Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Matheology § 112
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  2 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
WM  
View profile  
 More options Oct 7 2012, 3:39 am
Newsgroups: sci.math, sci.logic
From: WM <mueck...@rz.fh-augsburg.de>
Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2012 00:39:15 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Sun, Oct 7 2012 3:39 am
Subject: Matheology § 112

Matheology § 112

There is no evidence that Cantor himself ever considered the
possibility that the continuum hypothesis is undecidable. Obviously
formal investigations were far from his mind. [p. 213]

For him mathematical theorems were theses about something being; he
even was convinced that thh cardinal numbers aleph_0 and aleph were
corresponding to realities in the physical world. We are afraid, he
would not have enjoyed the "solution" of his questions by the modern
foundational researcher. [p. 213] {{This sentence could be improved by
another pair of quotation marks.}}

Obviously it was difficult for Cantor to express in hard mathematical
language, what he imagined. His "definitions" could appear rather
questionable to a critical thinker like Kronecker. [p. 229] {{Good
intuition is certainly preferable over fromalism.}}

I have no doubts concerning the truth of the transfinite that I have
recognized  by help of God and have been studying in its diversity and
unity for more than 20 years. Every year and nearly every day advances
me in this science. [...] From no other subjects of created nature I
have safer knowledge than of the theorems of transfinite number- and
type-theory.
[G. Cantor to Pater I. Jeiler, Pfingsten 1888] {{Of course this
intuition must not fail.}}

Or is it advisable to completel refrain from set theory in primary
school? Today we tend to recommend that. [p. 227] {{and not only
there!}}

[Quotations with page numbers from Herbert Meschkowski: "Georg Cantor:
Leben, Werk und Wirkung", 2nd ed., Bibl. Inst., Mannheim (1981)]

For German original texts see: Das Kalenderblatt 100707
http://www.hs-augsburg.de/~mueckenh/KB/KB%20201-400.pdf

Regards, WM


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Virgil  
View profile  
 More options Oct 7 2012, 3:42 am
Newsgroups: sci.math, sci.logic
From: Virgil <vir...@ligriv.com>
Date: Sun, 07 Oct 2012 01:42:54 -0600
Local: Sun, Oct 7 2012 3:42 am
Subject: Re: Matheology § 112
In article
<54dd6175-9dec-404f-94c7-1f1923a76...@p11g2000vbi.googlegroups.com>,

None of which supports any of WM's many delusions.
--

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »