Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion Primitive Root Question
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
benschop_nf  
View profile  
 More options Nov 6 1998, 3:00 am
Newsgroups: sci.math
From: benschop...@my-dejanews.com
Date: 1998/11/06
Subject: Re: Primitive Root Question
In article <71v0jc$2c...@nnrp1.dejanews.com>,

  benschop...@my-dejanews.com wrote:
> In article <71trtj$4h...@nnrp1.dejanews.com>,
>   tull...@my-dejanews.com wrote:
> > Given a prime modulus p (e.g.,71) and a number x less than p (e.g.,7), is
> > there a method (short of solving for all the powers of x) to determine
> > whether x is a primitive root mod p?  In other words, is there a formula
> > for determining the order of x mod p?  Many thanks for any assistance.
> > -- M.Tullius

> This is the well known "primitive root" problem, unsolved AFAIK

> The structure of Z(.) mod p is a p-1 cyclic group G, adjoined to '0' ,
> essentially Fermat's Small Theorem (FST): n^p = n mod p (prime p, all n).

> Short of checking x^d = 1 mod p, for proper divisors d= (p-1)/q [prime q],
> (if true for some d then x is not primitive: it generates a subgroup x*
> of units group G, with |x*| dividing p-1) there is no shorter way to tell
> the primitivity of x.

> Ciao, Nico Benschop. -- http://www.iae.nl/users/benschop

Nota bene: the group of units G_k mod p^k (k>1) is _also_ cyclic,

  and is of order (p-1)p^{k-1} --> hence is a product G_k = A_k.B_k.
  with "core" subgroup |A_k|=p-1 (re: FST), and |B_k|= p^{k-1} = (p+1)*

A generator of G_2 will generate (if padded by msd zero's) also G_k
for every k>2. This is not always true for x* = G_1, where x may not
generate G_2.

Prime p=2 is the only prime for which G_k (k>1) is NOT cyclic,

but in fact a direct product: G_k = C2 x Cm,  where m= 2^{k-2}

 with 2-cycle C2={-1,1}

 and Cm={3*}: so 3 is a semi-primitive root of 1 mod 2^k (k>2).

see http://www.iae.nl/users/benschop/nfb0.dvi   (lem1.1)
   "Triplets and symmetries of Arithmetic mod p^k"
                   (incl. proof of FLTcase1 via FST_extension)

So strangely: the only interesting prime, from a practical point
of view (computer hardware: binary code mod 2^k) is also the only
one for which the primitive root problem is solved (and simple;-)

Ciao, Nico benschop -- http://www.iae.nl/users/benschop

-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
http://www.dejanews.com/       Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own    


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.