> On 9 nov, 10:48, Don Stockbauer <don.stockba...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Nov 9, 3:35 am, "alainvergh...@gmail.com" <alainvergh...@gmail.com> > > wrote:
> > > Good morning,
> > > I was working about additive splitting of integer > > > polynomials and fell upon this equality: > > > 4a^4 + b^4 = {a^2+(a+b)^2}.{a^2+(a -b)^2}...
> > > Best regards, > > > Alain
> > I was working on equations which reveal to the contemplator deep > > meanings of space, time and affinity and fell upon this equation:
# Good morning, # # I was working about additive splitting of integer # polynomials and fell upon this equality: # 4a^4 + b^4 = {a^2+(a+b)^2}.{a^2+(a -b)^2}... #
This is commonly known as Sophie Germain's Identity; see for instance
> # Good morning, > # > # I was working about additive splitting of integer > # polynomials and fell upon this equality: > # 4a^4 + b^4 = {a^2+(a+b)^2}.{a^2+(a -b)^2}... > #
> This is commonly known as Sophie Germain's Identity; > see for instance
gwo...@figipc78.tu-graz.ac.at (GJ Woeginger) writes: > alainvergh...@gmail.com <alainvergh...@gmail.com> wrote: > # Good morning, > # > # I was working about additive splitting of integer > # polynomials and fell upon this equality: > # 4a^4 + b^4 = {a^2+(a+b)^2}.{a^2+(a -b)^2}...
> This is commonly known as Sophie Germain's Identity;
That I didn't know (and I really ought to have done). To me it was just an Aurefeuillian factorisation. I've got to admit, there's something prettier about Sophie-Germain's rendering of it.
Phil -- Any true emperor never needs to wear clothes. -- Devany on r.a.s.f1
> gwo...@figipc78.tu-graz.ac.at (GJ Woeginger) writes: > > alainvergh...@gmail.com <alainvergh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > # Good morning, > > # > > # I was working about additive splitting of integer > > # polynomials and fell upon this equality: > > # 4a^4 + b^4 = {a^2+(a+b)^2}.{a^2+(a -b)^2}...
> > This is commonly known as Sophie Germain's Identity;
> That I didn't know (and I really ought to have done). > To me it was just an Aurefeuillian factorisation. > I've got to admit, there's something prettier about > Sophie-Germain's rendering of it.
> Phil > -- > Any true emperor never needs to wear clothes. -- Devany on r.a.s.f1
> On Nov 9, 2:53 pm, Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demun...@yahoo.co.uk> > wrote:
> > gwo...@figipc78.tu-graz.ac.at (GJ Woeginger) writes: > > > alainvergh...@gmail.com <alainvergh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > # Good morning, > > > # > > > # I was working about additive splitting of integer > > > # polynomials and fell upon this equality: > > > # 4a^4 + b^4 = {a^2+(a+b)^2}.{a^2+(a -b)^2}...
> > > This is commonly known as Sophie Germain's Identity;
> > That I didn't know (and I really ought to have done). > > To me it was just an Aurefeuillian factorisation. > > I've got to admit, there's something prettier about > > Sophie-Germain's rendering of it.
> > Phil > > -- > > Any true emperor never needs to wear clothes. -- Devany on r.a.s.f1
> Except where it's cold.
1 =1 is an equation, innit, albeit a short one? Hofstadter uses 0 = 0 as an equation in his "Godel, Escher, Bach".