About 'Humanoid' and 3 'Tholus' in Cydonia.
Angel Garcia
thread (which still is going on, for more than a year) on important
discovery of Eric Crew at the "Museum of Monuments" in Cydonia.
My two recent posts on it are:
http://www.interlog.com/~uniam/HUMANOID.GIF
http://www.interlog.com/~uniam/ERIC.GIF
I saw a noticeable jump in visits to my URL which now is headed with
above pair of graphics. Perhaps it is just the rush of students back
to school.. and in that case I have to clarify the text in there which
is too compact and for learned researchers about the fundamental issue
of Cydonia. There is cryptoanalysis, Cosmogony and math with Advanced
Abstract Art in there. Let me start with the last.
About 'Humanoid': possibly with superior unconscious inspiration
the excellent image-processing expert Dr. MJ Carlotto named it
"Key". Because, indeed (and that was his excuse), it resembles the
intricate shape of a modern 'key' to open a car, say. That was by 1991
in his well known "Martian enigmas..". Apparently others had suggested
that in its 'normal' view of North-up (as in bottom of 1st. URL above)
it resembles a wild and long-hair siluette of a primitive type as
Homo Neanderthalensis or Homo Cromagnon... runing towards East despite
that only the head (up to shoulders and hairy neck) is shown. Carlotto
scurrilously dismissed such interpretative idea. However we at UNIAM
say that indeed such 'hairy primitive humanoid' in siluette is truly
intended by the martian Artist... and, please, no 'car-key' at all;
although 'Humanoid' is perhaps the grandest KEY to understand the
whole issue of the Museum: an honest confession of God and the
multimegayears martian civilization specifically addressed to us,
their recent human propgeny within the solar system.
It was not easy to discover the SECOND view of 'Humanoid' as sketched
in top of 1st. URL above. Only the frame 70A13 of Viking gives enough
contrast to be seen: just turning 90 deg. and setting the East-up and
North-to-left one clearly sees a magnificent depiction of sort of
'baby' face with large eyes, short skull and big mouth. It is Abstract
Art as in the 'Michelin-tyre logo' (say) or in comic strips. So I did
not care much about my sketch in there... but now I regret it a bit
because school children may be mislead to think that it is a joke.
It is NOT a joke but something extremely serious: the Abstract
description of emerging Homo Cromagnon (ca. -0.3 megayears epoch)
on Earth as viewed (and 'created') by Martian Designer; a frontal
and detailed view as opposed to the 'siluette' seen in the previously
mentioned view.
(to follow)
--
Angel, secretary of Universitas Americae (UNIAM). His proof of ETI at
Cydonia and index of book "TETET-98: Generacion del Hombre en Marte" by Prof.
Dr. D.G. Lahoz (leader on ETI and Cosmogony) can be studied at URL:
http://www.ncf.carleton.ca/~bp887 ***************************
Angel Garcia
> I have recently posted about it in the context of a repetitious
http://www.interlog.com/~uniam/HUMANOID.GIF
http://www.interlog.com/~uniam/ERIC.GIF
-----
The Three tholus are among the most striking set of Monuments in the
Museum due to their nearly identical structure:
http://www.interlog.com/~uniam/THOLUS.GIF
located in an empty area in the East of Cydonia. Clearly they were
produced as large and roundish hills probably by injecting fluid lava
or cement from sort of pipe below the surface. All 3 have 4 rings
if one includes the unique feature of marked niple (recall that 4
is cosmogonic number for Venus).
Therefore one can sumarize such 'Humanoid' and 3 tholus as follows:
http://www.interlog.com/~uniam/VENUS.GIF
See the whole set of 4 graphics at entrance in my URL.
I hope that some artists will send me (not via e-mail which does not work,
please) a better interpretative drawing for the 'baby-face and siluette'
of Humanoid.
Paul Morris
(Angel Garcia) wrote:
> ... Homo Neanderthalensis or Homo Cromagnon ...
Actually, there is no Homo Cromagnon, as presently believed.
Cromagnon Man is considered to be a subgroup of Homo Sapiens.
Paul
--
Email: lastname at best dot com. No spam please.
All spam will be complained to sender's ISP.
Angel Garcia
> In article <8pb0iq$bg3$1...@freenet9.carleton.ca>, bp...@FreeNet.Carleton.CA
> (Angel Garcia) wrote:
>
>> ... Homo Neanderthalensis or Homo Cromagnon ...
>
> Actually, there is no Homo Cromagnon, as presently believed.
> Cromagnon Man is considered to be a subgroup of Homo Sapiens.
Yes, yes. Is long ago since I read about these 'distinguished'
discussions of paleo-anthropologists but I remember that Homo
Cromagnon (from a site in Germany, no?) had already the same skull
capacity and body form as current Homo Sapiens. As opposed to
primitive Neanderthalensis which seems to have reached a 'dead end'
and replaced by Cromagnon-Sapiens. This last one has been dated
ca. 0.2 or 0.3 Ma ago and that seems to be about 'our' total
antiquity on Earth.
The Museum on Cydonia was preliminarily dated (TETET-98) with
antiquity less than 1 Ma and likely about 0.3 Ma when the brightest
EVER star (Aldebaran) crossed the pole of the solar invariable plane
forming a trio-constellation 'Fulgur' with Arcturus and Capella.
Aldebaran was far brighter (back then) than the current Sirius; due,
of course, to pass closer to the solar system in those years.
If the Museum had older antiquity than 1 Ma then the History-dates
given in there for Homo-Sapiens-Martis would be meaningless and
undecipherable because the TIME-UNIT as used in there is just
65 Ma (via 'destruction of T. Rex' at such epoch).
Incidentally let me mention that the 'Face' is NOT humanoid but
rather 'perfectly human Homo-Sapiens' as opposed to the Monument
'Humanoid' which really looks primitive and hairy in 'siluette'
and in 'frontal-view'; regardless if it depicts the Cromagnon-Sapiens
or and older hominid on Earth:
http://www.interlog.com/~uniam/HUMANOID.GIF
Angel Garcia
> I have recently posted about it in the context of a
My two recent posts are:
http://www.interlog.com/~uniam/HUMANOID.GIF
http://www.interlog.com/~uniam/ERIC.GIF
About 'Humanoid': possibly with superior unconscious inspiration
The 'baby' frontal view is also well discernible (even with better
lines for the mouth) in the frame 35A72. The 'siluette' which still
nobody has artistically interpreted (just a call to good and conscientious
artists!) may have various and slightly different interpretations;
the most clear of these is with profile of face small and upwards
looking and the rest being abundant hair covering skull and shoulders.
In any case it is clear and without shadow of doubt that such
Monument is a 'multiportrait' of emerging hominids on Earth. Possibly
and even probably contains more than 2 INTENTIONAL facets above
mentioned; which have to be disclosed and interpreted by very sensitive
abstract artists looking to it in all orientations. Still a challenge:
I would appreciate any new suggestion in such line of thought even
with crude ascii sketches.
-----
The Three tholus are among the most striking set of Monuments in the
Museum due to their nearly identical structure:
http://www.interlog.com/~uniam/THOLUS.GIF
they located in an empty area in the East of Cydonia. Clearly they were
produced as large and roundish hills probably by injecting fluid lava
or cement from sort of pipe below the surface. All 3 have 4 rings
if one includes the unique feature of marked niple (recall that 4
is cosmogonic number for Venus).
---
The recent image by MGS of 'Tholus' does not add anything new at all
over above 1976-Viking one (70A13) which is totally sufficient for
all interpretative purposes of this majestric and large Monument.
MOC could improve the view for Mtholus and Ltholus but there is very
little chance of its narrow-angle camera passing over them. The THREE
tholus are already good enough within the resolution of the 1976-Viking
because their identical structure is extremely simple: just an
ideograph for the mammary gland and the 'navel' and 'volcanic activity'
to depict the still embrionary biology (possibly still nil) in the
young and hot Venus-planet. A good lesson for plnning future cameras
to image martian surface: please send something wider than current
narrow-angle and not as wide as current wide-angle of MOC; something
just a little more resolving than the Viking camera (a factor of 2 or 3,
say) but with the capability of continuous overlapping shots as the
Viking did. Then we will get a GOOD cover of the whole Cydonia Museum
including the 'Face' and Mtholus, Ltholus, etc., at their best.
----
Angel Garcia
> Angel Garcia (bp...@FreeNet.Carleton.CA) writes:
>> I have recently posted about it in the context of a
> ....
> My two recent posts are:
>
> http://www.interlog.com/~uniam/HUMANOID.GIF
> http://www.interlog.com/~uniam/ERIC.GIF
> The Three tholus are among the most striking set of Monuments in the
> Museum due to their nearly identical structure:
>
> http://www.interlog.com/~uniam/THOLUS.GIF
>
> ----
> Therefore one can sumarize such 'Humanoid' and 3 tholus as follows:
>
> http://www.interlog.com/~uniam/VENUS.GIF
>
which would not be complete without mentioning the very fundamental
Monument 'Hand' which recently has been partly imaged by MGS:
http://www.interlog.com/~uniam/HAND.GIF
> See the whole set of 5 graphics at entrance in my URL.