Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Vitamin D works better than Fat.
17 views
Skip to first unread message
John H. Gohde
May 12, 2013, 2:23:10 PM5/12/13
to
John H. Gohde
May 13, 2013, 8:56:56 AM5/13/13
to
Life goes better with lots of Vitamin D.
http://tinyurl.com/c2n8myr
Including a 50 minute long video of Michael F. Holick, PhD, MD who
always successfully manages to add a bit of comedy to his work.
vittyguy
May 13, 2013, 1:40:44 PM5/13/13
to
"Further, the ability of Vitamin D to control gene expression was found
to improve in direct portion to dosage size or vitamin D status. The
impressive results of this study were achieved at the relatively low
dosage of just 2,000 IU a day of vitamin D-3. Further, it suggests that
higher doses of "D" would have resulted in even more gene expression."
Ah, anyone who has studied biology knows instantly the flaw in the above.
There is a minimal, an optimal, and a maximal level in any biological
process. Themin to have any effect, the ott to have the best results, and
the max where increasing something has no added benefit and becomes toxic
or otherwise undesired.
The connection between vit d and heart disease risk is an example. Below
and above a rather narrow range of blood vit d the risk of heart disease
increases.
to improve in direct portion to dosage size or vitamin D status. The
impressive results of this study were achieved at the relatively low
dosage of just 2,000 IU a day of vitamin D-3. Further, it suggests that
higher doses of "D" would have resulted in even more gene expression."
Ah, anyone who has studied biology knows instantly the flaw in the above.
There is a minimal, an optimal, and a maximal level in any biological
process. Themin to have any effect, the ott to have the best results, and
the max where increasing something has no added benefit and becomes toxic
or otherwise undesired.
The connection between vit d and heart disease risk is an example. Below
and above a rather narrow range of blood vit d the risk of heart disease
increases.
John H. Gohde
May 13, 2013, 2:59:51 PM5/13/13
to
I can spot somebody lying a mile away, especially Science Psychos.
I do NOT take, nor have I ever advocated that anybody should take any
where near a toxic dosage, short of a person dying from full blown
cancer.
So go right ahead, and wait a couple hundred years for the perfect
vitamin D info to come in, while I laugh my head off at a bonafide Ass-
Hole.
John H. Gohde
May 13, 2013, 3:12:40 PM5/13/13
to
Including a 50 minute long video of Dr. Michael Holick who always
vittyguy
May 13, 2013, 4:00:22 PM5/13/13
to
> There is a minimal, an optimal, and a maximal level in any biological
> process. =A0Themin to have any effect, the ott to have the best results,
=
and
> the max where increasing something has no added benefit and becomes toxic
> or otherwise undesired.
>
> The connection between vit d and heart disease risk is an example.
=A0Bel=
> the max where increasing something has no added benefit and becomes toxic
> or otherwise undesired.
>
> The connection between vit d and heart disease risk is an example.
ow
> and above a rather narrow range of blood vit d the risk of heart disease
> increases.
"ROFLOL
I can spot somebody lying a mile away, especially Science Psychos.
I do NOT take, nor have I ever advocated that anybody should take any where
near a toxic dosage, short of a person dying from full blown cancer.
So go right ahead, and wait a couple hundred years for the perfect vitamin
D info to come in, while I laugh my head off at a bonafide Ass- Hole."
Hmmm, what then is a toxic level? Who said anything about you or what you
> and above a rather narrow range of blood vit d the risk of heart disease
> increases.
"ROFLOL
I can spot somebody lying a mile away, especially Science Psychos.
I do NOT take, nor have I ever advocated that anybody should take any where
near a toxic dosage, short of a person dying from full blown cancer.
So go right ahead, and wait a couple hundred years for the perfect vitamin
D info to come in, while I laugh my head off at a bonafide Ass- Hole."
advocate? The above segmet is from the article mentioned as to the role of
vit d in molecular biology. The example of heart disease is from recent
published studies where different researchers looked at vit d levels and
risk of heart disease.
John H. Gohde
May 13, 2013, 5:42:37 PM5/13/13
to
YOU are at it. :)
vittyguy
May 13, 2013, 6:31:33 PM5/13/13
to
> I do NOT take, nor have I ever advocated that anybody should take any
whe=
re
> near a toxic dosage, short of a person dying from full blown cancer.
>
> So go right ahead, and wait a couple hundred years for the perfect
vitami=
> near a toxic dosage, short of a person dying from full blown cancer.
>
> So go right ahead, and wait a couple hundred years for the perfect
n
> D info to come in, while I laugh my head off at a bonafide Ass- Hole."
>
> Hmmm, what then is a toxic level? =A0Who said anything about you or what
> D info to come in, while I laugh my head off at a bonafide Ass- Hole."
>
=
you
> advocate? =A0The above segmet is from the article mentioned as to the
rol=
e of
> vit d in molecular biology. =A0The example of heart disease is from
recen=
t
> published studies where different researchers looked at vit d levels and
> risk of heart disease.
"Please take YOUR delusional rant some place else, and get a life while YOU
are at it. :)"
Hmmm, classic "don't confuse me with the facts" rant.
> published studies where different researchers looked at vit d levels and
> risk of heart disease.
"Please take YOUR delusional rant some place else, and get a life while YOU
are at it. :)"
Bob Officer
May 13, 2013, 6:38:33 PM5/13/13
to
On 13 May 2013 17:40:44 GMT, in misc.health.alternative, vitty guy
wrote:
I find the title of this article to be a bit disturbing.
Vitamin D is a fat based hormone. Hint it is modified fat
(cholesterol) produced normally by skin cells and UVB sunrays.
I find this interesting:
http://www.skincancer.org/healthy-lifestyle/vitamin-d/make-vitamin-d-not-uv-a-priority
<cite>
Ultraviolet (UV) Exposure Is Not the Answer
Our bodies manufacture vitamin D when the sun's ultraviolet B (UVB)
rays interact with 7-dehydrocholesterol (7-DHC) present in the skin.
"However, we can produce only a limited amount of vitamin D from UVB.
A few minutes at midday are sufficient for many Caucasians," says Roy
Geronemus, MD, clinical professor of dermatology at New York
University Medical Center and director of the Skin/Laser Division at
the New York Eye & Ear Infirmary. "After reaching the production
limit, further exposure actually destroys the vitamin, decreasing
vitamin D levels."
</cite>
--
Bob Officer
"Whoops .... now where did I put that other braincell?
It make it very hard to work things out.
Oh, I'll check up my arse ...get back to ya."
carole hubbard in Message-ID: <f3b680d9-da69-4c7e...@y5g2000pbi.googlegroups.com>
wrote:
Vitamin D is a fat based hormone. Hint it is modified fat
(cholesterol) produced normally by skin cells and UVB sunrays.
I find this interesting:
http://www.skincancer.org/healthy-lifestyle/vitamin-d/make-vitamin-d-not-uv-a-priority
<cite>
Ultraviolet (UV) Exposure Is Not the Answer
Our bodies manufacture vitamin D when the sun's ultraviolet B (UVB)
rays interact with 7-dehydrocholesterol (7-DHC) present in the skin.
"However, we can produce only a limited amount of vitamin D from UVB.
A few minutes at midday are sufficient for many Caucasians," says Roy
Geronemus, MD, clinical professor of dermatology at New York
University Medical Center and director of the Skin/Laser Division at
the New York Eye & Ear Infirmary. "After reaching the production
limit, further exposure actually destroys the vitamin, decreasing
vitamin D levels."
</cite>
--
Bob Officer
"Whoops .... now where did I put that other braincell?
It make it very hard to work things out.
Oh, I'll check up my arse ...get back to ya."
carole hubbard in Message-ID: <f3b680d9-da69-4c7e...@y5g2000pbi.googlegroups.com>
Bob Officer
May 13, 2013, 7:34:06 PM5/13/13
to
On 13 May 2013 22:31:33 GMT, in misc.health.alternative, vitty guy
wrote:
That's why gohde is a resident of my bozo file. He believes he knows
everything worthy of knowing, but is a fool in possession a little
bit of information, and no reliable method to determine what is true
and what is false.
The concept of toxicity is foreigns to him and within his belief
system, if a little is good, then a lot must be better.
wrote:
everything worthy of knowing, but is a fool in possession a little
bit of information, and no reliable method to determine what is true
and what is false.
The concept of toxicity is foreigns to him and within his belief
system, if a little is good, then a lot must be better.
John H. Gohde
May 13, 2013, 7:36:37 PM5/13/13
to
here helped moi clarify my thoughts.
As far as I am concerned, raving Science Psychos are just a bunch of
sick, evil people, who think that they are superior to others.
Sorry, in my worldview moi is on TOP and the Science Psychos will
ALWAYS be on the BOTTOM.
Just thought that you freaks might want to know. :)
vittyguy
May 13, 2013, 8:04:16 PM5/13/13
to
"As far as I am concerned, raving Science Psychos are just a bunch of
sick, evil people, who think that they are superior to others.
Sorry, in my worldview moi is on TOP and the Science Psychos will
ALWAYS be on the BOTTOM.
Just thought that you freaks might want to know. :)"
and nutters who might be of danger to themselves or others.
Push them a little and all is revealed.
John H. Gohde
May 14, 2013, 11:16:55 AM5/14/13
to
0 new messages