ten years ago may not apply when you have your test. Or if the test is a
different type.
Jeff
Oh i wasnt going to go with this information, im due to see the quack
tomorrow and will obvioulsy ask the same questions, just looking for an
early pointer.
If your cardiologist is a pediatrician like Jeff, it might be
understandable why you would call your cardiologist a quack. Then one
would question your wisdom for seeing this cardiologist in the first
place.
You remind me of the man who would denigrate his wife when it only
reflects back on him twice as badly.
Quack is often used to describe the doctor and is in no way meant to be
derogotive, Quackery is a rare thing these days, I hope
Writing as a practicing doctor, being called a "quack" is derogatory.
Common practice in the UK, lighten up
Simply informing you. Does not bother me for you to call your
cardiologist a quack.
Andrew <><
http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts
> Andrew being an Aussie it is quite common to refer to your doctor as a
> quack, its' not meant or perceived to be derogative it's just what some
> of us older Aussie's call them.
This is not Australia.
In the Holy Spirit,
Andrew <><
--
http://EmoryCardiology.com
It isn't a medical practice either. It's a garden centre.
On 8 Jan 2007 06:24:44 -0800, "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"
Because I don't believe in either chance or accident, I don't bet :-)
Written laughter simply confirms that you remain lost, Chung.