<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.logic</id>
  <title type="text">sci.logic Google Group</title>
  <subtitle type="text">
  Logic -- math, philosophy &amp; computational aspects.
  </subtitle>
  <link href="/group/sci.logic/feed/atom_v1_0_msgs.xml" rel="self" title="sci.logic feed"/>
  <updated>2010-01-04T08:16:23Z</updated>
  <generator uri="http://groups.google.com" version="1.99">Google Groups</generator>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Michael Gordge</name>
  <email>mikegor...@xtra.co.nz</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-01-04T08:16:23Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.logic/browse_frm/thread/ed602d5c986e5fff/1fbaa08d281c2e1e?show_docid=1fbaa08d281c2e1e</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/sci.logic/browse_frm/thread/ed602d5c986e5fff/1fbaa08d281c2e1e?show_docid=1fbaa08d281c2e1e"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Does inductive reasoning lead to knowledge?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  On Jan 4, 8:42 am, Patricia Aldoraz &amp;lt;patricia.aldo...@gmail.com&amp;gt; &lt;br&gt; wrote: &lt;br&gt; Because they prefer and feel right at home &amp;quot;conversing&amp;quot; with like &lt;br&gt; minded leftist Kantian cockheads like ewe and if ewe had an honest &lt;br&gt; bone in your body ewe would admit you love it and would have it no &lt;br&gt; other way. &lt;br&gt; MG
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Michael Gordge</name>
  <email>mikegor...@xtra.co.nz</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-01-04T07:36:05Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.logic/browse_frm/thread/ed602d5c986e5fff/6ddfc0934154d0f4?show_docid=6ddfc0934154d0f4</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/sci.logic/browse_frm/thread/ed602d5c986e5fff/6ddfc0934154d0f4?show_docid=6ddfc0934154d0f4"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Does inductive reasoning lead to knowledge?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  On Jan 4, 8:42 am, Patricia Aldoraz &amp;lt;patricia.aldo...@gmail.com&amp;gt; &lt;br&gt; wrote: &lt;br&gt; Why are ewe talking to me ewe fucking Kantian moron? &lt;br&gt; Why dont ewe fuck off and find your like minded fuckwits like &lt;br&gt; zinnchead and Stafford and chazzzzz and mortal and Fletcher etal to &lt;br&gt; talk to, because they make the exact same noises as you?
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Michael Gordge</name>
  <email>mikegor...@xtra.co.nz</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-01-04T07:23:50Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.logic/browse_frm/thread/ed602d5c986e5fff/e62c430017818dc2?show_docid=e62c430017818dc2</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/sci.logic/browse_frm/thread/ed602d5c986e5fff/e62c430017818dc2?show_docid=e62c430017818dc2"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Does inductive reasoning lead to knowledge?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Qualifying off topic utterly senseless garbage snipped, stay on &lt;br&gt; subject if you can. &lt;br&gt; There you go again, pretending that preceeding certain with the &lt;br&gt; adjective absolutely changes anything about the meaning of certain, &lt;br&gt; you still haven&#39;t even explained how the adjective axiomatic changed &lt;br&gt; the meaning of certainty.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Pentcho Valev</name>
  <email>pva...@yahoo.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-01-04T07:08:17Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.logic/browse_frm/thread/3091d18ddd5ecda7/af01fd42df11a783?show_docid=af01fd42df11a783</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/sci.logic/browse_frm/thread/3091d18ddd5ecda7/af01fd42df11a783?show_docid=af01fd42df11a783"/>
  <title type="text">Anti-Einsteiniana: Natural Philosophy Alliance?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  W. H. Newton-Smith, THE RATIONALITY OF SCIENCE, Routledge, London, &lt;br&gt; 1981, p. 3: &amp;quot;For vewed sub specie eternitatis scientists (even &lt;br&gt; physical scientists) are a fickle lot. The history of science is a &lt;br&gt; tale of multifarious shiftings of allegiance from theory to theory. &lt;br&gt; Newtonian mechanics had its hour of flourishing with virtual universal
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Virgil</name>
  <email>vir...@home.esc</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-01-04T06:54:50Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.logic/browse_frm/thread/8663e32c8926c0fe/9105f4d2aa5047a5?show_docid=9105f4d2aa5047a5</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/sci.logic/browse_frm/thread/8663e32c8926c0fe/9105f4d2aa5047a5?show_docid=9105f4d2aa5047a5"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Good Without God - What a Billion Nonreligious People Do Believe</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  In article &lt;br&gt; &amp;lt;fa6d7cbe-4a86-4745-b576-6dfb7 e506...@c3g2000yqd.googlegroup s.com&amp;gt;, &lt;br&gt; It is already beginning to happen in the more civilized nations of the &lt;br&gt; world. Theist religions are fading in both membership and power in those &lt;br&gt; nations, and, with two notable exceptions, is only thriving in countries &lt;br&gt; stricken by poverty, disease, war or revolution, or other ills. Those
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Ostap S. B. M. Bender Jr.</name>
  <email>ostap_bender_1...@hotmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-01-04T06:26:02Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.logic/browse_frm/thread/ccc970175fe3cda6/baad08cb540aef5f?show_docid=baad08cb540aef5f</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/sci.logic/browse_frm/thread/ccc970175fe3cda6/baad08cb540aef5f?show_docid=baad08cb540aef5f"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Math should view &quot;infinity&quot; in the same way that Physics views infinity #268 Re: Correct Mathematics</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  On Jan 3, 8:49 pm, Archimedes Plutonium &lt;br&gt; If it were up to you, genius, math would view &amp;quot;infinity&amp;quot; in the same &lt;br&gt; way as your own tribe Piraha: &lt;br&gt; &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=nofollow href=&quot;http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2007/04/16/070416fa_fact_colapinto#ixzz0bcct6IS3&quot;&gt;[link]&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt; Everett told him about the Pirahã’s limited “one,” “two,” and “many”
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Patricia Aldoraz</name>
  <email>patricia.aldo...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-01-04T05:00:10Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.logic/browse_frm/thread/ed602d5c986e5fff/b8054ebf5c0535e7?show_docid=b8054ebf5c0535e7</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/sci.logic/browse_frm/thread/ed602d5c986e5fff/b8054ebf5c0535e7?show_docid=b8054ebf5c0535e7"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Does inductive reasoning lead to knowledge?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  If some of the boys here settle down, it could also be an informative &lt;br&gt; one. But neither the headmaster, dorayme nor I, will reveal more than &lt;br&gt; any boy here can take. I think it is time to stop flicking ink at each &lt;br&gt; other and whatever you are all doing under the desks - is that a &lt;br&gt; rabbit I see? Zinnic, stand up straight and do up your fly you
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Archimedes Plutonium</name>
  <email>plutonium.archime...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-01-04T04:49:06Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.logic/browse_frm/thread/ccc970175fe3cda6/ed421143b20ca10a?show_docid=ed421143b20ca10a</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/sci.logic/browse_frm/thread/ccc970175fe3cda6/ed421143b20ca10a?show_docid=ed421143b20ca10a"/>
  <title type="text">Math should view &quot;infinity&quot; in the same way that Physics views infinity #268 Re: Correct Mathematics</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  So we have Physics as the king of sciences, and where mathematics is a &lt;br&gt; byproduct of &lt;br&gt; physics of the Atom Totality. Because atoms are numerous have have &lt;br&gt; arithematic. Because &lt;br&gt; atoms have sizes and shapes we have geometry. Because the Atom &lt;br&gt; Totality has a special &lt;br&gt; waist band of the Cosmic atom of 22 subshells inside of 7 shells in
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Marshall</name>
  <email>marshall.spi...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-01-04T04:09:31Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.logic/browse_frm/thread/ed602d5c986e5fff/aeba9b0e225156e3?show_docid=aeba9b0e225156e3</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/sci.logic/browse_frm/thread/ed602d5c986e5fff/aeba9b0e225156e3?show_docid=aeba9b0e225156e3"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Does inductive reasoning lead to knowledge?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  On Jan 3, 7:53 pm, Patricia Aldoraz &amp;lt;patricia.aldo...@gmail.com&amp;gt; &lt;br&gt; wrote: &lt;br&gt; I salute your excellent response! &lt;br&gt; This thread is the most entertainment usenet&#39;s produced in months. &lt;br&gt; Marshall
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Patricia Aldoraz</name>
  <email>patricia.aldo...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-01-04T03:53:42Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.logic/browse_frm/thread/ed602d5c986e5fff/43ca5351c2f7288e?show_docid=43ca5351c2f7288e</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/sci.logic/browse_frm/thread/ed602d5c986e5fff/43ca5351c2f7288e?show_docid=43ca5351c2f7288e"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Does inductive reasoning lead to knowledge?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  OK, then. I am finally sprung! I really really fall helplessy in love &lt;br&gt; with complete idiot strangers and if Jane Austen were alive, Pride and &lt;br&gt; Prejudice would have a rather different set of characters and a &lt;br&gt; different plot. &amp;lt;g&amp;gt;
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Free Lunch</name>
  <email>lu...@nofreelunch.us</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-01-04T02:17:04Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.logic/browse_frm/thread/8663e32c8926c0fe/f1501ab78ecd7f7b?show_docid=f1501ab78ecd7f7b</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/sci.logic/browse_frm/thread/8663e32c8926c0fe/f1501ab78ecd7f7b?show_docid=f1501ab78ecd7f7b"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Good Without God - What a Billion Nonreligious People Do Believe</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  On Sun, 3 Jan 2010 18:03:38 -0800 (PST), Robert Morpheal &lt;br&gt; &amp;lt;morph...@yahoo.com&amp;gt; wrote in alt.atheism: &lt;br&gt; Luckily for us, that is not what humanism is. That is a parody invented &lt;br&gt; by theists who cannot defend their own religions.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Robert Morpheal</name>
  <email>morph...@yahoo.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-01-04T02:03:38Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.logic/browse_frm/thread/8663e32c8926c0fe/3ad66a36b30400c5?show_docid=3ad66a36b30400c5</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/sci.logic/browse_frm/thread/8663e32c8926c0fe/3ad66a36b30400c5?show_docid=3ad66a36b30400c5"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Good Without God - What a Billion Nonreligious People Do Believe</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Though it is true that all manner of violence, attrocities, extremes, &lt;br&gt; and even all out wars, have been committed in the name of one or &lt;br&gt; another &amp;quot;God&amp;quot;.... I dread what happens when humans make a God out of &lt;br&gt; themselves and call it &amp;quot;Humanism&amp;quot;. &lt;br&gt; Robert Morpheal
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Marshall</name>
  <email>marshall.spi...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-01-04T01:49:09Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.logic/browse_frm/thread/ed602d5c986e5fff/a64a3c07deaea376?show_docid=a64a3c07deaea376</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/sci.logic/browse_frm/thread/ed602d5c986e5fff/a64a3c07deaea376?show_docid=a64a3c07deaea376"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Does inductive reasoning lead to knowledge?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  On Jan 3, 5:44 pm, Patricia Aldoraz &amp;lt;patricia.aldo...@gmail.com&amp;gt; &lt;br&gt; wrote: &lt;br&gt; Oh, come on. We&#39;re not fooled for a minute. If you &lt;br&gt; wanted him to leave you alone you could have &lt;br&gt; stopped replying 500 messages ago. You are &lt;br&gt; totally in love with John Stafford and all the &lt;br&gt; attention he gives you. Don&#39;t even bother trying
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Patricia Aldoraz</name>
  <email>patricia.aldo...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-01-04T01:47:17Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.logic/browse_frm/thread/ed602d5c986e5fff/3bf20afe68f0dd8d?show_docid=3bf20afe68f0dd8d</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/sci.logic/browse_frm/thread/ed602d5c986e5fff/3bf20afe68f0dd8d?show_docid=3bf20afe68f0dd8d"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Does inductive reasoning lead to knowledge?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  What, we are into religion now? You are praying? Are you kneeling or &lt;br&gt; something odd in your &amp;quot;observance&amp;quot;? &lt;br&gt; Collaboration for you is bandying about vague waffle from one usenet &lt;br&gt; guy idiot to another. Don&#39;t stop, it is a wonder of the world.
  </summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
  <author>
  <name>Patricia Aldoraz</name>
  <email>patricia.aldo...@gmail.com</email>
  </author>
  <updated>2010-01-04T01:44:02Z</updated>
  <id>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.logic/browse_frm/thread/ed602d5c986e5fff/41bf8223973603e7?show_docid=41bf8223973603e7</id>
  <link href="http://groups.google.com/group/sci.logic/browse_frm/thread/ed602d5c986e5fff/41bf8223973603e7?show_docid=41bf8223973603e7"/>
  <title type="text">Re: Does inductive reasoning lead to knowledge?</title>
  <summary type="html" xml:space="preserve">
  Always the accusation and never the evidence or analysis to back &lt;br&gt; yourself up. Where did you learn these pathetic debating tricks? Go &lt;br&gt; away and leave me alone.
  </summary>
  </entry>
</feed>
