Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Matheology § 234
3 views
Skip to first unread message
WM
Mar 31, 2013, 11:50:34 AM3/31/13
to
Matheology § 234
Enumerate all rational numbers to construct a Cantor-list. Replace the
diagonal digits a_nn by d_n in the usual way to obtain the anti-
diagonal d. Beyond the n-th line there are f(n) rational numbers the
first n digits of which are the same as the first n digits d_1,
d_2, ..., d_n of the anti-diagonal. For every n in |N, f(n) > k for
every k in |N. Define for every n in |N the function g(n) = 1/f(n) =
0. In analysis the limit of this function is lim[n-->oo] g(n) = 0.
So matheology with its limit lim[n-->oo] f(n) = 0 is incompatible with
analysis. Since analysis is a branch of mathematics, matheology is
incompatible with mathematics.
Of course, like in Stalin's days nobody could prove Stalinn being an
asshole, today nobody can prove Virgil and his ilk being Fools Of
Matheology.
Regards, WM
Enumerate all rational numbers to construct a Cantor-list. Replace the
diagonal digits a_nn by d_n in the usual way to obtain the anti-
diagonal d. Beyond the n-th line there are f(n) rational numbers the
first n digits of which are the same as the first n digits d_1,
d_2, ..., d_n of the anti-diagonal. For every n in |N, f(n) > k for
every k in |N. Define for every n in |N the function g(n) = 1/f(n) =
0. In analysis the limit of this function is lim[n-->oo] g(n) = 0.
So matheology with its limit lim[n-->oo] f(n) = 0 is incompatible with
analysis. Since analysis is a branch of mathematics, matheology is
incompatible with mathematics.
Of course, like in Stalin's days nobody could prove Stalinn being an
asshole, today nobody can prove Virgil and his ilk being Fools Of
Matheology.
Regards, WM
fom
Mar 31, 2013, 12:11:45 PM3/31/13
to
On 3/31/2013 10:50 AM, WM wrote:
> Matheology � 234
>
> Enumerate all rational numbers to construct a Cantor-list.
No such thing as a Cantor-list except in WM's delusions.
> Matheology � 234
>
> Enumerate all rational numbers to construct a Cantor-list.
> Replace the
> diagonal digits a_nn by d_n in the usual way to obtain the anti-
> diagonal d. Beyond the n-th line there are f(n) rational numbers the
> first n digits of which are the same as the first n digits d_1,
> d_2, ..., d_n of the anti-diagonal. For every n in |N, f(n) > k for
> every k in |N. Define for every n in |N the function g(n) = 1/f(n) =
> 0. In analysis the limit of this function is lim[n-->oo] g(n) = 0.
>
you will find it is not a natural number.
Oh wait! You know it is not a natural number.
But, you perform finite arithmetic as if it is a natural number.
Having violated the rules, you claim to make sense of the nonsense.
> So matheology with its limit lim[n-->oo] f(n) = 0 is incompatible with
> analysis. Since analysis is a branch of mathematics, matheology is
> incompatible with mathematics.
>
> Of course, like in Stalin's days nobody could prove Stalinn being an
> asshole, today nobody can prove Virgil and his ilk being Fools Of
> Matheology.
WM is threatening to not play with you anymore.
Apparently I have been demoted.
No longer a parrot.
No longer a slave.
Just ilk.
0 new messages