Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Re: Who the hell is bjacoby?
0 views
Skip to first unread message
Barbarian Mutual
Apr 28, 2012, 11:15:26 AM4/28/12
to
On Apr 27, 4:28 pm, bjacoby <bjac...@iwaynet.net> wrote:
> Who the hell is Sam Wormley?
>
> That is the question.
No. The question is who the hell is bjacoby? Bjacoby like other
unscientific deniers hasn't come up with a single bit of credible
evidence for anything. ANYTHING.
Nada. Nothing. Zilcho.
> Who the hell is Sam Wormley?
>
> That is the question.
No. The question is who the hell is bjacoby? Bjacoby like other
unscientific deniers hasn't come up with a single bit of credible
evidence for anything. ANYTHING.
Nada. Nothing. Zilcho.
Transition Zone
Apr 28, 2012, 1:59:18 PM4/28/12
to
On Apr 28, 1:05 pm, "$27 TRILLION to pay for Kyoto"
<rander3...@gmail.com> wrote:
> He was someone who was better-off warning us about solar storms and
> non-event auroras. Now (like all the failed world socialism types)
> has found a new calling.
Finding some "calling" instead of finding basic scientific evidence
won't help him or you.
<rander3...@gmail.com> wrote:
> He was someone who was better-off warning us about solar storms and
> non-event auroras. Now (like all the failed world socialism types)
> has found a new calling.
Finding some "calling" instead of finding basic scientific evidence
won't help him or you.
bjacoby
Apr 28, 2012, 5:30:54 PM4/28/12
to
Ah. "Denier"! Well now we know that this is not going to be a scientific
discussion, don't we? So why would anyone trust not only a politico
such as yourself, but an anonymous internet one as well, to judge what
is or is not "unscientific"?
Wonder who I am? I'm Wormley's doppelganger! Google is your friend!
Bill Snyder
Apr 28, 2012, 5:41:31 PM4/28/12
to
On Sat, 28 Apr 2012 17:30:54 -0400, bjacoby <bja...@iwaynet.net>
wrote:
As always: Insults, but no evidence, nothing of substance,
nothing verifiable at all, as was of course already pointed out.
--
Bill Snyder [This space unintentionally left blank]
wrote:
nothing verifiable at all, as was of course already pointed out.
--
Bill Snyder [This space unintentionally left blank]
RichA
Apr 28, 2012, 7:03:03 PM4/28/12
to
above those in Bush's time. Unemployment, when you factor in those
out of work for six months and those who have quit looking is 18%!!!
Not the B.S. 9% quoted by LIBERAL news queers.
Barbarian Mutual
Apr 29, 2012, 10:59:38 AM4/29/12
to
On Apr 28, 7:03 pm, RichA <rander3...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Apr 28, 1:59 pm, Transition Zone <mogu...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Apr 28, 1:05 pm, "$27 TRILLION to pay for Kyoto"
>
> > <rander3...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > He was someone who was better-off warning us about solar storms and
> > > non-event auroras. Now (like all the failed world socialism types)
> > > has found a new calling.
>
> > Finding some "calling" instead of finding basic scientific evidence
> > won't help him or you.
>
> Evidence?
You question the very word like you've never even heard of it. And
> On Apr 28, 1:59 pm, Transition Zone <mogu...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Apr 28, 1:05 pm, "$27 TRILLION to pay for Kyoto"
>
> > <rander3...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > He was someone who was better-off warning us about solar storms and
> > > non-event auroras. Now (like all the failed world socialism types)
> > > has found a new calling.
>
> > Finding some "calling" instead of finding basic scientific evidence
> > won't help him or you.
>
> Evidence?
you don't even realize it. Funny or sad?
0 new messages