Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion "No One" is sitting in my empty chairs

Received: by 10.180.73.173 with SMTP id m13mr1801726wiv.4.1349102028315;
        Mon, 01 Oct 2012 07:33:48 -0700 (PDT)
Path: q10ni50346917wif.0!nntp.google.com!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!news.mixmin.net!news.albasani.net!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Timothy Sutter <a202...@lycos.com->
Newsgroups: comp.theory,sci.logic,sci.math,alt.discordia
Subject: Re: "No One" is sitting in my empty chairs
Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2012 10:34:15 -0400
Organization: Absolute Zero
Lines: 47
Message-ID: <5069A9E7.2453@lycos.com->
References: <see-01D9FF.15113511092012@news.eternal-september.org>
												<504EC31B.1E2D@lycos.com->
												<0.080337bc0c25a1465518.20120911115028BST.874nn4ltor.fsf@bsb.me.uk>
												<504F2CDB.6C9@lycos.com->
												<0.10e7496f3719ae28684e.20120911144918BST.87sjaok6u9.fsf@bsb.me.uk>
												<504F55AA.4EB6@lycos.com-> <0.333094b479f11da2742b.20120911223724BST.87mx0wjl63.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <50508E6B.4CE3@lycos.com-> <505097AD.21AC@lycos.com-> <50509918.12C2@lycos.com-> <5050992D.1461@lycos.com-> <5050994A.674D@lycos.com-> <5050A431.23E3@lycos.com-> <5050B589.1A09@lycos.com-> <50699739.7312@lycos.com-> <5069A300.1F60@lycos.com-> <5069A42F.81B@lycos.com->
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: news.albasani.net xc39o+OW2d4kBm7G2i/lfEnGDr1r2RQ60KV8Eowg3y40LVH18joU4zoqakD05MLiTvtZ6JAdWghN4xhjUPxPXA==
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2012 14:33:48 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: news.albasani.net; logging-data="s8pH+icCkaMom9HvObeZG5pmZbjDEcb1GpMoo3tJEBX7QZXGRFjB1CgFaLHePY1F/7xoKbECeFWShJ0FmPh6rWy98VKj1BeL8qYrQyZCtz0UOxbPk8Rvmm9JH+lfsFNw"; mail-complaints-to="ab...@albasani.net"
X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.03 (WinNT; I)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:MpcSHpe90uTKXvY07wkbG3E/FD8=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

> so, -that- part needs no prior planning;

> "if you see a chance, kill a federal agent"

> so, what you're trying to say, is, that
> this thing was planned months in advance
> but this doesn't seem to be -obviously- the case,



#> and then you define it as a "terrorist" action

#> -because- of what happened.

and -not- by any 'plan' that you've been able to uncover

and you can't demonstrate conclusively that a considerable
number of people were -not- simply mulling around the embassy
with -no- prior knowledge of any 'planned' "terrorist action"
and that they may have been there 'for the movie'

now you can get your conspiracy together and say that
the maker of the movie was part of the grand scheme
just so the 'terrorists' could convince a large number
of people to mull around embassies so the smaller number
of 'terrorists' who were part of the "plan" could do
their thing with a diversionary crowd cover who had
no prior knowledge that they were, in fact,
a diversionary crowd.

now waste 6000 man hours trying to prove this...

and unca sam gets more and more paranoid and

starts pointing fingers at himself in the mirror...

win/win for the 'terrorists'...




> all without being able to show that this thing
>  was part of a specificly blueprinted diabolical
> plan that was outlined years in advance
> to commemorate holy 911 day.

> that you don't got...