Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Infinite cyclic automorphism group

9 views
Skip to first unread message

Bob Katz

unread,
Nov 30, 2001, 11:34:57 AM11/30/01
to
Is there a group G such that Aut(G) is infinite cyclic group ?

Thanks

Robin Chapman

unread,
Nov 30, 2001, 2:53:24 PM11/30/01
to
"Bob Katz" <bob...@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:ijsm76kltapq@legacy...

> Is there a group G such that Aut(G) is infinite cyclic group ?

No. Such a group would have G/Z(G) cyclic and this implies
that G is abelian. Every abelian group apart from the 2-torsion
groups has an automorphism of order 2 and 2-torsion abelian
groups of order >= 4 also have automorphisms of order 2.

Robin Chapman

--
Posted from webcacheh01a.cache.pol.co.uk [195.92.67.65]
via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG

Bob Katz

unread,
Dec 1, 2001, 7:47:12 PM12/1/01
to
> Is there a group G such that Aut(G) is infinite cyclic group ?

>No. Such a group would have G/Z(G) cyclic and this implies
>that G is abelian. Every abelian group apart from the 2-torsion
>groups has an automorphism of order 2 and 2-torsion abelian
>groups of order >= 4 also have automorphisms of order 2.

>Robin Chapman

OK thanks, but let me ask also if Aut(G) can be ZxZ (direct product of
two infinite cyclic groups) .

Bob

ma...@primrose.csv.warwick.ac.uk

unread,
Dec 2, 2001, 7:39:15 AM12/2/01
to
In article <73p1h8zfm9rk@legacy>,

No. All subgroups of a free abelian group are free abelian, so a subgroup
of ZxZ is isomorphic to 1, Z or ZxZ. Hence G/Z(G) is is isomorphic to
one of these. Robin has proved that 1 and Z are impossible,
so this only leaves G/Z(G) =~ ZxZ. Let a and b in G map onto the
two generators of ZxZ, and let c = [b,a] = b^-1 a^-1 b a be the commutator.

Every element of the group can be uniquely represented as a^i b^j x, for
x in Z(G). Now, since commutators are central, the commutator map is
bilinear - i.e. [b^i,a^j] = c^{ij} for all i,j in Z. Hence multiplication
in G is given by the rule
(a^i b^j x)(a^k b^l y) = a^{i+k} b^{j+l} c^{jk} xy, and it is now easy
to check that G has an automorphism of order 2 given by
a^i b^j x -> a^{-i} b^{-j} x.

I think the argument extends in then obvious way to show that Z^n cannot
occur as Aut(G) for any n.

Derek Holt.

0 new messages