Kevin
unread,May 18, 2013, 11:37:35 AM5/18/13You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to
So my ex-girlfriend was the daughter of a single mother and she
herself is a single mother with a daughter and is raising her daughter
to be a single mother and so I say that she is a gypsy... but that
isn't what makes her a gypsy... What makes her a gypsy is the fact
that she is clairvoyant. Ya see, I have the presense of mind not to
argue about the logical implications of being clairvoyant with a
gypsy. Her being clairvoyant is what makes her a gypsy. Just because I
dumped the notion of my being clairvoyant for the sake of being a
virtuoso, that doesn't mean I agree with science on the topic of
clairvoyance. Clairvoyance is under the purview of gypsyhood. My gypsy
ex-girlfriend is not the thing I have any genuine fear of... What's
relevant is that she raises suspicians of being a bad influence on
Heaven's Gate. Heaven's Gate and the gypsy are cousins, don't ya
know. What is the differance between Heaven's Gate and The Gypsy if
I'm a virtuoso? I have confidence in Heaven's Gate... Heaven's Gate
has an agreeable appearance... Heaven's Gate has an agreeable
personality... Heaven's Gate is intelligent and taken altogether, I
can have confidence in Heaven's Gate... The lingering issue is that
just because I have confidence in Heaven's Gate, that doesn't mean she
does what I want her to do. I don't have confidence in Heaven's Gate's
gypsy cousin. The Gypsy has no capacity to do what I want and need for
her to do. Given this context, I should ask science (sans physics): Do
you have confidence in me? I can do what science wants me to do but
that doesn't mean that I'm doing or intend to do what science wants me
to do. Science needs to prove that they have confidence in me, first
and foremost.