Your current Axiom bug list is far far too short to be trusted - sci.math.symbolic

Message from discussion Your current Axiom bug list is far far too short to be trusted

Vladimir Bondarenko

View profile

More options Jan 11 2005, 12:16 am

Newsgroups: sci.math.symbolic, comp.soft-sys.math.maple, sci.math, sci.physics, sci.edu

From: "Vladimir Bondarenko" <v...@cybertester.com>

Date: 10 Jan 2005 21:16:22 -0800

Local: Tues, Jan 11 2005 12:16 am

Subject: Your current Axiom bug list is far far too short to be trusted

  Reply to author
  |
  Forward
  | Print
  | View thread
  | Show original
  | Report this message
  | Find messages by this author
  

Date: Thu, 20 May 2004 20:47:25 +0300
From: Vladimir Bondarenko <v...@cybertester.com>
X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.61) Personal
Reply-To: Vladimir Bondarenko <v...@cybertester.com>
Organization: Cyber Tester, LLC
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Message-ID: <1423921166.20040520204725@cybertester.com>
Return-Receipt-To: v...@cybertester.com
To: Tim Daly <d...@rio.sci.ccny.cuny.edu>
Subject: Your current Axiom bug list is far far too short to be trusted
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

I'd say these 52 entries makes a kind of toy Axiom bug list. In my
opinion, if you want to make Axiom reliable and mathematically
correct, you might be interesting in a more solid bug list.

If you do not want to get Axiom tested by my environment, no
problem, just tell me this explicitly, so I'd not bother you
in the future.

Vladimir

Reply to author Forward