Newsgroups: alt.support.diabetes, sci.med.cardiology, sci.med, misc.health.diabetes
From: "Bob (this one)" <B...@nospam.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 23:59:48 -0400
Local: Tues, Jun 28 2005 11:59 pm
Subject: Re: major weight problem
John wrote: Oh, look. It's "John" come to deflect the justifiable skepticism from > Jeff, is it your claim that the peer reviewed literature is in > complete agreement in your medical specialty? Do you not sometimes > find wide divergence of opinion in such literature? If you are > treating a patient and the peers disagree, what do you do? If the > peers are silent, what do you do? Do you then rely on you own ideas > or just give up? If the former, after you've had success on a number > of patients using your own ideas, what do you do? > Sorry for all the question marks. ;-) the 2 pound diet. And asking all sorts of irrelevant "questions." Let me help you here, Slow-boy. It's not that there aren't reviewed It's that there are *none* regarding the 2 pound diet. *Nothing Chung keeps weaseling about this by saying it has been peer-reviewed Bottom line, Fake-boy. There's *nothing* to support Chung's delusions of Peer-reviewed publication is the way of dissemination of new information Pastorio You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||
