Fw: NOVEMBER, 2009, IS THE WARMEST ON THE 130-YEAR NASA RECORD!

[Graystar]

"Peter Muehlbauer" <spamt...@AT.frankenexpress.de> wrote in message
> Roger Coppock <rcop...@adnc.com> wrote:
>
>> Is any simple fact that a fossil fool can't get totally wrong?
>>
>> On Dec 22, 9:36 am, "bb" <b...@new.rr.com> wrote:
>> [ . . . ]
>> > The World Meteorological Organization (WMO) requires the calculation of
>> > averages for consecutive periods of 30 years, with the latest covering
>> > the
>> > 1961-1990 period. NASA uses 1951-1980. because of this the temps are
>> > artificially inflated
>>
>> Nope! 1951-1980 are used for the sake of computational
>> convenience. The mean of those years happens to be
>> very close to 14.00 C.
>
> Just like the last 12000 years.
>
>> Furthermore, the choice of baseline does not affect the trend.
>
> Ok, then take the last 12000 years for a new baseline.

Where the data comes from: a summary
Just loook at who is connected to who... and the flaws.
Video: http://www.pjtv.com/v/2889

http://www.USENETHOST.com 100% Uncensored , 100% Anonymous, 5$/month Only!