Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

The SUCCESSOR of DOG is NOT a NUMBER!

10 views
Skip to first unread message

Graham Cooper

unread,
May 18, 2013, 1:31:42 AM5/18/13
to
TRACE
nat [ s dog ]?

TRY 1
nat [ s X ]
TAIL 1
nat X
nat dog
FALSE 1
MISMATCH



STACK: 1 - X1 - R - dog
NOT FOUND!



--------

But don't take my word for it!

Consider it FORMALLY PROVEN!

http://blockprolog.com/nat-s-dog.png



me

unread,
May 18, 2013, 5:47:18 AM5/18/13
to
no.. its some kind of tessellation event before a number I should
think

Graham Cooper

unread,
May 18, 2013, 7:13:41 AM5/18/13
to
On May 18, 7:47 pm, me <me154...@gmail.com> wrote:
> no.. its some kind of tessellation event before a number I should
> think

but a concept dog doesnt exist in time either..

Prolog uses Negation As Failure for the negative result.

If I added

3 nat dog

then the result would change from "NOT FOUND!'
to 'CONFIRM!'

Blake's 7 fan here!
Herc


--

IS DOG+1 a NUMBER ?

http://blockprolog.com/nat-s-dog.png

0

unread,
May 18, 2013, 3:03:32 PM5/18/13
to
373

0

unread,
May 18, 2013, 3:09:22 PM5/18/13
to
Cy

me

unread,
May 18, 2013, 6:04:18 PM5/18/13
to
1+1= 1 alright!

me

unread,
May 18, 2013, 6:47:27 PM5/18/13
to
Is there any thought process involved between an RT referential ie
real-time ever? yes there is.. I know from my experience a dog
existed ? so why worry?

1. Is this particular moment at any time altering the perceptual
reference to a dog anywhere else? or occasion? does or did your
reference to a dog have a different memory ever associated with it?
was it abandoned or was the dog with three people? perhaps someone or
something has decided for you? or does every person have a unique
memory or calculation associated to that experience? only once are you
ever going to associate your own experience with a dog at each time
you try. To cheapen the issue... lets all agree that a dog is a visual
referent because there are hundreds if not thousands of calculations
anywhere all up until the present time in your own life experience. My
experiences all become valueless together if you fail to recognize
human emotion or animal welfare.


me

unread,
May 18, 2013, 7:18:47 PM5/18/13
to
Math existed once only. as any theoretical number data ie calculations
only associated, occasionally, to a word in the billions of dictionary
references any where in this world. There isnt any association to
human feelings, only that dogs & an animal like a cat have been
domesticated & tamed.

dog = 1 ?




me

unread,
May 19, 2013, 9:46:38 AM5/19/13
to
2. how to get the naming word 'dog' now interpreted as a number point,
to a successor using split geometry or fast tessellations towards a
successor. If you who tessellate all agree to the same specified
example of 'dog', maybe to any movie, or a dog belonging to a family,
perhaps a dog that guides people, or maybe a special breed of dog.
What is the plan ? should you simply leave here now, or will you & the
largest number of people who all agree to the same value
interpretation, plan to use the visual reference to be guided or
whatever motivates?

I shouldn't want to have to explain to people that they have no better
knowledge only in they are not calculating between the naming word
'dog' because they have chosen a number instead .... from billions
data bank references world-wide & their own private experience.
Instead they may have chosen to describe their love or hostility in
their imagined experience as easily as flipping a coin, 'the coin'
being a number instead.

Tessellations look interesting because the love or hate preference,
human feelings that motivate, very cautiously, could begin a process
of decision making to move or grow. If you have a faith law or a
sequence to your business transactions, then a number IS required, or
some small sentence, or an order, or quantified reference to an agreed
item of concern. How many ways will people often agree to move or plan
only towards certain specified objectives? & what shape is the
geometry that causes and creates the flow pattern to an object of
desire or coercion or disgust?

0 new messages