Web Images Videos Maps News Shopping Gmail more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
Message from discussion Early Iragi Turnout Appears Huge!
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
George William Herbert  
View profile  
 More options Feb 5 2005, 3:22 am
Newsgroups: sci.geo.geology, sci.space.policy, alt.religion.islam
From: gherb...@retro.com (George William Herbert)
Date: 05 Feb 2005 08:22:54 GMT
Local: Sat, Feb 5 2005 3:22 am
Subject: Re: Early Iragi Turnout Appears Huge!

Tom <m...@privacy.net> wrote:
>"Christopher M. Jones" <christopher.m.jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Tom wrote:
>> > That's a truly remarkable statement, considering the Taliban
>> > was precisely what the USSR was trying to get rid of when
>> > *they* invaded Afghanistan.  Had we helped the Soviets,
>> > instead of funding fundamentalist Islamic boobs and
>> > boycotting the freaking Olympics, the Taliban problem
>> > never would have existed in the first place.

The Soviet Union moved into Afghanistan in order to move
its armies closer to a warmwater port, either in Pakistan
or Iran.  There was no islamic terrorist group in the
country of note at the time; it was a poorly run socialist
borderline marxist puppet state of the Soviet Union, but one
which had a reasonably independent government.  The Russians
decided they wanted to go from a friendly puppet government
next door to actually running things directly, and sent
commandos in to kill their "ally" the then-president,
and invaded.

The subsequent Soviet governments (and Russian, post-collapse)
have all admitted what they did.

>[...]
>> As far as American involvement, I thinked we backed the
>> right side in that particular conflict

>Another remarkable statement, considering what's transpired
>since then.  Bin Laden fancied himself a war hero and leader
>of radical Islam because of his "victory" in that conflict, thanks
>to red baiting American ignoramuses.

It is a little hard to understand how anyone could
live in ignorance of the Soviet hostile intentions that
got it all started.  You're acting like there was no
threat of the Soviets continuing into Iran or Pakistan,
when they have admitted that doing so was exactly
their plan and if they hadn't ended up bogged down
with the Mujahadeen and seen US forces readying to
fight them off, they would have done so.

-george william herbert
gherb...@retro.com


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google