Account Options

  1. Sign in
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion A new convergent expansion for the gamma function
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Robin Chapman  
View profile  
 More options Nov 6 2001, 3:30 am
Newsgroups: sci.math
From: "Robin Chapman" <r...@maths.ex.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2001 08:30:32 +0000 (UTC)
Local: Tues, Nov 6 2001 3:30 am
Subject: Re: A new convergent expansion for the gamma function
"David W. Cantrell" <DWCantr...@sigmaxi.org> wrote in message
news:20011105093121.181$dL@newsreader.com...

> 3) I think that (*) clearly indicates that it is more "natural" to define
> a function shifted by 1/2, making it midway between z! and Gamma(z),
> so to speak. Nonetheless:
> Curséd be those who would give serious thought to yet another
> "normalization"! Things are messy enough already. Quoting from
> Lanczos' opening paragraph: "... Gamma(n+1) = n!
> The normalization of the gamma function to Gamma(n+1) instead of Gamma(n)
> is due to Legendre and void of any rationality. This unfortunate
> circumstance compels us to utilize the notation z! instead of Gamma(z+1)."

What an amazingly ignorant remark!

The Gamma function is the Mellin transform of the exponential
function. The Mellin transform of f being
M(f)(s) = integral_0^infinity t^s f(t) dt/t.

Well you might ask, why not absorb the final 1/t into the t^s
and change s-1 to s?

The point though is that dt/t should be inseparable in this
context as dt/t is the Haar measure on the multiplicative
group of the positive reals. That is
integral_0^infinity f(at) dt/t = integral_0^infinity f(t) dt/t
= integral_0^infinity f(1/t) dt/t.

This becomes important when studying the zeta function and
its functional equation. One gets nice integral representations
of Gamma(s)zeta(s) and Gamma(s/2)zeta(s), but not of
s! zeta(s) and (s/2)! zeta(s).

Robin Chapman
www.maths.ex.ac.uk/~rjc/rjc/html

--
Posted from ham.ulcc.wwwcache.ja.net [194.82.103.42]
via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.