JSH: Selling math is so lame
Mark Murray
http://groups.google.com/group/mymathgroup/browse_thread/thread/35424326540e1b0f
Response to this was censored, but the argument was taken to email.
After objection and no response for 1 day, the dialogue is taken to
email as promised.
--
Mark Murray
James Harris
There are none. I answered all of them years ago. And that paper was
not as erroneous as posters repeatedly claim.
They simply lie. And yes they killed that math journal. And the
paper did go through as it should.
The only reason you are even questioning the lies now is the
terrifying reality of the possibility that I DID solve the factoring
problem.
It looks like I did. RSA encryption will go away. The Internet as
the world knows it will have to change (but should survive,
hopefully).
I let you stay in my math group Mark Murray. Don't bug me outside of
it, or I'll toss you out and simply ban you, and have my spam filter
catch your emails.
On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 2:56 PM, AppliedPhysicist <...> wrote:
>
>
> On Nov 7, 10:02=A0pm, JSH <jst...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> But my mathematics is correct. =A0So if you know that then you know that
>> the world is stupid. =A0ALL those people rating me at 1 star are wrong,
>> and the group assessment is as wrong as it can be!
>
> What about the counterexamples?
>
> Like in:
>
> http://groups.google.co.uk/group/sci.math/browse_thread/thread/a2417f4c0d=
92865f/462c4f5a3329caf7?pli=3D1
>
> ??
>
> AP
--
Mark Murray
> I didn't censor anything.
Next mail from James says
> I DID censor the blog comment. I have not censored any of your group postings.
>
> It's extremely difficult to get a comment on any of my blogs. That's
> part of the reason I created the newsgroup.
No evidence of my posting has appeared in his "MyMathGroup" with the same title
as this one.
--
Mark Murray
Mark Murray
> No evidence of my posting has appeared in his "MyMathGroup" with the
> same title
> as this one.
James has now received:
> Mark Murray wrote:
> James Harris writes:
> > I DID censor the blog comment. I have not censored any of your group
> > postings.
>
> So you DO censor. At least that is cleared up. Then why is the original
> message (with the same subject as this email) not in your MyMathGroup
> dialogue?
>
> This corresponds rather nastily with your threat.
>
> > It's extremely difficult to get a comment on any of my blogs. That's
> > part of the reason I created the newsgroup.
>
> Its because you censor. Even the threat of censorship is enough.
>
> You whine about "stalkers" and you complain that "usenet posters" are
> unfair. What do they have to gain by going to a site where you have
> the power and the willingness to remove their contributions? You are
> only too likely to present the few you like. With your penchant for
> statistics selection, this would abuse their contributions in a way that
> was contrary to the original intent, and people Just Won't Do That(tm).
>
> This goes no further by email. Take it back to useent, please.
>
> M
sanboz
"Mark Murray" <w.h....@example.com> wrote in message
news:4af86031$0$2475$db0f...@news.zen.co.uk...
JSH is a frustrated girly libarian about 28. Nothing else.