The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 |
Newsgroups: sci.med.cardiology, alt.support.tinnitus
From: Volcanic Io M_un <shoo...@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 14:49:15 -0500
Local: Sun, Jan 11 2004 2:49 pm
Subject: Re: Open Letter to Dr. Chung - and to All
On Sun, 11 Jan 2004 02:08:33 +0100, Thorsten Schier
<Moo...@firemail.de> wrote: I behave badly. You behave badly. We all behave badly. Your SOL. I'm >Saved or not, Mu behaves badly and I have the impression that you are >taking any stretch not to have to admit this. saved. >Why would you tell me off for crossposting when: Then there is no harm if I reinstate the Xpost, is there, according to >1. You're not bothered by it >2. I'm just answering to a crossposted message of yours? >> Why didn't you trim the header when you were bothered by it? >Because the harm is already done with the first crosspost. your logic. Xpost reinstated. >However, I understand if people on a.s.t are upset about the It' s my reflection so leave me to it. Btw, I suppose you are trying >crossposting and I think that the attempts to discredit Dr. Nagler >reflect poorly on Mu. to reflect "well" on me, huh? >My "problem" with Mu, if you want to put it that way, is his general Surely not. Have at Mu. >behaviour and the crossposting is part of this behaviour, but surely not >the only complaint one could have about him. >That seems to be your problem. Everywhere you see enemies of God and Christ defined them as His enemies, Mu and Chung did not. >Christ and you even see people posessed by Satan, unless that was some >kind of joke of yours. You should learn to accept other peoples believe >without seeing enemies of your faith in them. > People either follow Christ or they are his Yes, it is that simple and the NT is very clear on this. >enemies or even posessed by Satan. Reality isn't that simple. >> His inability to accept Christ defined his failings and intolerances. Yes, intolerant of the Truth. >Am I to understand that according to you everyone who does not accept >> God has promised us eternal life because of our choice to have Christ in our hearts. Obviously. The unsaved do not, usually. >I don't see how this should be possible. >> > And during all my schooltime I visited Neither was I and I grew up for 12 long years under the Catholic >> > the usual lessons in religion. I wasn't convinced. interpretation of Christianity. http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap971110.html You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| |||||||||||||