Gmail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
this step-function in the proof of Kepler Packing with Corner-Edge-Hexagonal #679 new book 2nd edition: New True Mathematics
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  3 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Archimedes Plutonium  
View profile  
 More options Jul 4, 6:00 am
Newsgroups: sci.math, sci.physics, sci.logic
From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutonium.archime...@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2009 03:00:24 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Sat, Jul 4 2009 6:00 am
Subject: this step-function in the proof of Kepler Packing with Corner-Edge-Hexagonal #679 new book 2nd edition: New True Mathematics
BBC warning: this post may contain "flash photography."

Let me get going on this Step-Function. It is a step function because
the x is a Real number indicating the length of the cube-container
and the y component is the total number of spheres packed inside
that container. Now if Kepler Packing was only involving Hexagonal
Close Packing then this function would probably have some resemblence
to that of f(x) = x^2. But since it has two choices of maximum
packing of the Corner-Edge-HCP and the HCP-alone then the
function is going to be a Step-function, similar to making x^2 a
step function.

And a step-function is in accord with Kepler Packing being
discrete-geometry.

So let me speak of what I see in my imagination of this function
and then go and experiment with the marbles to see if the
imagination is accurate.

Let me use the case of N= 11 of a cube 11units long. Since I
have the marbles of a 11 stacking.

Let me make this line as indicating the top of the cube
and the topmost two layers of spheres

_________
 OOOOOO
OOOOOO

Now in the 11cube there is some headway of a space between
the top of the cube and the last layer. For my marbles have
an average diameter of 160mm/11 = 14.5mm and (my post
#664) the headway is 160mm - 147mm = 13mm

So there is not enough room for another layer but plenty of
room to scoot the entire upper layer to the rightmost edge.
And since the top layer is no longer nested in the hollows that
elevates the toplayer and removes some of that headway.
Now in the cubes going larger from N=11 to say 11.1 then
11.2 then 11.3, somewhere along this increase in cube size
where the headway is so large that entire new upper layer
can be rested into the hollows of the below layer.

So from say N= 11 to about N = 11.4 we have Corner-Edge-
HCP.

Then from N= 11.4 until about 11.6 or 11.7 we have a headway
not large enough to scoot over the entire upper layer so that
we return to the Corner-Edge-HCP. And so from N= 11.4
to N= 11.7 we have HCP-alone. And finally in the interval
N=11 to N=12 we return to the Corner-Edge-HCP from
11.7 to past N=12, and then the cycle repeats. So we cycle
from Corner-Edge-HCP to HCP-alone.

Let me try to summarize and remember what happens.

From 11 to 11.4 we have Corner-Edge-HCP
Then from 11.4 to 11.7 we have HCP-alone
Then from 11.7 to 2.2 we have Corner-Edge-HCP
and cycle through these from one interval to the next.

So let me see if the marbles conform to the above
mind model.

Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Uncle Al  
View profile  
 More options Jul 4, 11:46 am
Newsgroups: sci.math, sci.physics, sci.logic
From: Uncle Al <Uncle...@hate.spam.net>
Date: Sat, 04 Jul 2009 08:46:12 -0700
Local: Sat, Jul 4 2009 11:46 am
Subject: Re: this step-function in the proof of Kepler Packing with Corner-Edge-Hexagonal #679 new book 2nd edition: New True Mathematics
Archimedes Plutonium wrote:

[snip crap]

All gone.

Top o' the month.  Bells and smells time...

I cannot believe how incredibly stupid Archie-Poo is.  I mean
rock-hard stupid.  Blazing hot mid-day sun on Mercury stupid.  Surface
of Venus under 80 atmospheres of red hot carbon dioxide and sulfuric
acid vapor dehydrated for 300 million years rock-hard stupid.  Stupid
so stupid that it goes way beyond the stupid we know into a whole
different sensorium of stupid.  Archie-Poo is trans-stupid stupid.
Meta-stupid.  Stupid so collapsed upon itself that it is within its
own Schwarzschild radius.  Black hole stupid.  Stupid gotten so dense
and massive that no intellect can escape.  Singularity stupid.
Archie-Poo emits more stupid/second than our entire galaxy otherwise
emits stupid/year.  Quasar stupid.  Nothing else in the universe can
be this stupid.  Archie-Poo is an oozingly putrescent primordial
fragment from the original Big Bang of Stupid, a pure essence of
stupid so uncontaminated by anything else as to be beyond the laws of
physics that define maximally extrapolated hypergeometric
n-dimensional backgroundless stupid as we can imagine it.  Archie-Poo
is Planck stupid, a quantum foam of stupid, a vacuum decay of stupid,
a grand unified theory of stupid.

Archie-Poo is the epitome of stupidity, the epiphany of stupid, the
apotheosis of stupidity.  Archie-poo is stooopid.

--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
 (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
rossum  
View profile  
 More options Jul 4, 3:30 pm
Newsgroups: sci.math, sci.physics, sci.logic
From: rossum <rossu...@coldmail.com>
Date: Sat, 04 Jul 2009 20:30:55 +0100
Local: Sat, Jul 4 2009 3:30 pm
Subject: Re: this step-function in the proof of Kepler Packing with Corner-Edge-Hexagonal #679 new book 2nd edition: New True Mathematics
On Sat, 04 Jul 2009 08:46:12 -0700, Uncle Al <Uncle...@hate.spam.net>
wrote:

And your point is?   :)

rossum


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google