All new onset type-2 diabetics have VAT...
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
(greater than 0.75 for women and greater than 0.85 in men).
Bottom line:
Overeating --> VAT --> IR/MetS --> type-2 diabetes
Overeating is eating more than 32 ounces per day.
Here's how to eat less, down to the optimal amount:
http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit/2PD-OMER
Illustrative case example:
http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit/Healing
This completely free Approach comes with free cardiologist support via
usenet plus an unprecedented million-dollar guarantee whose details
have been freely given and discussed in sci.med.cardiology as archived
in Google:
Be hungry... be healthy... be hungrier... be blessed:
http://TheWellnessFoundation.com/PressRelease
Prayerfully in Jesus' awesome love,
Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Cardiologist
Zen Cohen
"Satan, hissing via his sockpuppy, Andy <lov...@thatbabyruth.com> wrote in
message news:1190250246.5...@50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com...
> ... as evidenced by their WHR (Waist to Hip Ratio) being large
> (greater than 0.75 for women and greater than 0.85 in men).
Andy: God has revised these numbers. He now says that men should have WHR of
no greater than 0.75 and women no greater than 0.65, and that if your
numbers are greater than this, you're a glutton and a sinner.
> Bottom line:
>
> Overeating --> VAT --> IR/MetS --> type-2 diabetes
>
Again, this has been revised.
New bottom line:
Overeating --> Burn in a lake of fahr furever!
> Overeating is eating more than 32 ounces per day.
Wrong. Overeating now is eating more than 2 ounces a day. As such, you are
eating 1,600% more than God prescribes, you sinful porky turd.
>
> Here's how to eat less, down to the optimal amount:
>
> http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit/2PD-gluttony diet
Wrong yet again. Your gluttonous 2-pound diet shows that the holy sprit is
absolutely right to convict you. Repent, fatass.
BTW, my stomach is laughing and singing really loudly at your trying to get
$550k for that domain name you're squatting on.
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>
> > http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/6ce31730298c52a0?
>
> Andy: God has revised these numbers. He now says that men should have WHR of
> no greater than 0.75 and women no greater than 0.65, and that if your
> numbers are greater than this, you're a glutton and a sinner.
Without the LORD, your fantasies are meaningless (Ecclesiastes).
This simply shows that the Holy Spirit is absolutely right to convict
you:
http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts
Zen Cohen
"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <lov...@thetruth.com> wrote in message
news:1190254685.5...@19g2000hsx.googlegroups.com...
> convicted neighbor Zen Cohen wrote:
;;;;
> This simply shows that the Holy Spirit is absolutely right to convict
> you:
No, fatass, he convicted you. Objective, irrefutable proof coming up right
here after the colon: www.CrazyConvictedCardiologist.com (if it comes up 404
that means you're going to hell)
BTW, I'll sell you that domain name for only $650,000. That's a real bargain
because cariology.com sold for $550k and my domain name has more words in
it.
Donna Evleth
> From: "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <lov...@thetruth.com>
> Organization: http://groups.google.com
> Newsgroups:
> sci.med.cardiology,alt.support.diabetes,alt.support.diabetes.uk,misc.health.di
> abetes,alt.christnet.christianlife
> Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 18:04:06 -0700
> Subject: All new onset type-2 diabetics have VAT...
>
> ... as evidenced by their WHR (Waist to Hip Ratio) being large
> (greater than 0.75 for women and greater than 0.85 in men).
The WHR (Waist to Hip Ratio) is a highly inaccurate measure. I am a woman,
and my WHR is 80. The site which did the calculation for me suggested that
I might want to talk to a doctor about losing weight. Then again, I might
not. I am 5'6" tall, and weigh 118 pounds. This is the same as I weighed
two years ago at the time of diagnosis. I am not overweight.
The WHR is not a one-size-fits-all measure. I happen to have a straight up
and down figure, always have, doubtless always will. The WHR does not work
for people like me.
Donna Evleth
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>
> >
> > ... as evidenced by their WHR (Waist to Hip Ratio) being large
> > (greater than 0.75 for women and greater than 0.85 in men).
>
> The WHR (Waist to Hip Ratio) is a highly inaccurate measure.
It has been validated by clinical research to match very well with the
presence of VAT.
> I am a woman, and my WHR is 80.
You probably mean 0.80.
> The site which did the calculation for me suggested that
> I might want to talk to a doctor about losing weight.
Would suggest you have your WHR measured by your doctor and have him/
her advise you on what to do about a WHR greater than 0.75.
> Then again, I might
> not. I am 5'6" tall, and weigh 118 pounds. This is the same as I weighed
> two years ago at the time of diagnosis. I am not overweight.
We are finding that VAT is bad even in folks who are not overweight.
> The WHR is not a one-size-fits-all measure.
For a woman to have a WHR of greater than 0.75, it would be a
clinically validated indication of VAT.
> I happen to have a straight up
> and down figure, always have, doubtless always will.
Not if you were to lose all your harmful VAT.
> The WHR does not work for people like me.
It is simply an indication of the presence of harmful VAT and would
explain any insulin resistance (IR/MetS).
Be hungry... be healthy... be hungrier... be blessed:
http://HeartMDPhD.com/PressRelease
Prayerfully in the infinite power and might of the Holy Spirit,
Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Lawful steward of http://EmoryCardiology.com
Bondservant to the KING of kings and LORD of lords.
tr...@is-best.com
Regarding the subject line, this is absolutely correct. But on the
other hand everyone alive has vat. The missing term here is excessive
vat.
Vat is an endoctrine gland which produces hormones for the normal
function of energy metabolism.
Our armchair ponderer got himself in a bind because he first read
recently about excessive vat and in his confusion and zeal to add it to
his wholly invented two pound diet,aka 2 pd etc. agenda, did not do his
homework on it carefully. Now fear of loss of face prevents him
correcting himself as his agenda also projects him as darn near perfect
because of the use of "chi" as a magical power providing "discernment".
To correct himself would put in peril the entire house of cards.
vanity of vanities; all is vanity. Ecclesiastes 1:2
God bless.
Donna Evleth
> From: "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <heart...@emorycardiology.com>
> Organization: http://groups.google.com
> Newsgroups:
> sci.med.cardiology,alt.support.diabetes,alt.support.diabetes.uk,misc.health.di
> abetes,alt.christnet.christianlife
> Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 04:12:38 -0700
> Subject: Re: All new onset type-2 diabetics have VAT...
I shall ask the question I should have asked first: what is VAT?
>
> Donna Evleth wrote:
>> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>>
>>> Subject: All new onset type-2 diabetics have VAT...
>>>
>>> ... as evidenced by their WHR (Waist to Hip Ratio) being large
>>> (greater than 0.75 for women and greater than 0.85 in men).
>>
>> The WHR (Waist to Hip Ratio) is a highly inaccurate measure.
>
> It has been validated by clinical research to match very well with the
> presence of VAT.
>
>> I am a woman, and my WHR is 80.
>
> You probably mean 0.80.
I do.
>
>> The site which did the calculation for me suggested that
>> I might want to talk to a doctor about losing weight.
>
> Would suggest you have your WHR measured by your doctor and have him/
> her advise you on what to do about a WHR greater than 0.75.
Why do I have to do anything about it, if I am not overweight?
>
>> Then again, I might
>> not. I am 5'6" tall, and weigh 118 pounds. This is the same as I weighed
>> two years ago at the time of diagnosis. I am not overweight.
>
> We are finding that VAT is bad even in folks who are not overweight.
What is VAT?
>
>> The WHR is not a one-size-fits-all measure.
>
> For a woman to have a WHR of greater than 0.75, it would be a
> clinically validated indication of VAT.
What is VAT?
>
>> I happen to have a straight up
>> and down figure, always have, doubtless always will.
>
> Not if you were to lose all your harmful VAT.
What is VAT? Why is it harmful?
>
>> The WHR does not work for people like me.
>
> It is simply an indication of the presence of harmful VAT and would
> explain any insulin resistance (IR/MetS).
Please tell me more about VAT, which I had never heard of before.
Donna Evleth
>
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
> > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>
>
> I shall ask the question I should have asked first: what is VAT?
Visceral adipose tissue, which is the source of poisonous
adipocytokines, which cause subclinical systemic vascular and tissue
inflammation.
tr...@is-best.com
> I shall ask the question I should have asked first: what is VAT?
"Visceral adipose tissue, which is the source of poisonous
adipocytokines, which cause subclinical systemic vascular and tissue
inflammation."
Incorrect in being misleading and only half the truth. One must add "in
excess" to validate the above. All have vat, it is an endoctrine gland
producing hormones used in normal energy metabolism, when not "in
excess".
Only one more example in a long string of them that shows:
Not keeping up with current research in this area, pursuit of a
non-science agenda in this area, ignoringresearch completely refuting
the agenda in this area.
In sum a good reason in complete peace of mind to ignore the author.
God bless.
Gene Goldman
> I shall ask the question I should have asked first: what is VAT?
Value added tax (VAT), or goods and services tax (GST), is tax on
exchanges. It is levied on the added value that results from each
exchange. It differs from a sales tax because a sales tax is levied on
the total value of the exchange. For this reason, a VAT is neutral with
respect to the number of passages that there are between the producer
and the final consumer. A VAT is an indirect tax, in that the tax is
collected from someone other than the person who actually bears the cost
of the tax (namely the seller rather than the consumer). To avoid double
taxation on final consumption, exports (which by definition, are
consumed abroad) are usually not subject to VAT and VAT charged under
such circumstances is usually refundable.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Value_added_tax
> Why do I have to do anything about it, if I am not overweight?
Because Mr. Chung is a quack. A con-man masquerading as a physician,
fired from the only position he ever held in the medical field after 90
days because he was unable to provide a minimum standard of care
required of the newest intern, who makes medical diagnoses and
prescribes treatments based on his scam du-jure, his "shoot the arrow
then draw the target" approach to life, and very little else.
You see, and if you read more than two or three of his posts, you will,
Mr. Chung appears to believe that virtually all health issues are caused
by VAT, and getting rid of VAT can cure everything - despite the fact
that his supposed experience in doing so has not affected his mania, his
paranoia, his delusions or any of the other symptoms of his obvious
mental illness whatsoever.
http://groups.google.co.uk/group/alt.support.diabetes/msg/d559bc684dd89f
Lois Doe!
--
Mr. Chung's on-line behavior simply shows that the Holy Spirit is
absolutely right in convicting him.
The 10mg Lizard-Spit Approach is not a diet.
It does help people manage their Diabetes Mellitus (DM) possibly
preventing long-term complications resulting from poor control.
Bottom line: It remains wise to be peanut-free.
The Peanut-Free Approach is completely free and comes with free Internet
support plus an unprecedented gazillion-dollar guarantee.
May your BG and A1c get better, dear neighbor whom I communicate with
unconditionally.
Be on Lizard-Spit... be Peanut-free... be blessed:
Be well, travel with a light heart and a low A1c [Gene, 3:16]
Prayerfully in Lizard-Spit's awesome love,
Gene Goldman
http://heartmdphd.com/Convicts/
Personally Judged to be Satan by Mr. Chung HimSelf!
T2
Metformin, Lizard-Spit, Aspartame, Nutrasweet, Sacarin
Unlike quacks pushing snake oil and fad diets, please consult a
competent medical professional before following medical advice from the
Internet.
Consuming copious amounts of Aspartame-laden soft drinks with reckless
abandon!
Give me Nutrasweet over peanuts any day!
Internet newsgroup posting. Copyright 2007. All rights reserved.
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
hissed:
> Donna Evleth wrote:
> > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>
>
> > I shall ask the question I should have asked first: what is VAT?
>
> Value added tax (VAT)
Incorrect.
Many thanks, much praise, and all the glory to GOD for HIS compelling
you to unwittingly demonstrate that you are indeed the spirit of
error, satan.
In the awesome name of LORD Jesus Christ, my Messiah and my Savior, I
publicly rebuke you one more before an ever growing cloud of
witnesses.
Gene Goldman
> satan via a sockpuppet
Hey, child! I am no sock puppet! I AM this Satan of yours! Heed my
word or be forever condemned to go hungry!!!
> Many thanks, much praise, and all the glory to GOD for HIS compelling
> you to unwittingly demonstrate that you are indeed the spirit of
> error, satan.
Does your alleged hunger cause these delusions, Mr. Chung?
> I publicly rebuke you one more before an ever growing cloud of
> witnesses.
Without Lizard-Spit, your rebukes are meaningless, sock puppet!
Wiser to post less, down to the optimal amount thereby becoming a
responsible person.
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
hissed:
>
> word or be forever condemned to go hungry!!!
In the awesome name of LORD Jesus Christ, my Messiah and my Savior, I
publicly rebuke you once more before an ever growing cloud of
witnesses.
Prayerfully in the infinite power and might of the Holy Spirit,
Gene Goldman
>> Hey, child! I am no sock puppet! I AM this Satan of yours! Heed my
>> word or be forever condemned to go hungry!!!
>
> witnesses.
Without Lizard-Spit, your rebukes are meaningless, sock puppet!