Love GOD with all your heart, soul, mind, and strength.
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
> sister ::: vera ::: wrote:
> > neighbor Jude del Alexander <Ca...@swamp.USA> typed:
> >>brother "1st Century Apostolic Traditionalist" <nospa...@add.com> wrote:
> >>>"Jim" <slim...@sagosams.co.uk> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>Now look what we have got!!!
> >>>
> >>>'Dyed in the wool' Homophiles and lovers of fornicators.
> >>
> >>Homohater and lover of condemnation!
> >
> > That is surely not what Jeff is. Jude Alexander is making up things
> > again. He has a rather vivid biased imagination. Jude Alexander hates
> > people who believe differently from him, that is all.
> >
> >>I rather be the former (even
> >>though I'm not)
> >
> > I'd rather be none of them, and I am not.
> >
> >>What you pretend to not get or truly can't understand that for one to
> >>defend homosexuals from RELIGIOUS CONDEMNATIONAL ABUSE doesn't mean
> >>we love every homosexual out there or that we think they don't commit
> >>wrongs. DUH
> >
> > There is the difference between Jude Alexander and real Christians. We
> > Christians love ALL homosexuals, and that is why we tell them what they
> > have to expect if they keep on with their lifestyle without repentance.
> > Hell is waiting, and we love them enough to let them no, no matter how
> > much a Mark T or Jude Alexander or whoever attacks us for that. They do
> > not mind if people go to hell, but we do, and that is why we are here.
> >
> > ::: vera :::
> >
> Geee, Im touched.
> Now who loves me more, Vera or Osama bin Laden?
Wrong question to ask.
The real question is why are you seeking the love of others rather
than loving GOD more ?
> http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit/love.asp
May GOD continue to heal our hearts with HIS living water so that we
can love our neighbors a little more and LORD Jesus Christ a whole lot
more, dear neighbor Michael whom I love unconditionally.
Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
http://EmoryCardiology.com
Kurt Gavin
The chung demon sticks its head up to make more ridiculous failed forecasts
of coming disaster.
This is consistent with his phony god jeezass, who also couldn't get his
predictions right, either.
Failed prophecies:
http://www.religioustolerance.org/end_wrl2.htm
About 30 CE: The Christian Scriptures (New Testament), when interpreted
literally, appear to record many predictions by Jeshua of Nazareth (Jesus
Christ) that God's Kingdom would arrive within a very short period, or was
actually in the process of arriving. For example, Jesus is recorded as
saying in Matthew 16:28: "...there shall be some standing here, which shall
not taste of death, till they see the Son of Man coming in his kingdom." In
Matthew 24:34, Yeshua is recorded as saying: "...This generation shall not
pass, till all these things be fulfilled." Since the life expectancy in
those days was little over 30 years, Jesus appears to have predicted his
second coming sometime during the 1st century CE. It didn't happen. More
details.
Here's a prediction of my own: the chung demon will be too craven to howl
out a reply to my righteous charges of him being a demonic fraud.
Hey chung - has Reverend Tedi still been having you service him? He says
he's taken the homo cure, so inquiring minds woudl like to know...
L O L at chunkers..
Father Haskell
> LOL
>
> The chung demon sticks its head up to make more ridiculous failed forecasts
> of coming disaster.
Punxatawny Chung saw the Earth's shadow and predicted 12 more weeks
of Armageddon?
You know, the only difference between Chung and Chicken Little is
Chicken Little was speaking figuratively.
Ask Shrub; Ted claims to be _his_ preacher, as well.
Kurt Gavin
"Father Haskell" <father...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1172449049.4...@z35g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
Interesting point.
Vladimir Fomin
Your hoofprints are showing. You are of the grossly decieved.
Vladimir
Faith Like A Child
ANY form of sex outside the blessed union of marriage between a man
and a woman is [biblically] sinful.
The three basic steps required [biblically] to reach heaven are:
1: Accept Christ as your Lord and Savior.
2: Repent of your sins
3: Live your life to glorify the Lord
That being said, it is our responsibility as Christians to spread the
Gospel. It is our responsibility as Christians to hold one another
accountable for our actions. I do not claim to be sinless. None but
the Son of Man was or is sinless. But I rely on my Brothers and
Sisters in Christ to help me lead a Christian life. If that means
that I must be called to task for acting sinfully, then I not only
accept it but am grateful that my Christian family cares enough about
me to do the calling. What sort of Christian would I be if I did not
pass on that love to others? Yes, I believe (because I am told in the
Bible) that homosexuality is a sin. Does that mean that I hate gays?
No. What it means is when I am called to disciple, where
homosexuality is concerned, I will not falter on my responsibility to
stand against the act.. It is not sinful to have sexual feelings
toward a member of the same sex. It becomes sinful when one ACTS upon
those feelings in a sexual way. It is not sinful to have sexual
feelings toward ANYONE regardless of sex. It becomes so, when we ACT
on those feelings outside the sanctity of marriage.
Will being gay get you a ticket to hell? I do not believe so. Acting
on that impulse, and refusing to repent what you KNOW [as a Christian]
is a sinful action... THAT is what earns you a seat at the front of
the southbound bus. Period.
God gave us free will. Our decisions are ours to make. I do not try
to control anyone through my faith. I simply do what Christ requires
of me. I try to disciple as best I can. If that offends you, I make
no apologies. But please, refrain from accusing those of us who are
merely doing as commanded by our Saviour of hatred and belittling
you. For the majority of us intend no such thing. Most of us are
speaking out of love and a true concern for the spiritual well being
of our fellow man.
::: vera :::
Faith Like A Child <Doomg...@gmail.com> typed:
A big AMEN to that.
His Grace and Peace,
::: vera :::
mariposas rand mair fheal greykitten tomys des anges
"Faith Like A Child" <Doomg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ok, here's the deal...
>
> ANY form of sex outside the blessed union of marriage between a man
> and a woman is [biblically] sinful.
you got new testament on that?
gentiles are not bound to mosaic law including leviticus and all that
most people who like to pretend theyre oh so holy
pick and choose which of those laws they follow
and ignore less convenient ones
like admonishments to be charitable to sojourners
which would include modern day illegal immmigrants
how many rednecks are nice to mexicans?
when the testament talks about homosexuality its in the context of promiscuity
not monogamy
if you bothered to understand what god intended from sex (lots of orgasms)
you would understand why promiscuity and adultery are problematic
homosexuality by itself does not affect a couples ability to trust
which is why outside leviticus
it is only mentioned in conjunction with promiscuity
may be god really does hate gays which would really suck for gays
but theres nothing in the new testament
incompatiable with gay or straight monogamity
so its not up to -you- to wave your holier than thou finger at your fellows
gays got a conscience from god just like you
if they feel at peace with the lord then let them be
if they screwed up they are the ones that will be held to account
so what it is all about?
if you examined your average redneck god fearing republican voter
he is repeatedly voting for people who will shift greater tax burdens on him
will shift greater spending for food medical care and other necessity
on said idiot voter
he will vote for people who will ship rednecks job overseas
and then cut rednecks benefit because redneck is obviously too lazy to work
in short your average republican is making the worst possible vote
if you examine their situation rationally and reasonably
so why does the idiot voter vote against their own rational best interest?
because republicans have realized that telling the truth
makes it hard for them to get elected
the republicans could try outright lying
but that only works while people are scared shitless
and work less so as the body bags pile up
so what the republicans discovered with reagan
is they could make a deal with hypocrite preachers and pharisees
and say things like -gay marriage- -school prayer- -high school condoms-
and the idiots would believe
one these politicians really give a damn about these issues
and will actually do something about them
two that their tv preachers have the power to damn the idiots
and if they dont do what they are told they all go to hell
no tv preacher can send you to hell
no politician is going to amend the constitution on a simple majority
wake up idiots
you know want to know what sodomy feels like?
examine your relation to your congresscritter
youre the bitch and hes been riding you
and youre paying him to do it
i dont know what gods plan is
maybe there is no plan
maybe he put us here to let us make our own plans
maybe god is a mean bastard
and maybe hes perfectly happy let most people burn
really sucks to be most people then
i kinda like to think we are not seen as good or evil
but rather as varying degrees as ill and injured
everyone gets healing
everyone gets to come home
maybe not
its not my place to decide
its not your space either
if you expect mercy for yourself
you must beg mercy for everyone
absolutely everyone no matter what you think of them
meow arf meow - they are performing horrible experiments in space
major grubert is watching you - beware the bakalite
impeach the bastard - the airtight garage has you neo
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
>
> Ok, here's the deal...
>
> ANY form of sex outside the blessed union of marriage between a man
> and a woman is [biblically] sinful.
Correct.
> The three basic steps required [biblically] to reach heaven are:
>
> 1: Accept Christ as your Lord and Savior.
> 2: Repent of your sins
> 3: Live your life to glorify the Lord
Those who are stuck at the first step are those who have not yet
received the love of our LORD (HIS living water) into the hearts of
their souls.
Love that resides in the heart is infinitely greater than love that
resides in the mind only.
Here I write with the authority of one, whom GOD has made an expert on
all matters of the heart. Laus Deo ! ! !
> That being said, it is our responsibility as Christians to spread the
> Gospel. It is our responsibility as Christians to hold one another
> accountable for our actions. I do not claim to be sinless. None but
> the Son of Man was or is sinless.
Correct. We, the brethren of LORD Jesus Christ, will always have our
past.
However, with GOD's help, we are able to stop sinning.
"With man this impossible but with GOD all things are possible." --
LORD Jesus Christ (Matthew 19:26)
Amen ! ! ! Laus Deo ! ! ! Marana tha ! ! ! ! ! ! !
> But I rely on my Brothers and
> Sisters in Christ to help me lead a Christian life.
Many who you consider to be your brothers and sisters in Christ are
not except in HIS name only so that you would be wise to rely on only
the guidance of the Holy Spirit if you wish to stop sinning.
Sin is simply not doing that which is the perfect will of GOD.
"Strive to be perfect because your Father in heaven is perfect." --
LORD Jesus Christ
Amen.
> If that means
> that I must be called to task for acting sinfully, then I not only
> accept it but am grateful that my Christian family cares enough about
> me to do the calling. What sort of Christian would I be if I did not
> pass on that love to others?
Wiser to become HIS brethren.
> Yes, I believe (because I am told in the
> Bible) that homosexuality is a sin. Does that mean that I hate gays?
> No. What it means is when I am called to disciple, where
> homosexuality is concerned, I will not falter on my responsibility to
> stand against the act.. It is not sinful to have sexual feelings
> toward a member of the same sex. It becomes sinful when one ACTS upon
> those feelings in a sexual way. It is not sinful to have sexual
> feelings toward ANYONE regardless of sex. It becomes so, when we ACT
> on those feelings outside the sanctity of marriage.
Thinking about doing the ACT is also sin.
> Will being gay get you a ticket to hell? I do not believe so. Acting
> on that impulse, and refusing to repent what you KNOW [as a Christian]
> is a sinful action... THAT is what earns you a seat at the front of
> the southbound bus. Period.
We remain sinful until we stop having sinful thoughts.
"With man this is impossible but with GOD all things are possible." --
LORD Jesus Christ (Matthew 19:26)
Amen ! ! ! Laus Deo ! ! ! Marana tha ! ! ! ! ! ! !
> God gave us free will. Our decisions are ours to make. I do not try
> to control anyone through my faith. I simply do what Christ requires
> of me. I try to disciple as best I can. If that offends you, I make
> no apologies. But please, refrain from accusing those of us who are
> merely doing as commanded by our Saviour of hatred and belittling
> you. For the majority of us intend no such thing. Most of us are
> speaking out of love and a true concern for the spiritual well being
> of our fellow man.
May GOD continue to heal our hearts with HIS living water so that we
can love our neighbors a little more and LORD Jesus Christ a whole lot
more, dear friend whom I love unconditionally.
Prayerfully in Christ's amazing love,
GaryG
news:1172461366.8...@p10g2000cwp.googlegroups.com...
> Ok, here's the deal...
>
"Faith Like A Child" - does that mean you believe in Santa Claus and the
Easter Bunny too?
GG
Kurt Gavin
"Andrew B. Chung, MDemon/PhDemon" HOWLED in message
news:1172468611.9...@z35g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
> Friend "Faith Like A Child" wrote:
>>
>> Ok, here's the deal...
>>
>> ANY form of sex outside the blessed union of marriage between a man
>> and a woman is [biblically] sinful.
>
> Correct.
Are you married to Reverend Tedi?
Or are the outcalls just business?
Father Haskell
wrote:
> Friend "Faith Like A Child" wrote:
>
>
>
> > Ok, here's the deal...
>
> > ANY form of sex outside the blessed union of marriage between a man
> > and a woman is [biblically] sinful.
>
> Correct.
How about a a man and _two_ women? How about a
man and a sheep?
Mettas Mother
born outside wed locks. Humans are a minority and marriage is only
practiced by humans.
Have you heard the saying we what we eat! Well news flash. Since humans
are eating bastards(plants and animals) then humans are what they eat!
GOD went down on unmarried MARY! Jesus was born outside a wed lock and
there for a bastard!
God is a paedophile. Mary was raped against her wishes! This caused
teenage pregnancy!
"Father Haskell" <father...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1172539706.6...@a75g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
Father Haskell
> Majority, in fact all non-human, life forms on earth are bastards! They are
> born outside wed locks. Humans are a minority and marriage is only
> practiced by humans.
>
> Have you heard the saying we what we eat! Well news flash. Since humans
> are eating bastards(plants and animals) then humans are what they eat!
>
> GOD went down on unmarried MARY! Jesus was born outside a wed lock and
> there for a bastard!
> God is a paedophile. Mary was raped against her wishes! This caused
> teenage pregnancy!
>
>
> news:1172539706.6...@a75g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
>
> > On Feb 26, 12:43 am, "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <l...@thetruth.com>
> > wrote:
> > > Friend "Faith Like A Child" wrote:
>
> > > > Ok, here's the deal...
>
> > > > ANY form of sex outside the blessed union of marriage between a man
> > > > and a woman is [biblically] sinful.
>
> > > Correct.
>
> > How about a a man and _two_ women? How about a
> > man and a sheep?
Gawd only went for Mary because the sheep were out to pasture.
Demon Lord of Confusion
further by squeaking:
> ::: vera ::: wrote:
>> Faith Like A Child typed:
> Olympiada
The three of you may, along with Crazy Andy, cordially get fucked. Or
rather, unfucked. No favours for you lot.
--
________________________________________________________________________
Hail Eris! mhm 29x21; TM#5; COOSN-029-06-71069
The God of Odd Statements, the Ugliest Pigfucker In The Universe
Stupidity Takes Its Toll. Please Have Exact Change.
"You're like some kind of rabid attack-gerbil." -- Lionel Lauer to Joxer
in MID: <oorbs2pt3dc6b8t4a...@4ax.com>
"I say you are out of your fucking mind." -- Ying Guo, posting as
"SameAsB4" <exeb...@yanospamhoo.com>, tells PorchMonkey4Life, posting
as the same nick but a slightly different morph, the score, in MID:
<ka4lo.3...@news.alt.net>
"in the holy spirit i know you would satisfy every single person in a
room if you were the only person present." -- ~tanya, to Crazy Andy II,
in MID: <1167007805.9...@a3g2000cwd.googlegroups.com>
If you never read anything else in any of my sigs, read this:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15321167/
http://borealin.livejournal.com/15104.html
Or watch it here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uqxmPjB0WSs
Then, if you manage to read/watch all that, try this:
http://www.newamericancentury.org/RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf
And Molly Ivins had a few choice words to say about it, weeks before:
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/092906B.shtml
Here's Chris Floyd: Fatal Vision: The Deeper Evil Behind the Detainee
Bill: http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/100206A.shtml
"Q: What's the difference between the Vietnam War and the Iraq War?
A: George W. Bush had a plan to get out of the Vietnam War." -- Anon.
Thread where outing begins: http://tinyurl.com/hojf8
George Pickett Memorial Trophy, Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart,
and the Order of the Holey Sockpuppet winner <wfh...@hotmail.com> on
outing personal contact info in x-poasted subject lines:
"Plenty of people post under their real names and do not attempt to hide
their contact info. You are scared of being 'outed' because you are a
pathological abuser of usenet, and people rightly despise you for it.
You're afraid of being reported to the authorities or, better, visited
by a couple of guys with baseball bats. Other people don't have this
obsessive fear. Ward Hardman himself has posted plenty of personal
information - nothing that anyone else added was hidden in any way.
You're so fucking scared you've built up this whole sick mythology about
different categories of bad dudes who 'out' scum like you.
"Meanwhile you are the ugliest pigfucker in the universe. You are the
coward without ethics. You call me a 'newbie' - ha! what an asshole you
are. Those who want to remain anonymous do so. There is absolutely no
way you could identify me, not unless you had the sort of subpoena power
that only gets turned on for big-time terrorists. That's because I chose
to be anonymous. Some people don't. Only really stupid dicks like you
choose the sort of semi-anonymity which leaves you in constant fear.
"What a dickless wonder you are 'Snarky' you fat asshole."
-- in MID: <1156587081....@m79g2000cwm.googlegroups.com>
"I am the only one who has outer filthed Ward" -- James C. "Crackhead"
Cracked voluntarily self-immolates, in MID:
1159678991.8...@m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com
"When I told Abbie Hoffman that he was the first one who made me laugh
since Lenny Bruce died, Hoffman said, "Really? He was my god." The
combination of satirical irreverence and sense of justice that Bruce and
Hoffman shared was the real spirit behind the Yippies--a term I coined
to describe a phenomenon that already existed: an organic coalition of
stoned hippies and political activists who engaged in such actions as
throwing money on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange, then
explaining to reporters the meaning of that symbolism. Folksinger Phil
Ochs summed it up: "A demonstration should turn you on, not turn you
off." So when journalists link the Yippies with misleading bedfellows,
at best it's careless shorthand; at worst it's deliberate demonization.
Osama bin Laden wanted an aircraft to crash into the Pentagon. Abbie
Hoffman merely wanted to levitate it." -- Paul Krassner,
http://tinyurl.com/ehu3v
Demon Lord of Confusion
the issue further by squeaking:
>> Friend "Faith Like A Child" wrote:
>>
>> > Ok, here's the deal...
>>
>> > ANY form of sex outside the blessed union of marriage between a man
>> > and a woman is [biblically] sinful.
>>
>> Correct.
>
> How about a a man and _two_ women? How about a man and a sheep?
What, like Bartlo?
Qolon
philosophical HETERONOMY and religious MYSTICISM through being subject
to a law or standard external to itself as AUTONOMY; In Kantian moral
philosophy, acting in accordance with one's desires rather than reason
or moral duty; subject to different laws} a heteronomy and impunity of
the autonomy of the will as the supreme principle of morality. It is
without merit, sense or substantial in fact--your life is temporal,
only for a time, nothing more!
At issue is the symbolic nature of religious philosophy, which fails
to marry the Theological teleological {ie. Telos [122J3W1D] = Arch
[3W1D] + c² [9(9²+1)/2} argument of intelligent design relating to
God's existence obtained from the existence of order and design in the
universe, and its concern with ultimate causes in nature or of actions
in relation to their ends or utility with Stephen Hawkings
perspectives of the Anthropic Principle:
"Roughly speaking, the anthropic principle says that we see the
universe the way it is, at least in part, because we exist. It is a
perspective that is diametrically opposed to the dream of a fully
predicative, unified theory in which the laws of nature are complete
and the world is the way it is because it could not be otherwise.
There are a number of different versions of the anthropic principle
and within the framework of the no boundary proposal, one can use
Feynman's rule for assigning numbers to each history of the universe
to find which properties of the universe are likely to occur. In this
context, the anthropic principle is implemented by requiring that the
histories contain intelligent life." [Stephen Hawking © 2001 'The
Universe in a Nutshell', p 86]
Briefly speaking the anthropic principle allows for:
a) assigning numbers to each history of the universe to find which
properties of the universe are likely to occur.
b) requirement that the histories contain intelligent life.
c) the creation as a product of Godhead is observable and
understandable
Other than to make a retreat into obscurantism or fideism, it is
simply impossible to make a claim to belief in 'Almighty God' as the
supreme being of the Bible, without regard for its cosmology and
cosmogony as the product of the Mind of such supreme being that is
conveyed by the teleological equation: Telos [122J3W1D] = Arch [3W1D]
+ c² [9(9²+1)/2]}
Thus we see that the 7 x 24 x 13 = 2184 days of the Priesthood is a
substantiation of Judaeo-Christian identity [Luke 1:5-9] and the
Torah's cosmology and cosmogony as 'oth cycle = 6D or 6 x 364 days.
This norm associated to the ephemeral and mundane has a transcendent
fecundite connection to the Vernal and the Autumn Equinox in the 6th
year of the 22nd Course of Gamul: 7 x 24 x 13 x 49 = 6J or 294 x 364
days or 365.2425 x 293 years - Vernal Equinox Wednesday 20 March
1996 / 21 March = 1 Nisan 5756 associated to the 'constant sequence of
sun and moon' as 354 x 3 + 30 day intercalation = 1092 days x 2 = 2184
days.
This computational norm of 365.2425 days associated to this Sabbath
Based Jubilee chronology transcends the adoption of that norm in the
1582 CE Gregorian Calendar Reforms (British Act of Parliament 1752 CE)
proposing a 400 year cycle which commences on a Saturday and equates
to 146097 days. According to this 'worldview, there is in 6,000 years
the equivalent of 2191455 days MOD 7 = 7; MOD 22 = 13; MOD 364 = 175
>From (1st day of 1st month solar calendar) Wednesday 20 March + 175 =
11 September. And from (1st day of 1st month solar calendar) Wednesday
20 March 1996 + 5 x 364 + 182 = 12 September 2001 as (1st day of 7th
month solar calendar). Thus the notion Telos [122J3W1D] = Arch [3W1D]
+ c^2 [9(9^2+1)/2] can be shown to focus 7 x #41 centric on 13-17
September 2001 / 18 September = 1 Tishri 5762.
The Grapple Homoiotic Noumenon, is after all, a transexperiental and
transpersonal object onto which time stamped phenomenon is referred,
as to the basis or cause of its sense content. And as a heuristic {ie.
a method of solving problems and for one which no algorithm is
considered to exist and which therefore depends on inductive reasoning
from past experience of similar problems} attributed to a
chronological (24 hr day / topical year / Telos (122J3W1D) = Arch
(3W1D) + 9(9^2+1)/2) hermeneutical overlay as behavioral 'a priori',
it may be considered in and of itself a jurisprudent determination as
to
the integrity of statements and whether, as the measure of their
categorical nature, are compliant with the natural, regulative and
metempirical principles of our legislation as jurisprudent framework
and accordingly our human, religious and Australian Constitutional
rights.
- dolf
http://www.sybilline.bigpondhosting.com/Chronicles/WaysideChapel.html
Faith Like A Child wrote:
Mettas Mother
"Father Haskell" <father...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1172560669.9...@k78g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Father Haskell
> So now it is the sheeps' fault!?
Of _course_ not.
But jeebiz wants you to kill them, just the same.