Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
The 2PD-OMER Approach quack science?
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  3 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Jimmy Alpha GeD  
View profile  
 More options May 15 2012, 2:11 pm
Newsgroups: sci.med.cardiology, misc.health.alternative, alt.support.diabetes, sci.med, alt.usenet.kooks
From: Jimmy Alpha GeD <jimmy_al...@operamail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 14:11:57 -0400
Local: Tues, May 15 2012 2:11 pm
Subject: The 2PD-OMER Approach quack science?
One person's diet, one sick looking person's diet without any peer
review is like asking Obama to watch your money!

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Ace*  
View profile  
 More options May 16 2012, 2:48 am
Newsgroups: sci.med.cardiology, misc.health.alternative, alt.support.diabetes, sci.med, alt.usenet.kooks
From: "Ace*" <avlvsvery...@hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 23:48:42 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Wed, May 16 2012 2:48 am
Subject: Re: The 2PD-OMER Approach quack science?
On May 15, 11:11 am, Jimmy Alpha GeD <jimmy_al...@operamail.com>
wrote:

> One person's diet, one sick looking person's diet without any peer
> review is like asking Obama to watch your money!

Why not just let him die a peaceful internet death? Everyone else has
abandoned him. He has nothing left to him except for cranking out the
same verbatim ignored material, day after day, like a machine. The
lights are on, but nobody is at home. He's gone. Lost.

A*


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Jimmy Alpha GeD  
View profile  
 More options May 16 2012, 6:32 am
Newsgroups: sci.med.cardiology, misc.health.alternative, alt.support.diabetes, sci.med, alt.usenet.kooks
From: Jimmy Alpha GeD <jimmy_al...@operamail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 06:32:32 -0400
Local: Wed, May 16 2012 6:32 am
Subject: Re: The 2PD-OMER Approach quack science?
On 5/16/2012 2:48 AM, Ace* wrote:
> On May 15, 11:11 am, Jimmy Alpha GeD<jimmy_al...@operamail.com>
> wrote:
>> One person's diet, one sick looking person's diet without any peer
>> review is like asking Obama to watch your money!

> Why not just let him die a peaceful internet death? Everyone else has
> abandoned him. He has nothing left to him except for cranking out the
> same verbatim ignored material, day after day, like a machine. The
> lights are on, but nobody is at home. He's gone. Lost.

> A*

lol, it is sad isn't it! lol

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »