Newsgroups: sci.math
From: "Robin Chapman" <r...@maths.ex.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2001 08:30:32 +0000 (UTC)
Local: Tues, Nov 6 2001 3:30 am
Subject: Re: A new convergent expansion for the gamma function
"David W. Cantrell" <DWCantr...@sigmaxi.org> wrote in message
news:20011105093121.181$dL@newsreader.com... > 3) I think that (*) clearly indicates that it is more "natural" to define What an amazingly ignorant remark! > a function shifted by 1/2, making it midway between z! and Gamma(z), > so to speak. Nonetheless: > Curséd be those who would give serious thought to yet another > "normalization"! Things are messy enough already. Quoting from > Lanczos' opening paragraph: "... Gamma(n+1) = n! > The normalization of the gamma function to Gamma(n+1) instead of Gamma(n) > is due to Legendre and void of any rationality. This unfortunate > circumstance compels us to utilize the notation z! instead of Gamma(z+1)." The Gamma function is the Mellin transform of the exponential Well you might ask, why not absorb the final 1/t into the t^s The point though is that dt/t should be inseparable in this This becomes important when studying the zeta function and Robin Chapman -- You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||
