Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Should We Take the Long Strides?

27 views
Skip to first unread message

Anamitra Palit

unread,
Jan 10, 2012, 8:00:06 AM1/10/12
to

We consider a semi-prime N=AB, where  A and B are primes.
We assume B>A
Stage A:

Letıs consider the relation:
N=Qx+R
X:Divisor
Q: Quotient and
R:Remainder
We write:
N=Q(x-1)+Q+R
The new remainder is Q+R, provided Q+R<x-1

Quotient remaining the same[ie,Q] we have the following relation for n
divisions by  successive divisors decreasing in steps of unity:
N=Q(x-n)+nQ+R
If x-n>nQ+R
then nQ +R is indeed the remainder after n steps:
n<{x-R}/{Q+1}
The largest value of n before the quotient increases is the least
integer greater than or equal to than {x-R}/{Q+1}. If  n={x-R}/{Q+1}
the higher factor,B, has been located [since remainder becomes zero].
For the next division[Divisor:x-n-1] the quotient should increase.

Stage B
Now
N=Qx+R
If the remainder increases by unity:
N=(Q+1)(x-1)+R+Q-x+1
New remainder:
Rı=R+Q-x+1
For nı steps[Quotient remaining Q+1] we have:
Rı=R+nıQ-x+n
For
Rı>=0 we have,
R-x>=nı(Q+1)
=>nı=<{R-x}/{Q+1}

The last remainder from Stage A:
=nQ+R
The last divisor from Stage A:x-n
Using the final  approximate value of n[=(x-R)/(Q+1)] and x[=(x-n)]
from the previous stage we have:
nı={nQ+R-(x-n)}/{Q+1}  [approx.]
nı={n(Q+1)+R-x}/{Q+1}  [approx]
nı approximately equal to n-{x-R}/{Q+1}
This implies: nı<n, rather nı<<n for large values of the divisor x

If the division result for the first operation in stage A is known to
us ,we immediately come to know of all the division results of stage A
and B[and of subsequent stages] from formulas without doing actual
division. The result of each individual operation is not necessary. We
simply have to calculate the values of n and nı and check out for the
smallest-value remainder in case it is zero. The zero remainder might
occur at the end of Stage A or Stage B while we are investigating the
upper integral from N to Sqrt[N],decreasing the divisor in steps of
unity.

Why the ³Strides² are long:
Letıs take N=RSA 280 by way of example [Link:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RSA_numbers#RSA-280].
It has 280 decimal digits. We choose the first divisor as 10^279.
Remainder, R is less than 8 * 10^278. Quotient, Q=1 . Therefore n is
greater than 0.5[10^279-8 * 10^278]=0.5[10 * 10^278-8 *
10^278]=10^278. The next divisor to be taken up is 10^279 -  10^278=9
* 10^278. So we are taking long strides for large divisors. In this
example the number of digits in the divisor is being reduced by one.
Subsequent strides would become  smaller.
How many strides[Stride=A+B] do we need to cover the higher interval
from N to sqrt[N]
Would this method be convenient on the microprocessor?
0 new messages