Message from discussion
Foundations of real numbers
Received: by 10.112.32.103 with SMTP id h7mr134127lbi.10.1350352678540;
Mon, 15 Oct 2012 18:57:58 -0700 (PDT)
Path: q10ni65138217wif.0!nntp.google.com!feeder2.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!194.109.133.84.MISMATCH!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!border4.nntp.ams.giganews.com!border2.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news.panservice.it!feeder.erje.net!news.albasani.net!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Peter Webb" <webbfamily@DIE_SPAMoptusnet.com.au>
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: Foundations of real numbers
Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2012 13:46:53 +1100
Organization: albasani.net
Lines: 53
Message-ID: <k5akne$i3l$1@news.albasani.net>
References: <9082b607-540d-4e9d-9bd7-fb3e405a7294@googlegroups.com> <k55n3g$pdu$1@news.albasani.net> <k56vk7$lja$2@dont-email.me> <k585os$h34$1@news.albasani.net> <5078204a$24$fuzhry+tra$mr2ice@news.patriot.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: news.albasani.net g+QHYQm5Ko1tJWxpkJ3jntv7WDSXlTzYBs22Zp9UQlBlOcK887XcPjnSTZy7fYjJhUUhDGAYQKLZQo2kPsSF2ORnuADq/Rcy8NJBD+C8o6tD0Z2kJi+muY4uV5IE8q6Z
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2012 02:47:11 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: news.albasani.net; logging-data="+7KPHCuOCykZXoOZPFcYflpQVHcI2mF+wxeAMzHyRHYYL6lcTp+qqK26cve4uC7VD9yWokQzW62J4sLFNzy2aMx4Z4aFfSlU0vwHm/ZCeTxpoupE0Lxui8PP9kZquoQm"; mail-complaints-to="ab...@albasani.net"
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V15.4.3555.308
In-Reply-To: <5078204a$24$fuzhry+tra$mr2ice@news.patriot.net>
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 15.4.3555.308
Importance: Normal
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Q0sLXBwZWM5Ax2W/wkTzhZyLyYE=
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
Content-Type: text/plain;
format=flowed;
charset="iso-8859-1";
reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
"Shmuel (Seymour J.)Metz" wrote in message
news:5078204a$24$fuzhry+tra$mr2ice@news.patriot.net...
In <k585os$h3...@news.albasani.net>, on 10/12/2012
at 03:19 PM, "Peter Webb" <webbfamily@DIE_SPAMoptusnet.com.au>
said:
>Because in order to define a Real number you have define a mapping
>from N to Rationals.
You're restating the phrase instead of explaining why it is a problem.
>Lots of situations arise where there is no obvious mapping.
1. You haven't explained why you need an obvious mapping
2. You haven't given an example where it it is a problem.
>The LUB property makes it easy to say that the sequence pi, pi-3,
>pi-3.14, pi-3.141, ... defines a unique Real;
Since each of those terms is irrational, it is not easy.
__________________________________________
Yes it is. It is a set of Reals with an upper bound of 4. It must therefore
have a LUB. How hard was that?
Since the
sequence is a Cauchy sequence, you have the obvious mapping that you
say you need.
________________________________________________
To use the Cauchy sequence to construct R, the terms must all be rational or
else the construction is circular. "The real numbers are complete under the
metric induced by the usual absolute value, and one of the standard
constructions of the real numbers involves Cauchy sequences of rational
numbers.", from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cauchy_sequence . You will note
the terms in pi, pi-3, pi-3.14 ... are not rational. So we do not have a
mapping from N to Q as you claim.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT <http://patriot.net/~shmuel>
Unsolicited bulk E-mail subject to legal action. I reserve the
right to publicly post or ridicule any abusive E-mail. Reply to
domain Patriot dot net user shmuel+news to contact me. Do not
reply to spamt...@library.lspace.org