Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Can we share information with the future in the present?

3 views
Skip to first unread message

M3

unread,
Sep 3, 2012, 7:28:41 PM9/3/12
to
If the future is close to us it is because the clock is always ticking
and the future is always becoming the present
and the present is always becoming the future
and this has been going on since the beginning of time
To see the future close to us we have to see the contrast with the
surrounding area.
We require a good to better outline of our futures.
If we recognize these goals and accept the responsibilities,
the future will be opened to us and we will see
we can interact and share information with the future in the present.
The solution to to the questions of computer science must focus on
positive affirmative outcomes, and the same principles must be adapted
to physics to continue to innovate and expand out our capabilities and
intelligence as a species.
Martin Musatov

Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway

unread,
Sep 3, 2012, 7:45:56 PM9/3/12
to
"M3" wrote in message
news:96d308bd-5556-4152...@k17g2000yqp.googlegroups.com...

If the future is close to us it is because the clock is always ticking
and the future is always becoming the present
and the present is always becoming the future
and this has been going on since the beginning of time

==============================================
Raving mad....
*plonk*

Charlie-Boo

unread,
Sep 3, 2012, 8:25:41 PM9/3/12
to
On Sep 3, 7:28 pm, M3 <marty.musa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> If the future is close to us it is because the clock is always ticking

But only when physical processes are occurring. If there is entropy
then there is no time. There is only Logic which is instantaneous.
(The use of Logic in program construction doesn't change the execution
time.)

> and the future is always becoming the present
> and the present is always becoming the future

But the future becomes the present only in the sense of a later future
becoming the current present, while the present becomes the future in
the sense of the current future becoming a later present, so these are
twi different processes.

> and this has been going on since the beginning of time

Has there been an infinite amount of past? If yes: the past has
finished so how could an infinite past finish? If no: What happened
right before the beginning of that finite time?
The only possibility is that time sometimes stands stil so there is an
infinite past but only a finite amount of time has passed.

> To see the future close to us we have to see the contrast with the
> surrounding area.
> We require a good to better outline of our futures.
> If we recognize these goals and accept the responsibilities,
> the future will be opened to us and we will see

The way to see the future now is to realize that all of mathematics
has developed via diagonalization of CBL expressions (I=Input,
x=output, A=quantified) and to write software to diagonalize for us
e.g.

Natural Numbers: Peano's Axioms i.e. X=0 while TRUE { output x ; X <=
suc(X) } is N.
Integers: ADD(I,x,J) where ADD(a,b,c) means a+b=c
Irrational Numbers: MUL( x , x , I) where MUL(a,b,c) means a x b = c
Imaginary Numbers: (eA)ADD(I,A,J)^MUL(x,x,A)

> we can interact and share information with the future in the present.
> The solution to to the questions of computer science must focus on
> positive affirmative outcomes, and the same principles must be adapted
> to physics to continue to innovate and expand out our capabilities and

But what is the principle of physics corresponding to assigning a
value to a variable (substitution) or diagonalizing?

C-B
0 new messages