Structural Nucleo Theory by Dr. Yehiel Porat
hanson
precious metals that have been in use for a long time:
Brass instead of Gold and Nickel/Tin instead of Platinum.
Each of these alloys exhibit physical properties like
appearance and corrosion resistance that mimic the
corresponding noble metal. -- It is interesting to see
why that may be so by comparing their charges:
Cu = 29 + Sn = 50 ::: CuSn-Bronze = 79 ... Au = 79
Ni = 28 + Sn = 50 ::: NiSn-NickelTin = 78 ... Pt = 78
Now besides each pair above just having the same number
of charges (protons or electrons) there is the beckoning
chance that ** Dr. Yehiel Porat's Structural Nucleo Theory **
may shed a better light on this. Rudimentary information
is given by the author of the theory about such matters on his
website ::: http://www.geocities.com/porat_y/mypage.html
The author."Y.Porat" map...@012.net.il who is a frequent
guest on the Usenet is hereby requested to explain not only the
obvious above phenomena but is invited to PREDICT WITH HIS
THEORY what other kinds of novel material combinations** can
be produced to substitute for rare or toxic metals like Mercury
or Lead, etc. (** RT liquidity // relatively nontoxic).
Other examples that Porat's theory could be useful for include
explanations whether there are alternative reasons for the O3
destruction by CFs, with Dr. Porat explaining that energetic
cosmic radiation can split Oxygen under certain circumstances
into carbon and helium per scheme
16O3 -----> 16O2 + 16O
16O -----> 12C + 4He
If Porat can convincingly lay out with his theory that the process
of reducing the stratospheric O3 content and leaving behind the
infamous "Ozone Hole" that is only partly to be blamed onto
anthropogenic influences then his theory could be a big payoff for
him, the refrigerant producers and the HVAC industry world wide.
In am sure that if Author Porat can demonstrate convincingly
a few of such predictions that then his theory will gain and enjoy
widespread appeal, application and use.
hanson
Y.Porat
A big thank you hanson!!!
please readers note
Hanson didnt start his post by HAHAHA
and it is a big compliment for me
because it means he takes me very seriously
now in order that he and others will take me seriously
i have a dosclaimer!!
i am not a PHD !
just a humble Bsc engineer (plus 68 years of big interst and investment
in science)
2
ther site he quoted above is not all my theory- it is just an
'appetiser' and abstract
much more ofit is in my book
anyway
that site is good enough as a start!!
3
i am am answering now just a quick first response
(cuae i have to do my dayly morning walk very good for old people
health
and not bad for yougsters either (:-)
4
the examples hanson gave are actually very interesting
because it showes that a good innovating model
can serve not only for coffe cup mumblings
but for PRACTICAL USES!
(and that is one of the differences between an Engineer and a
amtrhematician
that became a physicist (:-)
an enginerr will always lok for waht is called in our places
'tachless'-
(since hanson is very familiar with our folkloric language he will
explain what is
'Tachless'
--------
i actually was dealing with sibgle Atoms and very little yet on
compounds of elements
yet the knowlwdge of singles can shedd some light on compounds
though it clear cut
actually i was studying the enigma of Noble Atoms
and came to a new finding different from thr common undersranding
the common is that Atoms are noble because
'there is some perferction in their structure '!
it is only partially right
i found that in many cases it is rather something 'crippled' !!
in their sttructure - that make them 'Noble '
for instance some of the noble gases is rather because there is
somthing cripled
that prevents them even of creating a couple of Atoms
for inatnce Radiom (Radon - just call form memory without opening my
book)
in other cases it is the rather shotage of external orbitsls that makes
them inactive
in pther cases like Gold
it is a combination of external orbitals of a proton and nautron
(external chain of orbitals
that mekes it a closed inactive couple ie
neutron fromone side of that 'reactangul; pipe
and a Proton chain of prbiytals on the other symetric side (and same
pole)
of that 'reactangular pipe'
and for Oxygen and Ozone
Oxygen nus structure can be seen in my site
it is actually a carbon structure and an additional Alpha particle
commected at its middle ie not linearily but parallel to the Carbon
basic structre
and if so
the Alpha can ve removed elatively easily
(the binding energy of that additionasl is two times 0.00375 AMU
(~3.7 Mev)
2 times because it is connestd with two Arms' at two points
0.00375 Amu is not much foer nuclear proccesses
but not little for chemicasl processes!!
i didnt study ozon
but my guess is that Ozon is not connected 'nuclearly'
but chemically
ie much less than 3.7 Mev actually much less or else it would not be
decomposed just by Em radiation
soit is probably a linear chemical connectionnow wone would ask waht
is the difference between chemical bond and nucler bond:
please folow my 'chain of orbitald suggestion
presented on the Alpha particle just at the beginning:
the chemical is doner as known by the electron link (the last link on
the chain
while the nuclesr is done by some more inner link on that chain of
orbitals
that i called 'The medium orbital'
i even founf that is it is not just a bond loss of 0.00125 AMU
but actually A SUB PARTICLE
and strangely enough they come in TRIPPLES!!
does it ring some bellof recollection to you ??
(how about 3 quarks ??)
and i found as well the magis substructure and figure 3 !!
ie
3x0.00125 = ...... surprize 0.00375 Amu
and that magic figure of x3 goes even up and up
but i am not goint to reavel it all jsut now and here !!
so
do we have enough as a starrt ??
so Thank you Again Hanson
and the others that will join that important thread
but only the
'BON AFIDE'!! ones !!
Y.Porat
-------------------
Autymn D. C.
tell.)
A neat trick with gold is that, despite its nobility, it bonds with
many other metals to make ungold "golds"; that is, white gold, red
gold, black gold, grey gold, green gold, blue gold, lilac gold, carmine
gold. The shops, however, market these as golds, or metals, when many
of them in the pictures are obviosely dull "ores" as I'll call them.
Ores are on the brink of earths, then salts.
-Aut
Y.Porat
BTW are you a chemist in your formal education ??
i think we had once a discussion and may be a dispute
about some of my prediction invloving Gold
according to my model
Gold and Mercury (Hg) have a very similar nuclear structre
Platimun is also a neighbour of Gold but from the 'lower side' of the
periodic table
but hase some noticable difference in some detail of its nuclear
structre
and has some differnt edge orbitals
so my prediction is that
it should be much easier to turn Hg to Gold
raher than turn Platinum to Gold
their order in the Mendeliev table is
Pl Au Hg ie 'elbow to elbow' neighbours while Gold is at the
middle of them
i dont speak about some rare acidental isotopns of them
i mean the 'main strean abundant isotops of all of them
i have no previous idea about experimental facts
so
can anyone prove or disprove my prediction??
TIA
Y.Porat
-----------------------------
Eric Gisse
hanson wrote:
[...]
Porat does not have a doctorate, or any formal education in physics.
Y.Porat
i already noted it above (unlike some other imposters here ....)
i know some Phd imbecils and crooks as well here
2 please bypass the 22 years disturbed and sabotaging student from
Alaska
Y.Porat
------------------------
Y.Porat
The work that i did about nuclear and Atomic structure
could award me ' a bit more ' than the common PHd
it might even be a new landmark in physics .
ATB
Y.Porat
------------------------
Uncle Al
[snip crap]
> The work that i did about nuclear and Atomic structure
> could award me ' a bit more ' than the common PHd
> it might even be a new landmark in physics .
[snip more crap]
<http://static.flickr.com/26/40939042_2e7e157c89_m.jpg>
<http://www.openrescue.org/rescues/20021120/2.jpg>
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz3.pdf
hanson
message news:4540D922...@hate.spam.net...
> "Y.Porat" Yehiel Porat <map...@012.net.il>wrote:
> [snip crap]
>> The work that i did about nuclear and Atomic structure
>> could award me ' a bit more ' than the common PHd
>> it might even be a new landmark in physics .
> [snip more crap]
>
> <http://static.flickr.com/26/40939042_2e7e157c89_m.jpg>
> <http://www.openrescue.org/rescues/20021120/2.jpg>
> --
> Uncle Al
>
Al, for crying out loud! Are you indicationg by your
<http://static.flickr.com/26/40939042_2e7e157c89_m.jpg>
<http://www.openrescue.org/rescues/20021120/2.jpg>
that this is where your own research efforts went, to show Yehi
what he has to avoid? ... Don't be so jealous, Al. Let Yehi do
his own doctoring. After all, he is a spritual landsman of yours
and you and him will be soldiers in your Army of Light one
fine day... to shine on the goyim ... ahahahahaha... So,
*** 'Let'em sing!... All of'em!... It's a beautiful choir! ****
ahahaha.... ahahanson
.
Y.Porat
Yes Hanson
old senile AL is a dictator in his education
he can stand only his own ideas and findings
(like the mass diamond production)
(and in that sense he is not my 'family group' or 'clan')
and as you said
he is frustrated and jealous !!
may be just age problem
but as i remeber him he was laways the same .
-------------
now Hansonas for your question about magic Atomic number of compouds
or alloyes
accodrind to my findigs
it is not the overall Atomic number that makes the main properties of
materials
it is mainly the EDGE ORBITALS
the free orbitals at the edges (or poles) of the nuc and the Atom
accoding to my model as you could see
the structureof the Atom is a direct continuation of the nuc structre
electrons are not prbitiong around the nuc
they are connected directly to some specific points of the nuc
and **do not leave their hold on those specific points**
methaphorically;
if our globe is the nuc
an electron is sort of a beam that will stick to a specific location on
that globe
ie
a specific electron will always (if not torn away) stick say to
the empire state builiding and not leave its old on tha tlocation
and th e point is that
it is only the edge electreon orbitals that ahve to ability to make
connections
because of a very 'prosaic reason' they are geometrically' at the
front
all the inner orbitals are neutraslised by inner commections!!
so conclusion (imho)
it ias not the overall Atomic number tha tmakes the main properties
and that is BTW the rason of the periodity of the
periodic table
now another thing to know:
even a sight change in aragngement of those external orbitals
might make a very big difference in properties
and the same with the nuclear properties
(it is enough that a neutron will be relocated instead of at the fron
pole
to a nother palce- tha tyou get a substantial change in proiperties:
it is not as the common undersatnding' that wahts makes the properties
is just the NUMBER of protons and neutrons
the nuc is not as i indicated above a 'boillling poggidge' of uncleids
each proton and neutron has its unequivocal location
that can be mapped exactly as our
hose number
in a specific street in a specific city etc
**and i founf that ** 3D** mapp **!!!
difficult to beleive its done by a non pHd Eh ????
btw
i thinkit was my gig luch that i didnt learn too much of the exosting
amthematical
formulas
*and ddint wast my preciousd time on that uneffficiant system !!
and th emost difficult part in it was
**to get ridd of some wrong paradfigm**
for instance that
**in a heavy Atom**
the 'number of electrons 'orbiting around'
is the number of the protons in the nucit
is right only for light Atoms
and that is one of the reasons that the existing knoeledge
is stuck only to light Atoms
with the stupid 'excuse' of
'lack of computer power'!1
it is not lack of computer power
it is lack of some grey stuff in human heads !!
ATB
Y.Porat
> .
hanson
But as you have seen so far NOBODY has listened to you from
22 years olds to geriatrics, to Al's pseudo-genius... ahahaha..
My advice to you (AGAIN) is for you to forget to talk about your
theory for now. Instead just **post something like this**:
********************
" Dr. Yehiel Porat's theory predicts that if you alloy Fe with Xy
you will obtain a metal that is not brittle but flexible at -150F
and has a better conductivity than Silver"
********************
Go work on something like that, work an example, to show
something NEW and tangible that came out of the predictions
of your theory, like this example above, Yehi. Through proof
by APPLICATION.
AFTER that, everybody wants to see your theory. NOT before.
BTW, I gave you the Dr. title for promotional reasons. So KEEP
on doctoring. Titles and medals and certificates are good tools
to have for promotions. BTW, don't discuss nor argue with ME
over this. That will do you no good. Work an example and the
theory will sell itself. --- Good luck to you, Yehi
ahahaha.... ahahahanson
>
>
"Y.Porat" <map...@012.net.il> wrote in message
news:1161887063.8...@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
Y.Porat
hanson wrote:
> Yehi, what you said about your theory below is all good & right.
> But as you have seen so far NOBODY has listened to you from
> 22 years olds to geriatrics, to Al's pseudo-genius... ahahaha..
>
> My advice to you (AGAIN) is for you to forget to talk about your
> theory for now. Instead just **post something like this**:
>
> ********************
> " Dr. Yehiel Porat's theory predicts that if you alloy Fe with Xy
> you will obtain a metal that is not brittle but flexible at -150F
> and has a better conductivity than Silver"
> ********************
Hi hanson
you can immagine that i am aware to your advice i would say quite long
ago
and i mensioned above the folkloric wird tachless'
that word sais all you said just in one word
but it is not easy!!
btw
is thee an existing theory that told you that it is tou combine Fe with
Xy
it will obtain a metal that is not brittle etc etc etc ???
the fact with the existing theories is that it is first the
experimental
accidental findigs and only later comes the
smartguy physicist and 'ffiddles the explanations backwards !!
and as for predictions
i even suggestedone above (it is not all that i can predict)
i gave the prediction that
it would be easier to change (by a nuclear process!!) Hg mercury to
Gold
rather than Platimun to gold!!
though Hg and Pt are the imediate neighbours next to gold!
no one answered yet because it is a bit diffucult to find the
*existing ** experimental data but please note
that no one refuted it !!
(and will imho be able to refute it)
but i have many more predictions that only me can do
for instance that
Nickel is much closer to Cu
and not as common accepted -- to the iron group!!
i have even unprecedented explaantions
about the waht is called 'the geologic clock
in which Argon Kalium and Calcium are involved
Argon is anoble gass
kalium and calcium ar elocated in different raws in the periodic table
and even so
there is a nuclear spontanic process in which Kalium
is chaned either to Argon or to Calcium ???!!!
no one could untill now expalin that starge phenomena
(a 'spontanious process means that it is not a revolutionarry or
fundamental
process but some slight easy change
i could explain it by a surprising explanation:
the skeleton of all the 3 of them is **identical and a very rare
structure**
typical only for those 3 elements
and the change is only at the eedges of that structure
i could predict about new resources of triton (but haveno intension to
reveal
it right here (i hope you can guess why !!!)
----------------
i could guess as you say what will be a stron alloy and waht not
see the ed structures in my site
and i know waht are trhe combinations of edge prbitals that if
connected
can make a strong metal
my innovation is that in that case
it is not just the orbiytal that is involved but its direction in the
3d space
so it is dependant sometimes not only the exyernal one
but the one suborbila before it in the( inner dorection)
fo rinsatnce
an 'alpha proton orbital comnnected to an Alpha proton one of the
neighbor
Atom will give astrong connection
but it ias yet not all opf ghe story of strenght
it depends on how nmany of them are involved
lead for instance willnever give astrong alloy because it has
many missing external orbitals
etc etc
it is a whole world
a new world openrd
but you have to satrt somewhere in 'selling your merchandise'
and since it is so revolutionary
it is mighty difficult
so my tactics as now
to convince people that there is something betetr to look for
is to open their eyes
to the HOLES OF THEIR SACRED THEORIES
ie to wake themup from thier ** pradise** of fools
iow
one way as you say is to predict unknown prediction
but the second suplementry way
is to convince that there is something rotten in thjeir theories
that prevent firther advance
that is for instance why i mension the fact
that
thje theory calcualtions is stopped by the medium elements
and cant go further to all along the periodic table untill the most
heavy ones
the escuse of ;lack of computer power is a poor unconvincing argumernt]
and i even gave the explanation why
it cant go further
it is because of the false paradigm
that in heavy Atoms
the number of eelctrons 'orbiting around' is the number of protons in
the nuc.
if you satrt witha wrong assumption
and ;stuffing tro youc calculatins electrons **tht do not exist at
all**
you willnever get out of it !!
soyou see
taht my job in selling my Model is not a 'one punch and i win'
it is a life time job and may be more than a life time job!!!
yet that was the faith of many innovators
so i am not complaining
that is the way the world works
on the other hand
i amj now enjoing the 'blood and sweat' of too many previous
innovators
so no reason to complain !! (:-)
anyway Hanson
i tjank you for starting this thread .
the cleave peiople will pick it up !! ((sooner or later )
ATB
Y.Porat
--------------------------
>
> Go work on something like that, work an example, to show
> something NEW and tangible that came out of the predictions
> of your theory, like this example above, Yehi. Through proof
> by APPLICATION.
>
>
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Autymn D. C.
> " Dr. Yehiel Porat's theory predicts that if you alloy Fe with Xy
> you will obtain a metal that is not brittle but flexible at -150F
> and has a better conductivity than Silver"
Dr. -> dr.
For a bit I wonderd if one could get palladium or rhodium to behave a
better conductivity than silver if it were surrounded by a positive
field to relieve the conductional charges so that they match silver's
in configuration.
Trim yeir posts!
-Aut
Uncle Al
[snip crap]
> For a bit I wonderd if one could get palladium or rhodium to behave a
> better conductivity than silver if it were surrounded by a positive
> field to relieve the conductional charges so that they match silver's
> in configuration.
"Az di bobe vot gehat beytsim volt zi geven mayn zeyde."
Do you have three grandfathers?
If you shave your ass hair, will your butt be a peach?
Idiot.
Autymn D. C.
> > (But bronze is not brass. The authors/translators of the OT couldn't
> > tell.)
> >
> > A neat trick with gold is that, despite its nobility, it bonds with
> > many other metals to make ungold "golds"; that is, white gold, red
> > gold, black gold, grey gold, green gold, blue gold, lilac gold, carmine
> > gold. The shops, however, market these as golds, or metals, when many
> > of them in the pictures are obviosely dull "ores" as I'll call them.
> > Ores are on the brink of earths, then salts.
> BTW are you a chemist in your formal education ??
I am not, but I'v ae a'longstanding interest in kèmicei for want of
dear metals and stones, as well as the neat recipes in subversive texts
such as the /Anarchist's Cookbook/. For a few years I'v wanted to make
a death ray, so hav bene compilant lists of elemental incendiaries and
conductors. I can even say what substances/reactions are better than
onia and alqali perklorates for solid kèmical rocket engins. They
need a good magnet.
> i think we had once a discussion and may be a dispute
> about some of my prediction invloving Gold
Yes, you badmouthd the relativistic contraction for gold and mercury.
The sudden state-shifts from platinum to mercury on that period are
because of charge-shielding from the greater room and drop afforded by
strong fields and swift inner charges.
> according to my model
> Gold and Mercury (Hg) have a very similar nuclear structre
Then why does gold only hav one stabil isotope?
> Platimun is also a neighbour of Gold but from the 'lower side' of the
> periodic table
> but hase some noticable difference in some detail of its nuclear
> structre
> and has some differnt edge orbitals
>
> so my prediction is that
> it should be much easier to turn Hg to Gold
> raher than turn Platinum to Gold
Duh, it's near nickel.
-Aut
Autymn D. C.
> "Autymn D. C." wrote:
> [snip crap]
>
> > For a bit I wonderd if one could get palladium or rhodium to behave a
> > better conductivity than silver if it were surrounded by a positive
> > field to relieve the conductional charges so that they match silver's
> > in configuration.
>
> "Az di bobe vot gehat beytsim volt zi geven mayn zeyde."
> Do you have three grandfathers?
irrelevant
> If you shave your ass hair, will your butt be a peach?
>
> Idiot.
That is your signoff. I am for the pelting of Aspergian scum with hot
coals. Is that where the Schwartz name came from?
-Aut
Androcles
"Uncle Al" <Uncl...@hate.spam.net> wrote in message
news:45429142...@hate.spam.net...
| "Autymn D. C." wrote:
| [snip crap]
|
Gladly, FOaD.
Y.Porat
Uncle Al wrote:
> "Autymn D. C." wrote:
> [snip crap]
>
> > For a bit I wonderd if one could get palladium or rhodium to behave a
> > better conductivity than silver if it were surrounded by a positive
> > field to relieve the conductional charges so that they match silver's
> > in configuration.
>
> "Az di bobe vot gehat beytsim volt zi geven mayn zeyde."
Hi Uncle
saince i am of your 'tribe'
i could understand each word you wrote (:-)
but the others could not
so uncle
may be cut the BS of ??
do you what to prove youself 100 percent senile ???
yet in fact wha t you do is
that you contribute nothing but negative !!
ther is an old oat of a few thousand years by old Greek Doctors that
said:
if you cant help- at least dont cause damage!!
so you should be at least be - if not uaseful than ethical as those
ancient Doctors!!
keep well
Y.Porat
----------------------
Y.Porat
Autymn D. C. wrote:
> Y.Porat wrote:
> > > (But bronze is not brass. The authors/translators of the OT couldn't
> > > tell.)
> > >
> > > A neat trick with gold is that, despite its nobility, it bonds with
> > > many other metals to make ungold "golds"; that is, white gold, red
> > > gold, black gold, grey gold, green gold, blue gold, lilac gold, carmine
> > > gold. The shops, however, market these as golds, or metals, when many
> > > of them in the pictures are obviosely dull "ores" as I'll call them.
> > > Ores are on the brink of earths, then salts.
>
> > BTW are you a chemist in your formal education ??
>
> I am not, but I'v ae a'longstanding interest in kèmicei for want of
> dear metals and stones, as well as the neat recipes in subversive texts
> such as the /Anarchist's Cookbook/. For a few years I'v wanted to make
> a death ray, so hav bene compilant lists of elemental incendiaries and
> conductors. I can even say what substances/reactions are better than
> onia and alqali perklorates for solid kèmical rocket engins. They
> need a good magnet.
>
> > i think we had once a discussion and may be a dispute
> > about some of my prediction invloving Gold
>
> Yes, you badmouthd the relativistic contraction for gold and mercury.
> The sudden state-shifts from platinum to mercury on that period are
> because of charge-shielding from the greater room and drop afforded by
> strong fields and swift inner charges.
?????????
------------
it i think that no one could disprove by experimental data that
Hg can betetr be turned to Gold
rather than Pt can be changed to Goldi mean the main stream isotops
--------------
>
> > according to my model
> > Gold and Mercury (Hg) have a very similar nuclear structre
>
> Then why does gold only hav one stabil isotope?
it is probably not for a few minutes study
yet i made a quick look at my model
and i found
1
as above
there is nothing prior to it in the periodic table
even the 'closest to it from the lighter side ie Platimum is different
2
it is very symetrical and has less external orbitals than anything
under or above it
----------------
>
> > Platimun is also a neighbour of Gold but from the 'lower side' of the
> > periodic table
> > but hase some noticable difference in some detail of its nuclear
> > structre
> > and has some differnt edge orbitals
> >
> > so my prediction is that
> > it should be much easier to turn Hg to Gold
> > raher than turn Platinum to Gold
>
> Duh, it's near nickel.
Ni is No 28
ie far below it !!
--------------
now i have another prediction:
O (oxygen) cannot be turned to Fl 9Fluorine)
though they are neibours
whie i say cant be turned i mean
by a nuclear process (ie not by a big bang....)
and i mean **the mainstream isotop**
ie
not the rare 'exotic' isotops
can someone prove or disprovae it by experimental known data ??
(i hvae no previous knowlwdge abou tthe experimental data !!)
TIA
Y.Porat
-----------------------
hanson
news:1162007531....@i3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
>> "Autymn D. C." aka "Dyslexia" wrote:
>> [Al snips crap]
>> > For a bit I wonderd if one could get palladium or rhodium
>> > to behave a better conductivity than silver if it were
>> > surrounded by a positive field to relieve the conductional
>> > charges so that they match silver's in configuration.
>>
>> "Az di bobe vot gehat beytsim volt zi geven mayn zeyde."
>> If you shave your ass hair, will your butt be a peach?
>> Idiot.
>
> Hi Uncle
> saince i am of your 'tribe'
> i could understand each word you wrote (:-)
> but the others could not
>
ahahaha... it is not quite clear for what reason Al has such a
sudden interest in Dyselxia's peachy ass, much less for its
hair on it, especially if the ass belongs to an idiot... ahahaha...
Furthermore, Al's line "Do you have three grandfathers?"
is a loose and cleansed interpretation of the old Yiddishe
expression/proverb (one of Cerfas' favorite threats/curse)
"Az di bobe vot gehat beytsim volt zi geven mayn zeyde."
but it translates more literally into
"If the grandmother (bobe) had a cock and balls (beytsim)
she would be my grandfather (zeyde)"
This folksy wisdom probably stems from the observation
that once the freely fucking yentls turn into old yentas they
begin to behave like loud macho-sounding olde kackers
just like Messieurs Schwartz and Porat here, both being
exemplary issues of soldiers in their "Army of Light" to shine
onto the Gentiles... ahahahaha.... AHAHAHAHA.... ahahaha...
>
[Yehi to Al Schwartz]
> so uncle, may be cut the BS of ??
Y.Porat
hanson wrote:
> Yehiel "Y.Porat" <map...@012.net.il> wrote in message
> news:1162007531....@i3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
> >> "Autymn D. C." aka "Dyslexia" wrote:
> >> [Al snips crap]
>
> > so you should be at least be - if not uaseful than
> > ethical as those ancient Doctors!!
> > keep well
> > Y.Porat
-Hi hanson however you must admit that the jewish folklor
of east Europ (that does not exist there for known reasons
was built during a 1000 years
if you realy know it it is extremely 'juicy' and versatile
and has a lot of life wisdom
anyway
lets cut the bulshit of !! and concentrate on my model
as you started and innitiated.
----------
folowing your advice to be practical (tachless' ) and predictive
in an unprecedented way
i brought above the prediction
about Oxygen that cannot be turned to Fluorine
though they are immediate neighbours!
no one except me can bring such a prediction!!
it i sone of many ones that i can do .
ATB
Y.Porat
-----------------------------------
Autymn D. C.
> > > so my prediction is that
> > > it should be much easier to turn Hg to Gold
> > > raher than turn Platinum to Gold
> >
> > Duh, it's near nickel.
> > -----------------------
> Ni is No 28
> ie far below it !!
> --------------
See the links: http://egroups.com/message/free_energy/25647.
> now i have another prediction:
>
> O (oxygen) cannot be turned to Fl 9Fluorine)
> though they are neibours
> whie i say cant be turned i mean
> by a nuclear process (ie not by a big bang....)
> and i mean **the mainstream isotop**
> ie
> not the rare 'exotic' isotops
>
> can someone prove or disprovae it by experimental known data ??
> (i hvae no previous knowlwdge abou tthe experimental data !!)
Add three neutròns to three protòns. Generators or cosmic rays can
do it.
-Aut
Y.Porat
No !!
there is a difference between your imagination and reality
hand waving is not good enough
please bring experimental data !!
TIA
Y.Porat
---------------------------
Eric Gisse
Why should you hold yourself to different standards than you hold
others?
You have no experimental observation of a massive photon, yet you
insist that the photon is massive *anyway*.
> TIA
> Y.Porat
> ---------------------------
Y.Porat
if you dont get that E=hf is an experimental formula
and you dont get that that i showed that
if the h containes the mass dimesion of 1 kg
and that there is nothing in hf to multiply that h and the Kg
dimsnsion by
Zero
than the Enrgy of the photon and therefore of the Kg in it are nonzero
than ??
waht do you want now fromme ?? curse ??!!
so go do your homework or ask someone else to explain to you
my profe
you could say ok it has mass but relativistic mass
but
there is no relativistic mass
ifthat rumour has not arrived yet to Alaska than look for it
now bye
i am fed up with you
go climb on another horse or else i wioll climb on you more rudely
2
just note the title of this thred
photon mass has nothing to do with it
unless you are a comulsive irrational personal enemy of mine !
Y.Porat
------------------------
Y.Porat
no one could disprove my prediction that
Oxygen cannot be turned by ordinary nuclear process to Fluorine
and vice versa **though they are immediate neighbours**!!
so it should say something
ATB
Y.Porat
---------------------------------