<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
  <title>sci.logic Google Group</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.logic</link>
  <description>Logic -- math, philosophy &amp;amp; computational aspects.</description>
  <language>en</language>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Does inductive reasoning lead to knowledge?</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.logic/browse_frm/thread/ed602d5c986e5fff/523621cfe21a07d2?show_docid=523621cfe21a07d2</link>
  <description>
  Shows how desperate ewe are when ewe have to lie. &lt;br&gt; MG
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/sci.logic/browse_frm/thread/ed602d5c986e5fff/523621cfe21a07d2?show_docid=523621cfe21a07d2</guid>
  <author>
  mikegor...@xtra.co.nz
  (Michael Gordge)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 21:45:56 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Model != World?</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.logic/browse_frm/thread/4d9d203430ad7d9f/cbff024091c5c768?show_docid=cbff024091c5c768</link>
  <description>
  Excuse me, but I have a basic question. What is the motivation for &lt;br&gt; differentiating the concepts of &amp;quot;World&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;Model&amp;quot;?
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/sci.logic/browse_frm/thread/4d9d203430ad7d9f/cbff024091c5c768?show_docid=cbff024091c5c768</guid>
  <author>
  tegirinena...@gmail.com
  (Tegiri Nenashi)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 21:44:36 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Does inductive reasoning lead to knowledge?</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.logic/browse_frm/thread/ed602d5c986e5fff/e8b9d1e84634f66b?show_docid=e8b9d1e84634f66b</link>
  <description>
  Your example had nothing to do with reality, do you have another &lt;br&gt; example? &lt;br&gt; MG
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/sci.logic/browse_frm/thread/ed602d5c986e5fff/e8b9d1e84634f66b?show_docid=e8b9d1e84634f66b</guid>
  <author>
  mikegor...@xtra.co.nz
  (Michael Gordge)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 21:43:43 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Does inductive reasoning lead to knowledge?</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.logic/browse_frm/thread/ed602d5c986e5fff/bce8bf56d024d84e?show_docid=bce8bf56d024d84e</link>
  <description>
  Oh soooo &amp;quot;axiomatic certainty&amp;quot; is a contradiction in terms because to &lt;br&gt; be certain requires the non-contradictory identification and &lt;br&gt; integration of sensory evidence. &lt;br&gt; MG
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/sci.logic/browse_frm/thread/ed602d5c986e5fff/bce8bf56d024d84e?show_docid=bce8bf56d024d84e</guid>
  <author>
  mikegor...@xtra.co.nz
  (Michael Gordge)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 21:37:12 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Does inductive reasoning lead to knowledge?</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.logic/browse_frm/thread/ed602d5c986e5fff/0edae7946a036195?show_docid=0edae7946a036195</link>
  <description>
  What meaning does &amp;quot;certainty&amp;quot; have and what meaning does &amp;quot;evidence&amp;quot; &lt;br&gt; have in your silly slogans &amp;quot;axiomatic certainty&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;observational &lt;br&gt; evidence&amp;quot;? &lt;br&gt; MG
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/sci.logic/browse_frm/thread/ed602d5c986e5fff/0edae7946a036195?show_docid=0edae7946a036195</guid>
  <author>
  mikegor...@xtra.co.nz
  (Michael Gordge)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 21:31:48 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Does inductive reasoning lead to knowledge?</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.logic/browse_frm/thread/ed602d5c986e5fff/d4e8e5031c5bdd9a?show_docid=d4e8e5031c5bdd9a</link>
  <description>
  In article &amp;lt;hhsu2202...@news5.newsguy.com &amp;gt;, jmfbahciv &amp;lt;jmfbahciv@aol&amp;gt; &lt;br&gt; wrote: &lt;br&gt; You have been asked time and again to produce evidence that PA does not &lt;br&gt; understand this Scientific Method. You keep on repeating it as fact. &lt;br&gt; Show the evidence or shut up. &lt;br&gt; Show the evidence for his. What do you know that she does not and how is
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/sci.logic/browse_frm/thread/ed602d5c986e5fff/d4e8e5031c5bdd9a?show_docid=d4e8e5031c5bdd9a</guid>
  <author>
  doraymeridt...@optusnet.com.au
  (dorayme)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 21:29:23 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Does inductive reasoning lead to knowledge?</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.logic/browse_frm/thread/ed602d5c986e5fff/5bd48ec16da10f5e?show_docid=5bd48ec16da10f5e</link>
  <description>
  In article &amp;lt;hhstil31...@news3.newsguy.com &amp;gt;, jmfbahciv &amp;lt;jmfbahciv@aol&amp;gt; &lt;br&gt; wrote: &lt;br&gt; No he is not kidding, he can&#39;t kid, he is a uniquely crazed person. That &lt;br&gt; means everything he says is perfectly easy to accept. Nothing means &lt;br&gt; anything. But what is you excuse? You seem to be so sensible? Did your &lt;br&gt; many brothers and sisters kill everything off in you?
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/sci.logic/browse_frm/thread/ed602d5c986e5fff/5bd48ec16da10f5e?show_docid=5bd48ec16da10f5e</guid>
  <author>
  doraymeridt...@optusnet.com.au
  (dorayme)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 21:22:19 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Does inductive reasoning lead to knowledge?</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.logic/browse_frm/thread/ed602d5c986e5fff/8255c6a411d27bf6?show_docid=8255c6a411d27bf6</link>
  <description>
  In article &amp;lt;hhste421...@news3.newsguy.com &amp;gt;, jmfbahciv &amp;lt;jmfbahciv@aol&amp;gt; &lt;br&gt; wrote: &lt;br&gt; Oh yes, everyone is a walking science lab, who needs trained scientists &lt;br&gt; with sophisticated equipmentment analytical techniques to investigate &lt;br&gt; the brain when it is all there at every little fuckwits fingertips doing &lt;br&gt; hocus pocus spooky introspection?
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/sci.logic/browse_frm/thread/ed602d5c986e5fff/8255c6a411d27bf6?show_docid=8255c6a411d27bf6</guid>
  <author>
  doraymeridt...@optusnet.com.au
  (dorayme)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 21:19:28 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Does inductive reasoning lead to knowledge?</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.logic/browse_frm/thread/ed602d5c986e5fff/c9770831e3872a03?show_docid=c9770831e3872a03</link>
  <description>
  In article &amp;lt;hhstav11...@news3.newsguy.com &amp;gt;, jmfbahciv &amp;lt;jmfbahciv@aol&amp;gt; &lt;br&gt; wrote: &lt;br&gt; You go to the library to look up a website? My god, how do you get your &lt;br&gt; posts here, by carrier pidgeon? &lt;br&gt; It is not called inductive reasoning by anyone, at least not by anyone &lt;br&gt; much in any peer revieed literature. You are just following an idiot
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/sci.logic/browse_frm/thread/ed602d5c986e5fff/c9770831e3872a03?show_docid=c9770831e3872a03</guid>
  <author>
  doraymeridt...@optusnet.com.au
  (dorayme)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 21:15:47 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Does inductive reasoning lead to knowledge?</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.logic/browse_frm/thread/ed602d5c986e5fff/ce03582ab52ea584?show_docid=ce03582ab52ea584</link>
  <description>
  In article &amp;lt;hhst9601...@news3.newsguy.com &amp;gt;, jmfbahciv &amp;lt;jmfbahciv@aol&amp;gt; &lt;br&gt; wrote: &lt;br&gt; How come you ignore everything of value? Your brothers have scarred you &lt;br&gt; so badly that you don&#39;t even understand the expression throwing the baby &lt;br&gt; out with the bath water. It has turned you into a completely content &lt;br&gt; free zone. Your posts are good evidence of your ignorance. Fancy
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/sci.logic/browse_frm/thread/ed602d5c986e5fff/ce03582ab52ea584?show_docid=ce03582ab52ea584</guid>
  <author>
  doraymeridt...@optusnet.com.au
  (dorayme)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 21:08:03 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Does inductive reasoning lead to knowledge?</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.logic/browse_frm/thread/ed602d5c986e5fff/7c87eb6cea30db6b?show_docid=7c87eb6cea30db6b</link>
  <description>
  In article &amp;lt;hhst3g91...@news3.newsguy.com &amp;gt;, jmfbahciv &amp;lt;jmfbahciv@aol&amp;gt; &lt;br&gt; wrote: &lt;br&gt; Your answer seems irrelevant to what Purcell is saying. True, it is not &lt;br&gt; clear what Purcell is trying to say! But why not make a constructive &lt;br&gt; guess instead of just launching into these questionably relevant replies? &lt;br&gt; Let me guess why you don&#39;t do this: you have as little clue about doing
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/sci.logic/browse_frm/thread/ed602d5c986e5fff/7c87eb6cea30db6b?show_docid=7c87eb6cea30db6b</guid>
  <author>
  doraymeridt...@optusnet.com.au
  (dorayme)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 21:01:15 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Good Without God - What a Billion Nonreligious People Do Believe</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.logic/browse_frm/thread/8663e32c8926c0fe/b97559d1033ae709?show_docid=b97559d1033ae709</link>
  <description>
  On 4 Jan 2010 12:28:42 -0800, stevendaryl3...@yahoo.com (Daryl &lt;br&gt; They can&#39;t imagine anybody without a religion so they imagine a label &lt;br&gt; applied to people without one, is one.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/sci.logic/browse_frm/thread/8663e32c8926c0fe/b97559d1033ae709?show_docid=b97559d1033ae709</guid>
  <author>
  ca...@optonline.net
  (Christopher A. Lee)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 20:46:23 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: #266 mathematics ends at about 10^500 Re: powerset</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.logic/browse_frm/thread/ccc970175fe3cda6/9cd99c7e30b6bbc0?show_docid=9cd99c7e30b6bbc0</link>
  <description>
  Keep up the good works. It&#39;s a sure bet that one day you will be made &lt;br&gt; the Patron Saint of Cranks. &lt;br&gt; MoeBlee
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/sci.logic/browse_frm/thread/ccc970175fe3cda6/9cd99c7e30b6bbc0?show_docid=9cd99c7e30b6bbc0</guid>
  <author>
  jazzm...@hotmail.com
  (MoeBlee)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 20:44:34 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Does inductive reasoning lead to knowledge?</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.logic/browse_frm/thread/ed602d5c986e5fff/282ac1589dd4c5a6?show_docid=282ac1589dd4c5a6</link>
  <description>
  Reminds me of a MASH episode in which someone askes a Korean why the &lt;br&gt; women walk ahead of the men, land mines was the answer.
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/sci.logic/browse_frm/thread/ed602d5c986e5fff/282ac1589dd4c5a6?show_docid=282ac1589dd4c5a6</guid>
  <author>
  sacsca...@aol.com
  (M Purcell)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 20:41:31 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  <item>
  <title>Re: Good Without God - What a Billion Nonreligious People Do Believe</title>
  <link>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.logic/browse_frm/thread/8663e32c8926c0fe/8f23de661ac397eb?show_docid=8f23de661ac397eb</link>
  <description>
  Actually, it&#39;s something that mainly christian fundies do (although &lt;br&gt; other flavors of christianity may be stealing their trick, I don&#39;t &lt;br&gt; know). They start out with the erroneous assertion that &amp;quot;everybody &lt;br&gt; worships *something*.&amp;quot; (They loosely define &amp;quot;worship&amp;quot; as &amp;quot;pay a great &lt;br&gt; deal of attention to,&amp;quot; meaning that whatever occupies large portions
  </description>
  <guid isPermaLink="true">http://groups.google.com/group/sci.logic/browse_frm/thread/8663e32c8926c0fe/8f23de661ac397eb?show_docid=8f23de661ac397eb</guid>
  <author>
  skyey...@cox.net
  (SkyEyes)
  </author>
  <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 20:39:05 UT
</pubDate>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
