Newsgroups: sci.math
From: benschop...@my-dejanews.com
Date: 1998/11/06
Subject: Re: Primitive Root Question
In article <71v0jc$2c...@nnrp1.dejanews.com>,
benschop...@my-dejanews.com wrote: Nota bene: the group of units G_k mod p^k (k>1) is _also_ cyclic, > In article <71trtj$4h...@nnrp1.dejanews.com>, > tull...@my-dejanews.com wrote: > > Given a prime modulus p (e.g.,71) and a number x less than p (e.g.,7), is > > there a method (short of solving for all the powers of x) to determine > > whether x is a primitive root mod p? In other words, is there a formula > > for determining the order of x mod p? Many thanks for any assistance. > > -- M.Tullius > This is the well known "primitive root" problem, unsolved AFAIK > The structure of Z(.) mod p is a p-1 cyclic group G, adjoined to '0' , > Short of checking x^d = 1 mod p, for proper divisors d= (p-1)/q [prime q], > Ciao, Nico Benschop. -- http://www.iae.nl/users/benschop and is of order (p-1)p^{k-1} --> hence is a product G_k = A_k.B_k. A generator of G_2 will generate (if padded by msd zero's) also G_k Prime p=2 is the only prime for which G_k (k>1) is NOT cyclic, but in fact a direct product: G_k = C2 x Cm, where m= 2^{k-2} with 2-cycle C2={-1,1} and Cm={3*}: so 3 is a semi-primitive root of 1 mod 2^k (k>2). see http://www.iae.nl/users/benschop/nfb0.dvi (lem1.1) So strangely: the only interesting prime, from a practical point Ciao, Nico benschop -- http://www.iae.nl/users/benschop -----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==---------- You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||