Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Rooted trees and isometry classes for a ternary linear code
1 view
Skip to first unread message
TC
May 9, 2008, 5:40:14 PM5/9/08
to
I've just recently had a look at rooted trees and wrote up a short
pedagogical note on the subject at http://tcjpn.spaces.live.com/
under "A Walk in the Woods with Cayley and Comtet". In item 3) of the
note on page 7, I surmise (from some brute force calculations) a
relation between certain forests of rooted trees and the isometry
classes for a ternary linear code (A034363 in the OEIS). I'd be
interested in any comments on the validity of the conjecture or deeper
insights on the connections. (Any constructive criticism of the note
as a whole would be welcome also.)
pedagogical note on the subject at http://tcjpn.spaces.live.com/
under "A Walk in the Woods with Cayley and Comtet". In item 3) of the
note on page 7, I surmise (from some brute force calculations) a
relation between certain forests of rooted trees and the isometry
classes for a ternary linear code (A034363 in the OEIS). I'd be
interested in any comments on the validity of the conjecture or deeper
insights on the connections. (Any constructive criticism of the note
as a whole would be welcome also.)
Sincerely,
TC
TC
May 23, 2008, 10:30:02 AM5/23/08
to
On May 10, 6:40 am, in the entry "Rooted trees and isometry classes
for a ternary linear code," TC wrote:
> I've just recently had a look at rooted trees and wrote up a short
> pedagogical note on the subject at http://tcjpn.spaces.live.com/
> under "A Walk in the Woods with Cayley and Comtet".
for a ternary linear code," TC wrote:
> I've just recently had a look at rooted trees and wrote up a short
> pedagogical note on the subject at http://tcjpn.spaces.live.com/
> under "A Walk in the Woods with Cayley and Comtet".
Update: The conjecture alluded to in the entry is not true, and the
note has been revised accordingly. - TC
0 new messages