Newsgroups: sci.math
From: dlren...@gateway.net (Dave L. Renfro)
Date: 2000/05/11
Subject: Re: Question from Rudin
paul mitchell <pa...@cats.ucsc.edu>
[sci.math Wed, 10 May 2000 12:33:09 GMT] <http://forum.swarthmore.edu/epigone/sci.math/flarzhozal> wrote > This question from Rudin's textbook, p44 Any translation of the Cantor set is closed. There are many > has been stumping the undergrad Real Analysis > class at UCSC: Is there a non-empty perfect > set in R that contains no rational? We've tried > various translations of the Cantor set, but haven't > been able to demonstrate both closedness and the > absence of rationals. Any hints? ways to prove this. One way is to observe that the Cantor set is compact, any translation is a continuous map, any continuous image of a compact set is compact, and any compact set is closed. [Or: The Cantor set is closed, any translation is a homeomorphism, and any homeomorphic image of a closed set is closed.] In 1884, Scheeffer [4] (pp. 291-293) published a proof of Let C be a perfect nowhere dense set of reals and Z be a For a proof see pp. 52-53 of Young/Young [5] (these page numbers Boes/Darst/Erdos prove in [2] that given any countable set Z, the In 1959, Bagemihl proved the following stronger version of Let F be a first category set of reals and Z be a countable set [1] Frederick Bagemihl, "A note on Scheeffer's theorem", Michigan [2] Duane Boes, Richard Darst, and Paul Erdos, "Fat, Symmetric, [3] John C. Morgan II, POINT SET THEORY, Pure and Applied [4] L. Scheeffer, "Zur Theorie der stetigen Functionen einer [5] Grace C. Young and William H. Young, THE THEORY OF SETS OF Dave L. Renfro You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||
