Re.The Phaistos disc and the A.J.A.
hagen
like to comment upon.
http://groups.google.dk/group/HELLAS-GREECE/browse_thread/thread/cacaa4a42ef32e7d/c7021039d4e08dc5?hl=da&ie=UTF-8&q=phaistos+disc
The whole problematic about this increasingly prestige loaded Phaistos
'thing';.changes dramastically, if it is rendered probable, that
the figures are not 'by first, if at all' syllables, but countable
units instead.
Then no-one should hesitate to admit, that this would be a 'first
priority' sensation.
And that is exactly my '25 years old' deed 'through documentation', to
turn the situation 180 degrees (no more excuses for delayments
concerning detail about syllables etc.) Pure sensation. I understand
that this developement has been overlooked by bad accident by the
university establishments all over the globe
da capo:
http://web.gvdnet.dk/GVD002393/phaistos.htm
Sinceerely still
Ole Hagen
P.S. I could imagine, and imagination sometimes lies close to truth, -
that Professor Yves Duhoux indirectly learned about my 'break-through
through countings' by reading about Dr. Christoph Henke's experiment
http://www.denkeanhenke.de/DiskusvonPhaistosengl.pdf
(who strangely not at all refer to my Marathon deed)
And that he too was overcomingly tempted to take advantage from 'the
amoralic' blacklistning of my astounishing decipherment, enforced by
disturbed persons 'souls for sale'.
Now in full assurance that J. Faucounau could only be wrong, he could
write his very admirable and critical review with confidence in 'the
American Journal of Archaeology' being ironical about 'the Proto-
Ionian scheme'. Eventually 'triumphant' giving a hollow promise, aimed
at me? That::: "Decipherers should be completely confident that, if
their decipherment is correct, it will triumph in the end."
Is this a dream I had, or a tangent to the real?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v2iFpMdjPrQ
hagen
> I stumbled over this 'one year old' beautiful debate, which I would
>
> The whole problematic about this increasingly prestige loaded Phaistos
> 'thing';.changes dramastically, if it is rendered probable, that
> the figures are not 'by first, if at all' syllables, but countable
> units instead.
> Then no-one should hesitate to admit, that this would be a 'first
> priority' sensation.
> And that is exactly my '25 years old' deed 'through documentation', to
> turn the situation 180 degrees (no more excuses for delayments
> concerning detail about syllables etc.) Pure sensation. I understand
> that this developement has been overlooked by bad accident by the
> university establishments all over the globe
> da capo:http://web.gvdnet.dk/GVD002393/phaistos.htm
> Sinceerely still
> Ole Hagen
> P.S. I could imagine, and imagination sometimes lies close to truth, -
> that Professor Yves Duhoux indirectly learned about my 'break-through
> (who strangely not at all refer to my Marathon deed)
> And that he too was overcomingly tempted to take advantage from 'the
> amoralic' blacklistning of my astounishing decipherment, enforced by
> disturbed persons 'souls for sale'.
> Now in full assurance that J. Faucounau could only be wrong, he could
> write his very admirable and critical review with confidence in 'the
> American Journal of Archaeology' being ironical about 'the Proto-
> Ionian scheme'. Eventually 'triumphant' giving a hollow promise, aimed
> at me? That::: "Decipherers should be completely confident that, if
> their decipherment is correct, it will triumph in the end."
> Is this a dream I had, or a tangent to the real?
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v2iFpMdjPrQ
Yes you get tiny, if you admit your mistake; but let me give you this
comfort:
Only as small as you were before ...
grap...@www.com
> I stumbled over this 'one year old' beautiful debate, which I would
>
> The whole problematic about this increasingly prestige loaded Phaistos
> 'thing';.changes dramastically, if it is rendered probable, that
> the figures are not 'by first, if at all' syllables, but countable
> units instead.
A "solution" which solves NOTHING !!!
Neither the meaning of the glyphs, nor the motive why some have been
obliterated, for instance !...
> I understand
> that this developement has been overlooked by bad accident by the
> university establishments all over the globe
> da capo:http://web.gvdnet.dk/GVD002393/phaistos.htm
Wrong !.. It has been overlooked because it obviously solves
NOTHING !..
.......
> Now in full assurance that J. Faucounau could only be wrong, he could
> write his very admirable and critical review with confidence in 'the
> American Journal of Archaeology' being ironical about 'the Proto-
> Ionian scheme'.
"Full assurance" ???? RIDICULOUS !!!!
The A.J.A. rewiew by Y. Duhoux of the Proto-Ionic Solution is NOT
SERIOUS !!! A "serious" reviewer would have ad least mentioned the
EVIDENCE presented, instead of dedicating 10 lines (in a 2 pages-
paper!) to an obvious "error calami" without any consequences (the
Linear A tablet found near the Disk was indicated "North" of it) !!!!
> Eventually 'triumphant' giving a hollow promise, aimed
> at me? That::: "Decipherers should be completely confident that, if
> their decipherment is correct, it will triumph in the end."
> Is this a dream I had, or a tangent to the real?
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v2iFpMdjPrQ
This is YOUR dream ... But it's only a dream...
grapheus
hagen
Wait and see old friend. More videoes are under way.
Are you prepared?
:). Hagen
grap...@www.com
More videos will not change the basic fact : that the "calendaric
solution" lets UNEXPLAINED lots of questions : WHY a 8 months-
calendar ? WHY changing a square (or a pyramid) into a clumsy spiral ?
WHY using hieroghyphs ? WHY the corrections made by the scribe ? WHY
the glyphs have links with SEVERAL cultures (Cycladic, Aegean, Peoples
of the Sea, etc.)? Etc.
By contrast - and in spite of what you pretend about the solutions
based upon a written text - ALL these questions, and many more, can
found an answer in the Proto-Ionic Solution... The CONCLUSION is
OBVIOUS, and it would be obvious to you if you were not blind !...
Regards
grapheus
hagen
>
> - Vis tekst i anførselstegn -
Would it be unpolite to remind you all about Elena Ceausjescu. the
great chemist?
grap...@www.com
Dear Ole,
I have no idea whether that lady was a great chemist or not, but I
can
tell that you are an expert in answering an embarrassing question with
a
TOTALLY IRRELEVANT remark !!!!!
grapheus
hagen
How should I know? Ask the old man :-)
Normally calendars do'nt answer the same questions as language might.
My outriddling of the problem is independent of such questions as, the
origin of the disc, what language did they spoke etc.
Hagen
grap...@www.com
In other words, your calendaric hypothesis is not better than the
hypothesis that the Disk fell from a flying saucer !.. Its origin ?..
Some star in the sky!.. The language of the aliens who dropped it ?..
Unknown... Etc.
This is a good thing to know...
grapheus
hagen
You can't compare the results of a calendar solution to a language
key, as you ought to know
grap...@www.com
But I did't say that the Disk dropped from a flying saucer was a
text !.. It is, of course, the map of the aliens' galaxy !... See,
this hypothesis is better than yours : it explains, at least, the
SPIRAL !!!!
grapheus
hagen
My discoveries only mean, that the Phaistos disc is now proven to be a
calendar, and consequently it do not contains phonemes, syllables,
and other good stuff, galaxy boy.
grap...@www.com
> My discoveries only mean, that the Phaistos disc is now proven to be a
> calendar, and consequently it do not contains phonemes, syllables,
> and other good stuff, galaxy boy.
Correction please !.. You believe "that the Phaistos disc is now
proven to be a calendar" !...
The problem is that you are alone in believing this !
And I tried in vain to make you understand why...
grapheus