quasi
Ok, the proof just hit me -- it's easy -- the answer is "no".
But my proof doesn't appear to generalize to the case of 3
types of tiles, so here's the revised question ...
Do there exist positive integers m,n and relatively prime
positive integers a,b,c, none of which is a factor of either
m or n, such that an m x n grid can be tiled with some
combination of a x a, b x b, c x c tiles?
quasi
>On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 02:41:18 -0500, quasi <qu...@null.set> wrote:
>
>>Do there exist positive integers m,n and relatively prime
>>positive integers a,b, neither of which is a factor of
>>either m or n, such that an m x n grid can be tiled with
>>some combination of a x a and b x b tiles?
>
>Ok, the proof just hit me -- it's easy -- the answer is "no".
I take it back -- my "easy proof" just disintegrated.
>But my proof doesn't appear to generalize to the case of 3
>types of tiles, so here's the revised question ...
>
>Do there exist positive integers m,n and relatively prime
>positive integers a,b,c, none of which is a factor of either
>m or n, such that an m x n grid can be tiled with some
>combination of a x a, b x b, c x c tiles?
Ok, so both problems are in play.
quasi
The case of 3 types of tiles is trivial.
a 7x13 rectangle can be tiled by 8*2x2, 1*3x3 and 2*5x5 squares.
You may be interested in Theorem 5 of
http://www.combinatorics.org/Volume_11/PDF/v11i1n7.pdf
The rest of the paper may interest you, as well.
--
Gerry Myerson (ge...@maths.mq.edi.ai) (i -> u for email)
>In article <8enfj6hbh9ueutceq...@4ax.com>,
> quasi <qu...@null.set> wrote:
>
>> Do there exist positive integers m,n and relatively prime
>> positive integers a,b, neither of which is a factor of either
>> m or n, such that an m x n grid can be tiled with some
>> combination of a x a and b x b tiles?
>
>You may be interested in Theorem 5 of
>http://www.combinatorics.org/Volume_11/PDF/v11i1n7.pdf
>
>The rest of the paper may interest you, as well.
Those results pretty much clinch the answer to my question, and more.
Thanks.
quasi