Web Images Videos Maps News Shopping Gmail more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
sci.math.symbolic
+ new post
About this group
Subscribe to this group
This is a Usenet group - learn more
Message from discussion Reputation. Was:An exact 1-D summation challenge - 4
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Jerzy Karczmarczuk  
View profile  
 More options May 22 2005, 1:43 pm
Newsgroups: sci.math.symbolic, comp.soft-sys.math.maple
From: "Jerzy Karczmarczuk" <karc...@info.unicaen.fr>
Date: Sun, 22 May 2005 17:43:32 +0000 (UTC)
Local: Sun, May 22 2005 1:43 pm
Subject: Re: Reputation. Was:An exact 1-D summation challenge - 4
Reply to author | Forward | Print | View thread | Show original | Report this message | Find messages by this author
Generalissimus Bondarenko asked in his previous posting

> > ... what reputation I will create in the Maplesoft's owners
> > and top officers, but, mainly, in the computer algebra community

and I proposed

> Well, verify it experimentally.
> Apply for a job in an establishment where people know something about
> computer algebra (and they are aware of your "social activity").

His reply is:

> Why on earth me, the principal owner of a soft company, a person
> who has enough money to feed a team of programmers, and enough
> strong ideas to make even more money, and to change, within a
> reasonable span of time, the sad status quo in modern computer
> algebra math correctness, could even think of proceeding with
> a miserable, ridiculous idea that you have just proposed?

[Again, I removed the redundant folowup nsgroups, since one has to
be a clinical idiot to send this rubbish to sci.math, or to
educational/recreational math]

I believe that V. Bondarenko is not capable of understanding the
simplest logic. I don't care whether he *needs* a job (somebody
reading this cares?...), I just proposed a tangible way to test his
reputation, this is as obvious as that.

Anyway, it is time to flush down this thread, despite the involuntary
sparkling humour in the postings of this "gifted architect" with
plenty of money and even more of ideas...

J. Karczmarczuk

--
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google