Received: by 10.68.241.7 with SMTP id we7mr12689922pbc.4.1338380398687;
        Wed, 30 May 2012 05:19:58 -0700 (PDT)
Path: pr3ni65888pbb.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Alan Eaton <alan.dennis.ea...@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Re=3A_Matheology_=A7_020_Epistola_Pentecostes_MDCCCLXXX?=
	=?ISO-8859-1?Q?VIII?=
Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 05:12:46 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 20
Message-ID: <eaf30ce0-283b-467f-a5fd-cd9fe4e6e483@googlegroups.com>
References: <c3dcb8eb-2495-493f-afff-869525c3cba5@e20g2000vbm.googlegroups.com>
 <Uergil-6E9EB2.11563727052012@bignews.usenetmonster.com> <151197d4-8369-44d8-a1a4-193f6470556a@w24g2000vby.googlegroups.com>
 <Uergil-7ACBC8.16010827052012@bignews.usenetmonster.com> <d8185cf5-21d7-42af-8886-3211def7615e@p27g2000vbl.googlegroups.com>
 <Uergil-AD8943.10214328052012@bignews.usenetmonster.com> <87ipffmi5o.fsf@uta.fi>
 <440ce21f-1492-4140-8cd0-cbe6206d522f@oo8g2000pbc.googlegroups.com> <87hauyhe7c.fsf@uta.fi>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 202.124.74.27
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1338380398 16234 127.0.0.1 (30 May 2012 12:19:58 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 12:19:58 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <87hauyhe7c.fsf@uta.fi>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=202.124.74.27;
 posting-account=njgnuwkAAADYxSawZOEWZfxExRtKJHiR
User-Agent: G2/1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wednesday, 30 May 2012 07:25:43 UTC+10, Aatu Koskensilta  wrote:
> FredJeffries <fredjeffr...@gmail.com> writes:
>=20
> > Can not an omnipotent god perform the task: Create the stone and still
> > retain your omnipotence?
>=20
>   No, obviously an omnipotent God can't both give up omnipotence and
> remain omnipotent.
>=20
> --=20
> Aatu Koskensilta (aatu.koskensi...@uta.fi)
>=20
> "Wovon man nicht sprechen kann, dar=FCber muss man schweigen"
>   - Ludwig Wittgenstein, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus


One would suppose that an omnipotent god would not be constrained by consis=
tency. If so, then such a being would best be described using paraconsisten=
t logics. Simultaneously giving up and retaining omnipotence is not such a =
big deal.