JSH: The Simple Lie
JSH
integer solutions to j^2 - Dk^2 = -1, using x = 2j^2 + 1, is just a
mathematical reality.
The belief that modern mathematicians give a damn about their field
and value knowledge over basic human politics is a simple lie.
So I can show 9^2 - 5*4^2 = 1, is given by x = 2*2^2 + 1, as 2^2 -
5*1^2 = -1, but you can ignore that because you wish.
And modern mathematicians who pathetically don't give a damn about
anything but their grants so they can pay their mortgages I guess, can
get away with a simple lie.
Check online sources on Pell's Equation:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pell's_equation
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/PellEquation.html
See if you can see something so simple mentioned. I selected that
result as it reduces to saying that given an integer solution to the
equation often called the negative Pell's Equation you ALWAYS have a
solution to Pell's Equation in integers.
Always.
A mathematical absolute.
Now that result probably was known to Fermat and Euler but
incompetence entered the math field in the late 1800's and it kind of
slipped through the cracks.
But if modern mathematicians were what they claim to be, so what?
They'd just kind of laugh it off, note the obvious result and give me
credit...oh.
Now you see where it's politics.
Can you imagine physicists stopping with a result in an area with two
thousand years of research interest to prevent one man from getting
credit?
Why do you admire mathematicians so much? When they lie to you in
return?
Maybe some of you need to value yourselves and your knowledge better
as that is nothing compared to the bigger lies that cover Galois
Theory and shift what you think you know about Group Theory.
Your loss is just about history. When humanity adjusts and corrects,
and much of your research is tossed on the heap, students later may
read about you in a paragraph and imagine there is no way they could
have been like you.
But you are you. History is waiting to happen. The destruction of
your research is today.
James Harris
Gib Bogle
> But you are you. History is waiting to happen. The destruction of
> your research is today.
Tomorrow was new yesterday.
Enrico
=======================================================
> The fact that with integers x^2 - Dy^2 = 1, can always be solved by
> integer solutions to j^2 - Dk^2 = -1, using x = 2j^2 + 1, is just a
> mathematical reality.
Nope. Your forgot a constraint you had before.
j^2 - Dk^2 = -1 has no integer solutions for D = 7 or 19
Enrico
Rupert
> The fact that with integers x^2 - Dy^2 = 1, can always be solved by
> integer solutions to j^2 - Dk^2 = -1, using x = 2j^2 + 1, is just a
> mathematical reality.
>
Can you state the theorem more precisely?
Samsky
"Enrico" <unger...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:f477dab5-4777-47a8...@j12g2000vbl.googlegroups.com...
On May 4, 7:00 pm, JSH <jst...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The fact that with integers x^2 - Dy^2 = 1, can always be solved by
> integer solutions to j^2 - Dk^2 = -1, using x = 2j^2 + 1, is just a
> mathematical reality.
Nope. Your forgot a constraint you had before.
j^2 - Dk^2 = -1 has no integer solutions for D = 7 or 19
Enrico
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
JSH => an error in EVERY Post
Jens Stueckelberger
> [More inane crap.]
That's a very good description of yourself.
habitoid
"JSH" <jst...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:c043aa9a-1dde-43d2...@v23g2000pro.googlegroups.com...
> The fact that with integers x^2 - Dy^2 = 1, can always be solved by
> integer solutions to j^2 - Dk^2 = -1, using x = 2j^2 + 1, is just a
> mathematical reality.
let's see,
5 unknowns, 3 equations
(mean anything?)
>
> But you are you. History is waiting to happen. The destruction of
> your research is today.
>
History has passed you by JSH,
all because you were so stoned shitless in your High School Algebra classes.
>
> James Harris
Arturo Magidin
> > The fact that with integers x^2 - Dy^2 = 1, can always be solved by
> > integer solutions to j^2 - Dk^2 = -1, using x = 2j^2 + 1, is just a
> > mathematical reality.
>
> let's see,
>
> 5 unknowns, 3 equations
>
> (mean anything?)
Are you trying to insinuate that any system of equations that is
undertermined will have integer solutions?
Or even that any system of equations that is underdetermined will have
solutions?
Really?
--
Arturo Magidin
habitoid
"Arturo Magidin" <mag...@member.ams.org> wrote in message
news:8ce52da6-da27-4ff5...@r13g2000vbr.googlegroups.com...
Really?
--
Arturo Magidin
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
"any system of equations" and "underdetermined" is just "open"
But extend 5 unknowns, 3 equations => 10 unknowns and 4 equations, or => 15
unknowns and 2 sets of equations (5 total) with nothing in common.
The idea here is underscore JSH obscurification by throwing in more
varables. One time he was up to 15 unknowns in one post.
Haword
"Samsky" <inv...@invalid.com> wrote in message
news:49ffabe8$1...@news.x-privat.org...
Pix of JSH posting in newsproup;
http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2008/09/DogPoop.jpg
Arturo Magidin
> "Arturo Magidin" <magi...@member.ams.org> wrote in message
>
> news:8ce52da6-da27-4ff5...@r13g2000vbr.googlegroups.com...
> On May 5, 10:07 am, "habitoid" <inva...@invalid.com> wrote:
>
> > > The fact that with integers x^2 - Dy^2 = 1, can always be solved by
> > > integer solutions to j^2 - Dk^2 = -1, using x = 2j^2 + 1, is just a
> > > mathematical reality.
>
> > let's see,
>
> > 5 unknowns, 3 equations
>
> > (mean anything?)
>
> Are you trying to insinuate that any system of equations that is
> undertermined will have integer solutions?
>
> Or even that any system of equations that is underdetermined will have
> solutions?
>
> Really?
>
> --
> Arturo Magidin
>
>
>
> "any system of equations" and "underdetermined" is just "open"
>
> But extend 5 unknowns, 3 equations => 10 unknowns and 4 equations, or => 15
> unknowns and 2 sets of equations (5 total) with nothing in common.
You still don't get it. Diophantine problems may have no solutions,
even when there are far more unknowns than equations, even if the
equations have "nothing in common".
25x + 15y + 35z = 7
is one equation with three unknowns, but has no integer solutions,
even though it is underdetermined.
Looks, there is plenty real to criticize in certain assertions. No
need to go off and make equally naive assertions in reply.
> The idea here is underscore JSH obscurification by throwing in more
> varables. One time he was up to 15 unknowns in one post.
That's a different issue altogether. Your insinuation here, however,
is off the mark.
--
Arturo Magidin
Lits O'Hate
browser?
Didn't you stop using all open source software?
--
"In the past I regularly used open source software and, of
course, have my own open source software Class Viewer, but
I stopped using any but my own." -- James Harris
fishfry
group?
jpkarl
> Hey James if this newsgroup is full of lies, does that make it a Lie
> group?
Shhh! He has no idea what a Lie group is.
José Carlos Santos
>> Hey James if this newsgroup is full of lies, does that make it a Lie
>> group?
>
> Shhh! He has no idea what a Lie group is.
Or just what a group is, for that matter:
http://mathforum.org/kb/plaintext.jspa?messageID=6673289
Best regards,
Jose Carlos Santos
W. Dale Hall
> Hey James if this newsgroup is full of lies, does that make it a Lie
> group?
A simple Lie group, didn't you read the subject line?
Michael Press
<c043aa9a-1dde-43d2...@v23g2000pro.googlegroups.com>,
JSH <jst...@gmail.com> wrote:
[...]
Guys, Harris posts _one_ message, no follow ups, and gets up
to twenty replies.
--
Michael Press
banana...@aol.com
> In article
> <c043aa9a-1dde-43d2-8ae7-07d153dc1...@v23g2000pro.googlegroups.com>,
>
> JSH <jst...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> Guys, Harris posts _one_ message, no follow ups, and gets up
> to twenty replies.
Not enough? Well, here's another:
================================================
it would not be accepted for formal peer review,
even if you can ignore that because you wish.
And modern mathematicians who pathetically don't
give a damn about anything but their grants so
they can pay their mortgages I guess, can get away
with a banana.
Here, you take this.
Now it's quite simple to defend yourself against
a man armed with a simple lie. So I can show
9^2 - 5*4^2 = 1, is just about history.
When humanity adjusts and corrects, and much of
your research is tossed on the heap, students later
may read about you in prison, other inmates stick
bananas up your butt.
Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a banana.
Who was the first carpenter? Eve. She made Adam's
banana stand and that she made Adam's banana stand,
and for that matter how a banana can stand in the
Annals is strictly greater (yes ">" not ">=") than
that of the distribution hassles that would entail.
We are sorry to let you know about Group Theory.
Your loss is just about history. When humanity adjusts
and corrects, and much of your research is tossed
on the heap, students later may read about you in
return?
Maybe some of you need to value yourselves and your
knowledge better as that is nothing compared to the
bigger lies that cover Galois Theory and shift what
you think you know about Group Theory.
Your loss is just about history. When humanity adjusts
and corrects, and much of your research is today.
Right, bananas.
How to defend yourself against the banana fiend.
First of all, you force him to drop the banana,
thus disarming him.
You shot him. He's dead. He's completely dead.
I have now rendered him helpless.
Supposing he's got a pointed stick.
Shut up. Now, I eat the banana, thus disarming him.
You have now eaten the banana. The deceased, Mr Apricot,
is now 'elpless.
You shot him. You have now rendered him helpless.
Supposing he's got a bunch.
Shut up.
Now attack me with a simple lie.
So I can show
9^2 - 5*4^2 = 1, is given by x = 2j^2 +1,
as 2^2 - 5*1^2 = -1, using x = 2j^2 + 1,
as 2^2 - 5*1^2 = -1, using x = 2*2^2 + 1,
is just about history.
When humanity adjusts and corrects, and much of
your research is today.
Right, bananas. How to defend yourself against
the banana in the first place.
Work all night on a drink a'rum.
>
> --
> Michael Press
Carlos
"Michael Press" <rub...@pacbell.net> wrote in message
news:rubrum-928612....@news.sf.sbcglobal.net...
That is why JSH does this stuff.
Score is total # of responces.
How do you craft a post that will get the largest number of responces ?
He is an expert in it.
Try it some time, it is very hard.
Lits O'Hate
> Guys, Harris posts _one_ message, no follow ups, and gets up
> to twenty replies.
Including yours.
Michael Press
<6f8584a9-697d-4254...@21g2000vbk.googlegroups.com>,
Not mine: not a reply to James Harris.
--
Michael Press
Mensanator
> "Lits O'Hate" <litsoh...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > On May 6, 7:57 pm, Michael Press <rub...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> > > Guys, Harris posts _one_ message, no follow ups, and gets up
> > > to twenty replies.
>
> > Including yours.
>
> Not mine: not a reply to James Harris.
I'm sure the trolls take that into consideration when they
compute the reply tally.
>
> --
> Michael Press
Lits O'Hate
> In article
> <6f8584a9-697d-4254-a3db-7a375df96...@21g2000vbk.googlegroups.com>,
>
> > On May 6, 7:57 pm, Michael Press <rub...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> > > Guys, Harris posts _one_ message, no follow ups, and gets up
> > > to twenty replies.
>
> > Including yours.
>
> Not mine: not a reply to James Harris.
Yes, it was.
Here's the References header from your article:
References:
<c043aa9a-1dde-43d2...@v23g2000pro.googlegroups.com>
That's the Message-ID of James's article.
Michael Press
<aa38ca7b-0432-4904...@z19g2000vbz.googlegroups.com>,
"Lits O'Hate" <lits...@yahoo.com> wrote:
It is not a reply to James Harris, just as this is not.
--
Michael Press
Michael Press
<5453e2ae-f875-416b...@x6g2000vbg.googlegroups.com>,
Mensanator <mensa...@aol.com> wrote:
That is the troll's problem, not mine. It is their own
moribund lives at stake. Imagine trying to live on
what others throw away; to be dependent on others
for scraps: beggars.
--
Michael Press
Lits O'Hate
> In article
> <6f8584a9-697d-4254-a3db-7a375df96...@21g2000vbk.googlegroups.com>,
>
> > On May 6, 7:57 pm, Michael Press <rub...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> > > Guys, Harris posts _one_ message, no follow ups, and gets up
> > > to twenty replies.
>
> > Including yours.
>
> Not mine: not a reply to James Harris.
That's technically true. A "reply" is an e-mail message to the
poster of a Usenet article.
However, your article was a followup to James's article. In
MT-NewsWatcher, you clicked on "Followup to Newsgroup" while
reading James's article.
Now, maybe you were really complaining about people sending
e-mail replies to James's articles but I doubt that's the
case.
Clearly you were complaining about people posting followups
to his articles, which is exactly what your article was.
By the way, you're up to four articles in this JSH thread
so far. :-)
Michael Press
<604d49f8-ba79-4fb8...@z19g2000vbz.googlegroups.com>,
"Lits O'Hate" <lits...@yahoo.com> wrote:
I'm going for the record.
--
Michael Press
Jesse F. Hughes
> I'm going for the record.
You're also posting replies to JSH in another thread.
Exactly what is your point? I thought that you were trying to prevent
others from feeding the troll, but perhaps not.
--
Jesse F. Hughes
"How can I miss you when you won't go away?"
-- Dan Hicks and his Hot Licks
JSH
> On May 4, 7:00 pm, JSH <jst...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > The fact that with integers x^2 - Dy^2 = 1, can always be solved by
> > integer solutions to j^2 - Dk^2 = -1, using x = 2j^2 + 1, is just a
> > mathematical reality.
>
> > and value knowledge over basic human politics is a simple lie.
>
> > So I can show 9^2 - 5*4^2 = 1, is given by x = 2*2^2 + 1, as 2^2 -
> > 5*1^2 = -1, but you can ignore that because you wish.
>
> > And modern mathematicians who pathetically don't give a damn about
> > anything but their grants so they can pay their mortgages I guess, can
>
> > Check online sources on Pell's Equation:
>
> >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pell's_equation
>
> >http://mathworld.wolfram.com/PellEquation.html
>
> > See if you can see something so simple mentioned. I selected that
> > result as it reduces to saying that given an integer solution to the
> > equation often called the negative Pell's Equation you ALWAYS have a
> > solution to Pell's Equation in integers.
>
> > Always.
>
> > A mathematical absolute.
>
> > Now that result probably was known to Fermat and Euler but
> > incompetence entered the math field in the late 1800's and it kind of
> > slipped through the cracks.
>
> > But if modern mathematicians were what they claim to be, so what?
> > They'd just kind of laugh it off, note the obvious result and give me
> > credit...oh.
>
> > Now you see where it's politics.
>
> > Can you imagine physicists stopping with a result in an area with two
> > thousand years of research interest to prevent one man from getting
> > credit?
>
> > Why do you admire mathematicians so much? When they lie to you in
> > return?
>
> > Maybe some of you need to value yourselves and your knowledge better
> > as that is nothing compared to the bigger lies that cover Galois
> > Theory and shift what you think you know about Group Theory.
>
> > Your loss is just about history. When humanity adjusts and corrects,
> > read about you in a paragraph and imagine there is no way they could
> > have been like you.
>
> > But you are you. History is waiting to happen. The destruction of
> > your research is today.
>
> > James Harris
>
> =======================================================
>
> > The fact that with integers x^2 - Dy^2 = 1, can always be solved by
> > integer solutions to j^2 - Dk^2 = -1, using x = 2j^2 + 1, is just a
> > mathematical reality.
>
> j^2 - Dk^2 = -1 has no integer solutions for D = 7 or 19
>
> Enrico
It goes the other way: if you have a solution to j^2 - Dk^2 = -1, then
necessarily you have a solution to
x^2 - Dy^2 = 1
from x = 2j^2 + 1.
Read what I said more carefully.
James Harris
Michael Press
"Jesse F. Hughes" <je...@phiwumbda.org> wrote:
> Michael Press <rub...@pacbell.net> writes:
>
> > I'm going for the record.
>
> You're also posting replies to JSH in another thread.
>
> Exactly what is your point? I thought that you were trying to prevent
> others from feeding the troll, but perhaps not.
Not trying to dissuade anyone from feeding the troll.
I noticed that James is posting very few messages,
none with explicit math, and they produced many replies.
Yes, I directly address James from time to time.
His blatant projection is notable.
--
Michael Press
Jesse F. Hughes
It's notable in the same way that particular grains of sand on the
beach are notable. For James, projection comes more easily than
breathing.
--
Jesse F. Hughes
"The Cantorians are conducting a campaign of psychological warfare
against humanity."
-- David Petry, on why set theory is evil.